Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent complication of SLE, occurring in up to 60% of adult patients and ultimately progressing from acute inflammation to chronicity with fibrosis and end-stage kidney failure in 10%-30% of patients. Racial/ethnic minority patients with lupus have worse long-term outcomes, including progression to end-stage renal disease and overall mortality. A major challenge in the management of patients with SLE is delayed identification of early kidney disease, which ultimately leads to a greater burden on both patients and the health system. METHODS AND ANALYSIS/METHODS:Using a mixed methods approach, this study will develop, adapt and evaluate a home urine sampling protocol with a text-messaging reminder and data capture system for patients at elevated risk of de novo LN or relapse. First, a feasibility pilot using a single-group trial design (n=18) will be implemented, with a feasibility assessment and qualitative, debriefing interviews with patients to further refine the intervention. The second phase is a comparative effectiveness trial of the intervention (n=160) with the primary outcome of biopsy eligibility, that is, the participant has a clinical indication for a kidney biopsy (urine protein-creatinine ratio≥0.5), whether or not the patient actually undergoes the biopsy procedure. The randomised trial includes an economic evaluation of the adapted home urinalysis protocol. DISCUSSION AND DISSEMINATION/CONCLUSIONS:It is unknown whether weekly home-based urine sampling can identify proteinuria sooner than standard care; if found sooner, kidney problems could be diagnosed earlier, hopefully leading to earlier care for less-involved disease and subsequent reduced morbidity. The data collected in this trial will inform future feasibility and effectiveness of text-messaging-based home urine sampling interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/BACKGROUND:The randomised trial will be registered with ClincialTrials.gov prior to enrolment start.

OBJECTIVE:Autoantibodies are a hallmark of lupus nephritis (LN), but their association with LN classes and treatment response are not adequately known. In this study, we quantified circulating autoantibodies in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership LN longitudinal cohort to identify serological biomarkers of LN histologic classification and treatment response and how these biomarkers change over time based on treatment response. METHODS:Peripheral blood samples were collected from 279 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergoing diagnostic kidney biopsy based on proteinuria. Of these, 268 were diagnosed with LN. Thirteen autoantibody specificities were measured by bead-based assays (Bio-Rad Bioplex 2200) and anti-C1q by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the time of biopsy (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after biopsy. Clinical response was determined at 12 months. RESULTS:Proliferative LN (International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society class III/IV±V, n = 160) was associated with higher concentrations of anti-C1q, anti-chromatin, anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies compared to nonproliferative LN (classes I/II/V/VI, n = 108). Anti-C1q and-dsDNA were independently associated with proliferative LN. In proliferative LN, higher baseline anti-C1q levels predicted complete response (area under the curve [AUC] 0.72; P = 0.002) better than baseline proteinuria (AUC 0.59; P = 0.21). Furthermore, all autoantibody levels except for anti-La/SSB decreased over 12 months in patients with proliferative, but not membranous, LN with a complete response. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Baseline levels of anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA may serve as noninvasive biomarkers of proliferative LN, and anti-C1q may predict complete response at the time of kidney biopsy. In addition, tracking autoantibodies over time may provide further insights into treatment response and pathogenic mechanisms in patients with proliferative LN.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to validate claims-based algorithms for identifying SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) in Medicare data, enhancing the use of the Lupus Index for geospatial research on SLE prevalence and outcomes. METHODS:We retrospectively evaluated the performance of rule-based algorithms using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify SLE and LN in a well-defined prospective longitudinal cohort of patients with and without SLE from a South Carolina registry and rheumatology outpatient clinics. The analysis included comparison of algorithms based on Medicare fee-for-service claims data to these rigorously phenotyped populations. The primary classification for SLE cases was based on the American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics criteria for SLE and LN. Algorithms were based on the number of ICD-10 codes with and without a 30-day separation in the observation period, including all of 2016-2018. RESULTS:The algorithm using two ICD-10 codes for SLE, with or without a 30-day separation, showed the best overall performance. For LN, specific ICD-10 codes outperformed combinations of SLE and renal/proteinuria codes that were found in ICD-9. CONCLUSIONS:The findings of this study highlight the performance of specific ICD-10 code algorithms in identifying SLE and LN cases within Medicare data, providing a valuable tool for informing use of the Lupus Index. This index allows for improved geographical targeting of clinical resources, health disparity studies and clinical trial site selection. The study underscores the importance of algorithm selection based on research objectives, recommending more specific algorithms for precise tasks like clinical trial site identification and less specific ones for broader applications such as health disparities research.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are an emerging class of medications with demonstrated promise in improving cardiometabolic outcomes. Whether these drugs may be useful in mitigating the cardiac risk associated with SLE remains unknown, and a recent case of drug induced lupus secondary to GLP1-RA use calls the safety of GLP1-RAs in SLE patients into question. Accordingly, this retrospective analysis was initiated to evaluate outcomes of GLP1-RAs in SLE. METHODS:All patients in the NYU Lupus Cohort who had used a GLP1-RA were eligible for inclusion. Patient characteristics were assessed at baseline (most recent rheumatology visit prior to starting GLP1-RA), 1-4 months, and 6-10 months after GLP1-RA initiation. RESULTS:Of the 1211 patients in the cohort, only 24 had received a GLP1-RA. Six were excluded due to insufficient documentation regarding duration of medication use. Of the remaining 18 (median age 50), 17 (94%) were female and 9 (50%) were white. There was one mild-to-moderate flare at 6-10 months, but no patients accumulated new SLE criteria during the follow up period. Compared with baseline, median BMI was reduced by 3% at 1-4 months (p= 0.002) and 13% at 6-10 months (p= 0.001). Nine (50%) patients were initially denied insurance coverage for a GLP1-RA. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While limited by a small sample size, this descriptive study showed that GLP1-RAs did not trigger flares above expected background rates and were associated with significantly decreased BMI. Future studies exploring the potential benefits of GLP1-RAs in patients with SLE are warranted.

BACKGROUND:The Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program (MLSP), a population-based retrospective registry of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), was used to investigate the prevalence of cardiovascular disease events (CVE) and compare rates among sex, age and race/ethnicity to population-based controls. METHODS:Patients with prevalent SLE in 2007 aged ≥ 20 years in the MLSP were included. CVE required documentation of a myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident. We calculated crude risk ratios and adjusted risk ratios (ARR) controlling for sex, age group, race and ethnicity, and years since diagnosis. Data from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the 2013-2014 NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES) were used to calculate expected CVE prevalence by multiplying NHANES and NYC HANES estimates by strata-specific counts of patients with SLE. Crude prevalence ratios (PRs) using national and NYC estimates and age standardized prevalence ratios (ASPRs) using national estimates were calculated. RESULTS:CVE occurred in 13.9% of 1,285 MLSP patients with SLE, and risk was increased among men (ARR:1.7, 95%CI:1.2-2.5) and older adults (age > 60 ARR:2.5, 95%CI:1.7-3.8). Compared with non-Hispanic Asian patients, CVE risk was elevated among Hispanic/Latino (ARR:3.1, 95%CI:1.4-7.0) and non-Hispanic Black (ARR:3.5, 95%CI1.6-7.9) patients as well as those identified as non-Hispanic and in another or multiple racial groups (ARR:4.2, 95%CI:1.1-15.8). Overall, CVE prevalence was higher among patients with SLE than nationally (ASPR:3.1, 95%CI:3.0-3.1) but did not differ by sex. Compared with national race and ethnicity-stratified estimates, CVE among patients with SLE was highest among Hispanics/Latinos (ASPR:4.3, 95%CI:4.2-4.4). CVE was also elevated among SLE registry patients compared with all NYC residents. Comparisons with age-stratified national estimates revealed PRs of 6.4 (95%CI:6.2-6.5) among patients aged 20-49 years and 2.2 (95%CI:2.1-2.2) among those ≥ 50 years. Male (11.3, 95%CI:10.5-12.1), Hispanic/Latino (10.9, 95%CI:10.5-11.4) and non-Hispanic Black (6.2, 95%CI:6.0-6.4) SLE patients aged 20-49 had the highest CVE prevalence ratios. CONCLUSIONS:These population-based estimates of CVE in a diverse registry of patients with SLE revealed increased rates among younger male, Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic Black patients. These findings reinforce the need to appropriately screen for CVD among all SLE patients but particularly among these high-risk patients.

The authors investigated the impact of antiplatelet therapy on the megakaryocyte (MK) and platelet transcriptome. RNA-sequencing was performed on MKs treated with aspirin or P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, platelets from healthy volunteers receiving aspirin or P2Y₁₂ inhibition, and platelets from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). P2Y₁₂ inhibition reduced gene expression and inflammatory pathways in MKs and platelets. In SLE, the interferon (IFN) pathway was elevated. In vitro experiments demonstrated the role of P2Y₁₂ inhibition in reducing IFNα-induced platelet-leukocyte interactions and IFN signaling pathways. These results suggest that P2Y₁₂ inhibition may have therapeutic potential for proinflammatory and autoimmune conditions like SLE.

OBJECTIVE:Given fibromyalgia (FM) frequently co-occurs with autoimmune disease, this study was initiated to objectively evaluate FM in a multiracial/ethnic cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS:Patients with SLE were screened for FM using the 2016 FM classification criteria during an in-person rheumatologist visit. We evaluated hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores, SLE classification criteria, and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index. We compared patients with and without FM and if differences were present, compared patients with FM with patients with non-FM related chronic pain. RESULTS:316 patients with SLE completed the FM questionnaire. 55 (17.4%) met criteria for FM. The racial composition of patients with FM differed from those without FM (P = 0.023), driven by fewer Asian patients having FM. There was no difference in SLE disease duration, SELENA-SLEDAI score, or active serologies. There was more active arthritis in the FM group (16.4%) versus the non-FM group (1.9%) (P < 0.001). The Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Score did not correlate with degree of SLE activity (r = -0.016; 0.107) among patients with FM or non-FM chronic pain (r = 0.009; -0.024). Regarding criteria, patients with FM had less nephritis and more malar rash. Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Except for arthritis, patients with SLE with FM are not otherwise clinically or serologically distinguishable from those without FM, and Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Score indices do not correlate with SLEDAI. These observations support the importance of further understanding the underlying biology of FM in SLE.

OBJECTIVE:Lupus nephritis (LN) can occur as an isolated component of disease activity or be accompanied by diverse extrarenal manifestations. Whether isolated renal disease is sufficient to decrease health related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unknown. This study compared Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item (PROMIS-29) scores in LN patients with isolated renal disease to those with extrarenal symptoms to evaluate the burden of LN on HRQOL and inform future LN clinical trials incorporating HRQOL outcomes. METHODS:A total of 181 LN patients consecutively enrolled in the multicentre multi-ethnic/racial Accelerating Medicines Partnership completed PROMIS-29 questionnaires at the time of a clinically indicated renal biopsy. Raw PROMIS-29 scores were converted to standardized T scores. RESULTS:Seventy-five (41%) patients had extrarenal disease (mean age 34, 85% female) and 106 (59%) had isolated renal (mean age 36, 82% female). Rash (45%), arthritis (40%) and alopecia (40%) were the most common extrarenal manifestations. Compared with isolated renal, patients with extrarenal disease reported significantly worse pain interference, ability to participate in social roles, physical function, and fatigue. Patients with extrarenal disease had PROMIS-29 scores that significantly differed from the general population by > 0.5 SD of the reference mean in pain interference, physical function, and fatigue. Arthritis was most strongly associated with worse scores in these three domains. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Most patients had isolated renal disease and extrarenal manifestations associated with worse HRQOL. These data highlight the importance of comprehensive disease management strategies that address both renal and extrarenal manifestations to improve overall patient outcomes.