Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/UNASSIGNED:Dysphagia is a common medical condition among the geriatric population that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. The manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of esophageal dysphagia differ greatly based on the underlying etiology, especially in older individuals who may have accompanying complex medical comorbidities. This review explores the intricacies of esophageal dysphagia in the older population and how they are managed. RECENT FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:Novel modalities, like the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) and timed barium esophagram (TBE), are now woven into our diagnostic schemas for esophageal dysphagia. Studies have also looked at the safety profile of available therapeutic interventions for older individuals. There are newer, less invasive treatment options, including radiofrequency application (RFA) and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) for GERD management, that may benefit the geriatric population. SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:In this review, we discuss the most likely etiologies of esophageal dysphagia in the elderly population. We then explore a diagnostic schema and highlight treatment choices based on diagnosis. Our review specifically explores the risks and benefits of management options in more medically complex geriatric patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Beyond genetics, environmental factors may contribute to the rising incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Statins, widely used for cardiovascular risk reduction, also have anti-inflammatory properties and have been hypothesized to reduce IBD risk, though data are limited. We prospectively assessed the association between statin use and risk of developing IBD among individuals eligible for statin therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. METHODS:Using a prospective new user design within the Danish National Registries, we identified a nationwide cohort of individuals aged ≥40 years from 2008 to 2022 eligible for statin therapy for primary cardiovascular prevention. Statin users were matched 1:5 to nonusers on age, sex, calendar year, and cardiovascular risk factors. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for incident IBD. RESULTS:We identified 110,961 statin users and 554,805 matched nonusers. Statin use was associated with a reduced risk of IBD (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97), with subgroup analyses showing similar reductions for Crohn's disease (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.09) and ulcerative colitis (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-1.00). This corresponds to a number needed to treat of 2881 to prevent one additional IBD case over 5 years of statin treatment. Findings remained consistent when censoring individuals at statin discontinuation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this nationwide prospective study, statin use among individuals eligible for primary cardiovascular prevention was associated with a lower risk of developing IBD. These findings suggest a potential additional benefit of statins and support further research into their role in IBD prevention.

BACKGROUND:Surgery in select individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may obviate the need for future IBD-related treatment. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:To characterise individuals who remain treatment-free during the first 5 years after initial IBD-related surgery. METHODS:We performed a nationwide cohort study using the Swedish National Patient Register and the ESPRESSO histopathology to identify individuals undergoing first IBD-related intestinal resection for Crohn's disease (CD) or total colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) between 2007 and 2018. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for the need for any IBD-related therapy within the first 5 years post surgery. RESULTS:We included 1709 individuals with CD and 1010 with UC. At 5 years, 21.5% with CD and 42.4% with UC remained 'treatment free'. Being 'treatment free' 5 years after surgery was more common among patients with CD who had longer preoperative disease duration and older adults with UC. It was less common among individuals with extraintestinal manifestations of disease (CD aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.97; UC aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.73) and patients with CD who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS:Surgery obviated the need for future therapy in 22% of patients with CD and 42% with UC. Absence of extraintestinal manifestations, older age in UC, and longer disease duration and absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in CD may highlight an opportunity for precision surgery to identify those most likely to achieve long-term benefit from surgical intervention.

BACKGROUND:The benefits of achieving endoscopic remission among older adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who have mild persistent disease activity are unknown. METHODS:This was a retrospective study of adults ≥ 60 with IBD who had mild or no disease activity on endoscopy from January 1, 2018-January 1, 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of major IBD-specific adverse events (hospitalizations, surgery, and prescription of corticosteroids for IBD-related symptoms) within 1 year of endoscopic assessment. Our secondary outcome was a composite of 1-year morbidity-related events (mortality, all-cause hospitalization, infection requiring antibiotics, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular events, and osteoporotic fractures). We also assessed outcomes at 5 years. RESULTS:Among 504 patients, 192 (38.1%) had mild endoscopic disease and 312 (61.9%) were in endoscopic remission, with a median disease duration of 11 years. On multivariable analysis, mild endoscopic disease activity increased the odds of a 1-year adverse IBD-specific outcome (aOR 4.16, 95% CI 2.10-8.24), with similar results at 5 years. Furthermore, mild endoscopic disease was associated with increased odds of experiencing an adverse morbidity-related outcome within 1 year as compared to endoscopic remission (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.01-2.43). CONCLUSIONS:Among older adults with prevalent IBD, mild endoscopic disease activity, as compared to endoscopic remission, was associated with increased odds of adverse IBD-specific and morbidity-related outcomes at 1 year, with this risk persisting for IBD-specific outcomes at 5 years. These findings highlight the importance of achieving endoscopic remission, which may confer both short- and longer-term benefits in this population.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:There is a lack of safety and efficacy data for newer biologic agents among adults ≥ 60 years old with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) given their limited inclusion in clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) or vedolizumab (VDZ) use in older adults as compared to younger adults with IBD. METHODS:This single-center retrospective study compared individuals 18 to 59 years old to individuals ≥ 60 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD who began VDZ or UST treatment between 2014 and 2022. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were endoscopic remission and serious infection, respectively. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic response, clinical remission, and non-severe adverse events. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors independently associated with safety and efficacy. RESULTS:Overall, 948 individuals were included, with 779 (82.2%) < 60 years-old. In total, 548 (57.8%) had Crohn's disease, 367 (38.7%) had ulcerative colitis, 33 (3.5%) had indeterminate colitis, and a total of 403 individuals (42.5%) initiated VDZ whereas 545 (57.5%) initiated UST. When assessing efficacy, younger and older individuals had comparable rates of endoscopic remission (< 60 years-old 27.5% vs 29.0% ≥ 60 years-old, p = 0.69) as well as clinical remission (< 60 years-old 26.4% vs 26.6% ≥ 60 years-old, p = 0.96). When assessing safety, serious infection rates (< 60 years-old 8.9% vs 8.9% ≥ 60 years-old, p  = 0.99) and non-severe adverse event rates (< 60 years-old 12.3% vs 8.9% ≥ 60 years-old, p = 0.21) were not significantly different. On multivariable analysis, measures of disease severity (prior advanced therapy use, prior corticosteroid use, severe disease) significantly decreased the odds of endoscopic and clinical remission. Additionally, prior advanced therapy use and the presence of comorbidities increased the odds of serious infections. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The use of UST and VDZ had similar efficacy and safety outcomes in older adults as compared to younger individuals with IBD. Decisions to utilize these biologics should be driven by overall disease burden and comorbidities, and not be deferred due to advanced chronological age alone.

With nearly 60 million Americans aged 65 and older, gastrointestinal (GI) conditions are a leading cause of healthcare utilization in this population. Despite this, older adults remain underrepresented in GI clinical trials and research, limiting evidence-based care. This review highlights three pivotal studies addressing this gap: (1) proton pump inhibitors, which are commonly used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, are not associated with the later development of dementia; (2) undertreatment of chronic inflammation among older adults with inflammatory bowel disease is associated with a higher rate of adverse events compared to treatment with anti-TNF therapy, a biologic agent; (3) the majority (85%) of surveillance colonoscopies among older adults with a life expectancy of ≥ 10 years did not yield colorectal cancer, advanced dysplasia, or ≥ 3 polyps.

BACKGROUND:Sarcopenia has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in older age cohorts, but has not been assessed in older adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Further, current assessments of sarcopenia among all aged individuals with IBD have used various measures of muscle mass as well as cutoffs to define its presence, leading to heterogeneous findings. METHODS:In this single-institution, multihospital retrospective study, we identified all patients aged 60 years and older with IBD who underwent disease-related intestinal resection between 2012 and 2022. Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) and Total Psoas Index (TPI) were measured at the superior L3 endplate on preoperative computed tomography scans and compared through receiver operating characteristic curve. We then performed multivariable logistic regression to assess risk factors associated with an adverse 30-day postoperative outcome. Our primary outcome included a 30-day composite of postoperative mortality and complications, including infection, bleeding, cardiac event, cerebrovascular accident, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, reoperation, all-cause rehospitalization, and need for intensive care unit-level care. RESULTS:A total of 120 individuals were included. Overall, 52% were female, 40% had ulcerative colitis, 60% had Crohn's disease, and median age at time of surgery was 70 years (interquartile range: 65-75). Forty percent of older adults had an adverse 30-day postoperative outcome, including infection (23%), readmission (17%), acute kidney injury (13%), bleeding (13%), intensive care unit admission (10%), cardiac event (8%), venous thromboembolism (7%), reoperation (6%), mortality (5%), and cerebrovascular accident (2%). When evaluating the predictive performance of SMI vs TPI for an adverse 30-day postoperative event, SMI had a significantly higher area under the curve of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.76) as compared to 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.69) for TPI (P = .02). On multivariable logistic regression, prior IBD-related surgery (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR] 6.46, 95% CI, 1.85-22.51) and preoperative sepsis (adjOR 5.74, 95% CI, 1.36-24.17) significantly increased the odds of adverse postoperative outcomes, whereas increasing SMI was associated with a decreased risk of an adverse postoperative outcome (adjOR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.82-0.94). CONCLUSIONS:Sarcopenia, as measured by SMI, is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications among older adults with IBD. Measurement of SMI from preoperative imaging can help risk stratify older adults with IBD undergoing intestinal resection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with 44% of deaths occurring in individuals aged 75 years and older. With 78 million adults over 65 years projected by 2035, optimizing CRC screening and surveillance is crucial. This review examines guidelines, risks, and personalized approaches. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:CRC screening reduces incidence by 17-33% and mortality by 11-53%. Colonoscopy lowers mortality by 61% but has a 6.8% complication rate in those aged 75 years and older. The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding is 8.7 per 1,000 for polypectomy, and perforation occurs in 0.6 per 1,000. Frailty indices assess suitability, but surveillance guidelines lack clear discontinuation criteria. Screening should balance risk, complications, and health status. It may be cost-effective up to age 86 years in healthy individuals, but more research is needed to refine surveillance strategies and reduce overtreatment in older adults.