Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Minimally invasive cosmetic dermatology procedures continue to be increasingly popular; however, the extant literature has poorly documented the psychological antecedents of interest in cosmetic procedures and their psychological consequences. OBJECTIVE:To better inform dermatologists on their patients' motivations for cosmetic enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:In a general population survey, an online representative sample of 984 Americans reported the extent to which they feel authentic using the validated authenticity scale and whether they were interested in undergoing a cosmetic procedure. In a prospective dermatology office survey, 102 participants reported their feelings of authenticity immediately before and 2 weeks after receiving a minimally invasive injectable cosmetic procedure. RESULTS:In the general population survey, participants interested in cosmetic procedures felt significantly less authentic than participants who were not interested ( p = .003). In the prospective dermatology office survey, participants felt significantly more authentic 2 weeks after their minimally invasive injectable cosmetic procedure than before ( p = .018). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Lower feelings of authenticity are associated with interest in cosmetic procedures. Participants felt more authentic 2 weeks after receiving a minimally invasive injectable cosmetic procedure. Cosmetic procedures may present patients with an opportunity to feel more like their real, genuine selves.

There is a paucity of information on racial and ethnic disparities relating to barriers to care in healthcare access and utilization in patients with cutaneous malignancies. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults with melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) All of Us Research Program collected between May 2018 and July 2022. Participants included adults (aged 18 or older) with cutaneous malignancy who completed the Health Care Access and Utilization survey. We identified 5,817 adults who were diagnosed with BCC (67%), cSCC (28.9%), and melanoma (23.9%). Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic patients were more likely than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients to delay a primary care visit due to cost (p = 0.005 and p = 0.015, respectively). NHB patients were also more likely to delay care due to lack of transportation (p < 0.001). NHB and Hispanic patients were more likely to place importance on seeing a provider from the same background (NHB p < 0.002; Hispanic p = 0.002) and also were more likely to report never being able to see such a provider (NHB p < 0.001; Hispanic p = 0.002). Medicaid/Medicare patients, non-college graduates, and those with lower incomes also faced increased barriers to care, including delays due to cost and transportation issues. People of color with cutaneous malignancies are more likely to delay care in seeing primary care providers due to cost or transportation issues. This study provides important insights on disproportionate healthcare usage among racial/ethnic groups that may help mitigate healthcare disparities.

There is controversy regarding the optimal surgical modality and ideal recommended margins for treating melanoma in situ (MIS) and invasive melanoma (IM). Although wide local excision is recommended, staged excision offers excellent margin control and low recurrence rates. In this manuscript, we reviewed a 10-year experience of staged excisions for the treatment of MIS and IM. A retrospective review was performed of 130 MIS and 32 IM cases treated with staged excision from April 2012 to April 2022. Staged excision was performed on the head and neck in 102 (79%) MIS and 23 (72%) IM cases. Approximately 10% of cases required surgical margins above the current recommendations (11 (9%) MIS and 6 (19%) IM). Twenty-three (19%) MIS and 7 (22%) IM cases required more than one excision to obtain clearance. Recurrence rates among MIS and IM were 0.0% and 0.6%, respectively. Upstaging occurred in 5 (4%) MIS and 7 (22%) IM cases. Complex repairs were performed on 82 (63%) MIS and 17 (53%) IM cases. Our findings revealed that staged excision provides effective margin control and low recurrence rates. Approximately 10% of patients required margins greater than the current recommendations, leading to larger defects and more complex repairs.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Nasal reconstruction has important functional and cosmetic considerations, as proper repair of nasal defects is necessary to maintain function of the nasal airway and to recreate the normal appearance of this central facial structure. Cheek advancement flaps provide matched, mobile and highly vascularized tissue for the reconstruction of nasal defects, allowing for the concealment of incisions within natural creases in a one-stage approach. However, cheek advancement flaps are often underutilized for nasal reconstruction because of their difficulty restoring nasal contour. METHODS:We describe reconstruction of 19 nasal dorsal and sidewall defects 0.8 to 3.0 centimeters (cm) in size. We incorporated a periosteal anchoring suture to maintain/restore nasal contour and additionally removed a half standing cone inferior to the defect to prevent encroachment of the nasal ala or alar crease. All patients were evaluated at least 3 months post-operatively. RESULTS:In all patients, we were able to restore concavity of the nasofacial sulcus, preserve the biconvex nasal tips, prevent alar flaring and retraction and conserve the alar groove. All patients had excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We believe this modified cheek advancement flap provides functionally and aesthetically superior results and can be considered as a first-line approach for repair of nasal dorsal and sidewall defects in sub selected patients.