Faculty Bibliography

Patients with advanced melanoma resistant to immune checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors have treatment options with relatively low efficacy. Lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy, was approved in the US based on the pivotal C-144-01 study. A 5-year follow-up of the C-144-01 trial assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of lifileucel. At the cutoff date (November 20, 2024), the ORR was 31.4% (complete response [CR], 5.9%; partial response [PR], 25.5%). Overall, 79.3% of patients had tumor burden reduction; 16 had deepened responses with 4 converting from PR to CR > 1 year after lifileucel infusion; 31.3% of responders completed the 5-year assessment with ongoing responses. The median duration of response was 36.5 months. Responders (n = 48) had lower tumor burden and fewer liver or brain metastases than the overall population. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months, with 5-year OS of 19.7%. Adverse events were consistent with nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion and interleukin-2 safety profiles and declined rapidly within 2 weeks after lifileucel infusion. Most grade 3/4 cytopenias resolved to grade ≤ 2 by day 30. This 5-year analysis demonstrated long-term benefit and meaningful OS with one-time lifileucel therapy, with no additional long-term safety concerns.

BACKGROUND:edition (AJCC v8) stage IIIA melanoma have been under-represented in clinical trials of adjuvant drug therapy. The benefit of adjuvant targeted therapy and immunotherapy in this population is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:In this multicenter, retrospective study, patients with stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC v8) who received adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab (anti-PD1), BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy dabrafenib + trametinib (TT), or no adjuvant treatment (OBS) were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and toxicity rates were examined. RESULTS:A total of 628 patients from 34 centers across Australia, Europe and USA were identified - 256 in anti-PD1, 80 in TT and 292 in OBS. The median follow-up was 2.6 years (IQR, 1.6-3.4 years). The presence of some key poor prognostic variables was significantly higher in anti-PD1 compared to OBS. The two-year RFS was 79.3% (95% CI, 74.1-84.8) for anti-PD1, 98.6% (95% CI, 96.0-100) for TT and 84.3% (95% CI, 79.9-89.0) for OBS. The two-year DMFS was 88.4% (95% CI, 84.3-92.8) in anti-PD1, 100% in TT and 91.1% (95% CI, 87.7-94.7) in OBS. Higher Breslow thickness and higher mitotic rate were associated with higher risk of recurrence in the anti-PD1 and OBS (P<0.05). Rates of ≥ Grade 3 toxicities were 10.9% with anti-PD1 and 17.5% with TT; discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 13.3% and 21.2%, respectively. Rates of unresolved toxicity at last follow-up were 26.9% in anti-PD1 and 12.5% in TT groups. CONCLUSIONS:Stage IIIA melanoma has a modest risk of recurrence. Adjuvant anti-PD1 did not significantly improve RFS or DMFS compared to OBS alone. Adjuvant TT appears promising over anti-PD1 or OBS. Outcomes after adjuvant therapy in this population needs further study in larger datasets with longer follow up or prospective randomised trials.

BACKGROUND:In the phase 3 CheckMate 76 K trial, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival versus placebo in patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma. We report patient-reported outcomes from CheckMate 76 K. METHODS:Change from baseline to week 53 in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L utility index and visual analog scale (VAS), was compared between treatment groups using linear mixed-effect models. Time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) in HRQoL was assessed using Cox regression. Bother from side effects, as measured by the FACIT-GP5, was descriptively compared between treatment groups. RESULTS:There were no clinically meaningful differences in change from baseline between treatment groups in EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, including global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL; least squares mean [LSM] difference: -1.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -2.9, 0.4), and EQ-5D-5L utility index (LSM difference: -0.011; 95 % CI: -0.025, 0.004) and VAS (LSM difference: -1.3; 95 % CI: -2.6, 0.0). There was no difference in TTCD for nivolumab versus placebo in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10; 95 % CI: 0.88, 1.36) or EQ-5D-5L utility index (HR: 1.10; 95 % CI: 0.86, 1.42); however, TTCD in EQ-5D-5L VAS was longer with placebo (HR: 1.92; 95 % CI: 1.39, 2.64). Proportions of patients reporting severe side effect bother ("quite a bit"/"very much") were minimal (nivolumab: 1 %-4 %; placebo: 0 %-2 %). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab demonstrated stable HRQoL and minimal bother from side effects. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:NCT04099251.

The mechanisms underlying the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) therapy are incompletely understood. Here, by immune profiling responding PD-1⁺CD8⁺ T (T_Resp) cell populations from patients with advanced melanoma, we identified differential programming of T_Resp cells in response to combination therapy, from an exhausted toward a more cytotoxic effector program. This effect does not occur with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Single-cell transcriptome and T cell receptor repertoire analysis was used to identify altered effector programming of expanding PD-1⁺CD8⁺ T cell clones with distinct regulon usage, STAT1 and STAT3 utilization and antitumor specificity connected to interleukin (IL)-21 signaling in combination and anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy. Therapeutic efficacy of CTLA-4 blockade was lost in B16F10 melanoma models with either Il21r^- deficiency or anti-IL-21 receptor blockade. Together, these results show how IL-21 signaling to T_Resp is critical for anti-CTLA-4-based checkpoint therapies and highlight major signaling differences to anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

BACKGROUND:In BRAF-mutated high-risk melanoma, targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy have durable benefits as first-line (1L) adjuvant therapy. Based on differing action mechanisms of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and CPI immunotherapies, there is interest in evaluating the activity of 2L adjuvant targeted therapy in decreasing the risk of subsequent recurrence after repeat resection following relapse on/after 1L adjuvant CPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:This was a retrospective review of BRAF V600-mutated resected stage III/IV melanoma patients in the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands who received 1L adjuvant CPI immunotherapy, relapsed locoregionally/distantly, were again resected to no evidence of disease, and received dabrafenib/trametinib (dab/tram) as 2L adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) from initiation of 2L adjuvant dab/tram (RFS-2), analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS:Thirty-eight patients were included (median age 50 years, 63% male, 87% stage III, median follow-up 19 months from 2L dab/tram initiation). Median dab/tram duration was 10.1 months (range: 1 day-22.7 months), with half discontinuing due to progression or adverse events. Median (95% CI) RFS-2 was 18.9 (14.9-28.1) months, with 91%, 81%, and 58% remaining relapse-free at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Most patients remained distant metastasis-free at 6, 12, and 18 months (97%, 85%, and 71%, respectively). Two patients were deceased at the last follow-up, with 97% alive at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS:Over 80% of patients remained relapse- and metastasis-free at 12 months after 2L dab/tram initiation, with only 2 deaths observed. Dab/tram appears to have activity in the 2L adjuvant setting, although more follow-up is required.

mRNA-4157 (V940) is an individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) targeting up to 34 patient-specific tumor neoantigens to induce T cell responses and potentiate anti-tumor activity. We report mechanistic insights into the immunogenicity of mRNA-4157 via characterization of T cell responses to neoantigens from the first-in-human phase 1, KEYNOTE-603 study (NCT03313778) in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (Part A: 1mg mRNA-4157, n = 4) or resected cutaneous melanoma (Part D: 1mg mRNA-4157 + 200mg pembrolizumab, n = 12). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were assessed. All patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE); there were no grade 4/5 AEs or dose-limiting toxicities. mRNA-4157 alone induced consistent de novo, and strengthened pre-existing, T cell responses to targeted neoantigens. Following combination therapy, sustained mRNA-4157-induced neoantigen-specific T cell responses and expansion of cytotoxic CD8 and CD4 T cells were observed. These findings show the potential of a novel mRNA INT approach in oncology.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) shows benefits in adjuvant (AT) and neoadjuvant melanoma treatments. However, ICI frequently induces severe immune-related adverse events (irAE). Unlike metastatic disease, in which irAEs are a clinical trade-off for treatment that improves survival, the toxicity burden from ICI in the AT setting is a substantial clinical problem urging for irAE-predictive biomarkers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:We assessed postsurgical, pre-ICI treatment peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from clinical trial patients (CheckMate 915) treated with AT nivolumab (n = 130) or ipilimumab/nivolumab (COMBO, n = 82). Performing RNA sequencing differential gene expression analysis, we tested baseline differences associated with severe (grades 3-5) irAEs and constructed an irAE-predictive model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized logistic regression. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The analysis of predicted protein-protein interactions among differentially expressed genes in peripheral CD4+ cells revealed significant enrichment of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathway, associated with severe irAEs in COMBO-treated patients. This gene expression signature predicted severe-irAE COMBO patients (χ2P value = 0.001) with 73% accuracy and was independent of disease recurrence (P = 0.79). The irAE-predictive model incorporating this gene expression signature demonstrated 82% accuracy (χ2P value = 8.91E-06). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:We identified baseline gene expression differences in key immune pathways of peripheral blood T cells from COMBO-treated patients with grades 3 to 5 irAEs and defined a SYK-related gene signature correctly identifying ∼60% of COMBO-treated patients with grades 3 to 5 irAEs. This finding aligns with our previous work linking anti-CTLA4 irAEs with a germline variant associated with high SYK expression. This gene signature may serve as a baseline biomarker of severe grade 3 to 5 irAE risk, which is especially important in AT treatment.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Approximately 50 % of resected stage II-IV melanoma patients develop recurrent disease by 5 years despite adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. Data to define best management of recurrences is lacking. METHODS:This was a multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study. Patients with resected stage II-IV melanoma who commenced adjuvant anti-PD-1-based therapy before January 2022 and later recurred were identified. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, recurrence patterns, management and outcomes were collected. RESULTS:711 patients from 17 sites were included. Median age was 60 [range 16-92], 64 % were male, 2 % stage II, 91 % were stage III, 7 % stage IV. Median time to recurrence was 6.2 months (0-68.5) and median follow up time from recurrence was 19.8 months (range 0.2-73.1). 63 % recurred on anti-PD-1 therapy, 36 % off therapy [3 % < 6 months, 33 % > 6 months]. Initial recurrences were locoregional (LR) alone in 44 %, distant alone (DR) in 43 %, and 11 % in both sites. LR recurrences were managed with local therapy, alone (62 %) or with "second adjuvant" anti-PD-1 (14 %) or BRAF/MEK therapy (23 %); 12 m RFS2 was 25 %, 29 % and 69 % respectively (p = 0.0045). Definitive systemic therapy at first recurrence was given in 16 % LR and 86 % DR, with best outcomes for anti-CTLA4 + anti-PD-1 and trial combinations (24 m PFS 63 % and 69 %, respectively). The 24 m OS for the entire cohort was 65 %. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Most recurrences following adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy occur early and while still on drug. Outcomes are poor, regardless of site, timing of recurrence, and subsequent treatment.

Combination checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown promising efficacy in melanoma. However, the underlying mechanism in humans remains unclear. Here, we perform paired single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing across time in 36 patients with stage IV melanoma treated with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, or combination therapy. We develop the algorithm Cyclone to track temporal clonal dynamics and underlying cell states. Checkpoint blockade induces waves of clonal T cell responses that peak at distinct time points. Combination therapy results in greater magnitude of clonal responses at 6 and 9 weeks compared to single-agent therapies, including melanoma-specific CD8⁺ T cells and exhausted CD8⁺ T cell (T_EX) clones. Focused analyses of T_EX identify that anti-CTLA-4 induces robust expansion and proliferation of progenitor T_EX, which synergizes with anti-PD-1 to reinvigorate T_EX during combination therapy. These next generation immune profiling approaches can guide the selection of drugs, schedule, and dosing for novel combination strategies.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:>12 months [late] from initial therapy). RESULTS:73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.