Faculty Bibliography

Intismeran autogene (intismeran; formerly V940 or mRNA-4157) is an mRNA-based individualized neoantigen therapy. We report 5-year outcomes of intismeran plus pembrolizumab from the phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study (NCT03897881). Eligible patients with resected stage IIIB‒IV cutaneous melanoma were randomized 2:1 to receive 9 doses of intramuscular intismeran 1 mg Q3W plus 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); secondary endpoints included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety. Five-year analyses were descriptive. Among 157 randomized patients (intismeran plus pembrolizumab, n=107; pembrolizumab, n=50), median planned follow-up at data cutoff (December 15, 2025) was 60.3 (range, 50.5‒76.4) months. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab continued to prolong RFS (HR, 0.510; 95% CI, 0.294‒0.887) and DMFS (0.411; 0.200‒0.843), with a favorable trend in overall survival (0.471; 0.165‒1.345) versus pembrolizumab. Safety profile continued to be manageable, with no new safety signals. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab was associated with increased T-cell receptor clonality and novel clonotypes versus pembrolizumab; greater novel clone expansion was observed in patients without versus with recurrence in the combination arm. After 5 years' follow-up, intismeran plus pembrolizumab demonstrated sustained, durable treatment benefits versus pembrolizumab alone in resected high-risk melanoma.

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT/OBJECTIVE:To determine the prevalence, etiology, and clinical significance of incidental focal small bowel FDG uptake in patients undergoing PET/CT for staging of non-small bowel cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective review of consecutive FDG PET/CT examinations obtained for cancer staging with incidental focal small bowel radiotracer uptake was performed. Exclusion criteria included known small bowel pathology or insufficient reference standard. Imaging findings assessed included lesion location, number, CT correlate, SUVmax, and presence of metastases outside the bowel. Clinical data included age, sex, cancer clinical setting, origin, and stage. Focal small bowel FDG uptake etiology (benign vs. metastatic) was determined by composite reference standard (histopathology, clinical, and imaging follow-up). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and ROC curve analyses. RESULTS:In a review of 147,516 PET/CT examinations, incidental focal small bowel FDG uptake was rare, with a prevalence of 0.1% (88/147,516). Most cases were metastatic, 60.2% (53/88), most commonly spread from lymphoma [32.1% (17/53)] and melanoma [30.2% (16/53)]. Metastatic lesions were evenly distributed throughout the ileum [47.2% (25/53)] and jejunum [39.6% (21/53)]. Metastatic focal small bowel FDG uptake was associated with presence of other sites of distant metastases, higher SUVmax, and presence of a CT correlate (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Incidental focal small bowel FDG uptake is rare. Most small bowel hypermetabolic foci are metastatic and are predominantly encountered with melanoma and lymphoma. Multiple imaging and clinical factors helped differentiate between benign and metastatic focal small bowel FDG uptake.

BACKGROUND:Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) face frequent advanced cutaneous malignancies, yet data guiding systemic therapy are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), and Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors (HPIs) for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma in SOTRs, including a novel case from our institution. Outcomes included tumor response, graft rejection, and graft failure. RESULTS:Among 196 SOTRs treated with ICIs (101 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, 83 melanoma, 12 Merkel cell carcinoma), the overall response rate (ORR) was 39.3%, and lack of progression occurred in 58.0%. Graft rejection occurred in 36.9% and graft failure in 22.3%. A higher number of baseline immunosuppressive agents decreased odds of rejection (OR 0.55) and failure (OR 0.38). Tacrolimus was associated with reduced tumor response (OR 0.41), whereas mTOR-based regimens and cemiplimab were associated with fewer transplant rejection. T-VEC was reported in 10 SOTRs with an ORR of 90% and no graft rejection or failure. HPIs in six SOTRs with basal cell carcinoma demonstrated ORR of 83% without graft loss. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ICIs provide antitumor activity but substantial graft-related risk, while T-VEC and HPIs show high response rates with no reported rejection.

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic melanoma (MM) varies among patients, and current baseline biomarkers predicting treatment outcomes are limited. As mitochondrial (MT) metabolism has emerged as an important regulator of host immune function, we explored the association of host MT genetics (MT haplogroups) with ICI efficacy in 1,225 ICI-treated patients with MM from the clinical trial CheckMate-067 and the International Germline Immuno-Oncology Melanoma Consortium. We discovered and validated significant associations of MT haplogroup T (HG-T) with resistance to anti-programmed cell death protein-1-based ICI (both single-agent and combination) and have shown that HG-T is independent from established tumor predictors. We also found that patients belonging to HG-T exhibit a unique nivolumab-resistant baseline peripheral CD8⁺ T cell repertoire compared to other MT haplogroups, providing, to our knowledge, the first link between MT inheritance, host immunity and ICI resistance. The study proposes a host blood-based biomarker with stand-alone clinical value predicting ICI efficacy and points to an ICI-resistance mechanism associated with MT metabolism, with clinical relevance in immuno-oncology.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma care. Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with ICI has shown promise to improve clinical outcomes in prior studies in patients who have metastatic melanoma with brain metastases. However, others have suggested that concurrent ICI with stereotactic radiosurgery can increase the risk of complications. METHODS:We present a retrospective, single-institution analysis of 98 patients with a median follow up of 17.1 months managed with immune checkpoint inhibition and stereotactic radiosurgery concurrently and non-concurrently. A total of 55 patients were included in the concurrent group and 43 patients in the non-concurrent treatment group. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relation between concurrent or non-concurrent treatment and overall survival or local progression-free survival. The Wald test was used to assess significance. Significant differences between patients in both groups experiencing adverse events including adverse radiation effects, perilesional edema, and neurological deficits were tested for using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS:Patients receiving concurrent versus non-concurrent ICI showed a significant increase in overall survival (median 37.1 months, 95% CI: 18.9 months - NA versus median 11.4 months, 95% CI: 6.4-33.2 months, p = 0.0056) but not local progression-free survival. There were no significant differences between groups with regards to adverse radiation effects (2% versus 3%), perilesional edema (20% versus 9%), neurological deficits (3% versus 20%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that the timing of ICI does not increase risk of neurological complications when delivered within 4 weeks of SRS.

BACKGROUND:In the phase 2 EMPOWER-CSCC-1 study (NCT02760498), cemiplimab demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic (mCSCC) and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC). OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To report final analysis of weight-based cemiplimab in mCSCC and laCSCC (Groups 1 and 2), fixed-dose cemiplimab in mCSCC (Group 3), and primary analysis of fixed-dose cemiplimab in mCSCC/laCSCC (Group 6). METHODS:Patients received cemiplimab (3 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks [Groups 1 and 2]) or cemiplimab (350 mg IV [Groups 3 and 6]) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) are presented per protocol, according to post-hoc sensitivity analyses that only include the period of protocol-mandated imaging assessments. RESULTS:At 42.5 months, ORR for Groups 1-3 (n=193) was 47.2%, estimated 12-month DOR was 88.3%, and median PFS was 26.0 months. At 8.7 months, ORR for Group 6 (n=165 patients) was 44.8%; median DOR and median PFS were not reached. Serious treatment-emergent adverse event rates (grade ≥3) were Groups 1-3: 31.1% and Group 6: 34.5%. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Non-randomized study, non-survival primary endpoint. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:EMPOWER-CSCC-1 provides the largest prospective data on long-term efficacy and safety for anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy in advanced CSCC.

PURPOSE:Combined BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibition can induce clinical responses in BRAF-V600E-mutant colon cancer, but rapid resistance often occurs. METHODS:We use serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) in a patient case study in addition to organoids derived from mouse models of BRAF-V600E-mutant intestinal cancer, which emulated the patient's mutational profile to assess drug treatment efficacy. RESULTS:We demonstrate dynamic evolution of resistance to combined EGFR/BRAF/MEK inhibition in a pediatric patient with metastatic BRAF-V600E-mutant, mismatch repair-stable colon cancer. Initial resistance to targeted therapy was associated with development of MET amplification. Sequential treatment with chemotherapy and targeted therapy resulted in clearing of the resistant MET-amplified clone. Rechallenge with combined BRAF/EGFR inhibition resulted in clinical and radiographic response, demonstrating these treatments may be non-cross-resistant. Tumor organoids were used to model clinical findings and demonstrated effectiveness of combined targeted therapy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION:These findings suggest rational strategies for combining sequential chemotherapy and BRAF-/EGFR-directed therapy in BRAF-V600E-mutant colon cancer to prevent resistance and improve outcome. The data demonstrate rapid clonal dynamics in response to effective therapies in BRAF-V600E-mutant colon cancer that can be monitored by serial cfDNA analysis. Moreover, in mismatch repair-proficient BRAF-V600E-mutant colon cancers, combined EGFR and BRAF/MEK therapy is not cross-resistant with standard chemotherapy, suggesting new rational combination treatment strategies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can achieve durable responses in patients with advanced melanoma, and results from clinical trials suggest cure may be possible for a subset of patients. Despite clinical trial data, little is known about the risk, character, and clinical outcome of late recurrences after ICI. This study aimed to explore the disease outcomes and survival in a cohort of patients with long-term responses to ICI. We retrospectively identified patients treated with ICI for advanced melanoma with long-term disease control, defined as not requiring a subsequent line of systemic therapy within 3 years of ICI commencement. We analysed disease characteristics, treatment, toxicity, recurrence patterns, management, and outcomes. A total of 567 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 7.1 years: 504 (89 %) without disease progression within 3 years (cohort 1) and 63 (11.1 %) with disease progression within 3 years managed without a change in systemic therapy (cohort 2). Subsequent progression after 3 years occurred for 39 (7.7 %) patients in cohort 1, compared to 14 (22 %) in cohort 2. Predictors for late progression after 3 years were a non-complete radiological response (CR) best response and prior progression within 3 years. Thirty-two patients (5.6 %) died during follow-up, 8 (1.4 %) from melanoma, 6 (1.2 %) from cohort 1 and 2 (3.2 %) from cohort 2. In this population of patients with advanced melanoma with long-term disease control from ICI, the risk of subsequent disease progression and death was low. This suggests that a significant proportion of long-term ICI responders are likely cured and may inform the frequency and duration of follow-up.