Faculty Bibliography

When a suspected viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) case presents to a healthcare facility, healthcare personnel must be able to safely provide initial stabilizing care, which may involve performing basic routine laboratory testing. Current gaps exist in the ability of frontline acute care hospitals to safely perform routine laboratory tests on patients with suspected VHFs that generate category A waste. This review outlines a potential solution for frontline acute care hospitals to perform electrolytes, hemoglobin/hematocrit, and malaria testing, in accordance with National Special Pathogens System guidelines, in the patient's isolation room. We discuss guidance on laboratory risk assessment, equipment considerations, space requirements, staffing solutions, waste management, cost estimates, and remaining challenges. Our manuscript provides frontline acute care hospitals with a potential solution to safely provide a minimum set of routine laboratory tests for patients with suspected VHF.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Patients with a suspected high-consequence infectious disease (HCID), such as Ebola virus disease, may require routine laboratory testing to guide management. We assessed the capabilities of frontline hospitals and the barriers they face performing laboratory testing for patients with a suspected HCID. METHODS:A one-time confidential REDCap survey querying capabilities to safely perform laboratory tests that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers critical for patients with a suspected HCID was sent to 95 institutions in Baltimore, MD, Boston, MA, New York City, NY, and Washington, DC, from January to May 2025. RESULTS:Fifty (53%) institutions responded, mostly teaching hospitals (96%), with 24% reporting prior experience evaluating a patient with suspected Ebola virus disease. While many hospitals could perform on-site blood gas (70%), hemoglobin/hematocrit (68%), and lactate (68%) tests on a suspected HCID patient, fewer could safely perform a chemistry panel (64%), a urinalysis (60%), a complete blood count with differential (56%), and a malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) (48%) on a suspected HCID patient. The five tests respondents most often considered extremely or very important were hemoglobin/hematocrit (91%), chemistry panel (90%), CBC with differential and platelet count (89%), malaria RDT (88%), and blood gas (88%). Reported barriers to performing routine laboratory testing included issues related to patient and staff safety, infection control, lack of appropriate space, and funding. CONCLUSIONS:Our survey identified several barriers to implementing safe laboratory testing. The inability to conduct these laboratory tests may result in delays in care when an HCID is suspected.

DESCRIPTION/UNASSIGNED:Optimal transfusion strategies for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are uncertain. The aim of this guideline is to provide recommendations for red blood cell transfusion in patients with AMI. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:These guidelines are based on evidence from randomized controlled trials of patients presenting with AMI and assigned to 2 different transfusion strategies (restrictive or liberal) based on hemoglobin concentrations or hematocrit levels before receipt of a transfusion. A meta-analysis of eligible trials was performed using Cochrane methods. The international panel followed GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods to summarize evidence and formulate recommendations. This guideline's primary perspective is that of the patient, including medical, financial, and psychological effects, with secondary consideration of health care system issues, particularly conservation of the limited and costly blood supply. RECOMMENDATION/UNASSIGNED:For hospitalized patients with AMI, the panel suggests a liberal red cell transfusion strategy when the hemoglobin concentration is less than 10 g/dL (conditional recommendation, low-certainty evidence). A restrictive strategy of 7 to 8 g/dL may result in increased mortality in patients with AMI. The direction of the recommendation for the liberal strategy was based on the great importance of mortality for patients. The conditional recommendation was based on the low certainty of evidence and the competing consideration of blood supply conservation. Clinicians should adopt mitigation strategies to reduce potential adverse events associated with a liberal transfusion strategy, and all transfusion decisions should incorporate the clinical context rather than solely the hemoglobin concentration.

IMPORTANCE:Red blood cell transfusion is a common medical intervention with benefits and harms. OBJECTIVE:To provide recommendations for use of red blood cell transfusion in adults and children. EVIDENCE REVIEW:Standards for trustworthy guidelines were followed, including using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methods, managing conflicts of interest, and making values and preferences explicit. Evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials was reviewed. FINDINGS:For adults, 45 randomized controlled trials with 20 599 participants compared restrictive hemoglobin-based transfusion thresholds, typically 7 to 8 g/dL, with liberal transfusion thresholds of 9 to 10 g/dL. For pediatric patients, 7 randomized controlled trials with 2730 participants compared a variety of restrictive and liberal transfusion thresholds. For most patient populations, results provided moderate quality evidence that restrictive transfusion thresholds did not adversely affect patient-important outcomes. Recommendation 1: for hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable, the international panel recommends a restrictive transfusion strategy considering transfusion when the hemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL (strong recommendation, moderate certainty evidence). In accordance with the restrictive strategy threshold used in most trials, clinicians may choose a threshold of 7.5 g/dL for patients undergoing cardiac surgery and 8 g/dL for those undergoing orthopedic surgery or those with preexisting cardiovascular disease. Recommendation 2: for hospitalized adult patients with hematologic and oncologic disorders, the panel suggests a restrictive transfusion strategy considering transfusion when the hemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL (conditional recommendations, low certainty evidence). Recommendation 3: for critically ill children and those at risk of critical illness who are hemodynamically stable and without a hemoglobinopathy, cyanotic cardiac condition, or severe hypoxemia, the international panel recommends a restrictive transfusion strategy considering transfusion when the hemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL (strong recommendation, moderate certainty evidence). Recommendation 4: for hemodynamically stable children with congenital heart disease, the international panel suggests a transfusion threshold that is based on the cardiac abnormality and stage of surgical repair: 7 g/dL (biventricular repair), 9 g/dL (single-ventricle palliation), or 7 to 9 g/dL (uncorrected congenital heart disease) (conditional recommendation, low certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:It is good practice to consider overall clinical context and alternative therapies to transfusion when making transfusion decisions about an individual patient.

BACKGROUND:The Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee (CTMC) composes a summary of new and important advances in transfusion medicine (TM) on an annual basis. Since 2018, this has been assembled into a manuscript and published in Transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:CTMC members selected original manuscripts relevant to TM that were published electronically and/or in print during calendar year 2022. Papers were selected based on perceived importance and/or originality. References for selected papers were made available to CTMC members to provide feedback. Members were also encouraged to identify papers that may have been omitted initially. They then worked in groups of two to three to write a summary for each new publication within their broader topic. Each topic summary was then reviewed and edited by two separate committee members. The final manuscript was assembled by the first and senior authors. While this review is extensive, it is not a systematic review and some publications considered important by readers may have been excluded. RESULTS:For calendar year 2022, summaries of key publications were assembled for the following broader topics within TM: blood component therapy; infectious diseases, blood donor testing, and collections; patient blood management; immunohematology and genomics; hemostasis; hemoglobinopathies; apheresis and cell therapy; pediatrics; and health care disparities, diversity, equity, and inclusion. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This Committee Report reviews and summarizes important publications and advances in TM published during calendar year 2022, and maybe a useful educational tool.

BACKGROUND:Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently undergo prophylactic red blood cell (RBC) exchange transfusion and simple transfusion (RCE/T) to prevent complications of disease, such as stroke. These treatment procedures are performed with a target hemoglobin S (HbS) of ≤30%, or a goal of maintaining an HbS level of <30% immediately prior to the next transfusion. However, there is a lack of evidence-based instructions for how to perform RCE/T in a way that will result in an HbS value <30% between treatments. PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To determine whether targets for post-treatment HbS (post-HbS) or post-treatment HCT (post-HCT) can help to maintain an HbS <30% or <40% between treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We performed a retrospective study of patients with SCD treated with RCE/T at Montefiore Medical Center from June 2014 to June 2016. The analysis included patients of all ages, and data including 3 documented parameters for each RCE/T event: post-HbS, post-HCT, and follow-up HbS (F/u-HbS), which is the pre-treatment HbS prior to the next RCE/T. Generalized linear mixed model was used for estimating the association between post-HbS or post-HCT levels and F/u-HbS <30%. RESULTS:Based on our results, targeting post-HbS ≤10% was associated with higher odds of having events of F/u-HbS <30% between monthly treatments. Targeting post-HbS ≤15% was associated with higher odds of events of F/u-HbS < 40%. As compared to post-HCT ≤30%, a post-HCT >30%-36% did not contribute to more F/u-HbS <30% or HbS <40% events. CONCLUSIONS:For patients with SCD undergoing regular RCE/T for stroke prevention, a post-HbS ≤10% can be used as a goal to help maintain an HbS <30% for 1 month, and a post-HbS ≤15% allowed patients to maintain HbS <40%.