Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:levinj04

Total Results:

276


Free Arterialized Venous Sural Nerve Flap for Complex Traumatic Tibial Nerve Injury

Sorenson, Thomas J; Boyd, Carter J; Chopoorian, Abby H; Vernon, Rebecca; Hemal, Kshipra; Levine, Jamie P; Agrawal, Nikhil
Segmental peripheral nerve injuries, particularly those involving long nerve gaps, pose a significant challenge in reconstructive surgery. Conventional strategies, such as nerve autografts or processed allografts, are often limited by inadequate length or poor regenerative outcomes, especially in traumatized wound beds. Nerve flaps offer the theoretical advantage of enhanced axonal regeneration through improved perfusion and support of Schwann cell viability but are rarely used due to technical complexity and limited donor options. We present a unique case of a free sural nerve flap used to reconstruct a 7-cm segmental defect of the tibial nerve following blast trauma in a 23-year-old man. A composite flap consisting of the sural nerve and lesser saphenous vein was harvested with preservation of the bridging adipofascial tissue to maintain perfusion to the nerve. The lesser saphenous vein was anastomosed to the retrograde peroneal artery distally and ligated proximally, whereas the sural nerve was divided and used as a double-barrel cable graft across the defect. Intraoperative Doppler and SPY angiography confirmed perfusion of the nerve through the preserved adipofascial connections. The patient was recently seen in our clinic at 17 weeks postoperation. He demonstrated undetectable 2-point discrimination in all nerve distributions of his foot but is ambulatory. This case demonstrates the feasibility and potential utility of a free vascularized sural nerve flap for reconstructing extensive peripheral nerve defects, particularly in cases where standard techniques are inadequate.
PMCID:12999085
PMID: 41859504
ISSN: 2169-7574
CID: 6017092

Arterialized Saphenous Vein Transfer for Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction of Complex Posterior Defects

Sorenson, Thomas J; Tran, David; Boyd, Carter J; Park, Jenn J; Bekisz, Jonathan; Volk, Angela; Cohen, Oriana; Levine, Jamie P
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Complex posterior defects often present significant reconstructive challenges, particularly due to the scarcity of suitable recipient vessels. In these cases, an arterialized saphenous vein transfer can facilitate flap perfusion when direct anastomosis is not feasible. This study presents our institutional experience using an arterialized saphenous vein transfer for microvascular free flap (MVFF) reconstruction of posterior defects. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent posterior MVFF reconstruction using an arterialized saphenous vein transfer. Patient demographics, comorbidities, defect etiologies (including trauma, silicone injection, malignancy, and congenital abnormalities), flap types, and perioperative outcomes were collected through manual chart review. RESULTS:(±73). Arterialized saphenous vein transfer arterial inflow sources included the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (n = 6), deep inferior epigastric artery (n = 1), and transverse branch of the superficial femoral artery (n = 1). Average operative time was 11:00 h (±2:50); median hospital stay was 12 days (range: 6-76). There were no flap losses. One patient required two flap explorations; two patients required postoperative blood transfusions. At a mean follow-up of 1247 days (±393), all flaps had healed, including persistent minor wounds in the two silicone injection cases. CONCLUSIONS:Arterialized saphenous vein transfers enabled durable, successful MVFF reconstruction in complex posterior defects and represent a reliable option in anatomically challenging scenarios.
PMID: 41797397
ISSN: 1098-2752
CID: 6015152

Posterior Urethral Reconstruction with Ileal Chimeric Free Flap: A Novel Approach for Management of Radiation-Induced Devastated Bladder Outlet

Sorensen, Thomas J; Elbakry, Amr A; Ratanapornsompong, Wattanachai; Sarawong, Sutthirat; Tran, David; Volk, Angela; Levine, Jamie; Zhao, Lee C
OBJECTIVE:To describes our institutional experience of a case series using a novel multi-segment, chimeric free ileal flap for posterior urethral reconstruction, focusing on surgical technique, perioperative management, and functional outcomes. Complex posterior urethral defects, particularly those resulting from radiation pose a significant reconstructive challenge that is not easily approachable with standard reconstructive techniques. In this case series, we present a novel approach for this complex problem. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent posterior urethral reconstruction with a chimeric free ileal flap at our institution. Data were collected via chart review. RESULTS:Six male patients (median age: 61 years range: 59-77) with radiation-associated posterior urethral stenosis and bladder neck pathology underwent reconstruction. One was an active smoker; three had prior failed reconstructions. A 20-cm ileal segment was harvested and designed into a chimeric construct in all cases. The left deep inferior epigastric vessels were used for flap anastomosis. Median operative time was 717 minutes, and median hospital stay was 9 days. Two patients experienced early postoperative complications; none had flap loss. At median follow-up of 204 days, four patients had successful functional outcomes. One had persistent leak, and one required cystectomy for newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma found at the bladder neck on final pathology. CONCLUSIONS:Chimeric free ileal flap reconstruction is a novel management option for radiation-associated posterior urethral defects, offering well-vascularized, versatile tissue in patients unsuitable for traditional approaches. However, this approach is complex that requires multidisciplinary collaboration and extensive surgical planning.
PMID: 41106522
ISSN: 1527-9995
CID: 5955322

Logistical, Ethical, and Technical Considerations in the World's First Face and Whole Eye Transplantation

Chinta, Sachin R; Tran, David L; Shah, Alay R; Ceradini, Daniel J; Dedania, Vaidehi S; Gelb, Bruce E; Cohen, Oriana D; Flores, Roberto L; Levine, Jamie P; Saadeh, Pierre B; Staffenberg, David A; Rojas, Allison C; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
BACKGROUND:Whole eye transplantation (WET) has long been looked to as a potential solution for the aesthetic and functional deficits caused by severe ocular pathology and trauma. Here, we describe the first successful combined face and whole eye transplantation (FT/WET), highlighting the logistical, ethical, and technical considerations that enabled this milestone. METHODS:A 46-year-old male with severe facial and ocular deficits underwent multidisciplinary evaluation and was deemed a candidate for FT/WET. Subsequently, a surgical algorithm was developed through rigorous preoperative planning and team based surgical simulations. This process focused on techniques that would allow for efficient graft procurement and inset, while simultaneously limiting trauma to the globe and its adnexa. RESULTS:Longitudinal monitoring demonstrated maintained graft viability throughout the postoperative period. Fluorescein angiography and ICG angiography confirmed robust retinal and choroidal perfusion. Diffusion-weighted MRI revealed structural preservation of the optic tracts, despite inner retinal atrophy. The patient has also experienced significant improvement in facial aesthetics and functionality with no episodes of graft rejection to date. CONCLUSIONS:This case demonstrates the feasibility of addressing deficits once deemed irreparable through advanced surgical techniques, preoperative planning, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Although functional vision recovery has not been observed, this innovation expands the reconstructive options available for patients with severe facial and ocular deficits, paving the way for future advancements in vascularized composite allotransplantation.
PMID: 41467696
ISSN: 1529-4242
CID: 5985642

Proposal for an Objective and Concrete Definition for Determining Anatomic Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer: The Concept of the "Suitable Target"

Marchetti, Alessio; Garnier, Jonathan; Perri, Giampaolo; Hewitt, Brock D; Sacks, Greg D; Kluger, Michael D; Morgan, Katherine A; Levine, Jamie P; Garg, Karan; Wolfgang, Christopher L
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with extensive peripancreatic vessel involvement is classified as locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). For this group of patients, the current standard of care does not include considering a potentially curative oncologic resection. However, recent advances in multiagent chemotherapy and surgical techniques are challenging this paradigm. Moreover, the current determination of anatomic resectability is vague and unreliable. Here we propose a definition of local resectability, based on pre- and intra-operative assessment. This anatomic definition of resectability assumes careful patient selection based on tumor biology and patient condition. The pre-operative evaluation of vascular anatomy and tumor involvement is conducted using 3D-rendering of pancreas-protocol computed tomography. Identifying a disease-free arterial or venous segment above and below the tumor involvement ("suitable target") is the single critical factor that determines anatomic resectability. Intraoperative isolation of these target vessels confirms the feasibility of vascular reconstruction before resection. This approach, which focuses on identifying target vessels rather than circumferential involvement, offers a more straightforward and clinically relevant method for assessing surgical eligibility in LAPC patients at centers of excellence. In summary, reconstructability-based on surgical expertise and guided by tumor biology-now defines the modern paradigm of resectability in LAPC.
PMID: 41417959
ISSN: 1879-1190
CID: 5979782

"Does Academic Quarter or Operative Day of the Week Affect Flap Success?"

Sobba, Walter D; Jacobi, Sophia; Barrera, Janos A; Gursky, Alexis K; Wyatt, Hailey Paige; Levine, Jamie P; Agrawal, Nikhil; Hacquebord, Jacques Henri
BACKGROUND:The "July Effect" refers to the potential increase in adverse outcomes associated with the annual turnover of medical trainees, though its impact on surgical fields remains uncertain. Additionally, few studies have examined whether the operative day of the week and subsequent flap monitoring during the weekend affect time to reoperation or flap salvage. This study investigated whether academic quarter and operative day influence reoperation rates, flap salvage, or flap failure in microvascular free flap procedures. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted on 769 free flaps performed between June 2011 and November 2023. Multivariate analyses adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, flap type, and recipient region. Flaps were categorized by academic quarter and operative day, excluding weekends due to limited sample size. Primary outcomes included reoperation rates for vascular compromise, time to reoperation, and flap salvage. RESULTS:No significant differences in reoperation rates for vascular compromise were observed across academic quarters. While procedure duration trended longer in the first three quarters compared to the fourth, these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, operative day did not impact reoperation rates, flap salvage, or time to reoperation. Flaps were predominantly indicated for head and neck reconstruction (74.4%) and had an overall flap loss rate of 3.0%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We found no evidence of a "July Effect" in microvascular surgery or that operative day affects free flap outcomes. Institutional factors, such as structured flap monitoring, attending oversight, and advanced practice provider support, likely mitigate risks associated with trainee turnover and shift-based staffing fluctuations.
PMID: 41067266
ISSN: 1098-8947
CID: 5952212

Relative Donor Site Morbidity and Complication Rates of Gracilis Myocutaneous and Muscle Flaps in Reconstructive Surgery

Sobba, Walter D; Thai, Sydney; Barrera, Janos A; Montgomery, Samuel R; Agrawal, Nikhil; Levine, Jamie P; Hacquebord, Jacques Henri
BACKGROUND:The gracilis flap is a versatile muscle flap that can be utilized as a muscle only or myocutaneous flap for soft tissue coverage, as well as for reconstruction of facial animation or extremity function. Few studies have compared donor site complications of free and pedicled gracilis flaps, including the effect of skin paddle harvest on donor site morbidity. METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent a free or pedicled gracilis flap at our institution from 2013-2023. Gracilis flaps were categorized as: pedicled gracilis muscle flaps used for vaginectomy in gender reaffirming surgery, free gracilis muscle flaps, and free gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Outcome variables were duration of drain placement and complications including seroma, hematoma, infection, dehiscence, and persistent numbness. RESULTS:We identified 128 gracilis flaps including 19 free myocutaneous flaps, 35 free muscle flaps, and 74 pedicled muscle flaps. Free myocutaneous flaps required longer drain placement as compared to free muscle flaps or pedicled flaps (13.6 vs 8.4 vs 7.4 days, respectively, p=0.002). Free myocutaneous flaps displayed a higher complication rate (36.8%) as compared to pedicled muscle flaps (10.8%), or free muscle flaps (11.4%, p=0.020). After adjusting for age, BMI, and ASA status, free myocutaneous flaps demonstrated higher odds of major donor site complication as compared to pedicled muscle flaps (OR 1.23, p<0.001), while free muscle flaps were not associated with increased odds of major complication (OR 1.08, p=0.117). Of the documented complications, the most common were surgical site infection (36.8%), hematoma (21.1%) and seroma (21.1%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The inclusion of a skin paddle during gracilis flap harvest is associated with increased duration of drain placement and donor site complications including surgical site infection, hematoma, and seroma. These factors should be carefully considered in the context of patients' reconstructive needs and other risk factors.
PMID: 41072485
ISSN: 1098-8947
CID: 5952452

Ventral hernia repair with T-line hernia mesh: A multi-institutional experience

Emovon, Emmanuel O; Oyola, Anna Malysz; Arias-Espinosa, Luis; Naga, Hani I; Volk, Angela S; Hope, William; Malcher, Flavio; Levine, Jamie P; Harris, Hobart W; Yoo, Jin; Patel, Ash
INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is a common procedure complicated by high hernia recurrence rates exceeding 30 % over ten years. The T-Line® Hernia Mesh is a synthetic, polypropylene mesh featuring mesh extensions designed to prevent anchor point failure by evenly distributing tension to reduce ventral hernia recurrences. This study evaluates the outcomes of the T-Line® mesh in VHR with 1-3 year follow-up. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This study is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent VHR with T-Line® mesh between October 2020 and December 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using HerQLes and ACHQC surveys. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 7, 12.3 %). Of the five patients that reported feeling a slight bulge at their previous hernia site, upon clinical evaluation two patients had a recurrence (one recurrence was caused by the suture tearing through the underlying laparotomy repair while the mesh remained anchored intact above the repair, and the second recurrence was caused by inadequate mesh fixation at the caudal border of the mesh), while no patients reported using pain medication for abdominal wall discomfort. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The T-Line® Hernia Mesh demonstrated safety and effectiveness in ventral hernia repair, with low recurrences and postoperative complications rates over a 1-3-year period, suggesting it is a valuable tool for complex hernia repairs.
PMCID:12152597
PMID: 40503355
ISSN: 2666-2620
CID: 5869462

Is a Seroma the "Kiss of Death" in Prepectoral Tissue Expander Reconstruction?

Hemal, Kshipra; Boyd, Carter; Perez Otero, Sofia; Kabir, Raeesa; Sorenson, Thomas J; Thanik, Vishal; Levine, Jamie; Cohen, Oriana; Choi, Mihye; Karp, Nolan S
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:A seroma following prepectoral tissue expander (TE) reconstruction often begets other complications, which may compromise the reconstruction. This study investigated the association between seroma and subsequent complications. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:All consecutive prepectoral TE reconstructions performed between March 2017 and December 2022 at a single center were reviewed. Demographics, operative characteristics, and complications data were extracted for all patients and analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Although causality cannot be determined, our data suggests that seroma may be the "kiss of death" in prepectoral TE reconstruction because half of all breasts with a seroma went on to develop other complications.
PMCID:12144650
PMID: 40487834
ISSN: 2169-7574
CID: 5868962

Finding the Right Fill: The Ideal Tissue Expander Fill in Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Hemal, Kshipra; Boyd, Carter; Otero, Sofia Perez; Kabir, Raeesa; Sorenson, Thomas J; Jacobson, Alexis; Thanik, Vishal; Levine, Jamie; Cohen, Oriana; Choi, Mihye; Karp, Nolan S
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Although many factors in prepectoral breast reconstruction such as mastectomy weight and flap quality are out of the plastic surgeon's control, some elements such as intraoperative tissue expander (TE) fill can be optimized. This study assesses the impact of intraoperative TE fill on postoperative complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction and posits the optimal fill. METHODS:All consecutive, prepectoral TE reconstructions performed between March 2017 and December 2022 at a single center were reviewed. A "fill ratio" or ratio of intraoperative TE fill to mastectomy weight (TEF/MW) was constructed to quantify deadspace in the breast pocket, with values closer to 1 signifying less deadspace. Major complications include those requiring readmission or reoperation and minor complications include those that could be treated as an outpatient. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:A total of 200 patients (318 breasts) with average follow-up of 22 months were included. Patients were, on average, 53 years old, were nonsmoker (98%), were nondiabetic (91%), and had a body mass index of 26 kg/m2. Only immediate reconstructions were included and were performed following prophylactic mastectomies in 34% and therapeutic mastectomies in 66% of cases. Seventy-six (24%) breasts were radiated, and 93 (47%) patients received chemotherapy. Mean mastectomy weight was 546 g, median intraoperative TE fill was 175 ± 250 cc, and median final TE fill was 390 ± 220 cc.Major complications occurred in 64 (20%) breasts and were associated with less deadspace (0.49 vs 0.36, P < 0.05). In multivariable models, a higher fill ratio was associated with 2.4 times higher odds of major complications (95% CI, 1.2-4.7; P = 0.01). Optimal intraoperative TE fill for avoiding major complications was 80 cc, and optimal fill ratio was 0.09.Explantation occurred in 44 (14%) breasts and was associated with less deadspace (0.51 vs 0.35, P < 0.05); the optimal fill for avoiding explantation was 80 cc, and optimal ratio was 0.12. CONCLUSIONS:Higher intraoperative TE fill and less deadspace were associated with postoperative complications. Filling a TE to 80 cc or approximately a tenth of mastectomy weight may reduce complications.
PMID: 40167060
ISSN: 1536-3708
CID: 5818942