Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:A minority of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) receive post-therapy survivorship surveillance at their oncology center (OC) within 5 years of diagnosis. Primary care providers (PCPs) could be a promising alternative. We determined CCS' preferences for the site of surveillance, associated factors, and rationale. METHODS:CCS diagnosed with cancer at < 21 years at one of four participating hospitals, 2-4 years post-therapy, and English- or Spanish-speaking (or their caregivers if CCS < 18 years) indicated their preference and reasons for site of survivorship surveillance (OC vs. PCP vs. no preference) at baseline prior to randomization into the BRIDGES trial (NCT05448560). Multivariable logistic regression models estimated prevalence ratios for site preference and examined associations with patient characteristics. Qualitative methods examined reasons for preference. RESULTS:Of 235 participants, 92% (n = 214; 48% female, 36% Hispanic, 46% public insurance, median age 12 years at enrollment) indicated their preference. The majority (63%) were amenable to PCP-based surveillance (21% preferred PCP, 42% no preference). Preference for OC was associated with identifying as non-Hispanic "other" (Black, Asian, multi-racial) vs. non-Hispanic White (PR 4.7, p = 0.005, 95% CI 1.68, 13.84) and older age (PR 1.1/year, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.01, 1.15), but not insurance or area-level social determinants of health (SDoH) indices. Reasons for preference comprised two themes: practical (facts, logistics) and psychological (emotions, beliefs). OCs were preferred for psychological reasons (46/60; 77%); PCPs were preferred for practical reasons (25/35; 74%). CONCLUSIONS:Among diverse CCS, most were amenable to PCP-based survivorship surveillance, independent of SDoH factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS/CONCLUSIONS:Survivorship surveillance by PCPs may be a useful alternative for CCS.

Longitudinal trajectories of Long COVID remain ill-defined, yet are critically needed to advance clinical trials, patient care, and public health initiatives for millions of individuals with this condition. Long COVID trajectories were determined prospectively among 3,659 participants (69% female; 99.6% Omicron era) in the National Institutes of Health Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Adult Cohort. Finite mixture modeling was used to identify distinct longitudinal profiles based on a Long COVID research index measured 3 to 15 months after infection. Eight longitudinal profiles were identified. Overall, 195 (5%) had persistently high Long COVID symptom burden, 443 (12%) had non-resolving, intermittently high symptom burden, and 526 (14%) did not meet criteria for Long COVID at 3 months but had increasing symptoms by 15 months, suggestive of distinct pathophysiologic features. At 3 months, 377 (10%) met the research index threshold for Long COVID. Of these, 175 (46%) had persistent Long COVID, 132 (35%) had moderate symptoms, and 70 (19%) appeared to recover. Identification of these Long COVID symptom trajectories is critically important for targeting enrollment for future studies of pathophysiologic mechanisms, preventive strategies, clinical trials and treatments.

BACKGROUND:This study evaluated the impact of aging on the frequency and prevalent symptoms of Long COVID, also termed post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2, using a previously developed Long COVID research index (LCRI) of 41 self-reported symptoms in which those with 12 or more points were classified as likely to have Long COVID. METHODS:We analyzed community-dwelling participants ≥ 60 years old (2662 with prior infection, 461 controls) compared to participants 18-59 years (7549 infected, 728 controls) in the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery adult (RECOVER-Adult) cohort ≥ 135 days post-onset. RESULTS:Compared to the Age 18-39 group, the adjusted odds of LCRI ≥ 12 were higher for the Age 40-49 group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.21-1.61, p < 0.001) and 50-59 group (OR = 1.31, CI = 1.14-1.51, p < 0.001), similar for the Age 60-69 group (OR = 1.09, CI = 0.93-1.27, p = 0.299), and lower for the ≥ 70 group (OR = 0.68, CI = 0.54-0.85, p < 0.001). Participants ≥ 70 years had smaller adjusted differences between infected and uninfected symptom prevalence rates than those aged 18-39 for the following symptoms: hearing loss, fatigue, pain (including joint, back, chest pain and headache), post-exertional malaise, sleep disturbance, hair loss, palpitations, and sexual desire/capacity, making these symptoms less discriminating for Long COVID in older adults than in younger. Symptom clustering, as described in Thaweethai et al. (JAMA 2023) also exhibited age-related shifts: clusters 1 (anosmia and ageusia) and 2 (gastrointestinal, chronic cough and palpitations, without anosmia, ageusia or brain fog) were more likely, and clusters 3 (brain fog, but no loss of smell or taste) and 4 (a mix of symptoms) less likely to be found in older adults (relative risk ratios for clusters 3-4 ranging from 0.10-0.34, p < 0.001 vs. 18-39 year-olds). CONCLUSIONS:Within the limits of this observational study, we conclude that in community-dwelling older adults, aging alters the prevalence and pattern of reported Long COVID.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Olfactory dysfunction is common after SARS-CoV-2 infection and has been associated with cognitive loss in other conditions. Formal testing is needed to characterize the presence, severity, and patterns of olfactory dysfunction. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To characterize long-term olfactory dysfunction after SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This prospective cohort study included adults enrolled in the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER)-Adult study. All those with and a random sample of those without self-reported change or loss in smell or taste were offered olfactory testing, performed at 83 sites in 35 US states and territories. Participants included 2956 enrollees with prior infection (1393 with and 1563 without self-reported change or loss) and 569 without prior infection (9 with and 560 without self-reported change or loss in taste) who underwent olfactory testing a mean (SD) of 671.6 (417.8) days after the index date. Data were collected from October 29, 2021, to June 6, 2025. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Olfactory function, as defined by age- and sex-standardized performance on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a well-validated test comprising 40 unique odors. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The study included 3525 participants with a mean (SD) age of 47.6 (15.2) years; of 3520 with data available, 2548 (72.4%) were female or intersex. Among 1393 infected participants with self-reported change or loss, 1111 (79.8%) had hyposmia on the UPSIT, including 321 (23.0%) with severe microsmia or anosmia. Among 1563 infected participants without self-reported change or loss, 1031 (66.0%) had hyposmia, including 128 (8.2%) with severe microsmia or anosmia. Participants with prior infection and self-reported change or loss scored at the 16th age- and sex-standardized UPSIT percentile, compared with the 23rd and 28th percentiles for those without self-reported change or loss with and without prior known infection, respectively. Younger women had scores corresponding to lower mean age- and sex-standardized percentiles. Among participants who self-reported change or loss in smell, those with abnormal UPSIT scores more often reported cognitive problems (742 of 1111 [66.8%]) than those with normal UPSIT scores (179 of 282 [63.5%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this cohort study of RECOVER-Adult participants, self-reported change or loss in smell or taste was an accurate signal of verified hyposmia, but a high rate of hyposmia among those with no reported change or loss was also observed. Formal smell testing may be considered in those with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection to diagnose occult hyposmia and counsel patients about risks.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to examine real-world dose titration patterns of semaglutide for weight management (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk A/S) in US adults and identify characteristics associated with early discontinuation. METHODS:We identified 15,811 commercially insured adults who started semaglutide for weight management (administrated through single-dose prefilled pens) between June 2021 and December 2023. We depicted dose-titration patterns over 5 months and identified factors associated with discontinuation using multivariable Cox regression. Sensitivity analyses examined patterns after supply shortage resolution (after October 2023). RESULTS:Most semaglutide users deviated from the recommended monthly dose-escalation schedule within the first 5 months. By the fifth month, nearly one-half (46%) had discontinued the treatment, with similar rates (48%) among those initiating after supply stabilization. Discontinuation was strongly associated with copayment amount, with rates increased from 41% in the lowest quintile ($1-$54 per month) to 51% in the highest quintile ($161-$1460 per month). Higher discontinuation rates were also associated with lower household income and education level. CONCLUSIONS:The deviations from the recommended dose-escalation schedule and high discontinuation rate among real-world semaglutide users indicate important challenges in the delivery of evidence-based care. Policy interventions that reduce financial barriers to the persistence of semaglutide are needed.

IMPORTANCE/OBJECTIVE:Patients with poor glycaemic control have a high risk for major cardiovascular events. Improving glycaemic monitoring in patients with diabetes can improve morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE:To assess the effectiveness of a patient portal message in prompting patients with poorly controlled diabetes without a recent glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) result to have their HbA1c repeated. DESIGN/METHODS:A pragmatic, randomised clinical trial. SETTING/METHODS:A large academic health system consisting of over 350 ambulatory practices. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Patients who had an HbA1c greater than 10% who had not had a repeat HbA1c in the prior 6 months. EXPOSURES/METHODS:A single electronic health record (EHR)-based patient portal message to prompt patients to have a repeat HbA1c test versus usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES/RESULTS:The primary outcome was a follow-up HbA1c test result within 90 days of randomisation. RESULTS:The study included 2573 patients with a mean (SD) HbA1c of 11.2%. Among 1317 patients in the intervention group, 24.2% had follow-up HbA1c tests completed within 90 days, versus 21.1% of 1256 patients in the control group (p=0.07). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to log into the patient portal within 60 days as compared with the control group (61.2% vs 52.3%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with poorly controlled diabetes and no recent HbA1c result, a brief patient portal message did not significantly increase follow-up testing but did increase patient engagement with the patient portal. Automated patient messages could be considered as a part of multipronged efforts to involve patients in their diabetes care.

Previous studies have demonstrated that text message reminders can improve pediatric vaccination rates, including low income & diverse settings such as those served by federally qualified health centers. In this study, we aimed to improve compliance with routine childhood immunizations via a text message intervention in a network of urban, federally qualified health centers at a large academic medical center. We targeted parents or guardians of children aged 0-2 years who were overdue or due within 14 days for at least one routine childhood immunization without a scheduled appointment. In Round 1, two versions of a text were compared to a control (no text). In subsequent Rounds, a new text was compared to a control (no text). In each round the content, wording, and frequency of texts changed. Subjects were randomized to receive a text (treatment group(s)) or to not receive a text (control group) in each round between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was whether overdue vaccines had been given by 12 week follow up. The secondary outcome was appointment scheduling within the 72 hours after text messages were sent. In Round 1 (n=1203) no significant differences were found between groups in overdue vaccine administration per group or per patient at follow up, or in appointment scheduling. In Round 2 (n=251) there was no significant difference in vaccine administration per group or per patient. However, significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment (9.1% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01). In Round 3 (n=1034), vaccine administration was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control overall (7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016) and per subject (p=0.02). Significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment compared to the control (3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02). We found that text messaging can be an effective intervention to promote health service utilization such as pediatric vaccination rates, which although improved in this study, remain low.

BACKGROUND:Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) may occur after infection. How often people develop ME/CFS after SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. OBJECTIVE:To determine the incidence and prevalence of post-COVID-19 ME/CFS among adults enrolled in the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER-Adult) study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:RECOVER-Adult is a longitudinal observational cohort study conducted across the U.S. We included participants who had a study visit at least 6 months after infection and had no pre-existing ME/CFS, grouped as (1) acute infected, enrolled within 30 days of infection or enrolled as uninfected who became infected (n=4515); (2) post-acute infected, enrolled greater than 30 days after infection (n=7270); and (3) uninfected (1439). MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Incidence rate and prevalence of post-COVID-19 ME/CFS based on the 2015 Institute of Medicine ME/CFS clinical diagnostic criteria. RESULTS:The incidence rate of ME/CFS in participants followed from time of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 2.66 (95% CI 2.63-2.70) per 100 person-years while the rate in matched uninfected participants was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-10.95) per 100 person-years: a hazard ratio of 4.93 (95% CI 3.62-6.71). The proportion of all RECOVER-Adult participants that met criteria for ME/CFS following SARS-CoV-2 infection was 4.5% (531 of 11,785) compared to 0.6% (9 of 1439) in uninfected participants. Post-exertional malaise was the most common ME/CFS symptom in infected participants (24.0%, 2830 of 11,785). Most participants with post-COVID-19 ME/CFS also met RECOVER criteria for long COVID (88.7%, 471 of 531). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The ME/CFS clinical diagnostic criteria uses self-reported symptoms. Symptoms can wax and wane. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ME/CFS is a diagnosable sequela that develops at an increased rate following SARS-CoV-2 infection. RECOVER provides an unprecedented opportunity to study post-COVID-19 ME/CFS.