Faculty Bibliography

Advancements in congenital heart disease (CHD) care have significantly improved survival, leading to a growing population of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHDs). Many of these patients require ongoing interventions for residual defects, conduit or valve dysfunction, and arrhythmia management, often performed using transcatheter techniques. Imaging plays a critical role in ensuring procedural success and safety. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as an essential imaging modality in ACHD interventions. With continuous technological advancements, ICE offers several advantages over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), including superior visualization, real-time guidance, and the ability to avoid general anesthesia. These benefits have made ICE the preferred imaging tool for many transcatheter procedures. This review explores the expanding role of ICE in ACHD interventions, highlighting its applications in structural and electrophysiological procedures. By enhancing procedural precision and reducing complications, ICE is transforming the management of ACHD patients, optimizing outcomes, and improving long-term care for this complex and growing population.

Treatment of native right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction with predominant pulmonary regurgitation has become a catheter-based procedure since the introduction of the RVOT reducer devices such as the Alterra prestent (Edwards Lifesciences). These devices have potential complications. One such complication is the migration or embolization of the stent. Herein, we present 2 cases of patients with native RVOT dysfunction who underwent the implantation of the Alterra prestent complicated by proximal migration of the stent, which was managed by placement of a second Alterra prestent in 1 case and repositioning of the prestent in the second case.

BACKGROUND:Although sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT) in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is linked to abnormally conducting anatomical isthmuses, the clinical importance of inducible polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) is unclear. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of inducible PVT in TOF. METHODS:Patients from the ongoing CATAPULT-TOF (Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia Before Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot) registry with inducible sustained PVT at index electrophysiology study were included. Abnormal anatomical isthmus was defined as conduction velocity <0.5 m/s. Centrally adjudicated episodes with ≥3 consecutive beats of similar morphology (10 of 12 leads) were labeled transiently organized PVT (TO-PVT). TO-PVT was analyzed in relation to three-dimensional substrate characteristics and postablation inducibility. RESULTS: = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with inducible PVT display a lower clinical risk profile and healthier myocardial substrate than those with MVT. Organized beats at episode onset appear to be associated with anatomical isthmuses that can be targeted by catheter ablation.

Significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital heart disease have transformed patient outcomes, leading to an expanding adult congenital heart disease population. Many of these adults require lifelong procedural interventions, frequently performed in catheterization labs under the guidance of echocardiography. This review explores the transesophageal echocardiographic aspect in key catheterization-based procedures.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Information about left atrial (LA) 2-dimensional (2D) strain parameters in patients with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate LA strain (LAS) in COVID-19 patients with the Omicron variant and compare it to that of propensity-matched patients with the wild-type (WT) variant. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 148 consecutive patients who were hospitalized with Omicron COVID-19 underwent an echocardiographic evaluation within the first day after hospital admission and were compared to propensity-matched patients (1:1) with the WT variant. LA 2D speckle tracking echocardiography parameters included the following: LAS, reservoir (LASr); LAS, conduit (LAScd); LAS, contraction (LASct); and LASr to the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e'). The values for the parameters that occurred during acute Omicron-type infection were compared with those found on historic examinations in 36 patients. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< 0.001) improved in patients during acute infection. LASr, LAScd, and LASr/(E/e') were significantly associated with an increased risk of either in-hospital mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or the combined event. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In hospitalized patients with an Omicron COVID-19 infection, LAS parameters are similar to those of matched patients with WT variant and are associated with mortality and respiratory deterioration. These abnormalities were recorded previously in the 36 patients with historical echocardiograms, suggesting that they are related to background cardiac disease.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The study aims to investigate exercise-limiting factors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) using combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:A symptom-limited ramp bicycle exercise test was performed in the semi-supine position on a tilting dedicated ergometer. Echocardiographic images were obtained concurrently with gas exchange measurements along predefined stages of exercise. Oxygen extraction was calculated using the Fick equation at each activity level. Thirty-six HCM patients (mean age 67 ± 6 years, 72% men, 18 obstructive HCM) were compared with age and sex-matched 29 controls. At rest, compared with controls, E/E' ratio (6.26 ± 2.3 vs. 14 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressures (SPAP) (22.6 ± 3.4 vs. 34 ± 6.2 mmHg, P = 0.023) were increased. Along with the stages of exercise (unloaded; anaerobic threshold; peak), diastolic function worsened (E/e' 8.9 ± 2.6 vs. 13.8 ± 3.6 P = 0.011; 9.4 ± 2.3 vs. 18.6 ± 3.3 P = 0.001; 8.7 ± 1.9 vs. 21.5 ± 4, P < 0.001), SPAP increased (23 ± 2.7 vs. 33 ± 4.4, P = 0.013; 26 ± 3.2 vs. 40 ± 2.9, P < 0.001; 26 ± 3.5 vs. 45 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.001), and oxygen consumption (6.6 ± 1.7 vs. 6.8 ± 1.6, P = 0.86; 18.1 ± 2.2 vs. 14.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.008; 20.3 ± 3 vs. 15.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg/min, P = 0.01) was reduced. Oxygen pulse was blunted (6.3 ± 1.8 vs. 6.2 ± 1.9, P = 0.79; 10 ± 2.1 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6, P = 0.063; 12.2 ± 2 vs. 8.2 ± 2.3 mL/beat, P = 0.002) due to an insufficient increase in both stroke volume (92.3 ± 17 vs. 77.3 ± 14.5 P = 0.021; 101 ± 19.1 vs. 87.3 ± 15.7 P = 0.06; 96.5 ± 12.2 vs. 83.6 ± 16.1 mL, P = 0.034) and oxygen extraction (0.07 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.02, P = 0.47; 0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.03, P = 0.013; 0.13 ± 0.03 vs. 0.11 ± 0.03, P = 0.03). Diastolic dysfunction, elevated SPAP, and the presence of atrial fibrillation were associated with reduced exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS:Both central and peripheral cardiovascular limitations are involved in exercise intolerance in HCM. Diastolic dysfunction seems to be the main driver for this limitation.

Background Information about the cardiac manifestations of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is limited. We performed a systematic prospective echocardiographic evaluation of consecutive patients hospitalized with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 infection and compared them with similarly recruited patients were propensity matched with the wild-type variant. Methods and Results A total of 162 consecutive patients hospitalized with Omicron COVID-19 underwent complete echocardiographic evaluation within 24 hours of admission and were compared with propensity-matched patients with the wild-type variant (148 pairs). Echocardiography included left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic, right ventricular (RV), strain, and hemodynamic assessment. Echocardiographic parameters during acute infection were compared with historic exams in 62 patients with the Omicron variant and 19 patients with the wild-type variant who had a previous exam within 1 year. Of the patients, 85 (53%) had a normal echocardiogram. The most common cardiac pathology was RV dilatation and dysfunction (33%), followed by elevated LV filling pressure (E/e' ≥14, 29%) and LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%, 10%). Compared with the matched wild-type cohort, patients with Omicron had smaller RV end-systolic areas (9.3±4 versus 12.3±4 cm²; P=0.0003), improved RV function (RV fractional-area change, 53.2%±10% versus 39.7%±13% [P<0.0001]; RV S', 12.0±3 versus 10.7±3 cm/s [P=0.001]), and higher stroke volume index (35.6 versus 32.5 mL/m²; P=0.004), all possibly related to lower mean pulmonary pressure (34.6±12 versus 41.1±14 mm Hg; P=0.0001) and the pulmonary vascular resistance index (P=0.0003). LV systolic or diastolic parameters were mostly similar to the wild-type variant-matched cohort apart from larger LV size. However, in patients who had a previous echocardiographic exam, these LV abnormalities were recorded before acute Omicron infection, but not in the wild-type cohort. Numerous echocardiographic parameters were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (LV ejection fraction, stroke volume index, E/e', RV S'). Conclusions In patients with Omicron, RV function is impaired to a lower extent compared with the wild-type variant, possibly related to the attenuated pulmonary parenchymal and/or vascular disease. LV systolic and diastolic abnormalities are as common as in the wild-type variant but were usually recorded before acute infection and probably reflect background cardiac morbidity. Numerous LV and RV abnormalities are associated with adverse outcome in patients with Omicron.

We sought to divide COVID-19 patients into distinct phenotypical subgroups using echocardiography and clinical markers to elucidate the pathogenesis of the disease and its heterogeneous cardiac involvement. A total of 506 consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection underwent complete evaluation, including echocardiography, at admission. A k-prototypes algorithm applied to patients' clinical and imaging data at admission partitioned the patients into four phenotypical clusters: Clusters 0 and 1 were younger and healthier, 2 and 3 were older with worse cardiac indexes, and clusters 1 and 3 had a stronger inflammatory response. The clusters manifested very distinct survival patterns (C-index for the Cox proportional hazard model 0.77), with survival best for cluster 0, intermediate for 1-2 and worst for 3. Interestingly, cluster 1 showed a harsher disease course than cluster 2 but with similar survival. Clusters obtained with echocardiography were more predictive of mortality than clusters obtained without echocardiography. Additionally, several echocardiography variables (E' lat, E' sept, E/e average) showed high discriminative power among the clusters. The results suggested that older infected males have a higher chance to deteriorate than older infected females. In conclusion, COVID-19 manifests differently for distinctive clusters of patients. These clusters reflect different disease manifestations and prognoses. Although including echocardiography improved the predictive power, its marginal contribution over clustering using clinical parameters only does not justify the burden of echocardiography data collection.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Recently, several therapeutic agents have decreased the progression to critical disease in patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. However, their use is limited to patients with ≥1 clinical risk factor. We aimed to evaluate echocardiographic features that may aid in risk stratification for patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. METHODS:278 consecutive patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 underwent prospective clinical and echocardiographic examination, ≤7 days of symptoms, as part of a predefined protocol. Analysis to identify echocardiographic predictors of outcome was performed. RESULTS:In the multivariable risk model, E/e', TAPSE, and pulmonary acceleration time (PAT) were associated with the composite outcome (p = 0.01, 0.005, 0.05, respectively). Stepwise analyses showed that the addition of echocardiography on top of having ≥1 clinical risk factor and even using each parameter separately improved the prediction of outcomes. If patients were re-categorized as high risk only if having both ≥1 clinical and ≥ 1 echocardiography risk parameter (E/e' > 8, TAPSE<1.8 cm, PAT<90 msec), or even one echo parameter separately, then specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy improved. If patients were re-classified as high risk if having either ≥1 clinical risk factor or ≥ 1 high-risk echocardiography parameter, all five individuals who were missed by the ≥1 risk factor "rule", were correctly diagnosed as high risk. Similar analyses, including only patients with mild disease, showed that the addition of TAPSE improved the prediction of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with mild/moderate COVID-19, a very limited echocardiographic exam is sufficient for improved outcome prediction, and may improve resource allocation for new anti-COVID-19 agents. TRANSLATIONAL ASPECT OF THE WORK/UNASSIGNED:We show that among patients with mild/moderate COVID-19, several easily obtained echocardiographic findings are strongly correlated with mortality or progression to the need for invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation, even when adjusted for the presence or absence of ≥1 clinical risk factor. Furthermore, even a limited echocardiographic exam is sufficient to develop a strategy of risk stratification. We believe that our data have important implications for the clinicians involved in the acute treatment of patients with COVID-19.