Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Outcomes for NSCLC remain suboptimal. Recent data suggest that cryoablation can generate antitumor immune effects. In this first-in-human phase I clinical trial, we investigated the safety and feasibility of bronchoscopic cryoimmunotherapy (BCI) delivered during standard-of-care bronchoscopy and explored associated systemic immune responses. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Subjects with known or suspected advanced-stage NSCLC were recruited. BCI was delivered in dose-escalated freeze-thaw cycles to determine maximum dose tolerance. Feasibility assessment was determined with a pre-set goal of achieving successful BCI in more than or equal to 80% of subjects. Safety was assessed by review of BCI-related complications, including grades 2 to 3 bleeding, pneumothorax requiring intervention, and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 to 5 adverse events. Pre- and post-BCI blood samples were collected to explore changes in the systemic immune profile. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Subjects with predominantly clinical TNM stage 3 or 4 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. We reached the maximum dose of 30 seconds with 100% feasibility and no BCI-related adverse events. In peripheral blood analysis, we observed a significant decrease in derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the high-dose BCI group in comparison to the low-dose BCI cohort. We also observed increases in inflammatory cytokines-GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-17A, and IL-2-and effector memory T cells post-BCI. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:BCI is safe and feasible. In addition, we provide preliminary evidence that at higher dose levels there is a systemic immune response consistent with a cytotoxic profile. Further immune analyses will determine the potential of BCI as an adjunctive therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition in NSCLC treatment.

BACKGROUND:It remains challenging to safely and reliably biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is gaining adoption for navigation to PPLs. However, evidence from large studies remains limited. RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:What is the clinical safety, navigational success, and diagnostic yield of RAB for biopsy of PPLs in a broad range of patients in a real-world setting? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:This multicenter, prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients >21 years old with 8-50 mm lung lesions requiring bronchoscopic diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the following device- or procedure-related events: (1) pneumothorax requiring intervention; (2) bleeding requiring intervention; or (3) respiratory failure. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, procedure time, pneumothoraces, radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) confirmation, conversion to an alternative biopsy procedure, complications, and diagnostic yield (DY). RESULTS:Among 715 patients at 21 sites, 679 met study criteria and underwent RAB (mean age 68.7, 55.4% female, 86.5% White, 77.5% current/past tobacco users). Mean (range) lesion size was 20.9 (7.0-63.0) mm; median (IQR) distance from pleural surface was 5 (0-16) mm. Most lesions were solid (n=587; 86.6%) and within the outer two-thirds of the lung (n=593; 87.5%). The primary endpoint was observed in 26 (3.8%) patients (19 pneumothorax, 7 bleeding, 0 respiratory failure). Users reported that RAB reached the lesion in 670/679 (98.7%) cases, and lesion location was confirmed with R-EBUS in 607/662 (91.7%) cases; sampling through the bronchoscope was performed in 675/679 (99.4%) cases. Prevalence of malignancy was 64.1% through 12 months. Adjudicated DY was 61.6% when calculated with the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) definition for strict reporting criteria. Sensitivity for malignancy was 78.8%. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:This largest multicenter prospective study of RAB to date demonstrated that RAB-guided sampling of PPLs is safe and compares favorably to results from sizable non-robotic bronchoscopy studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/BACKGROUND:NCT04182815.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Mounting evidence indicates that an individual's humoral adaptive immune response plays a critical role in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and that the efficiency of the response correlates with disease severity. The relationship between the adaptive immune dynamics in the lower airways with those in the systemic circulation, and how these relate to an individual's clinical response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, are less understood and are the focus of this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We investigated the adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in paired samples from the lower airways and blood from 27 critically ill patients during the first wave of the pandemic (median time from symptom onset to intubation 11 days). Measurements included clinical outcomes (mortality), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood specimen antibody levels, and BALF viral load. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:While there was heterogeneity in the levels of the SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, we unexpectedly found that some BALF specimens displayed higher levels than the paired concurrent plasma samples, despite the known dilutional effects common in BALF samples. We found that survivors had higher levels of anti-spike, anti-spike-N-terminal domain and anti-spike-receptor-binding domain IgG antibodies in their BALF (p<0.05), while there was no such association with antibody levels in the systemic circulation. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Our data highlight the critical role of local adaptive immunity in the airways as a key defence mechanism against primary SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) complicate malignancies and portend worse outcomes. MPE is comprised of various components, including immune cells, cancer cells, and cell-free DNA/RNA. There have been investigations into using these components to diagnose and prognosticate MPE. We hypothesize that the microbiome of MPE is unique and may be associated with diagnosis and prognosis. We compared the microbiota of MPE against microbiota of pleural effusions from non-malignant and paramalignant states. We collected a total of 165 pleural fluid samples from 165 subjects; Benign (n = 16), Paramalignant (n = 21), MPE-Lung (n = 57), MPE-Other (n = 22), and Mesothelioma (n = 49). We performed high throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing on pleural fluid samples and controls. We showed that there are compositional differences among pleural effusions related to non-malignant, paramalignant, and malignant disease. Furthermore, we showed differential enrichment of bacterial taxa within MPE depending on the site of primary malignancy. Pleural fluid of MPE-Lung and Mesothelioma were associated with enrichment with oral and gut bacteria that are commonly thought to be commensals, including Rickettsiella, Ruminococcus, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillales. Mortality in MPE-Lung is associated with enrichment in Methylobacterium, Blattabacterium, and Deinococcus. These observations lay the groundwork for future studies that explore host-microbiome interactions and their influence on carcinogenesis.

Respiratory failure is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. There are no validated lower airway biomarkers to predict clinical outcome. We investigated whether bacterial respiratory infections were associated with poor clinical outcome of COVID-19 in a prospective, observational cohort of 589 critically ill adults, all of whom required mechanical ventilation. For a subset of 142 patients who underwent bronchoscopy, we quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, analysed the lower respiratory tract microbiome using metagenomics and metatranscriptomics and profiled the host immune response. Acquisition of a hospital-acquired respiratory pathogen was not associated with fatal outcome. Poor clinical outcome was associated with lower airway enrichment with an oral commensal (Mycoplasma salivarium). Increased SARS-CoV-2 abundance, low anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response and a distinct host transcriptome profile of the lower airways were most predictive of mortality. Our data provide evidence that secondary respiratory infections do not drive mortality in COVID-19 and clinical management strategies should prioritize reducing viral replication and maximizing host responses to SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and the risk for healthcare providers. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study; patients were enrolled between March 11, and April 29, 2020. The date of final follow-up was July 30, 2020. We used a propensity score matching approach to compare outcomes. Study outcomes were formulated before data collection and analysis. SETTING/METHODS:Critical care units at two large metropolitan hospitals in New York City. PATIENTS/METHODS:Five-hundred forty-one patients with confirmed severe coronavirus disease 2019 respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with modified visualization and ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS/RESULTS:Required time for discontinuation off mechanical ventilation, total length of hospitalization, and overall patient survival. Of the 541 patients, 394 patients were eligible for a tracheostomy. One-hundred sixteen were early percutaneous dilational tracheostomies with median time of 9 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation (interquartile range, 7-12 d), whereas 89 were late percutaneous dilational tracheostomies with a median time of 19 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation (interquartile range, 16-24 d). Compared with patients with no tracheostomy, patients with an early percutaneous dilational tracheostomy had a higher probability of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation (absolute difference, 30%; p < 0.001; hazard ratio for successful discontinuation, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.34-5.84; p = 0.006) and a lower mortality (absolute difference, 34%, p < 0.001; hazard ratio for death, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.06-0.22; p < 0.001). Compared with patients with late percutaneous dilational tracheostomy, patients with early percutaneous dilational tracheostomy had higher discontinuation rates from mechanical ventilation (absolute difference 7%; p < 0.35; hazard ratio for successful discontinuation, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01-2.3; p = 0.04) and had a shorter median duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors (absolute difference, -15 d; p < 0.001). None of the healthcare providers who performed all the percutaneous dilational tracheostomies procedures had clinical symptoms or any positive laboratory test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. CONCLUSIONS:In coronavirus disease 2019 patients on mechanical ventilation, an early modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy was safe for patients and healthcare providers and associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Mortality among patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure is high and there are no known lower airway biomarkers that predict clinical outcome. We investigated whether bacterial respiratory infections and viral load were associated with poor clinical outcome and host immune tone. We obtained bacterial and fungal culture data from 589 critically ill subjects with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. On a subset of the subjects that underwent bronchoscopy, we also quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, analyzed the microbiome of the lower airways by metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses and profiled the host immune response. We found that isolation of a hospital-acquired respiratory pathogen was not associated with fatal outcome. However, poor clinical outcome was associated with enrichment of the lower airway microbiota with an oral commensal ( Mycoplasma salivarium ), while high SARS-CoV-2 viral burden, poor anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, together with a unique host transcriptome profile of the lower airways were most predictive of mortality. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that 1) the extent of viral infectivity drives mortality in severe COVID-19, and therefore 2) clinical management strategies targeting viral replication and host responses to SARS-CoV-2 should be prioritized.