Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This study evaluated the use of point-of-care (POCUS) to differentiate between angioedema and cellulitis in pediatric patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with periorbital swelling from suspected insect bites. METHODS:Subanalysis of patients under 21 years old with periorbital swelling from suspected insect bites was performed in patients presenting to the ED. Participating physicians received hands-on soft tissue ultrasound training prior to study enrollment. Pre- and post-POCUS diagnoses and findings, disposition, ED discharge diagnosis, additional imaging studies, and treatment medications were recorded. Patients received telephone follow-up 1 week after the visit. RESULTS:Twenty-three subjects were enrolled. Twenty (86.9%) cases had a pre-POCUS diagnosis of allergic skin reaction, one (4.3%) had cellulitis, and two (8.7%) were undetermined. After POCUS, providers changed diagnoses and treatment management on five (21.7%) patients. Ultrasound features of linear bands were identified in 22 ultrasound images suggesting angioedema. No patients received further imaging or were admitted for hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS:POCUS may serve as an adjunct tool in differentiating between cellulitis and angioedema in patients with periorbital swelling from local allergic skin reactions from insect bites and decreasing unnecessary imaging studies and hospital admissions.

OBJECTIVE:Rates of suicide, anxiety, and depression have soared in US youth, and professional organizations strongly urge earlier identification, particularly in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). However, there are few commonly used suicide screeners that also identify other mental health (MH) problems. A new, electronically administered instrument, the K-CAT, screens for suicide and multiple MH problems. We hypothesized that the K-CAT would enhance suicide identification compared with routine screening and identify significant anxiety and depression in youth presenting with non-MH chief complaints. METHODS:This observational study was conducted in 2 PEDs. Eligible youth were 7 to 17 accompanied by a caregiver without: severe medical concerns, difficult behaviors, limited verbal language, or only a psychiatric complaint. Of the 341 eligible, 241 (70.7%) were screened, and 228 both presented with a non-MH problem and had complete K-CAT data. A Fisher exact test determined whether suicidal behaviors/ideation rates differed between the K-CAT and retrospective chart review data. RESULTS:Seventy-four or 32.46% of youth scored positive for suicide, anxiety, and/or depression on the K-CAT. Females were more likely to screen positive (P<0.001). Compared with the retrospective data, more youth were identified with suicide risk by the K-CAT (3.95% vs. 0%; P=0.004). Youth identified by the K-CAT were 62.5% female and 33.3% 7 to 11 years. CONCLUSIONS:The K-CAT increases the identification of suicidal ideation and behaviors overall and in younger children. It identifies significant rates of depression and anxiety in youth and could be an important first step in identifying MH problems in youth.

OBJECTIVE:Bicycle helmet use has repeatedly been shown to protect riders from serious injury. Despite this, a majority of children and adolescents do not regularly wear helmets. Our primary objective was to determine if an emergency department (ED)-based helmet distribution program could increase the amount of time children report wearing helmets. METHODS:This was a prospective cohort study of children aged 3 to 17 years presenting to the ED of an urban, tertiary care hospital. Participants were surveyed on their helmet use habits and perceptions regarding the efficacy and importance of helmets. Participants then received a bicycle helmet along with safety counseling in the ED and bicycle safety handouts provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Participants were contacted for follow-up 8 weeks after enrollment. RESULTS:We enrolled a total of 94 patients. Post-intervention surveys were obtained from 47% of participants. Our helmet program resulted in a statistically significant increase in the amount of time children reported wearing bicycle helmets. Prior to ED intervention, 48% of participants reported wearing a helmet "most of the time" or "all of the time." After participating, 86% of participants indicated that they wore a helmet "most of the time" or "all of the time." Participants indicated a variety of reasons for not wearing helmets. Of all patients contacted for follow-up, 16% indicated that they were involved in an accident after participating where the helmet they were given prevented a head injury. CONCLUSIONS:Helmet distribution programs based in the pediatric ED increase rates of bicycle helmet usage among pediatric patients. Additional study is needed to determine effect on head injury prevention.

OBJECTIVE:Because understanding barriers to universal suicide risk screening in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) may improve both identification and management of suicidal behaviors and ideation, this study assessed barriers to a quality improvement initiative examining the use of a novel computerized adaptive test (CAT), the Kiddie-CAT, in 2 PEDs. METHODS:Research assistants (RAs) trained in Rapid Assessment Procedures-Informed Clinical Ethnography methods documented barriers related to the environment, individuals, and workflow as encountered during screening shifts, categorizing the barriers' impacts as either general to a screening shift or related to screening an individual youth/caregiver dyad. Using thematic content analysis, investigators further categorized barriers based on type (eg, workflow, language/comprehension, clinician attitudes/behaviors) and relationship to the limited integration of this initiative into clinical protocols. Reasons for refusal and descriptive data on barriers are also reported. RESULTS:Individual screen barriers were most often related to workflow (22.9%) and youth/caregiver language/comprehension challenges (28%). Similarly, workflow issues accounted for 48.2% of all general shift barriers. However, many of these barriers were related to the limited integration of the initiative, as RAs rather than clinical staff conducted the screening. CONCLUSIONS:Although this study was limited by a lack of complete integration into clinical protocols and was complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic impacts on PEDs, the findings suggest that considerable attention needs to be directed both to physician education and to workflow issues that could impede universal screening efforts.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We describe our experiences and challenges as community volunteers in assisting individuals in scheduling initial COVID-19 vaccine appointments and highlight disparities and barriers in vaccine access in New York City (NYC). METHODS:Priority for assistance was given to individuals who were eligible for vaccination in NYC and New York State with the following barriers: technological, language, medical, physical and undocumented immigrants. Volunteers in NYC performed outreach and created program to assist in scheduling appointments. RESULTS:In sum, 2101 requests were received to schedule COVID-19 vaccine appointments from 28 February to 30 April 2021. Vaccinations were successfully scheduled for 1935 (92%) individuals. Challenges in this project included limited community outreach, language barriers, transportation difficulties and safety concerns travelling to vaccination sites. Spanish (40.5%) and Chinese (35.6%) were the primary languages spoken by appointment requesters. Most requests came from residents of Queens (40%) and Brooklyn (27.2%). CONCLUSIONS:The older population, public-facing workers, non-English speakers, undocumented immigrants and the medically complicated population experienced challenges in vaccine appointment access. In-person services and early website access in languages in addition to English may have reduced barriers in appointment navigation. While volunteers faced numerous obstacles when assisting individuals in scheduling vaccine appointments, most found the work fulfilling and rewarding.

STUDY OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to determine the level of agreement among pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians in whether various point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) video clips represent cardiac standstill in children and to highlight the factors that may be associated with the lack of agreement. METHODS:A single, online, cross-sectional, convenience sample survey was administered to PEM attendings and fellows with variable ultrasound experience. PEM attendings with an experience of 25 cardiac POCUS scans or more were the primary subgroup based on ultrasound proficiency set by the American College of Emergency Physicians. The survey contained 11 unique, 6-second video clips of cardiac POCUS performed during pulseless arrest in pediatric patients and asked the respondent if the video clip represented a cardiac standstill. The level of interobserver agreement was determined using the Krippendorff's α (Kα) coefficient across the subgroups. RESULTS:A total of 263 PEM attendings and fellows completed the survey (9.9% response rate). Of the 263 total responses, 110 responses were from the primary subgroup of experienced PEM attendings with at least 25 previously seen cardiac POCUS scans. Across all video clips, PEM attendings with 25 scans or more had an acceptable agreement (Kα=0.740; 95% CI 0.735 to 0.745). The agreement was the highest for video clips wherein the wall motion corresponded to the valve motion. However, the agreement fell to unacceptable levels (Kα=0.304; 95% CI 0.287 to 0.321) across video clips wherein the wall motion occurred without the valve motion. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is an overall acceptable interobserver agreement when interpreting cardiac standstill among PEM attendings with an experience of at least 25 previously reported cardiac POCUS scans. However, factors that may influence the lack of agreement include discordances between the wall and valve motion, suboptimal views, and the lack of a formal reference standard. More specific consensus reference standards of pediatric cardiac standstill may help to improve interobserver agreement moving forward and should include more specific details regarding the wall and valve motion.

OBJECTIVE:Because changes to pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) education may help address barriers to youth suicide risk screening programs, this study aimed to understand the impact of formal training in areas that likely include suicide-related practices, developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) and adolescent medicine (AM), on PEM physician-perceived level of training, attitudes, and confidence assessing and managing youth suicide risk. METHODS:Twenty-seven PEM attendings and trainees completed an online survey and were divided into 2 groups: those who had completed DBP and AM rotations (DBP/AM+; n = 20) and those who had not completed either rotation (DBP/AM-; n = 7). We compared perceived level of training, attitudes, and confidence in assessing and managing suicide risk across groups. We also examined the relationship between perceived level of training and confidence. Finally, we conducted exploratory analyses to evaluate the effect of an additional formal rotation in child psychiatry. RESULTS:The DBP/AM+ and DBP/AM- groups did not differ on perceived level of training or on attitudes and confidence in suicide risk assessment or management. Perceived level of training in assessment and management predicted confidence in both assessing and managing suicide risk. Additional training in child psychiatry was not associated with increased perceived level of training or confidence. CONCLUSIONS:The DBP and AM rotations were not associated with higher perceived levels of suicide risk training or greater confidence; however, perceived level of training predicted physician confidence, suggesting continued efforts to enhance formal PEM education in mental health would be beneficial.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Patients with multisystem inflammatory disease in children (MIS-C) are at risk of developing shock. Our objectives were to determine independent predictors associated with development of delayed shock (≥3 hours from emergency department [ED] arrival) in patients with MIS-C and to derive a model predicting those at low risk for delayed shock. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 22 pediatric EDs in the New York City tri-state area. We included patients meeting World Health Organization criteria for MIS-C and presented April 1 to June 30, 2020. Our main outcomes were to determine the association between clinical and laboratory factors to the development of delayed shock and to derive a laboratory-based prediction model based on identified independent predictors. RESULTS:Of 248 children with MIS-C, 87 (35%) had shock and 58 (66%) had delayed shock. A C-reactive protein (CRP) level greater than 20 mg/dL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-12.1), lymphocyte percent less than 11% (aOR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.6), and platelet count less than 220,000/uL (aOR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.8-9.8) were independently associated with delayed shock. A prediction model including a CRP level less than 6 mg/dL, lymphocyte percent more than 20%, and platelet count more than 260,000/uL, categorized patients with MIS-C at low risk of developing delayed shock (sensitivity 93% [95% CI, 66-100], specificity 38% [95% CI, 22-55]). CONCLUSIONS:Serum CRP, lymphocyte percent, and platelet count differentiated children at higher and lower risk for developing delayed shock. Use of these data can stratify the risk of progression to shock in patients with MIS-C, providing situational awareness and helping guide their level of care.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To highlight the similarity between madd fruit seeds and enteral drug concealment ("body packing") on computed tomography when evaluated by Hounsfield Units. CASE REPORT/UNASSIGNED:) seeds, which can cause bezoar formation and intestinal obstruction. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Madd fruit seeds may appear similar to drug packets on computed tomography with similar Hounsfield Unit characteristics. History and clinical context are paramount to avoid misdiagnosis.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is an uncommon but emerging syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. While the presentation of MIS-C is generally delayed after exposure to the virus that causes coronavirus 2019, both MIS-C and Kawasaki disease (KD) share similar clinical features. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge given the lack of definitive diagnostic tests and a paucity of evidence regarding treatment modalities. We review the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluations, and management of MIS-C and compare its clinical features to those of KD.