Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) resulting in venous hypertension can cause lifestyle-limiting debilitation. Studies have identified racial and ethnic disparities in CVI presentation and clinical severity; however, there is limited literature examining disparities in CVI management and procedural outcomes among different racial and ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to characterize differences in endovenous treatment paradigms between racial and ethnic groups and to assess how this affected patient outcomes. METHODS:The national Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Varicose Vein Registry (VVR) database was queried for superficial venous interventions, including endovenous radiofrequency ablation, endovenous laser ablation, high ligation, stripping, and microphlebectomy, performed from April 2014-March 2024. We categorized patients as non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and Other (including American Indian, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islander, more than one race, and unknown/other). Baseline demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, complication rates, and changes in quality-of-life endpoints (i.e., revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and HASTI (Heaviness, Achiness, Swelling, Throbbing, Itching) score)) were compared between racial/ethnic groups with NHW as the reference category. Linear regression and logistic regression/chi-squared tests were used to compare continuous/ordinal and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS:65,090 superficial venous procedures encompassing endovenous thermal ablations, stripping/high ligation, and microphlebectomy were included. NHW patients underwent interventions for less severe baseline CVI based on CEAP class and had more superficial venous interventions (2.45±1.95, p<0.001) and repeat thermal ablations (1.66±1.14, p<0.001) than other groups. NHB had more severe baseline CVI based on higher prevalence of severe CEAP, i.e. C5, C6, and C6r disease (5.8%, 11.8%, 0.9%, respectively, p<0.05). NHB patients were less likely to have concomitant microphlebectomy than NHW (OR: 0.79[ 95% CI 0.73, 0.87] p<0.001). NHB had the highest rVCSS score preoperatively (8.17±4.02, p<0.001) with the largest improvement at <3 (-4.40±5.23, p<0.001) and >3 months (-7.00±5.00, p<0.001) following intervention. Hispanic/Latinos had the highest preoperative HASTI score (10.34±5.40, p<0.001) and the largest score reduction at <3 months (-6.62±6.51, p<0.001). Post procedure, Hispanics and Other study groups were more likely to experience blistering and medication induced ulcer (p<0.05). Other group was less likely to experience hematoma postoperatively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights significant differences across racial/ethnic groups in the presentation, treatment and outcomes of patients with treated for CVI . Black patients undergo fewer ablations and superficial venous procedures overall, however once treated, they exhibit significant symptomatic improvement.

OBJECTIVE:Lower-extremity acute limb ischemia (LE-ALI) is a severe form of peripheral artery disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thrombus in previously placed stents or grafts may present treatment challenges when compared to treatment of thrombus in native vessels, and data evaluating first-line treatment with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy are lacking. This post hoc analysis of the STRIDE study examines outcomes for first-line mechanical aspiration thrombectomy with the Indigo Aspiration System for LE-ALI in patients with either in-stent or in-graft thrombosis as compared to native-vessel thrombosis. METHODS:STRIDE was a prospective, single-arm study that enrolled 119 adult patients across 16 sites in the United States and Europe who were treated first-line with the Indigo Aspiration System for LE-ALI. The primary outcome was target limb salvage (TLS) at 30 days post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included device-related serious adverse events (SAEs), technical success (post-procedure TIMI flow grades 2/3), and patency at 30 days. Outcomes for the in-stent thrombosis group versus the native-vessel thrombosis group, and for the in-graft thrombosis group versus the native-vessel thrombosis group, were compared. RESULTS:Of the 119 STRIDE patients, 29 had in-stent thrombosis, 19 had in-graft thrombosis, and 71 had native-vessel thrombosis. For both the in-stent vs native-vessel thrombosis and the in-graft vs native-vessel thrombosis group comparisons, there were no significant differences for any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Overnight adjunctive thrombolytics usage was higher for the in-graft vs. native-vessel groups (52.6% (10/19) and 11.3% (8/71), respectively (P< .001). In a combined multivariate Cox model, when adjusted for age and sex among US patients, in-stent thrombosis was associated with time to retreatment within 30 days (HR=3.8,95% CI 1.1-13.3, P = .040). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although in-stent and in-graft thrombosis may represent more challenging treatment settings for LE-ALI, high technical success and high TLS at 30 days were observed for both groups, similar to the favorable results seen in the native-vessel group. Additionally, there were no device-related SAEs in either the in-stent or in-graft groups. In-stent thrombosis is associated with an increased risk of retreatment, which is unrelated to the device or procedure and may be expected due to known complications of stenting. This STRIDE subgroup analysis shows that first-line mechanical aspiration thrombectomy using Indigo is safe and effective for LE-ALI patients in presentations of acute thrombosis in a stent or graft.

OBJECTIVE:Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition with an unclear natural history and no management consensus. This study evaluated mid-to-long-term outcomes of conservatively managed SICAD. METHODS:This single-center, retrospective cohort study identified patients with SICAD from January 2011-December 2022 in the institutional electronic health record. Demographics, comorbidities, radiographic features, management, and outcomes were reviewed. Clinical endpoints were symptomatic remission, significant organ malperfusion, rupture, and secondary intervention. Radiographic endpoints included dissection remodeling (i.e., shortened dissection length or increased true lumen diameter), celiac aneurysm incidence, and aneurysm diameter growth among <1.5 cm, 1.5-1.9 cm, and ≥2.0 cm size categories. Endpoints were stratified by symptomatic vs. incidental presentation. RESULTS:Forty-nine patients with SICAD were identified. Eighty percent were male, and 57% had hypertension. Extra-celiac aneurysms were present in 25%, including 12% with aortic aneurysms. Forty-nine percent of SICADs were symptomatic on presentation, while 51% were incidentally discovered. Patients with incidental SICAD were older than symptomatic patients (62 ± 15 years vs. 54 ± 8 years, p=0.02) but had similar comorbidities. Ninety-two percent of symptomatic patients experienced complete symptom resolution without operative intervention by the earliest follow-up (182 ± 386 days). No incidental cases developed symptoms over a mean of 3.9 ± 3.5 years. No significant organ malperfusion, rupture, or secondary intervention occurred in this series. Symptomatic SICAD was more likely to undergo remodeling than incidental SICAD (p=0.02) over an average of 3.3 ± 3.7 years. Thirty-two percent of symptomatic cases had partial remodeling, and 37% had no residual dissection. Seventy-one percent of incidental dissections remained stable without remodeling. Celiac thrombus on initial imaging predicted remodeling (p=0.003). Baseline antihypertensive (p=0.006) and antiplatelet use (p=0.047) were associated with remodeling in symptomatic patients only. Aneurysmal degeneration was noted in 46% of all presenting lesions; none were ≥2.0 cm in maximal diameter. Incidental cases presented with more aneurysmal dilatation than symptomatic cases (59% vs. 32%, p<0.001). No celiac aneurysms at presentation grew over an average of 4.8 ± 4.0 years. Forty percent and 13% of incidental and symptomatic cases without initial celiac aneurysms, respectively, developed incident aneurysms by a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 3.0 years (p=0.3). CONCLUSIONS:Conservative management of uncomplicated SICAD yielded excellent clinical outcomes, even with incomplete remodeling and aneurysmal degeneration, which were common, albeit largely benign. Patients may warrant screening for aneurysms beyond the celiac axis. Antihypertensive and antiplatelet therapy for ≥3-6 months may promote remodeling until dissection stabilization.

BACKGROUND:In patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), guidelines recommend further risk stratification (Class 1 indication). However, head-to-head comparison of different risk stratification tools are lacking. Our objective was to compare the performance of 4 scores in predicting adverse clinical events in intermediate-risk PE. METHODS:This was a retrospective study of 192 intermediate-risk PE patients spanning October 2016 to July 2019. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to compare the predictive performance of the composite PE shock (CPES) score, Bova, simplified PE shock index (sPESI), National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and ESC intermediate-risk subcategory types for the primary outcome, which was a composite of PE-related in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation and its individual components. RESULTS:A total of 28 patients (14.6%) experienced the primary composite outcome. CPES demonstrated the highest discriminatory power for predicting the primary composite outcome (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66-0.83) as well as its individual components compared to the other risk scores (p = 0.008). The AUCs for the other scores were as follows: Bova, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56-0.76); sPESI, 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77); NEWS, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) and ESC intermediate-risk subcategory, AUC of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51-0.68). The ESC intermediate-risk subcategory exhibited the lowest performance for the primary composite outcome and across all individual components. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:CPES score outperformed other commonly used risk stratification tools for PE-related morbidity and mortality in intermediate-risk PE patients. The findings support the integration of CPES into clinical practice to enhance patient selection for escalated care and timely interventions.

BACKGROUND:Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) have outcomes worse than uncomplicated ST elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, no large-scale study has compared the outcomes of large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) with anticoagulation alone (AC). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes among patients receiving LBMT vs AC alone. METHODS:This was a two-center retrospective study that included patients with intermediate-risk PE from October 2016 - October 2023 from the institution's Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) database. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest or hemodynamic decompensation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates; Kaplan Meir curves and IPTW multivariable Cox regression were used to assess the relationship between treatment groups and outcomes. RESULTS:Of the 273 patients included in the analysis, 192 (70 %) patients received AC alone and 81 (30 %) patients received LBMT and AC. A total of 30 (10.9 %) patients experienced the primary composite outcome over a median follow-up of 30 days. The primary composite outcome was significantly lower in the group that received LBMT compared to those on AC alone (1.2 % vs 15.1 %, log-rank p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 0.02; 95 % CI: 0.002-0.17, p < 0.001) driven by a lower rate of 30-day all-cause mortality (0 % vs 7.3 %, log-rank p = 0.01), resuscitated cardiac arrest (0 % vs 6.8 %, log-rank p = 0.016) and new or worsening hemodynamic instability (4 % vs 11.1 %, log-rank p = 0.007). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this largest cohort to date comparing LBMT versus AC alone in acute intermediate-risk PE, LBMT had a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome including a lower rate of all-cause mortality when compared to AC alone. Ongoing randomized trials will test these associations.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to characterize the natural history of incidentally identified asymptomatic mesenteric artery stenosis and to identify clinical and radiographic predictors that differentiate patients with asymptomatic mesenteric artery occlusive disease (MAOD) and patients with symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) diagnosed at index study. METHODS:This single-institution retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with >70% stenosis of the celiac or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) on axial imaging or duplex ultrasound in an institutional radiology database. Patients were grouped into asymptomatic MAOD and symptomatic CMI cohorts according to their clinical presentation at index study. The primary endpoint was progression of disease from asymptomatic stenosis to CMI. Demographic, clinical, and imaging features at index study were also compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts. RESULTS:79 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 43 in the asymptomatic group and 36 in the symptomatic group. Patients in the asymptomatic group were followed for mean 32.7 ± 30.2 months; 60.5% (n=26) were referred to and followed by a vascular surgeon for 21.5 ± 27.8 months. No asymptomatic patients developed symptoms during the follow-up period. All patients in the symptomatic group were evaluated by a vascular surgeon and underwent procedural intervention for CMI within six months of diagnosis. Patients with CMI were more likely to have a history of smoking (p=0.02) and less likely to be anticoagulated (p<0.01) than patients with asymptomatic MAOD. Symptomatic patients trended towards a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (p=0.06) and a lower prevalence of arrhythmia (p=0.08). On imaging, the symptomatic cohort was more likely to have severe SMA stenosis (p<0.001), multivessel mesenteric disease (p=0.001), calcified aortic plaque (p=0.01), and severe stenosis in one or both internal iliac arteries (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, a lack of anticoagulation use (p<0.01) and severe SMA stenosis (p<0.001) were independently associated with higher odds of symptomatic mesenteric stenosis. While statistically insignificant, calcified aortic plaque (p=0.08) and smoking history (p=0.06) trended toward higher odds of symptomatic index presentation. CONCLUSIONS:The rate of progression from asymptomatic MAOD to CMI appears exceedingly low in the first two to three years after diagnosis, suggesting that prophylactic revascularization is mostly unnecessary. Surveillance of asymptomatic MAOD may be personalized based on clinical and radiographic features of disease. SMA stenosis severity, anticoagulation use, and possibly smoking history and the presence of aortic plaque calcification may be promising markers to stratify the risk of ischemic progression.

OBJECTIVE:This study compared outcomes in patients with and without preoperative stress testing undergoing carotid revascularization including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS), and transcarotid revascularization (TCAR). METHODS:Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VQI VISION) database who underwent elective carotid revascularization 2016-2020 were included. Patients were analyzed by group based upon whether they underwent cardiac stress testing within two years preceding revascularization without subsequent coronary intervention. Subset analysis was performed comparing outcomes between those with negative and positive results (evidence of ischemia or MI). Outcomes of interest were postoperative MI/neurologic events, 90-day re-admission rates, as well as long-term mortality. RESULTS:We analyzed 18,364 patients (78.8% CEA, 9.3% TF-CAS, 11.9% TCAR). Of these, 35.8% underwent preoperative stress testing (37.4% of CEA patients, 27.5% of TF-CAS patients, and 31.9% of TCAR patients). While comorbidities were significantly higher amongst patients undergoing CEA with preoperative stress test compared to those without stress testing, the overall prevalence of co-morbidities was higher amongst patients undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR irrespective of preoperative stress test status. Compared to patients with a negative stress test, patients with positive stress test undergoing any form of carotid revascularization had a significant increase in 90-day re-admission rates (CEA 19.6% vs 15.8%, p=0.003; CAS 33.3% vs. 18.6%, p<0.001; TCAR 25% vs. 17.5%, p=0.04). No group demonstrated a difference in the incidence of in-hospital postoperative neurologic events or CHF, but those undergoing CEA (but not CAS or TCAR) experienced a significant increase in-hospital post-operative MI (1.7% vs 0.6%, p<0.001). In 3-year follow-up, those with a positive compared to negative stress test were more likely to undergo CABG/PCI in the CEA (adjusted HR 1.87 [1.42-2.27], p<0.0001) and CAS groups (adjusted HR 3.89 [1.77-8.57], p<0.01), but not the TCAR cohort. Notably those undergoing CEA with a positive compared to negative stress test, but not CAS or TCAR, exhibited a 28% increase in mortality (adjusted HR 1.28 [1.03-1.58], p=0.03) at 3 years. Conversely, those patients with a negative stress test compared to no stress test undergoing CEA experienced a 14% reduction in mortality at 3 years (adjusted HR 0.86 [0.76-0.98], p=0.02); this mortality difference was not observed in similar stress test cohort undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR. CONCLUSIONS:Our study highlights that a positive stress test in appropriately selected, asymptomatic patients undergoing elective carotid revascularization can predict select perioperative and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, given the high follow-up mortality associated with those undergoing CEA for elective carotid revascularization, our findings call into question whether these patients should be preferentially offered optimal medical management and/or stenting.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial found that in patients with an adequate (≥ 3.0 mm) single-segment great saphenous vein (GSV), surgical bypass resulted in superior outcomes when compared to endovascular intervention. Thus, the prevalence of an adequate GSV is an essential factor in planning appropriate intervention for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, the percentage of patients with an adequate GSV remains unknown. The objective of this study was to report the prevalence of an adequate GSV in patients with CLTI. METHODS:This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with CLTI, defined as an ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.60 with appropriate symptoms (ie, rest pain, arterial ulceration), who underwent bilateral sonographic GSV mapping from May 2023 to November 2023. Ipsilateral GSV was defined as the symptomatic limb with the lowest recorded ABI. GSV diameter measurements were collected in seven locations from the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) to the distal calf. To be considered an adequate GSV, all unilateral GSV diameter measurements from the SFJ to the mid-calf must have been at least 3.0 mm. Patients who underwent previous lower extremity bypass procedures were excluded. RESULTS:Seventy patients with CLTI were identified during the study period. Only 11.4 % (8/70) of patients had a completely adequate ipsilateral GSV; if the contralateral vein was also included, rates of GSV adequacy increased to 14.3% (10/70). There were no differences in demographics between patients who had adequate GSV and those who did not. Seven patients (10%) were missing an ipsilateral GSV due to a previous coronary bypass, and one patient (1.4%) had superficial venous thrombosis in their GSV. Patients with an inadequate ipsilateral GSV were less likely to have an adequate contralateral GSV (4.8% vs. 50.0%, p<0.001). The rates of GSV diameter ≥ 3 mm decreased as measurements were recorded more distally: 80% of GSVs were adequate at the level of the SFJ, 21% were adequate at the proximal-calf level, and only 9% were adequate at the distal-calf level. CONCLUSIONS:The majority of patients presenting with CLTI at our institution did not have a sonographically adequate ipsilateral nor contralateral GSV available for surgical bypass to the infrageniculate popliteal or tibial arteries. The rates of GSV diameter ≥ 3 mm in the calf were extremely low overall. Despite the improved outcomes in surgical bypass patients demonstrated in BEST-CLI, endovascular intervention will likely remain frequently utilized due to the low prevalence of an adequate GSV.

BACKGROUND:The recently published PEERLESS trial compared catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it included a low proportion of patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (4.4%), leaving uncertainty about how CDT would perform relative to CBT in a real-world cohort with higher bleeding risk. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to address this gap by comparing real-world outcomes of CDT and CBT in patients with acute PE. METHODS:This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent CDT and CBT at two tertiary care centers from January 2020 to January 2024. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline variables. RESULTS:A total of 162 (mean age 58 years, 45.7% women, 17.3% high-risk, 28% contraindication to lytics, 28% CDT, 72% CBT) patients were included, with 12.4% patients experiencing the primary outcome. There was no difference in the rates of the primary outcome between CBT versus CDT (11.2% vs. 15.2%, IPTW HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.27-2.38, p = 0.69). CBT was associated with a lower risk of hemodynamic decompensation (5% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.036), major bleeding (7.8% vs. 17.4%, IPTW HR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.95, p = 0.042) and ICH (0 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.024) compared to CDT. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among a real-world cohort of patients with acute PE with higher bleeding risk than PEERLESS undergoing catheter-based therapies, CBT was associated with a lower rate of hemodynamic deterioration, major bleeding, and ICH with similar rate of primary composite outcome when compared with CDT. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Patients presenting with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) often undergo percutaneous thrombectomy intending to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). However, the relationship between the extent of DVT and outcomes after thrombectomy has not been explored. The objective of this study was to compare rates of post-thrombectomy DVT recurrence between patients with isolated iliofemoral DVT and patients with iliofemoral DVT and extension more peripherally. METHODS:We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent thrombectomy for iliofemoral DVT from 2014-2023. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: (1) iliofemoral DVT without popliteal/tibial extension or (2) iliofemoral DVT with popliteal/tibial extension. The primary outcome was acute DVT recurrence and multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors for recurrence. Chi-squared and t-tests were calculated for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare rates of acute DVT and chronic venous changes postoperatively. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:222 patients were identified during the study period (76 isolated iliofemoral DVT vs. 146 iliofemoral DVT with peripheral extension) with a median follow-up of 19 months. Patients who presented with iliofemoral DVT with peripheral extension were more likely to be older (57 vs. 50 years, p=0.004), have hypertension (64% vs. 41%, p=0.001) or hyperlipidemia (58% vs. 40%, p=0.01), and to have had surgery within the prior 6-months (29% vs. 17%, p=0.04). Amongst female patients, those on hormone therapy were more likely to have isolated iliofemoral DVT (17% vs. 3%, p<0.001). Patients with iliofemoral DVT with peripheral extension had a greater chance of developing recurrent acute DVT (48% vs. 20%, p<0.001) and chronic venous changes (51% vs. 30%, p=0.004) during follow-up. Multivariable analysis showed a significant correlation between iliofemoral DVT with peripheral extension (Odds ratio 3.8 [95% confidence interval 1.7-8.7], p=0.001) and acute DVT recurrence. There were no differences in the rates of reintervention or death. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:More extensive peripheral thrombus burden was associated with higher rates of follow-up DVT recurrence in patients undergoing thrombectomy for iliofemoral DVT. These findings suggest that such patients may require closer follow-up and more aggressive anticoagulation therapy postoperatively. Moreover, our results provide a framework for further studies to specifically study the role peripheral thrombus may play in venous hemodynamics and the development of recurrent DVT and, ultimately, PTS.