Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:shetyp01
Predictors of Long-Term Protraction Headgear Success in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A 5-Year Follow-Up
Schechter, Jill; Alcon, Andre; Verzella, Alexandra; Diaz, Allison; Staffenberg, David; Flores, Roberto; Shetye, Pradip R
Patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) characteristically present with maxillary hypoplasia and class III malocclusion. Protraction headgear (PHG) is a commonly used treatment for this type of malocclusion, with the goal of reducing future surgical needs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of PHG treatment and determine the pretreatment predictors of long-term PHG success in patients with CLP. Twenty-nine patients with CLP who had undergone PHG treatment from 2012 to 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were included if they had a lateral cephalogram or CBCT before, immediately after, and at least 5 years after their PHG treatment. Patients were divided into surgery and nonsurgery groups based on their 5-year follow-up clinical presentation. Student t tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to compare pretreatment and post-treatment changes in both groups. Immediately post-treatment, the maxilla advanced 2.6 mm, the maxillary dentition advanced 4.7 mm, and the mandible rotated downward 5.0 mm and backward 2.6 mm. At long-term follow up the maxilla advanced 0.0 mm while the mandible advanced an additional 7.5 mm. Thus, PHG treatment is effective at improving class III malocclusion in the short term, but may not prevent future surgical need for patients with more severe skeletal discrepancies. Variables predictive of future surgical need include ANB, anterior facial height, overjet, and starting age of treatment, with ANB as the most reliable early predictor.
PMID: 39190786
ISSN: 1536-3732
CID: 5729672
Comparison of the Effects of Postoperative Arm Restraints and Mittens on Cleft Lip Scar Quality after Primary Repair
Verzella, Alexandra N; Laspro, Matteo; Diaz, Allison; Cassidy, Michael F; Park, Jenn; Schechter, Jill; Alcon, Andre; Shetye, Pradip R; Staffenberg, David A; Flores, Roberto L
PMCID:11242569
PMID: 38999195
ISSN: 2077-0383
CID: 5732512
An Innovative Technique of Presurgical Lip, Alveolus, and Nose Approximation (PLANA) for Infants with Clefts
Shetye, Pradip R
The innovative technique of "presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation" (PLANA) offers a new approach within the domain of presurgical infant orthopedics for infants born with cleft lip and palate. Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation introduces the utilization of the NoseAlign device in conjunction with medical adhesive tapes, designed to approximate and support displaced soft tissue nasolabial structures in patients with cleft, without an intraoral plate. The NoseAlign device, constructed from medical-grade silicone, consists of 2 tubular portions that fit into the nostrils, connected by a columella band. Notably, it also features a wave-shaped and curved horizontal lip band, resting on the upper lip, with elastic clasps for secure attachment to the face with medical adhesive tapes. Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation therapy employs the NoseAlign device to support the collapsed nasal alar rim and cartilage, the displaced columella, the deviated nasal septum, and the displaced nasal alar base. This innovative approach minimizes the need for frequent office visits, making it particularly suitable for patients residing at a distance from specialized cleft centers. The prefabricated NoseAlign device offers effective support to nasal structures, making it suitable for unilateral and bilateral clefts. Importantly, the absence of an intraoral plate ensures it does not interfere with feeding. Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation therapy, initiated as early as 1 to 2 weeks, leverages the plasticity of nasal soft tissue and cartilage to achieve the desired nasal form before primary surgery. Although presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation therapy does have some limitations, particularly in cases of medially collapsed alveolar segments, its simplicity, universal applicability, and patient-friendliness make it a promising technique in the presurgical infant orthopedics field.
PMID: 38587370
ISSN: 1536-3732
CID: 5664692
"The Effects of Gingivoperiosteoplasty and Cleft Palate Repair on Facial Growth."
Park, Jenn J; Kalra, Aneesh; Parsaei, Yassmin; Rochlin, Danielle H; Verzella, Alexandra; Grayson, Barry H; Cutting, Court B; Shetye, Pradip R; Flores, Roberto L
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) can avoid secondary alveolar bone graft in up to 60% of patients. The effects of GPP on maxillary growth are a concern. However, palatoplasty can also negatively impact facial growth. This study quantifies the isolated effects of GPP and cleft palate repair on maxillary growth at the age of mixed dentition. METHODS:A single institution, retrospective study of all patients undergoing primary reconstruction for unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (CLA) or cleft lip and palate (CLP) was performed. Study patients had lateral cephalograms at age of mixed dentition. Patients were stratified into four groups: CLA with GPP (CLA+GPP), CLA without GPP (CLA-GPP), CLP with GPP (CLP+GPP), and CLP without GPP (CLP-GPP). Cephalometric measurements included: sella-nasion-point A (SNA), sella-nasion-point B (SNB), and A point-nasion-B point (ANB). Landmarks were compared between patient groups and to Eurocleft Center D data. RESULTS:110 patients met inclusion criteria: 7 CLA-GPP, 16 CLA+GPP, 24 CLP-GPP, and 63 CLP+GPP patients. There were no significant differences in SNA, SNB, and ANB between CLA+GPP and CLA-GPP, or between CLP+GPP and CLP-GPP groups. In patients who did not receive GPP, SNA was significantly lower in patients with a cleft palate compared to patients with an intact palate (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in SNA or SNB of CLP-GPP or CLP+GPP groups when compared to Eurocleft data. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:When controlling for the effects of cleft palate repair, GPP does not appear to negatively affect midface growth at the age of mixed dentition.
PMID: 37184473
ISSN: 1529-4242
CID: 5544102
The Burden of Care of Nasoalveolar Molding: An Institutional Experience
Alfonso, Allyson R; Park, Jenn J; Kalra, Aneesh; DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M; Kussie, Hudson C; Shen, Chen; Staffenberg, David A; Flores, Roberto L; Shetye, Pradip R
Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is an early presurgical intervention to facilitate primary cleft lip repair by reducing cleft severity and improving labial and nasal form. However, it continues to be associated with the burden of care that influences access and completion of therapy. The authors, therefore, aim to determine the burden of care of NAM therapy for families seeking treatment at a high-volume urban cleft center. A retrospective study of all patients undergoing primary cleft repair between 2012 and 2020 was performed. Patients were grouped based on whether or not NAM therapy was offered. Variables including physical, psychosocial, and financial factors were assessed. Two hundred and thirty patients underwent primary cleft repair between 2012 and 2020. Of these, 176 patients were indicated for NAM, with 4% discontinuing, and 54 patients did not undergo NAM. The 169 patients who completed NAM had a mean duration of treatment of 13.6±8.8 wks consisting of 15±6 scheduled NAM adjustment visits and 1±1 unscheduled visit made urgently to assess caregiver concerns. The mean travel distance was 28.6±37.1 miles. Eighty-four percent of caregivers were married, and 16% did not have English as a primary language. Though 57% had private insurance, 43% of patients received charity support for their treatment. NAM is a finite presurgical intervention that requires caregivers to participate in patient care for approximately three months of their early life. The decision to pursue NAM should be considered alongside the burden of care for caregivers to complete treatment.
PMID: 38231199
ISSN: 1536-3732
CID: 5737472
Clinical Outcomes of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Repair with Nasoalveolar Molding and Gingivoperiosteoplasty to Facial Maturity
Rochlin, Danielle H; Park, Jenn; Parsaei, Yassmin; Kalra, Aneesh; Staffenberg, David A; Cutting, Court B; Grayson, Barry H; Shetye, Pradip R; Flores, Roberto L
BACKGROUND:The long-term effects of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) on patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) are unknown. The authors report clinical outcomes of facially mature patients with complete BCLP who underwent NAM and gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP). METHODS:A single-institution retrospective study of nonsyndromic patients with complete BCLP who underwent NAM between 1991 and 2000 was performed. All study patients were followed to skeletal maturity, at which time a lateral cephalogram was obtained. The total number of cleft operations and cephalometric measures was compared with a previously published external cohort of patients with complete and incomplete BCLP in which a minority (16.7%) underwent presurgical orthopedics before cleft lip repair without GPP. RESULTS:Twenty-four patients with BCLP comprised the study cohort. All patients underwent GPP, 13 (54.2%) underwent alveolar bone graft, and nine (37.5%) required speech surgery. The median number of operations per patient was five (interquartile range, two), compared with eight (interquartile range, three) in the external cohort ( P < 0.001). Average age at the time of lateral cephalogram was 18.64 years (1.92). There was no significant difference between our cohort and the external cohort with respect to sella-nasion-point A angle (SNA) [73 degrees (6 degrees) versus 75 degrees (11 degrees); P = 0.186] or sella-nasion-point B angle (SNA) [78 degrees (6 degrees) versus 74 degrees (9 degrees); P = 0.574]. Median ANB (SNA - SNB) was -3 degrees (5 degrees) compared with -1 degree (7 degrees; P = 0.024). Twenty patients (83.3%) underwent orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSION:Patients with BCLP who underwent NAM and GPP had significantly fewer total cleft operations and mixed midface growth outcomes at facial maturity compared with patients who did not undergo this treatment protocol. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, III.
PMID: 36943703
ISSN: 1529-4242
CID: 5590622
LeFort I Horizontal Osteotomy: Defining the Feasibility of the "High Osteotomy"
Verzella, Alexandra N; Alcon, Andre; Schechter, Jill; Shetye, Pradip R; Staffenberg, David A; Flores, Roberto L
OBJECTIVE:To define "high osteotomy" and determine the feasibility of performing this procedure. DESIGN/METHODS:Single institution, retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Academic tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:34 skeletally mature, nonsyndromic patients with unilateral CLP who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy between 2013 and 2020. Patients with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans completed both pre- (T1) and post-operatively (T2) were included. Patients with bilateral clefts and rhinoplasty prior to post-operative imaging were excluded. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Single jaw one-piece Le Fort I advancement surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Measurements of the superior ala and inferior turbinates were taken from the post-operative CBCT. RESULTS:The sample included 26 males and 8 females, 12 right- and 22 left-sided clefts. The inferior turbinates are above the superior alar crease at a rate of 73.53% and 76.48% on the cleft and non-cleft sides, respectively. One (2.9%) osteotomy cut was above the level of the cleft superior alar crease, and no cuts were above the level of the non-cleft superior ala. On average, the superior ala was 2.63 mm below the inferior turbinates. The average vertical distances from the superior alar crease and the inferior turbinates to the base of the non-cleft side pyriform aperture were 12.17 mm (95% CI 4.00-20.34) and 14.80 mm (95% CI 4.61-24.98), respectively. To complete a "high osteotomy," with 95% confidence, the cut should be 20.36 mm from the base of the pyriform aperture. CONCLUSIONS:A "high" osteotomy is not consistently possible due to the relationship between the superior alar crease and the inferior turbinate.
PMID: 37885216
ISSN: 1545-1569
CID: 5614352
Change in Lower Lip Position After Le Fort I Advancement in Patients with Bilateral vs. Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
Schechter, Jill; Alcon, Andre; Verzella, Alexandra; Shetye, Pradip; Flores, Roberto
To compare lower lip changes after Le Fort I advancement surgery in patients with a cleft. Single institution, retrospective review. Academic tertiary referral hospital. Skeletally mature patients with a cleft who underwent one-piece Le Fort I advancement surgery who had a lateral cephalogram or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent concomitant mandibular surgery or genioplasty were excluded. 64 patients were included: 45 male and 19 female, 25 with BCLP and 39 with UCLP. The mean age at surgery was 18.4 years. Single jaw one-piece Le Fort I advancement surgery. Standard lateral cephalometric landmarks of the bony skeleton and soft tissue were compared before and after Le Fort I advancement. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to measure the correlation between lower lip position and other soft and hard tissue changes. After comparable maxillary advancements [BCLP: 7.2 mm (95% CI: 6.2-8.3 mm), UCLP: 6.4 mm (95% CI: 5.7-7.0 mm)] the horizontal upper-to-lower lip discrepancy significantly improved in both groups. The lower lip became thinner and more posteriorly positioned. Changes in lower lip position correlated strongly with mandibular bony landmarks and moderately with upper lip position, but poorly with maxillary landmarks. Le Fort I advancement results in posterior displacement of the lower lip and better lip competence, thereby improving facial harmony. This lower lip change is not predictable by degree of maxillary advancement, and does not differ in patients with BCLP vs. UCLP.
PMID: 38836361
ISSN: 1545-1569
CID: 5665332
Orthodontic management in Pierre Robin sequence
Chapter by: Shetye, Pradip R.
in: Cleft and Craniofacial Orthodontics by
[S.l.] : wiley, 2023
pp. 649-656
ISBN: 9781119778363
CID: 5425412
Introduction
Chapter by: Gibson, Travis L.; Shetye, Pradip R.
in: Cleft and Craniofacial Orthodontics by
[S.l.] : wiley, 2023
pp. 3-7
ISBN: 9781119778363
CID: 5425562