Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy requires 2 years of follow-up for living kidney donors (LKDs); however, many transplant hospitals struggle to meet this requirement. We developed and tested a mobile health (mHealth) system for LKD follow-up in a pilot randomized-controlled trial (RCT). METHODS:LKDs were randomly assigned to either the intervention (mHealth + standard of care) or control arm (standard of care). We assessed OPTN policy-defined completeness and timeliness of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups. Four hundred LKDs were enrolled in the study (June 2018 to February 2021). RESULTS:At 6-month follow-up, a higher proportion of the intervention arm participants completed composite visits (97.5% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.01). Both arms had similar compliance rates at 1- and 2-year follow-up (92.0% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.49, and 66.5% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.83). Intervention arm participants completed 6-month follow-up 11 days earlier than their counterparts (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:mHealth technologies improved 6-month follow-up, but did not impact 1- and 2-year LKD follow-up in this single-center RCT. Other strategies, such as providing services beyond data collection, may be necessary to improve donor engagement and support LDK's long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Predicting graft failure risk in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients could identify areas for improving management. Persistent cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits are common in recipients and their impact on graft survival following LT helps inform risk prediction. METHODS:Using SRTR data 2008-2023, we evaluated the cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits of LT recipients at time of transplant to 14 years post-LT. We compared all cause graft failure (ACGF) among patients with versus without pre-LT and 1-year post-LT deficits using Cox regression, adjusting for recipient characteristics. We calculated an individual risk score for ACGF. RESULTS:In 8062 pediatric LT recipients median age 3 (IQR: 1, 10), 28.0%, 29.5%, 35.0%, and 79.8% of recipients had pre-LT deficits in cognition, motor, academic activity, and functional status respectively. This decreased to 23.0%, 18.1%, 14.2%, and 38.7% 1-year post-LT. Increased hazard of ACGF was noted in recipients with pre-LT decreased functional status (aHR = 1.13 (per 10% decrease), 95% CI: 1.10-1.15, p < 0.001), definite motor delay (aHR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21-2.10, p < 0.001), and inability to participate in academics (aHR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08-1.89, p = 0.01), but not delays in cognition (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.69-1.21, p = 0.19). Our risk score predicting ACGF demonstrated improved predictive performance compared to clinical parameters alone (C-statistic = 0.70 (0.67, 0.72) vs. 0.66 (0.64, 0.69), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Pediatric LT recipients with pre- or post-LT motor, academic, and functional deficits are at higher risk for ACGF. Care should be taken to assess deficits to identify patients who may benefit from functional intervention to potentially reduce ACGF risk.

BACKGROUND:Under the HOPE Act, transplants from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+) have been largely limited to kidney and liver. However, recent modifications to HOPE research guidelines allow broader participation of cardiothoracic programs. METHODS:To quantify potential cardiothoracic HOPE donors, we used SRTR data (3/2016-12/2024) to identify 101,200 donors without HIV and 273 HOPE donors (with true and false positive HIV tests). Using logistic regression, we predicted the probability of having a heart or lung(s) used for transplant among donors without HIV that had a kidney or liver used. We then applied model parameters to HOPE donors that had a kidney or liver used to estimate the number of HOPE donors that might have been cardiothoracic donors if the practice were expanded. RESULTS:Among donors without HIV, cardiothoracic donation was associated with age, cause of death, hepatitis C, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, cardiovascular disease, blood gas, and circulatory death. Applying our model, an estimated 41.0% (N=111), 18.7% (N=51), and 15.2% (N=41) of HOPE donors were potential heart, any lung (single or double), or double-lung donors, as compared to 32.3%, 21.8%, and 18.2% of abdominal organ donors without HIV, respectively. This translated to an annual 13-18 potential heart and 5-8 potential lung transplants (of which 4-6 would be double-lung transplants) from HOPE donors. CONCLUSIONS:If HIV D+/R+ is more widely expanded to cardiothoracic transplantation, 41% of HOPE kidney and liver donors have potential to donate a heart and almost 20% to donate a lung to candidates with HIV.

BACKGROUND:Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are indicators of abnormal body composition (BC). Computed tomography (CT) imaging has proven to be an accurate modality for BC quantification in kidney transplantation (KT). We tested whether pre-KT CT-based BC was associated with both all-cause graft loss (ACGL) and mortality among adult recipients from two centers (Johns Hopkins Hospital [JHH] and University Medical Center Groningen [UMCG]). METHODS:Patients who underwent a KT between 2003 and 2020 were followed for a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6.4 (4.6-8.5) years at JHH and 6.3 (5.1-7.5) years at UMCG. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the associations of BC with ACGL/ mortality. Fine and Gray regression analysis was performed to assess the association between BC and death-censored graft loss. Prior to KT, 49% of recipients had sarcopenia and 66% had myosteatosis. RESULTS:In total 608 patients were included from JHH (N= 294) and UMCG (N=314). Sarcopenia was not associated with post-KT outcomes. Myosteatosis was associated with a higher risk of ACGL (adjusted hazard ratio 1.78, 95%CI:1.08 - 2.93) and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.35, 95%CI: 1.27 - 4.33) at JHH, but showed no significant association at UMCG after adjusting for confounders. Myosteatosis did not show a significant association with death-censored graft loss at both centers. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Myosteatosis ascertained from existing CT scans could help identify recipients at higher risk for ACGL who may benefit most from prehabilitation.

With U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of clinical trials of kidney xenotransplantation (XTx) in living humans, understanding the recipient experience is critical. Semi-structured interviews with the three living XTx recipients identified core domains of the recipient experience, including quality of life (QoL), fears about XTx, and healthcare team communication and support. Transcribed interviews were analyzed by two qualitative researchers using an inductive thematic approach and were mapped onto the Warwick Patient Experience Model, a validated framework to assess key aspects of patient satisfaction with the healthcare experience. All three recipients (53-year-old female; 66-year-old male; 54-year old male) described a restoration of hope, contrasted with their poor quality of life on dialysis. They emphasized that access to XTx and graft survival requires mutual confidence and commitment between recipients and healthcare teams. XTx recipients use dialysis as a point of reference when describing changes in their post-transplant QoL and seemed well-situated to handle the possibility of graft failure. These insights may aid in the creation of decision aids and educational materials tailored to the specific needs of XTx recipients.

BACKGROUND:To encourage high-quality, reduced-cost care for total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services mandated a pay-for-performance model, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR), as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The CJR incentivizes cost containment, and it was anticipated that its implementation would reduce access to TJA for high-cost populations. Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing kidney replacement therapy (dialysis and kidney transplant) are costly compared with healthier patients, but it was unknown whether this population lost access to hip and knee replacement because of CJR implementation. This population allows study of whether TJA is accessible for medically complex patients whose risk of surgical complications has been mitigated, as kidney transplantation improves outcomes compared with dialysis, allowing evaluation as to whether access improved when patients crossed over from dialysis to transplantation. Because all patients with ESKD are included in a mandated national registry, we can quantify whether access changed for patients who underwent dialysis and transplantation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES/OBJECTIVE:(1) How did the rate of TJA change amid the shift to bundled payments for patients with ESKD receiving dialysis? (2) How did the rate of TJA change amid the shift to bundled payments for patients with ESKD after kidney transplant? METHODS:This was an observational cohort study from 2008 to 2018 using the United States Renal Data System, a mandatory national registry that allows for the opportunity to study all individuals with ESKD. During the study period, we identified 1,324,614 adults undergoing routine dialysis and 187,212 adult kidney transplant recipients; after exclusion for non-Medicare primary insurance (n = 785,224 for dialysis and 78,011 for transplant), patients who were 100 years or older (n = 79 and 0, respectively), those who resided outside of 50 US states and Puerto Rico (n = 781 and 87, respectively), missing dialysis status for the dialysis cohort (n = 8658), and multiorgan transplant recipients for the transplant cohort (n = 2442), our study population was 40% (529,872) of patients who underwent routine dialysis and 57% (106,672) of adult kidney transplant recipients, respectively. TJA was ascertained using Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. We divided the study period by PPACA (January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2016) and CJR (April 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018) implementation and compared the incidence of TJA by era using mixed-effects Poisson regression adjusting for calendar time and clinical and demographic variables. RESULTS:After adjustment for linear temporal trend and patient case mix, there was no evidence of association between policy implementation and the incidence of TJA. In the dialysis cohort, the adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for TJA was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98 to 1.14; p = 0.2) comparing PPACA with the previous period and 1.02 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.08; p = 0.6) comparing CJR with the previous periods. Similarly, in the transplant cohort, the adjusted IRR for TJA was 0.82 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.02; p = 0.07) comparing PPACA with the previous period and 1.10 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.28; p = 0.9) comparing CJR with the previous periods. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There was no loss in access to TJA for medically complex patients receiving kidney replacement therapy. The increase in TJA incidence for patients after kidney transplant and decrease for patients receiving dialysis suggest that surgeons continued to provide care for higher risk patients whose risk of morbidity or mortality with total joint replacement has been maximally improved after transplantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, prognostic study.

Community input enhances the impact of research. Yet, there are challenges when eliciting community perspectives in nephrology/transplant research: recruitment of patients across a wide spectrum of familiarity with kidney disease; a lack of trust from marginalized patients because of health care barriers, institutionalized structural racism, and historical harm; and retention of members facing high burden of care. To address these challenges, we drafted a mission and formed a community advisory board to provide input on nephrology/transplant research. We worked with kidney disease community organizations that prioritize diversity and equity to recruit members with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, or a kidney transplant, as well as nephrology/transplant caregivers and kidney donors. We formed a diverse group of 9 members and received feedback on 5 research proposals over 4 quarterly meetings, bridging a communication gap between community perspectives and researchers. The collaborative environment stimulated feedback that improved our nephrology/transplant research to reflect the perspectives of those most affected by research findings. Eight members have remained active for more than 1 year. In this collaborative paper, we describe our process of forming a nephrology/transplant community advisory board, and participants highlight the benefits of sharing their lived experiences to improve and amplify the impact of nephrology/transplant research.

The benefits of bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) versus single lung transplantation (SLT) are still debated. One impediment to clinical recommendations is that BLT vs. SLT advantages may vary based on underlying disease. Since both options are clinically tenable in patients with emphysema, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of lung allograft survival in this population. Using U.S. registry data, we studied time to all-cause allograft failure in 8,092 patients 12 years or older transplanted from 2006 to 2022, adjusting for recipient, donor, and transplant factors by inverse propensity weighting. Median allograft survival was 6.6 years in BLT compared to 5.3 years in SLT, a 25% risk-adjusted survival advantage of _0.81.3_1.8 years. Risk-adjusted bilateral survival advantages varied between 0.9 and 2.4 years across eleven subgroups. Median allograft survival in BLT was 1.2 years greater than right SLT and 2.0 years greater than left SLT. During the 16-year study period, allograft survival steadily improved for BLT but not for SLT. Although the 25% BLT survival advantage pre-dated the pandemic, COVID-19 may have contributed to an apparent SLT survival decline. Recognizing the possible influence of residual confounding due to selection biases, these findings may aid offer decision-making when both donor lungs are available.

BACKGROUND:Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) provide survival benefits in people with diabetes, including kidney transplant (KT) recipients with pre-existing diabetes. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is common, but the benefits of GLP1RAs remain undefined in this population. We aim to describe current usage practices and outcomes in PTDM. METHODS:We used USRDS and Medicare claims data (2013-2022) to conduct a drug utilization profile of GLP1RA among 7681 first-time adult KT recipients with PTDM. We used survival analysis to estimate GLP1RA initiation incidence and associated patient, graft, and safety outcomes. RESULTS:A total of 430 adult KT recipients with PTDM were prescribed GLP1RA. Dulaglutide was the most commonly prescribed medication (46.1%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of GLP-1 receptor agonists prescription was 9.8%. Median (interquartile range) time from PTDM diagnosis to first prescription was 1.7 (0.6, 3.4) years. GLP1RA use was not associated with a difference in the risk of mortality or graft failure but was associated with a 1.80-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.91) increased risk of diabetic retinopathy. No increased risk of pancreatitis, biliary complications, or medullary thyroid cancer were identified. CONCLUSIONS:GLP1RA use in KT recipients with PTDM was not associated with graft or patient survival, though longer follow-up is necessary. GLP1RA use was associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy, and care should be taken when initiating these agents.