Faculty Bibliography

Placental abruption has classically been defined as the premature separation of a normally located placenta before delivery of the fetus. Traditionally, this diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, including vaginal bleeding, pain, and fetal distress. This definition, however, preceded the advent of obstetric ultrasound. Ultrasound frequently identifies various hemorrhagic lesions, such as retroplacental, subchorionic, intraamniotic, intraplacental, and preplacental hematomas in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. These variable ultrasound findings lead to new challenges as to what to define as an abruption, particularly in the absence of symptoms. This ambiguity in defining placental abruption affects clinical decision-making and hinders our understanding of the pathophysiology of abruption, presenting challenges in studying abruption. It is likely that these varying sonographic findings may precede the classic presentation of vaginal bleeding and pain and therefore are often concealed abruptions. This commentary highlights the importance of developing clear diagnostic guidelines for placental abruption, given its association with severe outcomes including a high rate of perinatal mortality and maternal morbidity. We aim to elucidate the complexities of ultrasound diagnosis in placental abruption, advocating for precise criteria to better guide clinical practice. We propose that these ultrasound findings of hemorrhagic placental lesions after 20 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic patients should be considered part of the spectrum of abruption, while in symptomatic patients should be taken as confirmation of the diagnosis of abruption.

OBJECTIVE:To estimate the association between third-trimester maternal low blood pressure (BP) and delivery of a neonate with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight in patients treated for mild chronic hypertension. METHODS:This is a secondary analysis of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy) study, which randomized pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension to treatment to achieve goal BP below 140/90 mm Hg compared with usual care. We calculated mean systolic and diastolic BPs between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation and excluded those with systolic BP of 140 mm Hg or higher or diastolic BP of 90 mm Hg or higher. We defined low BP as mean systolic BP below 110 and mean diastolic BP below 70 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure below 80 mm Hg and compared those individuals with participants with mean systolic BP of 110-139 mm Hg or mean diastolic BP of 71-89 mm Hg or both or mean arterial pressure of 80 mm Hg or higher. Our primary outcome was delivery of a neonate with SGA birth weight (birth weight below the 5th percentile). Logistic regression estimated the association between low BP and SGA birth weight, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS:Of 2,408 CHAP participants, 1,205 (50.0%) met analysis criteria. Of those 1,205, 31 (2.6%) had low BP and 1,174 (97.4%) had mean BP 110/70-139/89 mm Hg; 33 (2.7%) had mean arterial pressure below 80 mm Hg, and 1,172 (97.3%) had mean arterial pressure of 80 mm Hg or higher. Having a neonate with SGA birth weight below the 5th percentile occurred in 62 participants (5.1%): 1 of the 31 (3.2%) with BP below 110/70 mm Hg and 1 of the 33 (3.0%) with mean arterial pressure below 80 mm Hg. There was no significant association between delivery of a neonate with SGA birth weight less than the 5th percentile and low BP by either mean systolic BP and mean diastolic BP (aOR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.06-3.58) or mean arterial pressure (aOR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.07-4.01). We found a nonlinear relationship between mean arterial pressure and delivery of a neonate with SGA birth weight less than the 5th percentile, and, as mean arterial pressure decreased, there was lower probability of having a neonate with SGA birth weight (P=.02). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Pharmacologic treatment of mild chronic hypertension infrequently results in low BP and does not appear to be associated with delivery of a neonate with SGA birth weight less than the 5th percentile for birth weight.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate if retroverted (RV) uterus noted on nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound is associated with second-trimester pregnancy loss and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:-value <0.05 denoting significance. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for possible confounding variables. RESULTS: = 0.0056). No other differences in adverse outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS: Persistent RV uterus in the first trimester is associated with increased risk of first-trimester vaginal bleeding. However, rates of pregnancy loss were similar between groups, providing valuable information for patient counseling. Significantly more RV subjects conceived by IVF, highlighting the need for further study in this population. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:· Pregnancy outcomes of patients with retroverted uterus have not been widely studied.. · Significantly more patients with a retroverted uterus conceived by in vitro fertilization.. · Patients with retroverted uterus were four times more likely to have first-trimester bleeding.. · Despite increased rates of vaginal bleeding, there was no increased rate of pregnancy loss..

BACKGROUND:The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg. OBJECTIVE:We compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved blood pressure <130/80 vs 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:This was a secondary analysis of a multcenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks of gestation and at least 2 recorded blood pressure measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated using ambulatory antenatal blood pressures. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and small for gestational age. Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg and average diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg using Student's t test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates. RESULTS:Of 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.61, P<.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (adjusted relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.79). The risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (adjusted relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.12-2.92). Small for gestational age less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.96). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes.

Placental abruption is a complete or partial separation of the placenta from the uterine decidua. Clinical manifestations include vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, uterine contractions, and abnormalities in the fetal heart rate tracing. Placental abruption occurs in 0.4% to 1.0% of all pregnancies. However, the pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. We present a review of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of placental abruption, exploring overlapping processes which contribute to premature placental separation. Classic findings and limitations of ultrasound in evaluating placental abruption are explained. Finally, we discuss the management of placental abruption based on gestational age, fetal status, and maternal hemodynamic stability.

OBJECTIVE:To test whether treatment of mild chronic hypertension (CHTN) in pregnancy is associated with lower rates of unplanned maternal healthcare utilization postpartum. METHODS:This was a secondary analysis of the CHTN and pregnancy (CHAP) study, a prospective, open-label, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized treatment trial of pregnant people with mild chronic hypertension. All patients with a postpartum follow-up assessment were included. The primary outcome was unplanned healthcare utilization, defined as unplanned postpartum clinic visits, Emergency Department or triage visits, or unplanned hospital admissions within six weeks postpartum. Differences in outcomes were compared between study groups (Active Group: blood pressure goal of<140/90 mm Hg, and Control Group: blood pressure goal of <160/105 mm Hg) and factors associated with outcomes were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS:A total of 2,293 patients were included with 1,157 (50.5%) in the active group and 1,136 (49.5%) in the control group. Rates of unplanned maternal postpartum health care utilization did not differ between treatment and control groups, (20.2% vs 23.3%, p=0.07, aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69-1.03. However, Emergency Department or triage/maternity evaluation unit visits were significantly lower in the Active group (10.2% vs 13.2%, p=0.03, aOR 0.76, 95% 0.58-0.99). Higher BMI at enrollment and cesarean delivery were associated with higher odds of unplanned postpartum healthcare utilization. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While treatment of mild CHTN during pregnancy and postpartum was not significantly associated with overall unplanned healthcare resource utilization, it was associated with lower rates of postpartum Emergency Department and triage visits.

OBJECTIVE:To compare differences in postpartum blood pressure (BP) control (BP below 140/90 mm Hg) for participants with hypertension randomized to receive antihypertensive treatment compared with no treatment during pregnancy. METHODS:This study was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (The CHAP [Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy] trial). Pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension (BP below 160/105 mm Hg) were randomized into two groups: active (antihypertensive treatment) or control (no treatment unless severe hypertension, BP 160/105 mm Hg or higher). Study outcomes were BP control below 140/90 mm Hg (primary) and medication nonadherence based on a composite score threshold (secondary) at the 6-week postpartum follow-up visit. Participants without follow-up BP measurements were excluded from analysis of the BP control outcome. Participants without health care professional-prescribed antihypertensives at delivery were excluded from the analysis of the adherence outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS:Of 2,408 participants, 1,684 (864 active, 820 control) were included in the analysis. A greater percentage of participants in the active group achieved BP control (56.7% vs 51.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% CI, 1.00-1.48) than in the control group. Postpartum antihypertensive prescription was higher in the active group (81.7% vs 58.4%, P<.001), and nonadherence did not differ significantly between groups (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.64-1.03). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Antihypertensive treatment of mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy was associated with better BP control below 140/90 mm Hg in the immediate postpartum period.