Faculty Bibliography

MAIN OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:To analyze postoperative palatoplasty outcomes before and after systemic protocol changes to preferred bottle and arm immobilizer use after surgery. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective, cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Urban, academic, tertiary medical center in New York City, NY. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:= 39). INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Protocols were amended over the 2018 calendar year to allow for utilization of the baby's preferred bottle (vs alternative feeding methods) and hand socks (vs arm immobilizers) in the immediate postoperative period. Data was extrapolated from electronic medical records to compare surgical outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Postoperative wound complications (fistula and dehiscence) that did not resolve within 1 month, length of stay (hours), and 30-day re-admission. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests and Fisher's Exact test were utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS: = .366). CONCLUSIONS:The findings from this study suggest relaxing postoperative protocols following palatoplasty to allow immediate bottle feedings and unrestricted arm use may be safe without compromise to surgical outcomes.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Catastrophic facial injury with globe loss remains a formidable clinical problem with no previous reports of reconstruction by whole eye or combined whole eye and facial transplant. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To develop a microsurgical strategy for combined whole eye and facial transplant and describe the clinical findings during the first year following transplant. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANT/UNASSIGNED:A 46-year-old man who sustained a high-voltage electrical injury with catastrophic tissue loss to his face and left globe underwent combined whole eye and face transplant using personalized surgical devices and a novel microsurgical strategy at a specialized center for vascularized composite allotransplantation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Reperfusion and viability of the whole eye and facial allografts, retinal function, and incidence of acute rejection. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The patient underwent a combined whole eye and face transplant from an immunologically compatible donor with primary optic nerve coaptation and conventional postoperative immunosuppression. Globe and retinal perfusion were maintained throughout the immediate postoperative period, evidenced by fluorescein angiography. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated atrophy of inner retinal layers and attenuation and disruption of the ellipsoid zone. Serial electroretinography confirmed retinal responses to light in the transplanted eye. Using structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging, the integrity of the transplanted visual pathways and potential occipital cortical response to light stimulation of the transplanted eye was demonstrated. At 1 year post transplant (postoperative day 366), there was no perception of light in the transplanted eye. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This is the first report of whole eye transplant combined with facial transplant, demonstrating allograft survival including rejection-free graft survival and electroretinographic measurements indicating retinal response to light stimuli. These data highlight the potential for clinical allotransplantation for globe loss.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess surgical instrument usage in cleft lip (CL) and cleft palate (CP) surgery and create an optimized surgical tray with an associated cost-savings analysis. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective, observational study. SETTING/METHODS:Single institution, 6-month prospective review. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A total of 10 primary CL surgeries and 10 primary CP surgeries were included in this study. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Complete lists of surgical instruments utilized in CL and CP surgeries were collected. UNLABELLED:Utilization fractions (UFs) were calculated as the percentages of average used instruments to averaged opened instruments per case. New optimized CL and CP surgical trays were idealized by removing instruments not used in at least 20% of cases, and a cost analysis was performed to identify potential savings. Calculation of annual potential savings was also conducted based on institutional caseload. RESULTS:The average instrument UFs were 26.0% for CL and 22.6% for CP. The estimated costs were $33.15 to $290.29 for the original CL surgical tray and $10.20 to $63.80 for the optimized tray. For CP, the original tray's cost was estimated at $38.25 to $319.00, and the optimized tray at $9.18 to $57.42. This demonstrates a cost reduction of $22.95 to $226.49 for CL and $29.07 to 261.58 for CP. CONCLUSIONS:The idealized surgical instrument tray could contribute to reducing healthcare expenditures and promoting operating room efficiency, patient safety, and environmentally friendlier operating theaters.

Patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) characteristically present with maxillary hypoplasia and class III malocclusion. Protraction headgear (PHG) is a commonly used treatment for this type of malocclusion, with the goal of reducing future surgical needs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of PHG treatment and determine the pretreatment predictors of long-term PHG success in patients with CLP. Twenty-nine patients with CLP who had undergone PHG treatment from 2012 to 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were included if they had a lateral cephalogram or CBCT before, immediately after, and at least 5 years after their PHG treatment. Patients were divided into surgery and nonsurgery groups based on their 5-year follow-up clinical presentation. Student t tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to compare pretreatment and post-treatment changes in both groups. Immediately post-treatment, the maxilla advanced 2.6 mm, the maxillary dentition advanced 4.7 mm, and the mandible rotated downward 5.0 mm and backward 2.6 mm. At long-term follow up the maxilla advanced 0.0 mm while the mandible advanced an additional 7.5 mm. Thus, PHG treatment is effective at improving class III malocclusion in the short term, but may not prevent future surgical need for patients with more severe skeletal discrepancies. Variables predictive of future surgical need include ANB, anterior facial height, overjet, and starting age of treatment, with ANB as the most reliable early predictor.

STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:This study analyzes the epidemiology of pediatric Le Fort fractures and assesses the incidence of concomitant injuries and acute-level hospital course using the largest, national pediatric trauma database to date. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Pediatric midface and Le Fort fractures from 2016-2019 were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Descriptive analyses of Le Fort compared to non-Le Fort midface fractures were performed. Multivariable regression assessed whether Le Fort fractures were risk factors for ICU admission, intracranial injury, cervical spine (C-spine) fracture, tracheostomy, and mortality. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< 0.001). Incidence of all the above increased with higher-grade Le Fort fractures. Le Fort III fractures had higher rates of mortality than non-Le Fort midface fractures (7.6% vs 3.2%). Multivariable regression showed that all Le Fort patterns were independent risk factors for tracheostomy and ICU admission, but only Le Fort I for C-spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The incidence of Le Fort fractures appears to increase with age. Higher category Le Fort fractures are associated with greater morbidity.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To objectively quantify results of sagittal lip changes following Abbe flap reconstruction in patients with bilateral cleft lip. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective, observational study. SETTING/METHODS:Single institution, 8-year retrospective review. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:In total, 17 patients with bilateral cleft lip that underwent Abbe flap reconstruction were included in this study. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Patients had lateral photographs taken prior to Abbe flap reconstruction and at least 8 months post-Abbe flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Vegter's index, Sushner's S2 line and Burstone's B line reference lines were used for evaluation of sagittal lip changes. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used in analysis. RESULTS:The mean pre-Abbe flap upper to lower lip ratio, defined as Vegter's Lip Index, was 0.906 compared to a mean of 0.946 following Abbe flap reconstruction. The mean upper to lower lip ratio for Sushner's S2 and Burstone's B line exhibited an increase in upper lip sagittal projection from -0.164 to 1.459 and 0.259 to 0.957, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:This study quantifies sagittal changes to upper and lower lip position after Abbe flap reconstruction. These findings may aid in operative planning and patient/caregiver expectations during counseling.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The pediatric craniofacial trauma literature is limited to single institutions or short study periods. Herein, this study analyzes a national database over 10 years to delineate the epidemiology of pediatric craniofacial fractures and to identify risk factors for acute-level hospital course in the largest series to date. METHODS:Utilizing the National Trauma Data Bank, pediatric craniofacial fractures admitted between 2010 and 2019 were identified. Descriptive analyses and multivariable regression were performed to identify risk factors for acute-level hospital course. RESULTS:A total of 155,136 pediatric craniofacial fracture cases were reviewed, including cranial vault (49.0%), nasal (22.4%), midface (21.0%), mandibular (20.2%), and orbital floor fractures (13.7%). Midface and orbital floor fractures occurred commonly as multicraniofacial fractures. Cranial vault fractures were the most common among all age groups, but frequency declined with age. In contrast, facial fractures increased with age. Despite the inherent complexity of multicraniofacial trauma, isolated fractures remained a concern for acute-level hospital course.Cranial vault and midface fractures had an increased risk of intracranial injury and intensive care unit admission (P<0.001). Mandibular and midface fractures had an increased risk for cervical spine fracture and tracheostomy (P<0.001). Patient and injury-specific risk factors among the fractures with the strongest association for each outcome-cranial vault and mandible-were identified. CONCLUSIONS:The inherent limitations of prior studies-geographical biases, small cohorts, and short-term study periods-were addressed. Describing the independent contribution of each craniofacial fracture to the risk of acute-level hospital course outcomes can be employed to better optimize risk stratification, counseling, and management.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety of same-day discharge for patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair. DESIGN/METHODS:Single-surgeon retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary care institution. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:40 consecutive patients that underwent primary cleft palate repair by a single surgeon from September 2018 to June 2023. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Same-day discharge versus overnight admission after primary palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:30-day readmission, reoperation, wound and all-cause complication rate and 1-year fistula incidence. RESULTS: < .001). CONCLUSIONS:In a low-risk patient population, same-day discharge following primary cleft palate repair may be safely undertaken and result in similar short-term outcomes and 1-year fistula incidence as patients admitted for overnight stay.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) can avoid secondary alveolar bone graft in up to 60% of patients. The effects of GPP on maxillary growth are a concern. However, palatoplasty can also negatively impact facial growth. This study quantifies the isolated effects of GPP and cleft palate repair on maxillary growth at the age of mixed dentition. METHODS:A single institution, retrospective study of all patients undergoing primary reconstruction for unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (CLA) or cleft lip and palate (CLP) was performed. Study patients had lateral cephalograms at age of mixed dentition. Patients were stratified into four groups: CLA with GPP (CLA+GPP), CLA without GPP (CLA-GPP), CLP with GPP (CLP+GPP), and CLP without GPP (CLP-GPP). Cephalometric measurements included: sella-nasion-point A (SNA), sella-nasion-point B (SNB), and A point-nasion-B point (ANB). Landmarks were compared between patient groups and to Eurocleft Center D data. RESULTS:110 patients met inclusion criteria: 7 CLA-GPP, 16 CLA+GPP, 24 CLP-GPP, and 63 CLP+GPP patients. There were no significant differences in SNA, SNB, and ANB between CLA+GPP and CLA-GPP, or between CLP+GPP and CLP-GPP groups. In patients who did not receive GPP, SNA was significantly lower in patients with a cleft palate compared to patients with an intact palate (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in SNA or SNB of CLP-GPP or CLP+GPP groups when compared to Eurocleft data. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:When controlling for the effects of cleft palate repair, GPP does not appear to negatively affect midface growth at the age of mixed dentition.