Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Alkyl nitrites ("poppers") are used recreationally for sexual enhancement, muscle relaxation, and euphoria. However, they can be toxic and cause adverse reactions such as methemoglobinemia. While inhalation is the typical route of usage, the New York City Poison Center has noted an increase in calls related to ingestion. Given the uncertainty of usage instructions at the point of sale, our study aimed to assess instructions provided to consumers about alkyl nitrite use and to evaluate the proximity and co-sale of alkyl nitrites with similarly appearing energy drink shots. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a cross-sectional convenience sample survey of smoke shops, cannabis dispensaries, and exotic shops within the catchment area of an urban poison center. Plain clothes "investigators" (i.e., the researchers) visited these retailers and followed a predetermined protocol and script to request information regarding the availability and usage of alkyl nitrites. Additionally, the researchers attempted to visually assess the proximity of alkyl nitrites to similarly appearing energy drink shots during their visit. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:drinks and alkyl nitrites were located near these energy drink shots in twenty (39%) of these fifty-one stores. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Many commercial alkyl nitrite retailers in our survey area lack knowledge or provide potentially inaccurate information regarding the use of alkyl nitrites. Additionally, alkyl nitrites are often sold alongside commercial energy drinks, potentially increasing the risk of incidental ingestion. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Further research is necessary to determine the impact of these patterns of sale and potential misinformation. Discussing preliminary results of our survey with the New York City Department of Health led to the rapid creation of an informational poster and local outreach. Clinicians should report cases of alkyl nitrite use to their regional poison center to allow for more targeted and timely public health intervention.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Hemodialysis has an essential role in the treatment of certain poisoned patients, both by enhancing the elimination of select poisons and correcting underlying fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base disturbances. We sought to identify barriers to the performance of hemodialysis when it was recommended by our poison center. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Data from a single United States poison center were retrospectively queried for adult patients for whom the poison center recommended intermittent hemodialysis for poison removal. The primary outcome was the performance of intermittent hemodialysis within 12 h of the poison center recommendation, which we defined as timely hemodialysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess the effect of the following variables on this outcome: age group, patient sex, time of day of the recommendation, day of week of the recommendation, year of the recommendation, hospital location, and poison category. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 535 patient encounters were analyzed. The majority (72%) of patients had intermittent hemodialysis performed within 12 h of when it was recommended. The multivariable analyses showed that the odds of receiving recommended intermittent hemodialysis within 12 h were significantly lower when the recommendation was made during the nighttime (OR: 0.660; 95% CI: 0.442-0.987) compared to daytime and during the weekend (OR: 0.605; 95% CI: 0.398-0.918) compared to weekdays. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Intermittent hemodialysis is resource-intensive and requires specialized equipment and personnel, which is likely less available outside of regular business hours. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and may not be generalizable to other poison centers. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients for whom our poison center recommended intermittent hemodialysis during non-weekday times had lower odds of receiving timely hemodialysis. Hospital administrators and healthcare providers should be aware of this potential treatment obstacle for poisoned patients and identify the specific barriers involved in order to facilitate timely hemodialysis.

Likelihood ratios compare two values (i.e., case rates) in order to illustrate the magnitude of the difference between the two. This ratio increases the confidence one can have in a diagnostic test from a different vantage point than that of sensitivity and specificity. The calculations of likelihood ratios are presented along with a simplified approach. Likelihood ratios are another tool the toxicologist should employ in their understanding of statistics and probability.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Methylthioninium chloride is used for multiple treatment purposes and is sometimes administered through peripheral intravenous lines. We highlight the potential adverse effects of methylthioninium chloride extravasation during continuous peripheral intravenous administration. CASE SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with multifactorial hypovolemic and septic shock. She was treated with a continuous peripheral infusion of intravenous methylthioninium chloride for shock refractory to multiple vasopressors. IMAGES/UNASSIGNED:One day after administration commenced, the patient developed blue staining of the left upper arm due to extravasation of methylthioninium chloride proximal to the site of infusion. Further images show its later spread. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:While reported cases of methylthioninium chloride extravasation are rare, it is our preference that methylthioninium chloride should be administered through a central line in cases of continuous infusion due to the risk of potential toxicity from extravasation.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Sodium nitrite is a curing agent increasingly used for self-harm and suicide, and multiple locales have reported increasing cases. However, approaches to forensic investigation of these cases are not standardized, and current modes of surveillance in the United States may be inadequate. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To define a potential standard approach for identifying sodium nitrite deaths based on forensic confirmation, and compare findings based on this standard to poison center surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective case series of sodium nitrite exposures and deaths was conducted in 2 urban medical examiner jurisdictions in New York State from 2000 to 2022. The population-based sample included individuals from (1) medical examiner reports of decedents where the cause of death was sodium nitrite and (2) poison center reports of intentional exposures to sodium nitrite. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:Sodium nitrite as either cause of death (medical examiner reports) or intentional exposure (poison center reports). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Medical examiner determination of sodium nitrite deaths was considered the criterion standard and relied largely on confirmatory blood nitrite testing. Poison center records were assessed for intentional exposures to sodium nitrite. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:In this case series of 36 decendents, median (range) age was 28 (20-57) years; 23 (63.8%) were male; 6 (16.7%) were African-American, 5 (13.9%) were Chinese, 13 (36.1%) were White, and 4 (11.1%) had unknown race; and 6 (16.7%) were Hispanic. No deaths were found from 2000 to 2018, and yearly increases in deaths from 2019 to 2022; these deaths were largely missed by local poison center surveillance. Most cases (83.3% [n = 30]) had postmortem blood nitrite concentrations available, and multiple decedents had evidence of suicide kit recommendations from internet sources. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this case series of decedents in 2 New York medical examiner jurisdictions, sodium nitrite deaths increased yearly, and the medical examiners were able to obtain confirmatory nitrite concentrations in most cases. These findings suggest that poison center surveillance underestimates confirmed deaths from sodium nitrite; public health authorities should rely on multiple data sources when analyzing this problem, and forensic analyses should be standardized.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:The use of the osmol gap as a surrogate marker of toxic alcohol poisoning is common. Unfortunately, many patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis have elevated osmol gaps and are misdiagnosed with toxic alcohol poisoning. We aimed to characterize the range of osmol gaps in patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This was a retrospective poison center study. Data from 24 years were reviewed using the following case definition of alcoholic ketoacidosis: (1) documented alcohol use disorder; (2) presence of urine or serum ketones or an elevated blood beta-hydroxybutyrate concentration; (3) an anion gap ≥14 mmol/L. Potential cases of alcoholic ketoacidosis that failed to fulfill all three criteria were adjudicated by three toxicologists. Exclusion criteria included (1) detectable toxic alcohol concentration, (2) hemodialysis and/or multiple doses of fomepizole, (3) no osmol gap documented, (4) other diagnoses that lead to a metabolic acidosis. Demographics, pH, anion gap, lactate concentration, and osmol gap were extracted. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of 1,493 patients screened, 55 met criteria for alcoholic ketoacidosis. Sixty-four percent were male, and their median age was 52 years. The median osmol gap was 27 [IQR 18-36]. The largest anion gap was 57 mmol/L, and the lowest pH was 6.8. Forty-five (82%) of the patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis had osmol gaps >10; 38 (69%) had osmol gaps >20; 24 (44%) had osmol gaps >30; 11 (20%) had osmol gaps > 40. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:The large range of osmol gaps in patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis often reaches values associated with toxic alcohol poisoning. The study is limited by the potential for transcribing errors and the inability to identify the cause of the osmol gap. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In this retrospective study, patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis had a median osmol gap of 26. Given that alcoholic ketoacidosis is easily and inexpensively treated, proper identification may prevent costly and invasive treatment directed at toxic alcohol poisoning.

A 22-kg female in early childhood with a history of reactive airway disease presented to a paediatric emergency department with acute shortness of breath, tachypnoea and wheezing. Despite treatment with albuterol and corticosteroids, her bronchospasm persisted, prompting the administration of terbutaline. The patient received 220 mcg (10 mcg/kg) terbutaline intravenously, followed immediately by an inadvertent supratherapeutic intravenous dose of 10 000 mcg (454.5 mcg/kg). The patient's laboratory results obtained minutes after the medication error were notable for: potassium, 3.1 mmol/L, lactate, 2.6 mmol/L and troponin I, 0.30 ng/mL (normal <0.03 ng/mL). Over the next 48 hours, serial serum troponin values decreased. The patient was discharged home approximately 72 hours after the initial presentation and she remained well based on follow-up calls over the next several months. Given the timing and trend of troponin concentrations, we do not believe the terbutaline overdose to be responsible for the myocardial injury.