Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To characterize and classify different forms of peripapillary retinoschisis (PPRS), and to clarify the nomenclature of this condition. METHODS:A retrospective, multicenter, multinational case series of PPRS was performed from August 2021 to September 2024. Cases were included if they demonstrated retinoschisis contiguous with and thought to be originating from the optic disc. Demographic and clinical data collected included age, gender, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, axial length, refraction and referring symptoms. Mandatory investigations included optical coherence tomography of the optic disc and macula with radial scans, colour fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence. Select cases underwent fundus fluorescein and/or indocyanine green angiography. Retinoschisis was characterised by the meridian in relation to the optic disc, layer(s) of the retina affected and associated conditions. A literature review was performed to identify all causes of PPRS. RESULTS:A total of 47 eyes from 41 patients with PPRS were identified, comprising of 22 (54%) females and a mean age of 56 years (range 14-92 years). These were classified into nine aetiologies: Congenital Disc Abnormalities (CDA, n=16 eyes), peripapillary chorioretinal coloboma (n=1), peripapillary atrophy (n=3), glaucoma (n=7), Peripapillary Pachychoroid Syndrome (PPS, n=4), peripapillary choroidal neovascularization (PP-CNV, n=3), high/ pathological myopia (n=5), vitreopapillary traction (VPT, n=4) and idiopathic (n=4). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The nine aetiologies of peripapillary retinoschisis can be classified into five groups: non-glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities (CDA, PP-coloboma, PP-atrophy), glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities, peripapillary choroidal diseases (PPS and PP-CNV), vitreous optic disc interface abnormalities and idiopathic. A new entity, "Focal Optic Disc Dome" (FODD) was identified. Understanding the full spectrum of PPRS can assist in correct diagnosis and management.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To establish consensus-based guidelines on the diagnosis, classification, and management of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) through a structured expert panel initiated by the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society (APVRS), the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO), and the Academia Retina Internationalis (ARI), addressing the existing clinical controversies. METHODS:An international panel of 26 experts from 13 countries collaboratively drafted consensus statements spanning five key areas: disease definition, pathophysiology, investigations, current management, and future developments. Consensus was reached through an iterative Delphi process and anonymous voting using a five-point Likert scale. Statements were accepted when >75 % agreement ('agree' & 'strongly agree') was achieved. RESULTS:Consensus was achieved for all 25 statements, reflecting strong alignment among experts. Key agreements included defining CSC as a pachychoroid-driven chorioretinal disorder characterized by neurosensory retinal and/or RPE detachment, with multimodal imaging (optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography) recognized as essential for diagnosis. Half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) was unanimously endorsed as the first-line treatment for chronic CSC. Oral mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) lacked consensus for therapeutic benefit, aligning with evidence from the VICI and SPECTRA trials. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor therapy was recommended solely for CSC complicated by a macular neovascularization. Future priorities highlighted standardizing disease classification and exploring targeted therapies through genetic and nanomedicine research. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This consensus initiative provides a robust, evidence-based framework for the diagnosis and management of CSC, promoting standardization across clinical practices and guiding future research directions to address persistent gaps in CSC care.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To characterize the clinical and multimodal imaging features of central bouquet hemorrhage (CBH) with Henle fiber layer (HFL) involvement in highly myopic eyes, and to investigate the relationships between hemorrhage characteristics, reabsorption time, and visual outcomes. METHODS:Multicenter, retrospective analysis of highly myopic eyes with CBH involving the HFL, confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS:Eighteen eyes from 18 subjects were included for analysis. The mean age of the cohort was 39 ± 13.7 years (range: 17-69) and 61% of subjects were female. Mean refractive error was -14.8 ± 3.14 diopters (range: -9 D to -22 D). All eyes demonstrated a combined CBH with HFL component, while a subretinal component was present in 83.3% of cases. Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) was excluded in all eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) or dye-based angiography (fluorescein or indocyanine green). No correlation was observed between hemorrhage size and visual outcomes or reabsorption time. Hemorrhage cleared after a mean of 2.63 months, and the radial HFL hemorrhage component resolved first. All eyes showed improvement in visual acuity from baseline. Persistent OCT alternations after resolution of hemorrhage included ellipsoid zone disruption (88.9%) and hyperreflective changes in HFL (77.8%). Anti-VEGF injections were administered to 6 eyes (33.3%) and did not correlate with a significant visual or anatomical benefit. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:CBH with HFL involvement in high myopia was associated with significantly improved visual outcomes from baseline but structural alterations can persist after clinical resolution. The size of the hemorrhage did not correlate with resorption time, and anti-VEGF treatment did not affect outcome. These findings provide new insights into the natural history and management of nonneovascular CBH in highly myopic eyes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To describe the multimodal imaging findings of the angular sign of Henle fiber layer (HFL) hyperreflectivity (ASHH) at baseline and follow-up in patients with contusion maculopathy. METHODS:Eleven eyes of ten patients were captured with multimodal imaging after non-penetrating ocular blunt trauma from a soccer ball, fist, or airsoft pellet. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics and follow-up outcomes are presented. RESULTS:Hyper-reflective lesions extending along the HFL from the ellipsoid zone (EZ) to the outer plexiform layer consistent with ASHH were identified with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Mean presenting visual acuity (VA) was logMAR 0.59 ± 0.64 (Snellen VA 20/77, range 20/25 to counting fingers) and follow-up visual acuity was logMAR 0.43 ± 0.35 (Snellen VA 20/53, range 20/20 to 20/200). Additional OCT findings included external limiting membrane attenuation and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) disruption. On follow-up, resolution of ASHH was accompanied by outer nuclear layer thinning with varying degrees of EZ attenuation and RPE loss. A macular hole was detected in one patient on follow-up. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ASHH is a distinctive acute OCT feature of contusion maculopathy secondary to blunt injury, causing disruption of the photoreceptors and presumably anterograde alterations in the HFL. Associated RPE alterations may ensue, either acutely or delayed, and are a biomarker of persistent structural abnormalities and variable visual outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report the clinical and multimodal imaging (MMI) findings and long-term follow-up of stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis (SNIFR) contiguous with midperipheral retinoschisis (MPRS) and to describe a severe SNIFR variant termed CARPET (Central Anomalous Retinoschisis with mid-PEripheral Traction). DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case series. SUBJECTS/METHODS:Eleven patients (15 eyes) with SNIFR contiguous with MPRS in at least one eye at baseline or final follow-up. METHODS:MMI features, including cross-sectional and en face macular and peripheral spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography, were reviewed in all cases at baseline and at the final follow-up visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Various courses (including progression, regression, or stability) of MPRS or SNIFR over time were evaluated. RESULTS:MPRS exhibited centripetal progression to SNIFR in 5 eyes of 3 patients with follow up of 67, 60, and 27 months, respectively, with maintenance of excellent visual acuity (range: 20/25-20/20) in 4 of these 5 eyes. In 2 eyes of 2 patients (including 1 eye with initial centripetal progression of MPRS to SNIFR), MPRS contiguous with SNIFR spontaneously resolved with long-term follow-up (77 and 48 months, respectively). SNIFR contiguous with MPRS partially regressed after 48 months in one patient, and was stable after 54 months in another. A distinctive midperipheral microvasculopathy, associated with MPRS that was contiguous with SNIFR, was identified in 7 eyes of 4 patients. Finally, 3 eyes of 3 patients exhibited additional unique features, including central neurosensory detachment and outer lamellar macular hole, which were associated with significant midperipheral traction, representing a severe variant subtype of SNIFR that we refer to as CARPET. Two of these 3 eyes progressed with short-term follow-up of 6 and 2 months, respectively, while the schisis resolved and vision improved after pars plana vitrectomy in the third case. CONCLUSIONS:MPRS can progress to SNIFR over multiple years of follow-up. SNIFR with MPRS can also spontaneously resolve or remain stable. MPRS can additionally be complicated by a midperipheral inner retinal microvasculopathy. Finally, CARPET may represent a unique and severe variant form of SNIFR driven by midperipheral vitreoretinal traction and associated with significant vision loss.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To explore the impact of home optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided treatment personalization for type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS:A prospective home OCT trial of a patient with a one-month history of type 3 MNV under anti-angiogenic treatment (two "loading" injections). During the 23.4-week study period, the patient's treatment regimen was managed through regular self-imaging, enabling continuous monitoring of retinal fluid dynamics. RESULTS:Over the observation period, the patient performed 143 home OCT measurements (mean 6.1 per week, standard deviation 1), which prompted three in-office visits where three anti-angiogenic injections were delivered at the discretion of the investigator. The mean individualized treatment intervals established through home OCT were 8 weeks, with the patient maintaining stable visual acuity at 20/20 Snellen. Complete resolution of intraretinal fluid was noted between injection. Notably, home OCT revealed unexpected fluctuations in retinal fluid measured as hyporeflective spaces in the absence of treatment. Two out of three injections were administered after the retinal fluid volume had decreased by more than half within two, and eight days following an initial transient spike. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The neovascular subtype as defined by the Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular AMD Data (CONAN) may serve as a useful management framework when approaching home OCT guided treatment decisions. In type 3 disease, home OCT-guided management demonstrates significant potential for optimizing treatment. Further research is warranted to elucidate the dynamics of retinal fluid variations in different MNV subtypes.

OBJECTIVE:To develop a consensus nomenclature for Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) findings in retinal vascular diseases (RVD). DESIGN/METHODS:Expert consensus using standardized online surveys with modified Likert scale. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:RVD imaging experts, OCT biomedical engineers and the members of the International Retinal Imaging Society (IntRIS) METHODS: A PubMed literature review identified quantitative and qualitative terms forming the basis for a consensus-building process using a modified Delphi method. Agreement levels were categorized as "Accepted" (median ≥ 6), "Considerable Consensus" (median 6-7, IQR ≤ 3), "Strong Consensus" (median ≥ 8, IQR ≤ 2), and "Refined Strong Consensus" (median ≥ 8, IQR ≤ 2, with ≥ 70% responses in the 8-10 range). A multidisciplinary expert panel refined the terminology through three survey rounds, leading to a final survey conducted by IntRIS members. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Consensus on OCTA nomenclature in RVD RESULTS: The literature review identified 58 relevant papers, yielding 51 quantitative and 108 qualitative terms. A series of three surveys was used to refine the nomenclature framework for describing OCTA findings. The selected framework includes a generic term ("OCTA signal"), adjective terms ("presence/absence", "decreased/increased", "normal/abnormal"), and descriptive/etiologic terms ("of unknown cause", "due to blockage", "due to non-perfusion"). In the final survey among 44 IntRIS members, the framework achieved strong consensus for overall acceptance (median: 8.0, IQR: 7.0-9.0). The term "OCTA signal" met refined strong consensus criteria (median: 8.0, IQR: 8.0-9.0, with ≥ 70% of responses in the 8-10 range). Adjective terms, including "absence/presence" and "increased/decreased," were also rated with strong consensus (median: 8.0, IQR: 7.0-9.0). Similarly, descriptive/etiologic terms achieved strong consensus (median: 8.0, IQR: 7.0-9.0). Adoption of the framework for clinical practice and scientific reporting was rated with strong consensus (clinical: median 8.0, IQR: 7.0-9.0; scientific: median 9.0, IQR: 8.5-10.0). CONCLUSIONS:This study establishes a strong consensus framework for reporting OCTA findings in RVD for clinical and scientific contexts.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To develop imaging and consensus-based guidelines on the application of multimodal imaging in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). DESIGN/METHODS:Consensus agreement guided by literature, and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT). METHODS:The expert committee employed a structured NGT with multiple rounds of discussion, conflict resolution, and anonymous voting to: (1) establish imaging criteria for diagnosing and monitoring MEWDS using color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), and OCT angiography (OCTA); and (2) develop consensus-based recommendations for assessing specific characteristics in patients with MEWDS. These formal recommendations were derived from a structured NGT using illustrative cases of MEWDS and were further voted upon by the entire task force. RESULTS:The diagnosis of acute MEWDS is supported by distinct multimodal features on CFP, multi-focal disruption of the ellipsoid/interdigitation zone with overlying outer retinal hyper-reflectivity with OCT, and hyper-autofluorescent spots with FAF (short-wave blue/green). In complex cases, wreath-like lesions on FFA and the absence of early hypofluorescence on ICGA help differentiate MEWDS from other chorioretinopathies. The lack of specific choroidal changes on OCT and preserved signal on OCTA on retinal and inner choroidal slabs also aid in diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS:Multimodal imaging is essential for diagnosing MEWDS and differentiating it from other non-infectious uveitis types, extending the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification. These imaging criteria enable detailed assessment of disease activity and offer valuable insights into MEWDS pathogenesis.