Faculty Bibliography

Surgical repair of extracapsular hip fractures is associated with a higher rate of successful healing compared to intracapsular fractures; however, a small subset of patients may still experience complications or treatment failure. Potential modes of failure include nonunion, peri-implant fracture, malalignment, cortical impingement or perforation and hardware failure with or without lag screw cutout. Factors determining salvage method include physiologic age, functionality, bone quality, and fracture stability. In this review, potential complications of extracapsular hip fracture repair are described with proposed solutions and supporting literature, when available.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:While extremes of body mass index (BMI) are known to influence surgical risks, their distinct impacts on short- and long-term outcomes following hip fracture remain poorly defined. This study compared outcomes in severely underweight, normal weight, and obese elderly patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a prospectively collected hip fracture database (2014-2024) at a single academic medical center. Patients with BMI ≤16.5 (severely underweight) or ≥35 (class 2+ obesity) were compared to a randomly selected cohort of normal-weight controls (BMI 18.5-25.0). Outcomes included complications, discharge disposition, mortality, and functional recovery. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 282 patients were included. Obese patients had significantly higher odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission compared to normal weight patients (OR 5.75 [2.00-16.39], p = .001) and were less likely to be discharged home (OR 0.31 [0.14-0.66], p = .003). In contrast, underweight status was significantly associated with increased six-month mortality compared to normal weight (OR 4.95 [1.34-18.18], p = .016). No significant differences were found in healing or functionality across groups. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Obese patients were more likely to require ICU admission but did not face increased long-term mortality. Severely underweight patients demonstrated the opposite pattern, with minimal short-term morbidity but significantly higher risk of death at six months. These findings suggest that short- and long-term risks after hip fracture diverge at the extremes of BMI and highlight the need for tailored perioperative strategies based on metabolic status.

OBJECTIVE:To determine if the occurrence of short-term post-operative altered mental status (AMS) was lower in geriatric patients undergoing operative repair of hip fractures with Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft-Tissue Infiltration with Local Anesthesia (MAC-STILA) when compared with general anesthesia (GA). DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Two U.S. hospitals within a single academic medical center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Geriatric patients with hip fractures (AO/OTA 31A and 31B) undergoing operative repair were identified. Propensity matching was performed in a 1:2 ratio to minimize selection bias (age, sex, BMI, ASA class, fracture pattern, fixation construct, pre-injury ambulatory status, and assistive device use). OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Patients who underwent surgical fixation with MAC-STILA were compared with GA. Primary outcome was post-operative AMS, defined as missing ≥1 items on the alert and oriented assessment (person, place, and time) at any point from post-operative days 0-3. RESULTS:After matching, 228 patients (76 MAC-STILA: 152 GA) were included in the analysis. The average age of patients in both groups was 83 years. In the MAC-STILA group, 62% were female and 33% had baseline dementia while in the GA group 66% were female and 29% had baseline dementia. Treating patients with MAC-STILA was associated with 72% lower odds of having AMS compared with GA, controlling for baseline comorbidity and dementia (OR: 0.28. 95% CI: 0.09-0.075, p=0.016). Among patients with baseline dementia, the rate of AMS was lower in patients treated with MAC-STILA compared with GA (64.0% vs 95.3%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft-Tissue Infiltration with Local Anesthesia (MAC-STILA) was associated with lower odds of short-term postoperative altered mental status (AMS) compared to general anesthesia (GA) in hip fracture patients undergoing operative repair. Given the high rate of post-operative AMS and complications associated with geriatric hip fracture patient, MAC-STILA should be considered for use in patients with increased risk of post-operative AMS, particularly in the setting of preoperative dementia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic III.

OBJECTIVE:To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients. METHODS:Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a "risk matrix" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients. RESULTS:Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575). CONCLUSIONS:A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/]. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III Diagnostic.

Most surgically repaired proximal femoral fractures heal uneventfully, however a small percentage of surgical interventions lead to failures. Salvage of failed treatment is challenging and dependent on the type and location of the complication. Potential complications of intracapsular hip fractures and their treatment include fixation failure, nonunion, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Factors guiding the choice of salvage option include patient age and quality of remaining bone. This article aims to present several potential complications and corresponding potential solutions using supporting literature, when available. This narrative review focuses on salvage treatment options of failed fixation of femoral neck fractures. Total hip arthroplasty is always the last resort salvage option.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Hip fracture patients may be hospice candidates if life expectancy is < 6 months. This study evaluates STTGMAHIP FX's ability to identify high-risk hip fracture patients for hospice discharge at emergency room presentation to guide end-of-life care planning. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained registry of patients aged ≥55 with low-energy hip fractures (2014-2024) was conducted. Patients were stratified by STTGMAHIP FX percentiles: minimal (≤50th), low (50th-<80th), moderate (80th-<97.5th), and high (≥97.5th). Demographics, injury characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was identification of Hospice Discharge Candidates (HDCs), defined as discharge to hospice during the index admission, inpatient mortality >48 h after surgery, or mortality <6 months post-operation. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was compared to STTGMAHIP FX for the ability to cluster HDCs using area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis and a two-proportion Z-test. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 2777 patients (mean age 81.18 ± 9.80 years), HDC incidence rose with STTGMAHIP FX risk level: 2.9% (minimal risk), 5.9% (low risk), 14.2% (moderate risk), and 29.6% (high risk) (p < 0.05). Only 17.0% of patients classified as ASA 4 were HDCs. Additionally, STTGMAHIP FX demonstrated a slightly better ability to discriminate HDCs compared to ASA, although not statistically significant (0.719 vs 0.683; p = 0.138). However, the STTGMAHIP FX high risk stratification was much more useful in identifying HDCs than ASA (29.6% vs 17.0%; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:STTGMAHIP FX identifies hospice-eligible hip fracture patients more effectively than ASA. High-risk patients per STTGMAHIP FX demonstrate elevated 6-month mortality and may benefit from early hospice planning at admission.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:This study compares outcomes and complications of patients with Bado II Monteggia fracture-dislocations that required radial head fixation or replacement based upon approach to the radial head. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective review was performed of 159 consecutive patients with proximal ulna fractures and a radial head dislocation or fracture (Monteggia Variant). Injuries were classified by Bado type. Forty-one patients with Bado II Monteggia injuries treated with either a radial head replacement or fixation with complete follow up were included. Demographics, injury information, surgical details, and follow up information including elbow range of motion (ROM) and complications were collected. A trans-osseous posterior (TOP) approach working through the ulna fracture to address the radial head first was used in 19 patients, while 22 patients had their radial head treated via a separate lateral (Kocher) interval after ulnar fixation. Ulnar plate fixation was performed for all patients. Comparisons were made using independent t-tests. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Forty-one Monteggia lesions treated through TOP (19, 46 %) or Kocher (22, 64 %) approaches underwent a radial head replacement (33, 80.5 %) or fracture repair (8, 19.5 %) with a mean final follow-up of 15.3 months. At all post-operative visits, groups displayed similar rates of functional elbow ROM. At latest follow-up rates of patient-reported pain, ultimate elbow ROM, time to radiographic healing were equivalent. No significant differences were observed in ulna non-union, joint malalignment, post-operative nerve injury, post-operative infection, heterotopic ossification, incidence of hardware failure, patient-reported pain, and rate of removal of symptomatic hardware. Sub-analysis of radial head replacement versus fixation revealed equivalent percentage of patients with full ROM at each post-operative time point. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:For Bado II Monteggia fracture-dislocations, the surgical approach to the radial head-TOP versus Kocher-does not influence ultimate patient outcomes or complication rates. Radial head replacement and fixation provide comparable results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to compare fracture nonunion rates in tibial shaft fractures fixed with intramedullary nails using fixed angle locking screws (FALS) that thread into the intramedullary nail versus standard locking screws in a cohort of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Secondarily, this study evaluated whether FALS location was associated with nonunion risk in tibial diaphyseal fractures. METHODS:A retrospective review of surgically treated OTA 42 A-C tibial shaft fractures from 2014 to 2024 at a single academic institution was performed. Inclusion criteria were age > 18, isolated OTA 42 A-C tibia fracture, intramedullary nail fixation, and minimum 6-month follow-up. Patients treated with a FALS were matched to those without a FALS with a 1:1 propensity match based on OTA fracture classification and open fracture status. The Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) was used to determine healing. Statistical comparisons were performed using Pearson Chi-squared tests, independent t-tests, Mann Whitney-U tests, and multivariate logistic regression as appropriate. RESULTS:78 patients were included (39 in each cohort), with the FALS group being older and having higher age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Indices (CCI). The FALS and CLS groups had comparable rates of open fractures and similar proportions of OTA/AO fractures. FALS configuration per patient was: 16 only distal, 13 only proximal, and 10 both proximal and distal. There were no differences in nonunion rates (25.6% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.262) and healed-by times (6.15 ± 2.95 [months] vs. 6.38 ± 2.73, p = 759), complication rate, or 30/90-day readmission rates (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of single-end FALS (used only proximally or distally) was independently associated with higher odds of nonunion compared to CLS and FALS used both proximally and distally (OR = 6.027, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The use of single-end fixed angle locking screws in only the distal or proximal segment in intramedullary nails for the treatment of OTA 42 A-C tibial diaphyseal fractures is associated with higher odds of fracture nonunion. Larger, prospective studies evaluating FALS configuration for intramedullary nail fixation of tibia shaft fractures are warranted.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Tibial plateau fractures are some of the most commonly treated injuries around the knee and loss of range of motion has a significant effect on post-operative outcomes, very few studies have demonstrated the impact of flexion contractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect that development of a knee flexion contracture has on outcomes following operative repair of tibial plateau fractures. METHODS:Patients operatively treated for tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker II, IV, V, and VI) between 2005-2024 at a multi-center academic urban hospital system were included in this retrospective comparative study. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts: 1. Full extension (FE), 2. 5-10 degrees of flexion contracture (Mild, ME) and 3. Greater than 10 degrees of flexion (Severe, SE) contracture at 6 months post-operatively. Patients with contracture were matched to patients who regained full extension based on age and Schatzker classification. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate outcomes including patient reported pain levels, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, complication rates and reoperation rates. RESULTS:The cohort consisted of 3 groups of 30 patients (14 Schatzker II, 5 Schatzker IV, 3 Schatzker V, and 8 Schatzker VI). The average knee flexion contracture for the mild cohort was 5 degrees and the average knee flexion contracture for the severe cohort was 12.7 degrees. Patients who experienced flexion contracture had poorer SMFA scores at 6 months, and those in the severe cohort had the poorest SMFA scores (112.6) when compared to those with full extension at 6 months (77.7) (p<0.001). Flexion contractures were associated with higher rates of fracture related infection (FRI) (p =0.002). Patients with flexion contracture also had a higher rate of subsequent re-operation, with 36.7% of the ME undergoing re-operation and 40% of SE undergoing re-operation. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who developed a flexion contracture following repair of a tibial plateau fracture experienced worse outcomes, higher rates of complications, increased pain, and poorer function at long term follow up compared to those who achieved full knee extension.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is to compare the quality and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for a proximal humerus fracture in a "timely manner" which was defined to be within 5 days of injury compared to those with "delayed intervention" (>5 Days) to determine the effect this had. METHODS:This IRB-approved study evaluated patients who sustained a proximal humerus fracture treated with plate and screw fixation (ORIF) between January 2004 and October 2022 and had time from injury to surgery documented. Patients were grouped based on the time to surgery (TTS) - Less than 5 Days (L5) vs. More than 5 Days (M5). TTS was also evaluated as a continuous variable. Univariable and multivariable analysis compared patient demographics, injury/surgical characteristics, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes to determine effect of TTS. Clinical outcomes included shoulder range of motion (ROM) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at least 1 year following the date of injury. Standard statistical tests were used (p<0.05 considered significant). RESULTS:, p=0.03, β= -0.27, 95% CI = -41.71- -2.89) surgery was associated with less passive forward elevation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Timing of surgery did not impact outcomes of patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures. Surgical intervention after 14 days was associated with diminished passive forward elevation only.