Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This prospective, non-randomized phase II single-arm pilot trial aimed to explore favorable mid-treatment nodal response (FMNR) through CT imaging to guide de-escalated chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with favorable risk, node-positive HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:. At week 4, CT imaging evaluated nodal response: ≥40% reduction warranted de-escalation to 60 Gy, while <40% reduction continued standard CRT. Primary endpoint was 2-year PFS from initiation of dose de-escalated CRT. Tissue tumor modified viral (TTMV) HPV DNA samples and DW-MRI were collected at baseline and week 4. MDADI questionnaires were collected at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS:Of 39 patients, 26 had FMNR and underwent de-escalated treatment. 13 pts had slow mid-treatment nodal shrinkage and received standard dose. At a median follow-up of 47.4 months, the 2-year PFS was 92.1% (95% CI: 0.72-0.98) for the deescalated dose group and 92.3% for the standard dose patients (95% CI: 0.57-0.99), p=0.96. With a median survival follow up of 48.9 months (range: 16.7-77.8 months), there were no deaths or distant failures. FMNR was associated with rapid TTMV HPV DNA clearance, reduced TTMV HPV DNA flare, lower baseline and week 4 MRI diffusivity, and higher baseline and week 4 MRI diffusional kurtosis. No differences in acute or late maximum grade 3-4 toxicity by patient were noted. MDADI composite scores showed minimal clinical important difference (MCID) in the de-escalated group at 1-month post-treatment while the standard group had MCID up to 1-year post-treatment. No patients required feeding tube placement. CONCLUSIONS:De-escalated CRT using CT-based mid-treatment nodal response in favorable risk, node-positive HPV-associated OPC achieved excellent 2-year PFS and OS rates and represents a potential approach in better selecting patients for treatment de-escalation.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure in Otolaryngology and can be performed in different settings. We evaluate patient characteristics and cost efficacy of tracheostomy at the bedside versus operating room (OR). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective chart review was performed for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent tracheostomy from 2020 to 2023. Data and cost of procedures were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:One hundred and sixty-five patients were included. One hundred and thirty-four (81.2%) patients underwent bedside tracheostomy. Age, sex, and BMI were not significantly different. Average time from consult to procedure and operative time was significantly shorter (p = 0.03; 0.008). There were no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), or overall LOS. Tracheostomy at the bedside offered a 73.1% cost reduction compared with performed in the OR. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Advantages of bedside tracheostomy include decreased operative time, time from consult to procedure, and cost reduction for the hospital system. We advocate for consideration of bedside tracheostomy when appropriate.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate whether a new preoperative education and discharge planning protocol reduced unexpected discharge delays for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer. METHODS:A quality improvement (QI) intervention was implemented in January 2021 with several components to address historically prolonged observed lengths of stay (LOS) with head and neck cancer patients. The intervention added a preoperative educational visit with a head and neck cancer advanced practice provider, a standardized preoperative speech and swallow assessment, a personalized patient care plan document, discussion of inpatient hospital stay expectations, and early discharge planning. The intervention group included patients who underwent the preoperative education protocol from February to December 2021. For comparison, an age and sex-matched control group was constructed from inpatients who had been admitted for similar procedures in the 2 years prior to the QI intervention (2019-2020) and received standard of care counseling. RESULTS:Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in observed to expected LOS ratio after implementation of the intervention (1.24 ± 0.74 control, 0.95 ± 0.52 intervention; P = .012). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:We discuss a preoperative education QI intervention at our institution. Our findings demonstrate that our intervention was associated with decreased LOS for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE/CONCLUSIONS:This QI study shows the benefit of a new standardized preoperative education and discharge planning protocol for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) often experience high symptom burden leading to lower quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:This study aims to conceptually model optimal cutpoint by examining where total number of patient-reported symptoms exceeds patients' coping capacity, leading to a decline in QoL in patients with HNC. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Secondary data analysis of 105 individuals with HNC enrolled in a clinical usefulness study of the NYU Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA)©, a digital patient-reported symptom measure. Patients completed ePVA and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC©) QLQ-C30 v3.0. The total number of patient-reported symptoms was the sum of symptoms as identified by the ePVA questionnaire. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to define optimal cutpoint. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:<.0001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In HNC, defining optimal cutpoints in the total number of patient-reported symptoms is feasible. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE/UNASSIGNED:Cutpoints in the total number of patient-reported symptoms may identify patients experiencing a high symptom burden from HNC. FOUNDATIONAL/UNASSIGNED:Using optimal cutpoints of the total number of patient-reported symptoms may help effectively align clinical resources with patients' symptom burden.

UNLABELLED:Management of Enlarging tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) with Voice Prosthesis in Laryngectomized Head and Neck Cancer Patients. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:An enlarging TEF following voice prosthesis placement impacts patient quality of life, risks airway compromise, and can lead to aspiration pneumonia. Pharyngoesophageal strictures have previously been reported to be associated with TEF enlargement and leakage. We describe a series of patients with enlarging TEFs after Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for voice prosthesis who required pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. METHODS:Retrospective case series of laryngectomized H&N cancer patients with primary or secondary TEP who underwent surgical management for enlarging TEF site between 6/2016-11/2022. RESULTS:Eight patients were included. The mean age was 62.8 years old. Seven patients had a history of hypothyroidism. Of seven with prior H&N radiation history, two had both historical and adjuvant radiation. Two of the eight TEPs were placed secondarily. Mean time from TEP to enlarging TEF diagnosis was 891.3 days. Radial forearm-free flaps were used in five patients. Six had stenosis proximal to the TEF whereas one had distal stenosis and one had no evidence of stenosis. Mean length of stay was 12.3 days. Mean follow-up was 400.4 days. Two required a second free flap for persistent fistula. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Surgical reconstruction of enlarging TEFs due to TEP/VP placement is effective in combination with addressing underlying pharyngeal/esophageal stenosis contributing to TEF enlargement and leakage. Radial forearm-free flaps have the additional benefit of a long vascular pedicle to access more distant and less-irradiated recipient vessels. Many fistulae are resolved after the first flap reconstruction, but some may require subsequent reconstruction in case of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV Laryngoscope, 2023.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Lacrimal gland cancer is a rare malignancy with little data known about its pathologic characteristics or optimal management. We performed a large database analysis using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to elucidate this unusual condition. METHODS:Patients with lacrimal gland cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Using available clinical data, we excluded all patients with histologies likely reflective of lacrimal sac or duct cancer, which are coded similarly to lacrimal gland cancer in the NCDB. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards models were used to indicate covariates associated with survival. RESULTS:A total of 440 cases of lacrimal gland cancer were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 52.9 months. The five-year OS for the entire cohort was 65.0%. Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the predominant histology (47.3%). Cox models showed that improved OS was associated with surgical resection (UVA: p < 0.001; MVA: p = 0.035). A detriment in OS was associated with increasing age, Charlson-Deyo score of 1, T4 stage, and positive margins and on UVA for adenocarcinoma and malignant mixed tumor histology. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Adenoid cystic carcinoma comprises the plurality of lacrimal gland cancers. About half of patients with lacrimal gland carcinoma will live beyond 10 years, underscoring the importance of reduced morbidity of treatment. Surgical management is associated with improved prognosis. Further study will elucidate the role of surgical excision and radiotherapy in lacrimal gland cancer.

OBJECTIVE:To compare treatment outcomes for T4b head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Historical cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS:Identified all T4b ACC of head and neck origin diagnosed 2004 to 2019 in the NCDB. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and survival were analyzed. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS:We identified 606 cases of T4b ACC. Less than half (284, 47.0%) underwent curative-intent treatment. Among these, most were treated with primary surgery: surgery + radiotherapy (RT) (122, 43.0%) or surgery + chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (42, 14.8%). The positive margin rate was 78.7%, and 90-day postoperative mortality was zero. Nonsurgical patients were treated with definitive RT (60, 21.1%) or definitive CRT (60, 21.1%). The median follow-up was 51.5 months. Overall survival was 77.8% at 3 years. Three-year survival was higher for patients treated with surgery compared to those treated nonsurgically (84% vs 70%; p = .005). Surgical treatment remained associated with higher survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, p = .005). This effect was most pronounced for oral cavity tumors (HR: 0.17, p = .01). Among matched cohorts of surgically treated patients, there was no difference in 3-year survival between clinical T4a and T4b tumors (83.3% vs 83.0%, p = .99). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Long-term survival for T4b ACC of the head and neck could be expected. Primary surgical treatments can be performed safely and are associated with longer survival. A carefully selected subset of patients with very advanced ACC might benefit from the consideration of surgical treatments.

BACKGROUND:There are several options for primary surgical treatment of early-stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), including transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of TORS to open partial laryngectomy and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). METHODS:Patients with clinical classification T1-2 supraglottic SCC diagnosed 2010-2019, treated with TORS, open partial laryngectomy, or TLM in the National Cancer Database were selected. RESULTS:One thousand six hundred three patients were included: 17% TORS, 26.5% TLM, 56.5% open. TORS patients had the lowest rates of adjuvant treatment (28.4% vs. TLM: 45.0%, open: 38.5%, p < 0.001), and lower positive margin rates than TLM (16.9% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001). Thirty-day and ninety-day post-operative mortality did not differ between the approaches. Five-year survival was higher following TORS compared to open surgery (77.8% vs. 66.1%, p = 0.01); this difference persisted following matched-pair analysis. CONCLUSIONS:TORS may be a safe and effective surgical approach for early-stage supraglottic SCC in appropriate patients.