Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The Veterans Affairs Health Administration (VA) has experience using telehealth (TH) to deliver care to 10 million enrolled Veterans for many clinical care needs. The VA National TeleOncology Service (NTO) was established in 2020 to provide specialized cancer services regardless of geography. We sought to compare quality in TH-delivered cancer services with traditional (TR) in-person VA care. METHODS:Using electronic health record data, we identified patients with an International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic code for an incident malignancy from December 2016 to March 2021 at early adopting sites providing both TR and TH care. We classified patients as TH users if they received TH services at least once for their cancer care. We gathered demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics to calculate 25 Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) measures in the symptoms and toxicity management (two), end of life and palliative care (10), and core measure domains (13). We report disease-specific measures, QOPI measures descriptively, and performed chi-square tests to compare TH and TR. RESULTS:= .002). TH and TR rates were similar for the other QOPI measures. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:VA is a leader in TH cancer care because of both its volume and quality. VA-provided TH cancer care quality is similar to or better than that of TR in-person care. NTO specifically, and VA teleoncology broadly, provides another option to Veterans for cancer care.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Black sexually minoritized men and gender-expansive people (SGM), including transgender women, have higher levels of alcohol use and experience greater negative consequences from alcohol consumption than the general population. We investigated the role of multilevel factors contributing to alcohol use among these groups. METHODS:We analyzed data collected from HIV-negative participants in the Neighborhoods and Network (N2) cohort study in Chicago, IL (N = 138). Participants completed a social network inventory (November 2018-April 2019) and reported alcohol use (frequency, quantity, and frequency of binge drinking) during a quantitative assessment. We used stepwise negative binomial regression to identify associations with social network and individual-level alcohol use while controlling for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: = 2.7), of whom 93% were Black and 78% were friends/family. Among the confidants, 30% drank alcohol at least several times per week. Identifying as Latine (RR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.44-3.10), having a higher Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score (RR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00-1.05), living with a problem drinker during one's childhood (RR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.39-2.34), and having a greater proportion of regular drinkers in one's social network (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.02-2.17) were positively associated with alcohol use. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Black SGM exposed to social network alcohol use during childhood and adulthood reported increased alcohol use. Interventions targeting Black SGM should address social norms around alcohol, intersectional discrimination, and mental health.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) provides insight into the effectiveness and feasibility of smoking-related interventions. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The objective of this paper was to assess adherence to an EMA protocol and compare EMA-derived responses with measures collected through multiple surveys. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A subanalysis was conducted using data from a 12-week, open-label, and 2-arm pilot randomized clinical trial among adult smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, or asthma in the last 12 months (n=109). Participants were randomized to either electronic cigarette (EC) or nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) treatment arms. We compared EMA data collected through automated SMS text message prompts sent to participants 4 times daily for 12 weeks, including cigarettes smoked per day (CPD), craving, and satisfaction, to survey data collected at 12 weeks. Convergent validity between survey- and EMA-reported measures was evaluated using Pearson correlation and paired t tests. CPD was modeled using negative binomial regression. Relative rates (RRs) of reaching at least 50%, 75%, and 100% CPD reduction between two arms were calculated using both EMA and survey data. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The majority of participants were non-Hispanic White (63/109, 58%) and female (60/109, 55%), and had a median age of 60 (IQR 54-65) years. Among the 109 participants, 59.6% (n=65) were consistently adherent to the EMA protocol over the 12-week period. Median weekly EMA response rate remained high over the 12-week study period even though a modest decline was observed (week 1, 97.8% and week 12, 89.4%). The mean CPD declined significantly (week 1, mean 14.2, SD 9.9 and week 12, mean 4.6, SD 6.7; P<.001). EMA-derived and survey-based CPD measurements were positively correlated (r=0.73, 95% CI 0.6-0.82) as were measures of craving (r=0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.56). No significant paired difference in CPD was observed between EMA measurements and surveys. A significant effect of time on CPD EMA data (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1-week change 0.93; P<.01) and survey data was found (IRR 12-week change 0.36; P<.01). However, the treatment effect was not significant, which aligned with the RR results. An increase in the EC consumption was observed over time in the EC arm, with 12.1% (7/58) fully switched to EC (defined as CPD=0 and EC use>0) and 20.7% (12/58) mostly switched (defined as a reduction in CPD>75% and EC use>0) in week 12. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:EMA is a suitable method to collect recall-based smoking-related data. Though results from mixed effect modeling and RR comparisons were similar using EMA or survey data, EMA provides unique advantages, namely greater granularity in the time and the capability to detect switching patterns in near real time. These findings provide the feasibility of using EMA in developing smoking cessation interventions in future tobacco harm reduction research.

BACKGROUND:Tobacco use continues to take the lives of many, and targeted interventions can counter this health burden. One possible target population is patients who have had a smoking-related diagnosis, as they may have a greater drive to quit. OBJECTIVE:To assess whether patients with previous cardiac or pulmonary conditions directly attributable to smoking have greater rates of abstinence post-discharge from hospitalization in the CHART-NY trial. DESIGN/METHODS:CHART-NY was a randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing a more intensive versus a less intensive smoking cessation intervention after hospital discharge. We divided the 1618 CHART-NY participants into a smoking-related history group of 597 and a nonsmoking-related history group of 1021 based on cardiac or pulmonary conditions in a retrospective chart review. We conducted chi-squared analyses on baseline characteristics. Using follow-up survey data, we conducted chi-squared analyses on abstinence outcomes and made logistic regression models for the predictive value of smoking-related conditions on abstinence. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A total of 1059 and 1084 participants in CHART-NY who completed both 2- and 6-month follow-up surveys respectively. MAIN MEASURES/METHODS:Self-reported 30-day abstinence at 2- and 6-month follow-up and survey data for baseline characteristics. KEY RESULTS/RESULTS:Those abstinent at 6-month follow-up were more likely to have a smoking-attributable history (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.81). When stratified based on intervention, only the intensive counseling group was significant (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). The regression model using a smoking-related comorbidity score was significant at 6 months (OR = 1.29, p = 0.03), and the multivariate logistic regression model analyzing each smoking-related condition separately demonstrated significance for myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR = 1.66, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:People who smoke who have experienced smoking-related conditions may be more likely to benefit from smoking cessation interventions, especially intensive telephone-based counseling. Multiple conditions had an additive effect in predicting long-term abstinence after intervention, and myocardial infarction had the greatest predictive value.

BACKGROUND:In the United States (U.S.), the prevalence of anxiety and depression is increasing, yet significant barriers to mental health treatment remain. U.S. military veterans are disproportionately affected by anxiety and depression. Many veterans receive medical care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), an integrated healthcare system that has enacted clinical initiatives to reduce barriers to mental health treatment. OBJECTIVE:We examined associations between VHA healthcare use and receipt of mental health counseling or prescription medication for anxiety or depression. DESIGN/METHODS:Cross-sectional nationally representative study. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:U.S. veterans aged ≥ 18 years with past 12-month healthcare use and anxiety or depression (N = 1,161). MAIN MEASURES/METHODS:In the 2019 National Health Interview Survey, veterans were assessed for their use of the VHA (vs. non-VHA healthcare use) and receipt of past 12-month mental health counseling, prescription medication for anxiety, or prescription medication for depression. KEY RESULTS/RESULTS:Among all veterans with anxiety or depression, only 23% received mental health counseling, while 26% and 23% received prescription medication for anxiety or depression, respectively. Compared to non-VHA veterans, VHA patients were more likely to receive counseling (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.28, 95% CI: 5.33, 7.40), and prescription medication for anxiety (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.72, 2.40), or depression (aOR = 2.54, 95% CI: 2.17, 2.97). CONCLUSIONS:Among veterans with anxiety or depression, VHA patients were more likely to receive mental health treatment than non-VHA veterans. Findings suggest that veteran use of counseling and psychiatric interventions remains limited, though the integrated healthcare system of the VHA may facilitate access to mental health treatment and provides a framework for non-VHA medical centers to expand access to and improve delivery of mental health services.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease, and the risk increases with number of family members affected. It offers insights into shared genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors that influence heart disease risk. In this study, we aimed to estimate the association of family history of CVD and its risk factors, as well as the number of affected parents or siblings, with the prevalence of major cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs) such as hypertension, dysglycemia, dyslipidemia and obesity in a sample of young adults. METHODS:The study utilized a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the UAE Healthy Future Study (UAEHFS), involving 5,058 respondents below the age of 40 years. Information on parental and sibling health regarding heart disease and stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), high cholesterol and obesity, was gathered through a self-completed questionnaire. CRFs were estimated based on body measurements, biochemical markers and self-reported conditions. Multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the associations between categories of family history and the estimated CRFs. RESULTS:More than half (58%) of the sample reported having a positive family history of CVD or its risk factors. The most common family history reported was T2D and hypertension, which accounted for 39.8% and 35% of the sample, respectively. The prevalence of all CRFs was significantly higher among those with a positive family history compared to those without family-history (P < 0.001). The prevalence and likelihood of having a CRF increased as the number of parents and/or siblings affected increased, indicating a potential dose-response trend. The odds were highest among individuals with both parental-and-sibling family history of disease, where they increased to 2.36 (95% CI 1.68-3.32) for hypertension, 2.59 (95% CI 1.86-3.60) for dysglycemia, 1.9 (95% CI 1.29-2.91) for dyslipidemia and 3.79 (95% CI 2.83-5.06) for obesity. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this study, we addressed the effect of family history as an independent risk factor on the major CRFs for the first time in the region. We observed that the majority of young Emirati adults had a positive family history of CVD-related diseases. Family history showed a strong association with the increased prevalence of CRFs. Additionally, having more relatives with specific diseases was associated with a higher risk of developing CRFs. Identifying people with a history of these conditions can help in early intervention and personalized risk assessments.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:E-cigarettes (ECs) may be an effective harm reduction strategy for individuals with conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, coronary artery disease (CAD), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who smoke combustible cigarettes (CCs). Our aim was to examine how individuals with chronic conditions transition from CCs to ECs and its impact on health outcomes. METHODS:In a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients with COPD, asthma, CAD/PAD who currently smoke CCs and have not used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or ECs in the past 14 days were randomized to receive ECs or combination NRT with behavioral counselling. Disease symptoms, acceptability/satisfaction (TSQM-9) and feasibility, and cigarettes per day (CPD), and/or EC use were collected at baseline, 3-, and 6-months. Descriptive statistics and a linear regression were conducted to explore changes in CPD and chronic condition-specific assessments (CAT, SAQ-7, ACT) that assess COPD, asthma, and CAD/PAD symptom change. RESULTS:At 3-months, the EC group (n=63, mean CPD=9±11) reduced their CPD by 54% vs. 60% in the NRT group (n=58, mean CPD=7±6), p=0.56. At 6-months, 17.5% had switched completely to ECs while 23% quit smoking in the NRT arm. CAT scores showed a significant 6-point reduction in the EC arm (p=0.03). Participants scored an average of 69±27 for EC effectiveness, 87±23 for convenience, and 75±27 for overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS:This pilot study suggests that ECs may be a safer alternative for chronic condition patients using CCs and warrants further research on expected smoking cessation/reduction among individuals who use ECs. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The findings from this pilot RCT hold significant implications with chronic conditions such as COPD, asthma, CAD and PAD who smoke CCs. The observed reduction in cigarettes per day and improvement in respiratory symptoms suggest that switching to ECs appears feasible and acceptable among those with chronic diseases. These results suggest that ECs may offer an alternative for individuals struggling to quit CC smoking through existing pharmacotherapies. This study supports further exploration of switching to ECs as a harm reduction strategy among CC users who have been unsuccessful at quitting by other means.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:E-cigarettes (ECs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) are recent arrivals to the nicotine product market in the Middle East, which are rapidly growing in popularity in the region. There is a lack of surveillance data at the country-level on use of these products and factors associated with their use. METHODS:This study analyzed a subset of data from the UAE Healthy Future Study, a population-based cohort study of the Emirati population, to determine the factors associated with EC and HTP use among a sample of Emirati adults (≥ 18 years). The baseline assessment and supplementary questionnaires, conducted from 2016 to 2023, included data on combustible tobacco use, EC, and HTP use and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS:Of the 2,041 individuals who answered questions on EC use, 32% reported ever using them. Of 521 people providing data on HTP, 30% reported ever using them. After adjusting for age, sex, education, perceived harms and perceived addictiveness of EC, current EC use was associated with baseline combustible tobacco smoking (aOR = 27.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.39, 53.06), users of a younger age (aOR=0.91, 95%CI 0.88, 0.95), and users of male sex (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.21, 3.81). Current HTP use was less common, but was also associated with baseline combustible tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS:Use of ECs and HTPs was more common among those who used combustible tobacco. Future research should examine use trajectories among those who do and do not smoke, as well as uptake of these products among youth. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Non-combustible nicotine products are growing in popularity in the Middle East Region. Our study found that EC and HTP use is associated with baseline combustible tobacco use and that concurrent users may use them to cut down on their combustible tobacco use. Continued comprehensive population-based monitoring of all tobacco and nicotine products, especially EC and HTP use, will provide current data to aid in appropriately informing public health and harm reduction messages and programming.

BACKGROUND:Chinese immigrants experience significant disparities in tobacco use. Culturally adapted tobacco treatments targeting this population are sparse and the use is low. The low use of these treatment programs is attributed to their exclusive focus on individuals who are ready to quit and the wide range of barriers that Chinese immigrants face to access these programs. To support Chinese immigrant smokers at all levels of readiness to quit and address their access barriers, we developed the WeChat Quit Coach, a culturally and linguistically appropriate WeChat (Tencent Holdings Limited)-based peer group mobile messaging smoking cessation intervention. OBJECTIVE:This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of WeChat Quit Coach. METHODS:We enrolled a total of 60 Chinese immigrant smokers in 2022 in New York City for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a single-arm pilot test. The first 40 participants were randomized to either the intervention arm (WeChat Quit Coach) or the control arm (self-help print material) using 1:1 block randomization stratified by sex. WeChat Quit Coach lasted 6 weeks, featuring small peer groups moderated by a coach, daily text messages with text questions, and chat-based instant messaging support from the coach in response to peer questions. The next 20 participants were enrolled in the single-arm pilot test to further assess intervention feasibility and acceptability. All 60 participants were offered a 4-week supply of complimentary nicotine replacement therapy. Surveys were administered at baseline and 6 weeks, with participants in the pilot RCT completing an additional survey at 6 months and biochemical verification of abstinence at both follow-ups. RESULTS:Of 74 individuals screened, 68 (92%) were eligible and 60 (88%) were enrolled. The majority of participants, with a mean age of 42.5 (SD 13.8) years, were male (49/60, 82%) and not ready to quit, with 70% (42/60) in the precontemplation or contemplation stage at the time of enrollment. The pilot RCT had follow-up rates of 98% (39/40) at 6 weeks and 93% (37/40) at 6 months, while the single-arm test achieved 100% follow-up at 6 weeks. On average, participants responded to daily text questions for 25.1 days over the 42-day intervention period and 23% (9/40) used the chat-based instant messaging support. Most participants were satisfied with WeChat Quit Coach (36/39, 92%) and would recommend it to others (32/39, 82%). At 6 months, self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates were 25% (5/20) in the intervention arm and 15% (3/20) in the control arm, with biochemically verified abstinence rates of 25% (5/20) and 5% (1/20), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:WeChat Quit Coach was feasible and well-received by Chinese immigrants who smoke and produced promising effects on abstinence. Large trials are warranted to assess its efficacy in promoting abstinence in this underserved population. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05130788; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05130788.

The COVID-19 pandemic placed a spotlight on the potential to dramatically increase the use of telehealth across the cancer care continuum, but whether and how telehealth can be implemented in practice in ways that reduce, rather than exacerbate, inequities are largely unknown. To help fill this critical gap in research and practice, we developed the Framework for Integrating Telehealth Equitably (FITE), a process and evaluation model designed to help guide equitable integration of telehealth into practice. In this manuscript, we present FITE and showcase how investigators across the National Cancer Institute's Telehealth Research Centers of Excellence are applying the framework in different ways to advance digital and health equity. By highlighting multilevel determinants of digital equity that span further than access alone, FITE highlights the complex and differential ways structural determinants restrict or enable digital equity at the individual and community level. As such, achieving digital equity will require strategies designed to not only support individual behavior but also change the broader context to ensure all patients and communities have the choice, opportunity, and resources to use telehealth across the cancer care continuum.