Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:taslab01

Total Results:

138


A Prospective Single-Arm Trial of Genicular Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Clinical and Biomarker Outcomes

Taslakian, Bedros; Mabud, Tarub; Attur, Mukundan; Alaia, Erin F; Samuels, Jonathan; Macaulay, William; Ramos, Danibel; Salame, Christiana; Liu, Shu; Morris, Elizabeth M; Hickey, Ryan
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization and its longitudinal effects on biomarkers implicated in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) pathogenesis.. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This is a prospective, single-arm clinical trial of patients with symptomatic KOA resistant to conservative therapy for greater than 3 months. Twenty-five patients who underwent GAE using 250-μm microspheres were included. Patient reported outcome measures were evaluated at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 12-months following GAE. Blood samples were collected for biomarker analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging was obtained at baseline and 3 months post GAE. The primary endpoint was the clinical success rate at 12 months. Baseline and follow-up outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. RESULTS:The technical success was 100%, with no significant adverse events. The clinical success rate was 62%. The mean VAS pain score for the target knee decreased by 48.5% at 1 month, 50.8% at 3 months, and 55.4% at 12 months (p < .001). WOMAC pain scores improved by 39.6% at 1 month, 50.1% at 3 months, and 43.7% at 12 months (p < .001). There was a statistically significant decrease in the serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) at 12 months. The remaining biomarkers showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS:GAE is a safe treatment for symptomatic KOA, providing clinically significant pain relief for a subset of patients. The observed reductions in serum VEGF and IL-1Ra levels following GAE may contribute to local pain relief and decreased inflammation in the knee joints.
PMID: 40812531
ISSN: 1535-7732
CID: 5907702

Choosing the Right Tool: Comparing Risk Stratification Models in Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Zhang, Robert S; Yuriditsky, Eugene; Zhang, Peter; Bailey, Eric; Amoroso, Nancy E; Maldonado, Thomas S; Taslakian, Bedros; Horowitz, James; Bangalore, Sripal
BACKGROUND:In patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), guidelines recommend further risk stratification (Class 1 indication). However, head-to-head comparison of different risk stratification tools are lacking. Our objective was to compare the performance of 4 scores in predicting adverse clinical events in intermediate-risk PE. METHODS:This was a retrospective study of 192 intermediate-risk PE patients spanning October 2016 to July 2019. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to compare the predictive performance of the composite PE shock (CPES) score, Bova, simplified PE shock index (sPESI), National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and ESC intermediate-risk subcategory types for the primary outcome, which was a composite of PE-related in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation and its individual components. RESULTS:A total of 28 patients (14.6%) experienced the primary composite outcome. CPES demonstrated the highest discriminatory power for predicting the primary composite outcome (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66-0.83) as well as its individual components compared to the other risk scores (p = 0.008). The AUCs for the other scores were as follows: Bova, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56-0.76); sPESI, 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77); NEWS, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) and ESC intermediate-risk subcategory, AUC of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51-0.68). The ESC intermediate-risk subcategory exhibited the lowest performance for the primary composite outcome and across all individual components. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:CPES score outperformed other commonly used risk stratification tools for PE-related morbidity and mortality in intermediate-risk PE patients. The findings support the integration of CPES into clinical practice to enhance patient selection for escalated care and timely interventions.
PMID: 40692422
ISSN: 1522-726x
CID: 5901372

Comparing Real-World Outcomes of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis and Catheter-Based Thrombectomy in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Post PEERLESS Analysis

Zhang, Robert S; Zhang, Peter; Yuriditsky, Eugene; Taslakian, Bedros; Rhee, Aaron J; Greco, Allison A; Elbaum, Lindsay; Mukherjee, Vikramjit; Postelnicu, Radu; Amoroso, Nancy E; Maldonado, Thomas S; Alviar, Carlos L; Horowitz, James M; Bangalore, Sripal
BACKGROUND:The recently published PEERLESS trial compared catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it included a low proportion of patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (4.4%), leaving uncertainty about how CDT would perform relative to CBT in a real-world cohort with higher bleeding risk. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to address this gap by comparing real-world outcomes of CDT and CBT in patients with acute PE. METHODS:This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent CDT and CBT at two tertiary care centers from January 2020 to January 2024. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline variables. RESULTS:A total of 162 (mean age 58 years, 45.7% women, 17.3% high-risk, 28% contraindication to lytics, 28% CDT, 72% CBT) patients were included, with 12.4% patients experiencing the primary outcome. There was no difference in the rates of the primary outcome between CBT versus CDT (11.2% vs. 15.2%, IPTW HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.27-2.38, p = 0.69). CBT was associated with a lower risk of hemodynamic decompensation (5% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.036), major bleeding (7.8% vs. 17.4%, IPTW HR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.95, p = 0.042) and ICH (0 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.024) compared to CDT. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among a real-world cohort of patients with acute PE with higher bleeding risk than PEERLESS undergoing catheter-based therapies, CBT was associated with a lower rate of hemodynamic deterioration, major bleeding, and ICH with similar rate of primary composite outcome when compared with CDT. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.
PMID: 39726241
ISSN: 1522-726x
CID: 5767842

Key Osteoarthritis Biomarkers: What Interventional Radiologists Performing Genicular Artery Embolization Need to Know

Chlorogiannis, David-Dimitris; Taslakian, Bedros; Ahmed, Osman; Mukundan, Attur; Guermazi, Ali; Ghodadra, Anish; Krishnasamy, Venkatesh P; Badar, Wali; Epelboym, Yan
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of pain and disability. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is a promising alternative for patients unresponsive to conservative treatment or unsuitable for total knee replacement. GAE may alleviate knee pain by reducing synovitis and by causing ischemia to pathologic knee nerves. However, outcomes vary based on baseline MRI and radiographic findings, making patient selection challenging. Recently, reduction in synovitis on contrast-enhanced MRI has been associated with pain relief post-GAE. Novel OA phenotypes (inflammatory, cartilage, bone, and atrophic) can aid in patient selection by using imaging and molecular biomarkers. Moreover, imaging features such as cartilage defects, bone marrow lesions, and synovitis may predict symptomatic outcomes. This review explores OA pathophysiology, focusing on radiographic, biochemical, and imaging biomarkers in evaluating GAE for knee OA treatment.
PMID: 40399701
ISSN: 1432-086x
CID: 5853232

Histotripsy of Pancreatic Cancer Liver Metastases: Early Outcomes and Imaging Findings

Mabud, Tarub S; Vergara, Monica; Du, Jasper; Liu, Shu; Bertino, Frederic; Taslakian, Bedros; Wolfgang, Christopher; Silk, Mikhail; Hewitt, D Brock
Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently present with liver metastases, which severely limit treatment options and prognosis. In other cancers, treatment of liver disease can improve outcomes and similar approaches are being explored in PDAC. Clinical data for locoregional control of pancreatic cancer liver metastases (PCLM) are limited, and histotripsy offers a new noninvasive tool for disease control. This study evaluates the preliminary safety, efficacy, and imaging findings of histotripsy in patients with PCLM.
PMID: 40445073
ISSN: 1432-2323
CID: 5854482

Uterine Artery Embolization for Mixed Adenomyosis and Fibroids: Outcomes According to Initial Particle Sizes

Manduca, Sophia; Mabud, Tarub; Liu, Shu; Morris, Elizabeth; Taslakian, Bedros; Kulkarni, Kopal
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To characterize the effect of embolic particle size on outcomes of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for mixed adenomyosis/fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A single-center retrospective database was compiled of all patients with mixed adenomyosis/fibroids who underwent UAE with particles (Embosphere, Merit, USA; Embozene, Varian, UK) from September 2015 to May 2022 (n=76, mean age: 46.7 ± 5.7). Demographic, clinical, imaging, procedural, and follow-up data were collected. Intraprocedurally, initial particle size was chosen according to proceduralist judgment and subsequently upsized as needed until near-stasis was achieved. Initial particle size was categorized as either small (Embosphere 300-500μm, Embozene 500μm) or large (Embosphere 500-700μm, Embozene 700μm). The effect of initial particle size on patient-reported symptomatic improvement was assessed with logistic regression, with pre-procedural uterine volume, presence of focal adenomyoma, and total number of vials of embolic material as regression covariates. RESULTS:Pre-procedural symptoms included menorrhagia (89.5%), pelvic pain (53.9%), and bulk symptoms (60.5%). Baseline mean uterine volume was 748.5 ± 543.9 mL. Post-procedurally, 89.1%, 92.3%, and 97.4% reported improvement in menorrhagia, pelvic pain, and bulk symptoms, respectively. Initial embolic particle sizing was not significantly associated with patient-reported improvement in menorrhagia (p=0.134), pelvic pain (p=0.598), or bulk symptoms (p=0.151), when controlling for covariates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:When controlling for covariates, smaller calibrated microspheres had similar post-procedural pain outcomes as larger particles, with similar target outcomes in UAE for mixed adenomyosis/fibroids.
PMID: 39662617
ISSN: 1535-7732
CID: 5762742

Editorial Comment: A Road Map for Implementing Transarterial Embolization in the Management of Chronic Joint Pain [Comment]

Taslakian, Bedros
PMID: 39503558
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 5803612

Impact of Time to Catheter-Based Therapy on Outcomes in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Zhang, Robert S; Yuriditsky, Eugene; Zhang, Peter; Taslakian, Bedros; Elbaum, Lindsay; Greco, Allison A; Mukherjee, Vikramjit; Postelnicu, Radu; Amoroso, Nancy E; Maldonado, Thomas S; Horowitz, James M; Bangalore, Sripal
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The aim of this study was to examine the impact of early versus delayed catheter-based therapies (CBTs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2 academic centers involving patients with intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were divided into early (<12 hours) and delayed CBT (≥12 hours) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hemodynamic instability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:=0.046). When patients were stratified by timing of CBT (early/late) and the composite PE shock score (high ≥3; low <3), all 16 patients who experienced the primary composite outcome had a high composite PE shock score, with 14/16 (87.5%) having a high composite PE shock score and delayed intervention. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Early CBT was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The composite PE shock score may help identify patients who will benefit from early CBT. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
PMID: 39836740
ISSN: 1941-7632
CID: 5778492

First-Line Treatment for Massive Pulmonary Embolism: Point-Catheter-Directed Mechanical Thrombectomy May Challenge the Treatment Algorithm

Taslakian, Bedros; Sista, Akhilesh
PMID: 38748728
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 5733622

Society of Interventional Radiology Research Reporting Standards for Genicular Artery Embolization

Ahmed, Osman; Epelboym, Yan; Haskal, Ziv J; Okuno, Yuji; Taslakian, Bedros; Sapoval, Marc; Nikolic, Boris; Golzarian, Jafar; Gaba, Ron C; Little, Mark; Isaacson, Ari; Padia, Siddharth A; Sze, Daniel Y
Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an emerging, minimally invasive therapy to address the global burden of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the unmet needs for medically refractory disease. Although total knee arthroplasty has been a standard intervention for severe cases, GAE is developing into a promising alternative, particularly for patients ineligible for or unwilling to undergo surgery. GAE targets the inflammatory cascade underlying OA pathophysiology by arresting neoangiogenesis and preventing pathological neoinnervation, offering potential pain relief. Although early studies have established safety and short-term effectiveness, ensuing studies are needed to validate long-term safety, durability, and comparative effectiveness and to optimize patient selection, embolic agent selection, and administration techniques. Standardized reporting guidelines are therefore essential to enhance transparency and reproducibility across clinical trials, facilitating data aggregation and comparison. This Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR)-endorsed reporting standards consensus document provides a framework to harmonize future research efforts and to improve the interpretation of outcomes.
PMID: 38685470
ISSN: 1535-7732
CID: 5694822