Faculty Bibliography

CLINICAL CONDITION/UNASSIGNED:The authors present the case of a young man who presented with cardiogenic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and microaxial flow pump complicated by acute spinal cord infarction (SCI) leading to bilateral lower extremity paraplegia. KEY QUESTIONS/UNASSIGNED:The key questions included the following: 1) What is the incidence and pathophysiology for SCI with mechanical circulatory support (MCS)?; 2) Which configurations of MCS carry a greater risk of SCI? How do we approach MCS escalation, recognizing that with each device we carry additive risk of complications?; 3) What data guide anticoagulation strategies for MCS?; and 4) What strategies can we implement to support patients who have suffered SCI from MCS? OUTCOME/RESULTS:Our patient was transitioned to a right ventricular assist device with Impella 5.5 as a bridge to therapy, and underwent cardiac transplantation 4 weeks after presentation with ongoing inpatient rehabilitation. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES/CONCLUSIONS:Contemporary MCS carries a small but significant risk of SCI which is often irreversible. More data are required to guide anticoagulation strategies for MCS and mitigate risk.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Donation after circulatory death (DCD) with cardiopulmonary bypass for thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has led to increased use of donor hearts. Rejection rates and long-term survival outcomes are not known. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A single-center retrospective cohort review of patients who underwent DCD heart transplantation from January 2020 to December 2023 was performed. Donor and recipient characteristics, operative characteristics, and posttransplantation outcomes were analyzed. Subgroup analysis comparing co-localized vs distant donors and recipients was performed. The primary end point was 1-year survival. Secondary end points included incidences of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), rejection rate, and overall mortality. Our TA-NRP protocol has remained the same, consisting of sternotomy, ligation of aortic arch vessels, establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, reintubation, resuscitation of the heart, and cold static storage during transport. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< .005) ischemia times, without any other differences. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Outcomes after DCD heart transplantation using TA-NRP remain encouraging with acceptable rates of rejection, PGD, CAV, and survival at 1 year.

BACKGROUND:In the 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network donor heart allocation system, patients listed for re-transplantation due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) are assigned to Status 4 unless hemodynamic criteria are met. We aim to examine waitlist outcomes of CAV patients among adult heart transplant candidates. METHODS:We examined waitlist mortality stratified by CAV and waitlist status among adult heart transplant candidates using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 10/1/2018-11/1/2023. We analyzed waitlist mortality using Kaplan-Meier curves and doubly-robust Cox regressions adjusted for age, gender, sex, race, and dialysis. We compared CAV to non-CAV patients by initial waitlist status, first status of interest, and time-dependent status. RESULTS:Of 21,586 listed patients, 368 were listed for CAV. CAV patients were most often listed at Status 4 with lower proportions at Status 3/2/1 compared with non-CAV patients. Status 4 and Status 3 CAV candidates demonstrated higher than expected waitlist mortality compared to non-CAV counterparts (Status 4: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.84; p < 0.01; Status 3: HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.23-1.64; p = 0.33) with similar mortality to non-CAV patients in Status 3 and 2, respectively (Status 4: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.48-1.35; p = 0.4; Status 3: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.40-2.86; p = 0.89). When stratifying by status tier, CAV waitlist patients ever listed at Status 4 and 3 had a higher probability of death compared to their non-CAV counterparts (Status 4: HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.20-3.31, p < 0.01; Status 3: HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.06-8.87, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS:After 2018, CAV patients had a higher risk of waitlist mortality at Status 4 and 3 compared to non-CAV patients. These results suggest that CAV patients are underprioritized in the current allocation system.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is beneficial in heart transplant and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, but patterns of attendance remain poorly understood. We describe CR adherence and cessation in this population. METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of heart transplant and LVAD recipients who attended ≥1 CR session at a tertiary medical center (2013-2022). Complete adherence was defined as attending 36 sessions. Primary reasons for cessation before 36 sessions were recorded. We compared post-operative complications, duration of hospitalization, and readmissions between participants with and without complete adherence using logistic and linear regressions. Among participants with complete adherence, we compared changes in metabolic equivalent of task (MET), exercise time, and peak oxygen uptake using paired sample t tests. RESULTS:There were 137 heart transplant and LVAD recipients (median age 56.9 years, 74% male) who attended CR. Among them, 91% either completed 36 CR sessions or <24 sessions. Among those without complete adherence (n = 74), 72% reported medical reasons, and 15% reported personal reasons for cessation. Compared to those who completed CR, those without complete adherence experienced more post-operative complications (44% vs 24%, P = .02) and major bleeding (23% vs 7%, P = .02) prior to CR. Participants with complete adherence experienced significant improvements in exercise time (142.5 seconds), MET (0.4), and peak oxygen uptake (1.4 mL/kg/min). CONCLUSIONS:Nearly half of heart transplant and LVAD recipients in CR completed all 36 sessions. Those with complete adherence experienced significant improvements in exercise measures, underscoring the important benefits of CR in this population.

Radial artery occlusion (RAO), a complication of transradial access, has an incidence of 4.0% to 9.1% in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may preclude its use creation of arteriovenous fistula. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has lower rates of RAO compared with TRA, but prior studies excluded patients with advanced CKD. This was a single center study of patients with advanced CKD who underwent coronary procedures with dTRA from January 1, 2019 to May 12, 2022 who were retrospectively evaluated for radial artery patency in follow-up with reverse Barbeau testing or repeat access of the artery. Of 71 patients, 66% were on hemodialysis and the remainder had CKD 3 to 5. Access was ultrasound-guided, and all received adequate spasmolytic therapy and patent hemostasis. Proximal radial arteries were patent in 100% of the patients at follow-up. Our data suggest that dTRA is safe for patients with advanced CKD and preserves radial artery patency.

BACKGROUND:Because of advances in medical treatment of heart failure, patients are living longer than in previous eras and may approach the need for advanced therapies, including heart transplantation, at older ages. This study assesses practices surrounding heart transplant in older adults (> 70 years) and examines short- and medium-term outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:This study is a retrospective analysis using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 2010 to 2021. The absolute number of older adults being transplanted is increasing. Older adults were more likely to have had a prior malignancy or ischemic cardiomyopathy and less likely to be on extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation or have a high UNOS status prior to transplant. Mortality at 1-year was higher for older adults (27.8% vs. 23.4%), but at 5 years there was no significant difference (22.3% vs. 19.4%.). Older adults were more likely to die of malignancy or infection. Adults under 70 were more likely to die of cardiovascular causes or graft failure. There was less rejection in older adults. Mortality has not changed for older adults transplanted before versus after the 2018 UNOS allocation change. CONCLUSIONS:Carefully selected older adults may be considered for heart transplantation, given similar intermediate-term mortality.

BACKGROUND:Recent studies suggest the transplantation of Hepatitis C (HCV) hearts from viremic donors is associated with comparable 1 year survival to nonviremic donors. Though HCV viremia is a known risk factor for accelerated atherosclerosis, data on cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) outcomes are limited. We compared the incidence of CAV in heart transplant recipients from HCV viremic donors (nucleic acid amplification test positive; NAT+) compared to non-HCV infected donors (NAT-). METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed annual coronary angiograms with intravascular ultrasound from April 2017 to August 2020 at two large cardiac transplant centers. CAV was graded according to ISHLT guidelines. Maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥ 0.5 mm was considered significant for subclinical disease. RESULTS:Among 270 heart transplant recipients (mean age 54; 77% male), 62 patients were transplanted from NAT+ donors. CAV ≥ grade 1 was present in 8.8% of the NAT+ versus 16.8% of the NAT- group at 1 year, 20% versus 28.8% at 2 years, and 33.3% versus 41.5% at 3 years. After adjusting for donor age, donor smoking history, recipient BMI, recipient, hypertension, and recipient diabetes, NAT+ status did not confer increased risk of CAV (HR.80; 95% CI.45-1.40, p = 0.43) or subclinical IVUS disease (HR.87; 95% CI.58-1.30, p = 0.49). Additionally, there was no difference in the presence of rapidly progressive lesions on IVUS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our data show that NAT+ donors conferred no increased risk for early CAV or subclinical IVUS disease following transplantation in a cohort of heart transplant patients who were treated for HCV, suggesting the short-term safety of this strategy to maximize the pool of available donor hearts.