Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:We report results from two clinical trials of the cyclic dinucleotide stimulator of IFN genes (STING) agonist ulevostinag. PATIENTS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:In a phase I study (NCT03010176) with an accelerated titration design/modified toxicity probability interval method, participants with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas received intratumoral ulevostinag (±intravenous pembrolizumab). In an expansion phase, participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or triple-negative breast cancer received the combination. Primary objectives were safety/tolerability and identifying the recommended phase II dose; biomarkers were exploratory. In a randomized phase II study (NCT04220866), participants with untreated metastatic or unresectable, recurrent HNSCC received intravenous pembrolizumab (±ulevostinag 540 µg). The primary objective was antitumor activity. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered every 3 weeks in both studies. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:In the phase I study (NCT03010176; N = 156), the most common adverse event was pyrexia (70%). Plasma ulevostinag concentrations increased dose-dependently. Circulating levels of C-X-C motif chemokine 10, IFNγ, and IL-6 showed elevation at 2 to 4 hours, peak at 6 to 8 hours, and plateau/partial resolution at 24 hours but, beyond the 540 µg dose, did not show a clear dose-effect relationship. Ten participants experienced dose-limiting toxicities; the recommended phase II dose for intratumoral ulevostinag was 540 µg. In the phase II study (NCT04220866), 4 of 8 participants treated with combination therapy and 1 of 10 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy had a complete or partial response. The most common adverse event was pyrexia (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Intratumoral ulevostinag (±pembrolizumab) had manageable toxicity, dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, and evidence of STING activation and target engagement. Combination therapy showed antitumor activity in participants with untreated metastatic or unresectable, recurrent HNSCC.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Sarcoma encompasses a diverse group of cancers that are typically resistant to current therapies, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The contexture of sarcomas limits generation of high-quality data using cutting-edge molecular profiling methods, such as single-cell RNA-sequencing, thus hampering progress in understanding these understudied cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Here, we demonstrate feasibility of producing multimodal single-cell genomics and whole-genome sequencing data from frozen tissues, profiling 75,716 cell transcriptomes of five undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and three intimal sarcoma samples, including paired specimens from two patients treated with ICB. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We find that genomic diversity decreases in patients with response to ICB, and, in unbiased analyses, identify cancer cell programs associated with therapy resistance. Although interactions of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes within the tumor ecosystem increase in ICB responders, clonal expansion of CD8+ T cells alone was insufficient to predict drug responses. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This study provides a framework for studying rare tumors and identifies salient and treatment-associated cancer cell intrinsic and tumor microenvironmental features in sarcomas.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase Ib study was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of unesbulin plus dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:intravenously (IV) once every 21 days. The time-to-event continual reassessment method was used to determine the RP2D on the basis of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) assessed during the first two 21-day treatment cycles. All explored doses of unesbulin (200 mg up to 400 mg) were in combination with DTIC. An expansion cohort was enrolled to evaluate the safety and efficacy of unesbulin at the RP2D. RESULTS:IV once every 21 days was identified as the RP2D. On the basis of data from 27 subjects who were deemed DLT-evaluable, toxicity was higher in the unesbulin 400 mg group, with three of four subjects (75%) experiencing DLTs versus one of four subjects (25%) in the 200 mg group and three of 19 subjects (15.8%) in the 300 mg group. The most commonly reported DLTs and treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. At the RP2D, seven subjects who were efficacy evaluable achieved partial response for an objective response rate of 24.1%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:once every 21 days was identified as the RP2D, demonstrating a favorable benefit-risk profile in a heavily pretreated population of adults with advanced LMS.

BACKGROUND:COVID-19 can have a particularly detrimental effect on patients with cancer, but no studies to date have examined if the presence, or site, of metastatic cancer is related to COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS:, admitted to an intensive care unit, received mechanical ventilation, or died from any cause. The authors used ordinal logistic regression models to compare COVID-19 severity by presence and specific site of metastatic cancer. They used logistic regression models to assess 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS:Compared to patients without metastasis, patients with metastases have increased hospitalization rates (59% vs. 49%) and higher 30 day mortality (18% vs. 9%). Patients with metastasis to bone, lung, liver, lymph nodes, and brain have significantly higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 1.38, 1.59, 1.38, 1.00, and 2.21) compared to patients without metastases at those sites. Patients with metastasis to the lung have significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00) when adjusting for COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with metastatic cancer, especially with metastasis to the brain, are more likely to have severe outcomes after COVID-19 whereas patients with metastasis to the lung, compared to patients with cancer metastasis to other sites, have the highest 30-day mortality after COVID-19.

Unesbulin is being investigated in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) as a potential therapeutic agent in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS). This paper reports the pharmacokinetics (PK) of unesbulin, DTIC, and its unreactive surrogate metabolite 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC) in 29 patients with advanced LMS. Drug interactions between DTIC (and AIC) and unesbulin were evaluated. DTIC (1000 mg/m² ) was administered to patients with LMS via 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every 21-day (q21d) cycle. Unesbulin dispersible tablets were administered orally twice weekly (BIW), starting on Day 2 of every cycle, except for Cycle 2 (C2), where unesbulin was dosed either on Day 1 together with DTIC or on Day 2, 1 day after DTIC administration. The PK of DTIC, AIC, and unesbulin in Cycle 1 (C1) and C2 were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. DTIC and AIC were measurable immediately after the start of infusion and reached C_max immediately or shortly after end of infusion at 1.0 and 1.4 hours (T_max ), respectively. Coadministration of unesbulin orally at 200 mg or above with DTIC inhibited cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2-mediated DTIC metabolism, resulting in 66.7% reduction of AIC exposures. Such inhibition could be mitigated when unesbulin was dosed the day following DTIC infusion. Repeated unesbulin dosing demonstrated evidence of clinical CYP1A2 induction and increased AIC C_max by 69.4% and AUC_inf by 57.9%. No meaningful difference in unesbulin PK was observed between C2 and C1. The combination therapy of 1000 mg/m² IV DTIC q21d and 300 mg unesbulin BIW in a staggered regimen is well tolerated in patients with LMS.

PURPOSE:Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with frequent metastatic relapse after curative surgery. Chemotherapy provides limited benefit for advanced disease. Multiomics profiling studies have identified homologous recombination deficiency in uLMS. In preclinical studies where olaparib and temozolomide provided modest activity, the combination was highly effective for inhibiting uLMS tumor growth. PATIENTS AND METHODS:orally once daily with olaparib 200 mg orally twice a day both on days 1-7 in 21-day cycles. The primary end point was the best objective response rate (ORR) within 6 months. A one-stage binomial design was used. If ≥5 of 22 responded, the treatment would be considered promising (93% power; α = .06). All patients underwent paired biopsies that were evaluated with whole-exome sequencing (WES)/RNAseq and a RAD51 foci formation assay. RESULTS:= .05) by RAD51. CONCLUSION:Olaparib and temozolomide met the prespecified primary end point and provided meaningful clinical benefit in patients with advanced, pretreated uLMS.

PURPOSE:To evaluate sitravatinib, an inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), for the treatment of well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WD/DD LPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS:This multicenter, open-label, Phase II trial enrolled patients with advanced WD/DD LPS who had received at least one prior systemic regimen and had progression within 12 weeks of enrollment. Patients received sitravatinib 150 mg (later amended to 120 mg) orally daily. A Simon two-stage design was used to evaluate for an improvement in the primary endpoint, progression-free rate at 12 weeks (PFR12), from 20% to 40%. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity and safety. A subset of patients underwent paired biopsies analyzed using reverse-phase protein array. RESULTS:Twenty-nine patients enrolled. Median age was 62 years and 31% had received 3 or more prior lines. Most patients (93%) had DDLPS or mixed WD/DD LPS. Overall, 12 of 29 patients (41%) were alive and progression-free at 12 weeks and the study met the primary endpoint. There were no confirmed responses. Median progression-free survival was 11.7 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.9-35.9] and median overall survival was 31.7 weeks (95% CI: 18.1-90.1). The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (59%), hypertension (52%), hoarseness (41%), mucositis (31%), and nausea (31%). Baseline expression of phospho-RTKs was not significantly different between patients with and without clinical benefit from sitravatinib, but the number of samples was small. CONCLUSIONS:Sitravatinib provided a PFR12 of 41% and meaningful disease control in a subset of patients with advanced, progressive WD/DD LPS.

Leiomyosarcoma is an aggressive mesenchymal malignancy and represents one of the most common subtypes of soft tissue sarcomas. It is characterized by significant disease heterogeneity with variable sites of origin and diverse genomic profiles. As a result, the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma is challenging. First-line therapy for metastatic and/or unresectable leiomyosarcoma includes anthracycline or gemcitabine based regimens, which provide a median progression-free survival time of about 5 months and overall survival time between 14-16 months. Effective later-line therapies are limited. Molecular profiling has enhanced our knowledge of the pathophysiology driving leiomyosarcoma, providing potential targets for treatment. In this review, we explore recent advances in our understanding of leiomyosarcoma tumor biology and implications for novel therapeutics. We describe the development of clinical trials based on such findings and discuss available published results. To date, the most promising approaches for advanced leiomyosarcoma include targeting DNA damage repair pathways and aberrant metabolism associated with oncogenesis, as well as novel chemotherapy combinations. This review highlights the recent progress made in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma. Ongoing progress is contingent upon further development of clinical trials based on molecular findings, with careful consideration for clinical trial design, strong academic collaborations, and prospective correlative analyses.

A 52-year-old man came to the cardiac surgery clinic for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) evaluation. He had initially appeared at an outside hospital 1 year earlier, with chest pain and shortness of breath. He had no known chronic conditions. A CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) at that time showed a filling defect at the bifurcation of the main pulmonary artery. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed mild mitral valve regurgitation, but otherwise the results were normal. As he was hemodynamically stable and not hypoxemic, he was treated solely by anticoagulation. Despite adhering to prescribed apixaban, he developed progressive dyspnea and reduced exercise tolerance over the subsequent year. A repeat CTPA performed 12 months after the initial presentation showed a persistent filling defect at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation, with a new extension now completely occluding the right main pulmonary artery. A pulmonary angiogram confirmed this complete occlusion, and right heart catheterization revealed precapillary pulmonary hypertension, with a mean pulmonary artery pressure of 50 mm Hg. His anticoagulation was transitioned to enoxaparin for presumed apixaban treatment failure, and an investigation for hypercoagulable conditions was initiated. His lupus anticoagulant test result was positive, but he did not meet the criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome because he was negative for anticardiolipin and β₂-glycoprotein antibodies. Assays for antithrombin III, protein C, prothrombin gene, and factor V Leiden mutations produced normal results.