Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:While preoperative anemia is prevalent among surgical patients, its impact on patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the relationship between the severity of preoperative anemia and outcomes following TCAR. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative database (2016-2021) was performed to identify patients who underwent TCAR for carotid stenosis. Anemia was defined according to World Health Organization guidelines as a hemoglobin (Hb) level <12 g/dL in females and <13 g/dL in males. The severity of anemia was further classified as mild (Hb: 10-11.9 g/dL in females and 11-12.9 g/dL in males) or moderate to severe (Hb < 10 g/dL in females and <11 g/dL in males). Patients were stratified into three cohorts as follows, based on the presence and severity of preoperative anemia: no anemia, mild anemia, and moderate-to-severe anemia. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital stroke, in-hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI), and prolonged postoperative hospitalization (>1 day). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between the severity of preoperative anemia and clinical outcomes. RESULTS:Among 21,648 patients who underwent TCAR, 4,240 (19.8%) had mild anemia, and 3,401 (15.8%) had moderate-to-severe anemia preoperatively. After adjusting for relevant clinical factors and confounders, moderate-to-severe preoperative anemia was associated with significantly increased odds of in-hospital MI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-3.74; P < 0.001), in-hospital death (aOR, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.62-4.34; P < 0.001), and 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.89; 95% CI: 1.32-2.72; P < 0.001) compared to nonanemic patients. Among patients with moderate-to-severe anemia, factors such as a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or congestive heart failure (CHF), urgent or emergent procedures, and symptomatic carotid stenosis were the strongest predictors of 30-day mortality. In contrast, mild anemia was not associated with increased odds of adverse postoperative outcomes compared to the nonanemic cohort. Preoperative anemia, regardless of severity, was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative stroke following TCAR. However, the severity of preoperative anemia was associated with a stepwise increase in the adjusted odds of prolonged hospitalization (aOR, 1.19 [mild anemia] and 1.57 [moderate-to-severe anemia]). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this multi-institutional retrospective study of patients undergoing TCAR, moderate-to-severe preoperative anemia was independently associated with higher adjusted odds of in-hospital MI, in-hospital death, and 30-day mortality, without an increased risk of postoperative stroke. These findings highlight moderate-to-severe preoperative anemia as a potential independent prognostic marker for identifying high-risk patients. Furthermore, incorporating the severity of anemia into preoperative risk stratification may aid in tailoring perioperative cardiac assessment and optimization strategies, potentially mitigating the risk of adverse outcomes following TCAR.

BACKGROUND:Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is utilized to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms, while patients with short infrarenal necks can undergo fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR). Previous studies have demonstrated decreased aortic neck dilation for FEVAR compared to EVAR. Sac regression is a marker of success after EVAR; however, little is known regarding changes in sac volumetrics. This study compares aortic sac regression after EVAR versus FEVAR using volumetric analysis. METHODS:A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 120 patients who underwent EVAR was performed. Thirty patients underwent FEVAR (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, IN) and 90 patients underwent EVAR (30 each with Endurant [Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland], Excluder [Gore, Flagstaff, AZ], and Zenith [Cook]). Demographic data were analyzed. Using 3-dimensional reconstruction software, preoperative and postoperative aneurysm sac volumes were measured, in addition to aneurysm characteristics. RESULTS:, P = 0.005). EVAR patients had greater number of lumbar arteries (7.26 ± 1.68 vs. 5.31 ± 1.93, P < 0.000001). On postoperative follow-up, FEVAR cases had greater sac regression compared to standard EVAR (-22.75 ± 25.7% vs. -5.98 ± 19.66%, P = 0.00031). The percentage of sac regression was greater when measured by volume compared to maximum diameter for FEVAR (-22.75 ± 25.7% vs. -13.90 ± 15.4%, P = 0.01) but not EVAR (-5.98 ± 19.7% vs. -4.51 ± 15.2%, P = 0.246). Those in the top tertile of percent volume of thrombus (>48.5%) were more likely to experience greater than 10% sac regression by volume (55% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, FEVAR was associated with sac regression greater than 10% by volume (odds ratio [OR] 4.325, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.346-13.901, P = 0.014), while endoleak (OR 0.162, 95% CI 0.055-0.479, P < 0.001) and 2 patent hypogastric arteries (OR 0.066, 95% CI 0.005-0.904, P = 0.042) were predictive against. CONCLUSIONS:Fenestrated EVAR is associated with greater sac regression compared to EVAR on volumetric analysis. This difference may be attributable to decreased endotension within the aneurysm resulting from less aortic neck dilatation, while the greater proportion of thrombus may be a protective factor from growth. Patients being evaluated for EVAR with borderline neck anatomy should be considered for FEVAR given increased sac regression.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to characterize the natural history of incidentally identified asymptomatic mesenteric artery stenosis and to identify clinical and radiographic predictors that differentiate patients with asymptomatic mesenteric artery occlusive disease (MAOD) and patients with symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) diagnosed at index study. METHODS:This single-institution retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with >70% stenosis of the celiac or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) on axial imaging or duplex ultrasound in an institutional radiology database. Patients were grouped into asymptomatic MAOD and symptomatic CMI cohorts according to their clinical presentation at index study. The primary endpoint was progression of disease from asymptomatic stenosis to CMI. Demographic, clinical, and imaging features at index study were also compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts. RESULTS:79 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 43 in the asymptomatic group and 36 in the symptomatic group. Patients in the asymptomatic group were followed for mean 32.7 ± 30.2 months; 60.5% (n=26) were referred to and followed by a vascular surgeon for 21.5 ± 27.8 months. No asymptomatic patients developed symptoms during the follow-up period. All patients in the symptomatic group were evaluated by a vascular surgeon and underwent procedural intervention for CMI within six months of diagnosis. Patients with CMI were more likely to have a history of smoking (p=0.02) and less likely to be anticoagulated (p<0.01) than patients with asymptomatic MAOD. Symptomatic patients trended towards a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (p=0.06) and a lower prevalence of arrhythmia (p=0.08). On imaging, the symptomatic cohort was more likely to have severe SMA stenosis (p<0.001), multivessel mesenteric disease (p=0.001), calcified aortic plaque (p=0.01), and severe stenosis in one or both internal iliac arteries (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, a lack of anticoagulation use (p<0.01) and severe SMA stenosis (p<0.001) were independently associated with higher odds of symptomatic mesenteric stenosis. While statistically insignificant, calcified aortic plaque (p=0.08) and smoking history (p=0.06) trended toward higher odds of symptomatic index presentation. CONCLUSIONS:The rate of progression from asymptomatic MAOD to CMI appears exceedingly low in the first two to three years after diagnosis, suggesting that prophylactic revascularization is mostly unnecessary. Surveillance of asymptomatic MAOD may be personalized based on clinical and radiographic features of disease. SMA stenosis severity, anticoagulation use, and possibly smoking history and the presence of aortic plaque calcification may be promising markers to stratify the risk of ischemic progression.

OBJECTIVE:Cryopreserved vein grafts serve as alternative conduits for infrainguinal bypass when autogenous vein is unavailable or inadequate. Anticoagulation has been advocated to improve outcomes, but published studies demonstrate conflicting results. We assessed the association of anticoagulation on outcomes after infrainguinal bypass with cryopreserved vein in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS:The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried (2003-2022) for infrainguinal bypass performed using cryopreserved vein graft for CLTI. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes between those discharged with or without anticoagulation were recorded. Univariable, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS:There were 2336 patients who underwent an infrainguinal bypass with cryopreserved vein conduit. The average age was 70.6 years and 63.5% were male. Bypass targets were femoral/popliteal (27.5%) and tibial (72.5%). Indication for intervention included rest pain (25.7%) and tissue loss (74.3%). Patients were discharged with aspirin (80.1%), a P2Y12 inhibitor (45.6%), and anticoagulation (47.3%). Patients discharged on postoperative anticoagulation more often were treated for rest pain (28.1% vs. 23.5%), had a tibial bypass target (78.4% vs. 67.2%), and less often underwent endarterectomy (27.8% vs. 34.2%) (all P<.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis at one-year demonstrated that postoperative anticoagulation had similar freedom from loss of primary patency/death (28.9% vs. 34.3%), major amputation/death (62.3% vs. 63.8%), and reintervention/major amputation/death (50.6% vs. 53.8%) (all P>.05), but higher survival (85.1% vs. 81.7%, P=.03). Multivariable analysis at one-year demonstrated that postoperative anticoagulation had a similar likelihood for loss of primary patency/death (HR .95, 95% CI .83.-1.09), major amputation/death (HR .88, 95% CI .74-1.05), and reintervention/major amputation/death (HR .93, 95% CI .79-1.08) (all P>.05), but lower likelihood for death (HR .59, 95% CI .46-.74, P<.001) compared to no anticoagulation. Postoperative aspirin was associated with decreased likelihood for amputation/death (HR .74, 95% CI .61-.91, P=.003) and reintervention/major amputation/death (HR .76, 95% CI .64-.9, P=.002). Postoperative P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with decreased likelihood for amputation/death (HR .75, 95% CI .63-.9, P=.002) and reintervention/major amputation/death (HR .78, 95% CI .67-.91, P=.001). Results were similar when analyzing patients who were not on anticoagulation preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative anticoagulation following infrainguinal bypass using cryopreserved vein did not affect patency or limb salvage. Antiplatelet agents were associated with improved outcomes. Overall patency and limb salvage rates at one year were poor. When cryopreserved vein is used, surgeons should consider antiplatelet therapy for cryopreserved graft patency rather than anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVE:Venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) is the accepted initial imaging study to rule out lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In accordance with the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) vascular laboratory policies, many institutions require technicians to additionally assess the asymptomatic contralateral common femoral vein. There is conflicting literature on whether this policy is needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the utility of examining the asymptomatic contralateral common femoral vein in patients undergoing a unilateral lower extremity VDUS to rule out DVT by (1) defining the prevalence of DVT in the contralateral asymptomatic limb and (2) identifying risk factors that predispose patients to develop a DVT in the asymptomatic limb. METHODS:and Student's t-tests, respectively. For all tests, a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:371 patients (170 inpatient vs. 201 outpatient) with unilateral DVT symptoms who underwent VDUS during the study period were identified. Right leg symptoms were present in 186 (50%) patients and left leg symptoms were present in 185 (50%) patients. The overall incidence of acute DVT in the symptomatic limb was 17% (17.4% outpatient vs. 16.5% inpatient, p=NS). Outpatients were more likely to have superficial venous thrombosis (7.0% vs. 0.6%, p=0.002) and chronic venous changes (25.4% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001) in the symptomatic limb. 59% of DVTs in the symptomatic limb were documented in the calf veins, 25% in the proximal veins, and 16% in both the proximal and calf veins. There were no incidences of bilateral DVT in our cohort. Moreover, none of the patients had a DVT isolated to the contralateral common femoral vein. CONCLUSIONS:Scanning the asymptomatic contralateral common femoral vein may not be necessary for patients undergoing unilateral VDUS for symptomatic DVT, regardless of thrombotic risk factors. A single-extremity study will suffice in most cases, and if implemented, it will improve vascular laboratory efficiency and decrease costs without a decline in DVT detection.

BACKGROUND:The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines consider pancreatic cancer with celiac axis (CA), proper hepatic artery (PHA), and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) involvement unresectable. Thus, technical reports and video illustrations of these operations are rare. We report the stepwise management of multivascular reconstruction for Mayo Clinic class IIIb CA resections at New York University Langone Health, a dedicated center of excellence in pancreatic surgery. METHODS:We illustrated the management of a 56-year-old patient with biopsy-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma arising from the pancreatic body and involving the CA, PHA, SMA, and mesentericoportal venous axis. PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT/UNASSIGNED:The preoperative stepwise considerations include: 1) mandatory patient selection; 2) planning vascular reconstructability; 3) tailoring risk assessment while carefully considering the need for total pancreatectomy, total gastrectomy, and mesenteric/hepatic revascularization; and 4) 3D-reconstruction for arterial evaluation. The key intraoperative considerations include: 1) selective and sequential clamping for vascular reconstruction in a "domino" fashion, to minimize warm ischemic time 2) a combined multi-surgeon approach to comprehensively tackle vascular reconstructions; 3) a low threshold for total pancreatectomy to avoid pancreatic leak; and 4) two-stage surgery to reassess the blood supply to the liver and stomach for on-demand gastric preservation instead of a theoretically advised total gastrectomy. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Liver, stomach, and bowel vascularization present life-threatening risks that require an extensive preoperative evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach. Our stepwise management for these extensive operations includes total pancreatectomy, "domino" vascular reconstruction, and two-stage surgery.

OBJECTIVE:This study compared outcomes in patients with and without preoperative stress testing undergoing carotid revascularization including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS), and transcarotid revascularization (TCAR). METHODS:Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VQI VISION) database who underwent elective carotid revascularization 2016-2020 were included. Patients were analyzed by group based upon whether they underwent cardiac stress testing within two years preceding revascularization without subsequent coronary intervention. Subset analysis was performed comparing outcomes between those with negative and positive results (evidence of ischemia or MI). Outcomes of interest were postoperative MI/neurologic events, 90-day re-admission rates, as well as long-term mortality. RESULTS:We analyzed 18,364 patients (78.8% CEA, 9.3% TF-CAS, 11.9% TCAR). Of these, 35.8% underwent preoperative stress testing (37.4% of CEA patients, 27.5% of TF-CAS patients, and 31.9% of TCAR patients). While comorbidities were significantly higher amongst patients undergoing CEA with preoperative stress test compared to those without stress testing, the overall prevalence of co-morbidities was higher amongst patients undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR irrespective of preoperative stress test status. Compared to patients with a negative stress test, patients with positive stress test undergoing any form of carotid revascularization had a significant increase in 90-day re-admission rates (CEA 19.6% vs 15.8%, p=0.003; CAS 33.3% vs. 18.6%, p<0.001; TCAR 25% vs. 17.5%, p=0.04). No group demonstrated a difference in the incidence of in-hospital postoperative neurologic events or CHF, but those undergoing CEA (but not CAS or TCAR) experienced a significant increase in-hospital post-operative MI (1.7% vs 0.6%, p<0.001). In 3-year follow-up, those with a positive compared to negative stress test were more likely to undergo CABG/PCI in the CEA (adjusted HR 1.87 [1.42-2.27], p<0.0001) and CAS groups (adjusted HR 3.89 [1.77-8.57], p<0.01), but not the TCAR cohort. Notably those undergoing CEA with a positive compared to negative stress test, but not CAS or TCAR, exhibited a 28% increase in mortality (adjusted HR 1.28 [1.03-1.58], p=0.03) at 3 years. Conversely, those patients with a negative stress test compared to no stress test undergoing CEA experienced a 14% reduction in mortality at 3 years (adjusted HR 0.86 [0.76-0.98], p=0.02); this mortality difference was not observed in similar stress test cohort undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR. CONCLUSIONS:Our study highlights that a positive stress test in appropriately selected, asymptomatic patients undergoing elective carotid revascularization can predict select perioperative and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, given the high follow-up mortality associated with those undergoing CEA for elective carotid revascularization, our findings call into question whether these patients should be preferentially offered optimal medical management and/or stenting.

OBJECTIVE:Juxtarenal aortic aneurysms present a challenge for endovascular treatment. While renal dysfunction following open repair has been associated with lower short-term survival, the relationship between postoperative kidney function and midterm outcomes such as rupture, reintervention, and mortality remains unclear. This study investigates the association between postoperative renal function and these outcomes. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) linked to Medicare claims through the Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION). Patients who underwent elective open repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms between January 2003 and December 2018 (N=1925) were included. Patients were stratified based on postoperative renal function: stable renal function; acute kidney injury (AKI), as defined by ≥0.5 mg/dL increase in baseline serum creatinine level; or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Primary outcomes included 5-year mortality, rupture, and reintervention, and secondary outcomes were immediate postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression modeling were used. RESULTS:Among the 1925 patients, 74% had stable postoperative renal function, 21% developed AKI, and 4.9% required RRT. Worse renal outcomes were associated with longer renal ischemia times, higher proximal aortic clamping, and renal artery bypass. Postoperative, 30-day mortality was highest in the RRT group, along with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, and intestinal ischemic complications (P<.001). Patients requiring RRT had higher risks of subsequent aortic aneurysm-related reintervention (aHR 2.4 [1.1-5.1], P=.03) and midterm (1-,3-,and 5-year follow up) mortality (aHR 2.2 [2.1-5.1], P<.001) compared to those with stable renal function. Patients with AKI also had higher midterm mortality (aHR 1.5 [1.1-2.0], P=.01). No significant differences in aneurysm rupture were observed between groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative patients who required RRT were associated with increased midterm aortic reinterventions and mortality after open juxtarenal aneurysm repair. Patients demonstrating any degree of renal impairment were associated with higher midterm mortality risk, though rupture rates and rates of reintervention demonstrated no difference.