Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Counseling on the immediate postoperative experience for outpatient procedures is largely based on anecdotal experience. We devised a short messaging service (SMS) survey using mobile phone text messages to evaluate real-time patient recovery following outpatient thyroid or parathyroid surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Daily automated SMS surveys were sent the evening of the operation until postoperative day 10. Pain, opioid use, voice quality, and energy levels were assessed. Impaired voice and energy was defined as a score < 2/3 of normal. RESULTS:, preoperative opioid or tobacco use, and history of anxiety or depression. Patients with loss of intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve signaling had a significantly worse overall voice score (54.65 versus 92.67, P < 0.001). Up to 10% of patients were still using opioids and/or reported impaired voice and energy levels beyond 1 wk postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS:Real-time SMS survey is an effective and potentially valuable way to monitor patient recovery following surgery. A subset of patients reported impaired voice and energy and was still using opioids beyond 1 wk after thyroid and parathyroid surgery and these patients may benefit from closer follow-up and earlier intervention.

BACKGROUND:The 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines recommended either total thyroidectomy or lobectomy for surgical treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer and de-escalated recommendations for central neck dissections. The study aim was to investigate how practice patterns among endocrine surgeons have changed over time. METHODS:All adult patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancers (T1-T2, N0/Nx, M0/Mx) in the Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program (2014-2021) were identified. The outcomes between patients undergoing lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy were compared using multivariable logistic regression. The annual percent change in the proportion of lobectomies and central neck dissections performed was estimated using joinpoint regression. RESULTS:In total, 5,567 patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancers were identified. Of these, 2,261 (40.6%) were very low-risk tumors ≤1 cm, and 2,983 (53.6%) were low-risk tumors &gt;1 and &lt;4 cm. Most patients (67.9%) underwent total thyroidectomy. Compared to total thyroidectomy, lobectomy was associated with outpatient surgery (adjusted odds ratio 5.19, P &lt; .001), a decreased risk of postoperative emergency department visits (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, P = .03), and decreased risk of hypoparathyroidism events (adjusted odds ratio 0.03, P &lt; .001). Compared to before (2014-2015), patients undergoing surgery after publication of the revised guidelines (2016-2021) had higher odds of lobectomy and lower odds of central neck dissection for tumors ≤1 cm (lobectomy adjusted odds ratio 2.70, P &lt; .001; central neck dissections adjusted odds ratio 0.64, P = .03) and tumors between 1 and 4 cm (lobectomy adjusted odds ratio 2.27, P &lt; .001; central neck dissection adjusted odds ratio 0.62, P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION:After publication of the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines, there has been an increase in thyroid lobectomies as a proportion of all thyroid operations performed by endocrine surgeons for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. This has implications for reduced health care use and costs, with potential population-level benefits.

OBJECTIVE:Cancer patients and survivors may be disproportionately affected by COVID-19. We sought to determine the effects of the pandemic on thyroid cancer survivors' healthcare interactions and quality of life. METHODS:An anonymous survey including questions about COVID-19 and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System profile (PROMIS-29, version 2.0) was hosted on the ThyCa:Thyroid Cancer Survivors' Association, Inc. website. PROMIS scores were compared to previously published data. Factors associated with greater anxiety were evaluated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS:From 5/6/2020 - 10/8/2020, 413 participants consented to take the survey; 378 (92%) met inclusion criteria: diagnosed with thyroid cancer or NIFTP, within the United States, and completing all sections of the survey. Mean age was 53 years; 89% were female, and 74% had papillary thyroid cancer. Most respondents agreed/strongly agreed (83%) that their lives were very different during COVID-19, as was their interaction with doctors (79%). A minority (43%) were satisfied with information from their doctor regarding COVID-19 changes. Compared to pre-COVID-19, PROMIS scores were higher for anxiety (57.8 vs. 56.5, p<0.05) and lower for ability to participate in social activities (46.2 vs. 48.1, p<0.01), fatigue (55.8 vs. 57.9, p<0.01), and sleep disturbance (54.7 vs. 56.1, p<0.01). After adjusting for confounders, greater anxiety was associated with younger age (p<0.01) and change in treatment plan (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS:During the COVID-19 pandemic, thyroid cancer survivors reported increased anxiety compared to a pre-COVID cohort. To deliver comprehensive care, providers must better understand patient concerns and improve communication about potential changes to their treatment plans.

BACKGROUND:Primary hyperparathyroidism historically necessitated bilateral neck exploration to remove abnormal parathyroid tissue. Improved localization allows for focused parathyroidectomy with lower complication risks. Recently, positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine demonstrated high accuracy in detecting these lesions, but its cost-effectiveness has not been studied in the United States. METHODS:A decision tree modeled patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism using single preoperative localization modalities: (1) positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine, (2) 4-dimensional computed tomography, (3) ultrasound, and (4) sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). All patients underwent either focused parathyroidectomy versus bilateral neck exploration, with associated cost ($) and clinical outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years gained. Model parameters were informed by literature review and Medicare costs. Incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated in US dollars/quality-adjusted life-years gained, with a willingness-to-pay threshold set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. One-way, 2-way, and threshold sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS:Positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine gained the most quality-adjusted life-years (23.9) and was the costliest ($2,096), with a total treatment cost of $11,245 or $470/quality-adjusted life-year gained. Sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography and ultrasound were dominated strategies. Compared with 4-dimentional computed tomography, the incremental cost-utility ratio for positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine was $91,066/quality-adjusted life-year gained in our base case analysis, which was below the willingness-to-pay threshold. In 1-way sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-utility ratio was sensitive to test accuracy, positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine price, postoperative complication probabilities, proportion of bilateral neck exploration patients needing overnight hospitalization, and life expectancy. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our model elucidates scenarios in which positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine can potentially be a cost-effective imaging option for primary hyperparathyroidism in the United States. Further investigation is needed to determine the maximal cost-effectiveness for positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine in selected populations.

BACKGROUND:The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Comprehensive Endocrine Surgery Fellowship interview stakeholders previously favored in-person interviews, despite time and expense. This study assessed perception changes given mandated virtual interviews because of coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS:Immediately after the 2020 Match, anonymous surveys were distributed to applicants (n = 37) and program directors (n = 22). Mixed-methods analyses were used to evaluate responses. Results were compared to data from a prior study of the 2013 to 2018 in-person interview process. RESULTS:Response rates were 82% (program directors) and 60% (applicants). Compared with prior applicants, 2020 applicants attended similar numbers of interviews (1-10, 32% vs 37%; P = .61), used fewer vacation days (23% vs 56%; P = .01), and most reported 0 expenses. Burdens included lack of protected time for interviews. The virtual format did not compromise applicant ability to meet faculty (mean rank = 6.8/10) or make favorable impressions (mean rank = 6.8/10). Program directors reported equivalent or improved assessments of applicants. Program directors (72%) and applicants (77%) indicated that future interviews should be partially or completely virtual. CONCLUSION:In contrast to prior survey data, applicants and program directors now express interest in virtual or hybrid interview processes. Virtual interviews were less costly, less time-consuming, and met goals effectively. Integrating virtual interview components will require innovative strategies to reduce redundancies and promote equitable access.

BACKGROUND:Radiofrequency ablation is an alternative strategy for the management of benign thyroid conditions. We analyzed the proportion of patients who underwent thyroid surgery for benign conditions who would be potentially eligible for radiofrequency ablation. METHODS:We identified patients who underwent thyroid surgery from 2015 to 2019 at the study institution for Bethesda II cytopathology or toxic adenoma. Patients were considered potentially eligible for radiofrequency ablation if they had a dominant nodule >2 cm with or without compression symptoms, a dominant nodule <2 cm with compression symptoms, or a toxic adenoma. RESULTS:Of 411 patients in total, 284 (69.1%) would be eligible to consider thyroid radiofrequency ablation. In the radiofrequency ablation-eligible group, 20 (7.0%) experienced voice change after surgery, and 2 (0.7%) were dissatisfied or concerned about their scar. In the radiofrequency ablation-eligible group, 70 patients (24.6%) had malignancy diagnosed by final pathology, and 23 patients (8.1%) had cancers that were equal to or larger than 1 cm in size. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Many patients who undergo surgery for benign thyroid disease could be considered for radiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment modality. Given the rate of occult malignancy, optimal evaluation of nondominant nodules before radiofrequency ablation and long-term thyroid surveillance for patients who undergo radiofrequency ablation should be further studied.

BACKGROUND:Guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism in patients diagnosed with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Recent studies have shown that adherence to these recommendations is extremely low. It has been suggested that cost is a barrier to implementation. No analysis has been done to rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of widespread implementation of these guidelines. METHODS:We constructed a decision-analytic model to evaluate screening of the hypertensive obstructive sleep apnea population for primary aldosteronism as per guideline recommendations in comparison with current rates of screening. Probabilities, utility values, and costs were identified in the literature. Threshold and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness of the model. Costs were represented in 2020 US dollars and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years. The model assumed a societal perspective with a lifetime time horizon. RESULTS:Screening per guideline recommendations had an expected cost of $47,016 and 35.27 quality-adjusted life-years. Continuing at current rates of screening had an expected cost of $48,350 and 34.86 quality-adjusted life-years. Screening was dominant, as it was both less costly and more effective. These results were robust to sensitivity analysis of disease prevalence, test sensitivity, patient age, and expected outcome of medical or surgical treatment of primary aldosteronism. The screening strategy remained cost-effective even if screening were conservatively presumed to identify only 3% of new primary aldosteronism cases. CONCLUSIONS:For patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea, rigorous screening for primary aldosteronism is cost-saving due to cardiovascular risk averted. Cost should not be a barrier to improving primary aldosteronism screening adherence.

BACKGROUND:F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography for preoperative parathyroid localization on patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS:F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography imaging was assessed using 3 anatomic locations (left neck, right neck, and mediastinum), with surgery as the gold standard. RESULTS:F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (88.9%) outperformed both ultrasound (37.1%) and sestamibi (27.5%), as well as ultrasound and sestamibi combined (47.8%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography for parathyroid localization confirm its utility in a challenging cohort, with better sensitivity than ultrasound or sestamibi.

BACKGROUND:Resistant hypertension is common in patients with primary aldosteronism and in those with obstructive sleep apnea. Primary aldosteronism treatment improves sleep apnea. Despite Endocrine Society guidelines' inclusion of sleep apnea and hypertension co-diagnosis as a primary aldosteronism screening indication, the state of screening implementation is unknown. METHODS:All hypertensive adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea (n = 4751) at one institution between 2012 and 2020 were compared with a control cohort without sleep apnea (n = 117,815). We compared the association of primary aldosteronism diagnoses, risk factors, and screening between both groups. Patients were considered to have screening if they had a primary aldosteronism diagnosis or serum aldosterone or plasma renin activity evaluation. RESULTS:Obstructive sleep apnea patients were predominantly men and had higher body mass index. On multivariable analysis, hypertensive sleep apnea patients had higher odds of drug-resistant hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 2.70; P < .001) and hypokalemia (OR 1.26; P < .001) independent of body mass index, sex, and number of antihypertensive medications. Overall, sleep apnea patients were more likely to be screened for primary aldosteronism (OR 1.45; P < .001); however, few patients underwent screening whether they had sleep apnea or not (pre-guideline publication 7.8% vs 4.6%; post-guidelines 3.6% vs 4.6%; P < .01). Screening among eligible sleep apnea patients remained low prior to and after guideline publication (4.4% vs 3.4%). CONCLUSIONS:Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with primary aldosteronism risk factors without formal diagnosis, suggesting screening underutilization and underdiagnosis. Strategies are needed to increase screening adherence, as patients may benefit from treatment of concomitant primary aldosteronism to reduce sleep apnea severity and its associated cardiopulmonary morbidity.

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the correct localization rate (CLR) of ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET for the detection of parathyroid adenomas in comparison to ^99mTc-sestamibi imaging. Methods: This was a single-arm prospective trial. Ninety-eight patients with biochemical evidence of primary hyperparathyroidism were imaged before parathyroidectomy using ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET/MRI. ^99mTc-sestamibi imaging performed separately from the study was evaluated for comparison. The primary endpoint of the study was the CLR on a patient level. Each imaging study was interpreted by 3 masked readers on a per-region basis. Lesions were validated by histopathologic analysis of surgical specimens. Results: Of the 98 patients who underwent ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET, 77 subsequently underwent parathyroidectomy and 60 of those had ^99mTc-sestamibi imaging. For ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, the CLR based on the masked reader consensus was 75% (95% CI, 0.63-0.82). In patients who underwent surgery and had an available ^99mTc-sestamibi study, the CLR increased from 17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.27) for ^99mTc-sestamibi imaging to 70% (95% CI, 0.59-0.79) for ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET. Conclusion: In this prospective study using masked readers, the CLR for ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET was 75%. In patients with a paired ^99mTc-sestamibi study, the use of ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET increased the CLR from 17% to 70%. ¹⁸F-fluorocholine PET is a superior imaging modality for the localization of parathyroid adenomas.