Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:With increased access to gender affirming care, the rate of vaginoplasties in the US has risen rapidly. Although some retrospective studies report high rates of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after gender affirming vaginoplasty, the type and severity of symptoms has not been well-described. The purpose of this study was to prospectively characterize postoperative changes in lower urinary tract function after robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty as measured by the American Urological Association Symptom Index questionnaire (AUASI), Urogenital Distress Inventory 6 (UDI6), and additional measures. METHODS:This was a prospective observational study of patients undergoing gender affirming robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty enrolled between August 2020 to September 2021. LUTS were evaluated pre- and postoperatively (1, 3, 6, and 12-month) via the AUASI, UDI6, uroflowmetry, and post void residual (PVR) measurements. Averages and 95% confidence intervals over time were estimated and compared through univariate mixed-effect linear regression models. RESULTS:A total of 43 patients were enrolled. The average patient age was 31.1 ± 9.1 years. Overall AUASI Score declined over time (p = 0.002; -0.42,-0.09), though the decrease was less than the clinically minimum importance difference (MID) of 3 points. Preoperative AUASI was 8.1 ± 5.2, 1 month: 8.1 (95% CI: -1.9,1.8); 3 months: 5.2 (-5.0,-1.2); 6 months: 5.7 (-4.6,-0.62); 12 months: 5.2 (-4.9,-0.81). Similarly, UDI6 score declined over time (p = 0.002; -1.12,-0.26), though the decrease was less than MID of 16.7 points. UDI6 score preoperatively was 16.3 ± 1.8; 1 month post op: 16.5 (-5.2,5.0); 3 months: 16.2 (-5.6,5.1); 6 months: 11.6 (-10,1.0), and at 12 months: 8.1 (-13,-2.3). Overall uroflowmetric outcomes measured at postoperative visits including post void residual volume, maximum flow velocity, and average flow velocity did not show any difference at any postoperative time point when compared with preoperative measurements. CONCLUSIONS:In this study both the AUASI and UDI6 declined over time from initial preoperative evaluation to the 12 month follow up period, although the changes in AUASI and UDI6 score did not reach MID. Additionally, urodynamic measurements remained unchanged postoperatively. This data suggests that robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty has no effect on lower urinary tract function.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:We describe a method of robotic ureterocalicostomy (RALUC) with the Da Vinci Single Port (SP) platform and present clinical outcomes in our cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing RALUC with the SP platform in a single-institution, IRB-approved database between 2020-2023. Demographics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were collated. Surgical success was defined as freedom from hardware, avoidance of additional surgical reconstruction, and no obstruction on follow up imaging/ureteroscopy. An incision is made 1/3rd the distance from anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus. The retroperitoneal space is entered and SP Access Port is placed. The psoas is identified and concomitant ureteroscopy is used to identify the ureter. The ureter is dissected to the most proximal aspect and transected. The remaining proximal ureteral stump is suture ligated. The lower pole parenchyma is removed to access the calyx. Absorbable barbed suture is used to control parenchymal bleeding and evert the mucosal edge of the calyx. Barbed suture is then used for the ureterocaliceal anastomosis over a ureteral stent. RESULTS:Six patients underwent RALUC. Retroperitoneal approach was used for 5/6 cases. Prior ureteral surgery had been performed in 4/6 patients. Fifty percent of cases included an additional procedure with a median operative time of 248 minutes. One patient required nephrostomy tube placement postoperatively. Median follow up was 10.35 months with surgical success rate of 67%. CONCLUSIONS:SP RALUC is a safe and feasible option for proximal ureteral reconstruction in patients with unfavorable upper urinary tract anatomy or in salvage cases.

CONTEXT.—/UNASSIGNED:The use of hormonal therapy and gender-affirming surgery in the transgender community has been rising during the last several years. Although it is generally safe, hormonal therapy's link to testicular cancer remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE.—/UNASSIGNED:To review the incidence of testicular cancer in specimens from gender-affirming orchiectomies at our institution and evaluate the tumors for histologic and genetic alterations. DESIGN.—/UNASSIGNED:Pathology reports for gender-affirming orchiectomies (January 1, 2018, to August 1, 2023) were reviewed for testicular neoplasms, with additional analysis for chromosome 12 abnormalities. Incidence and chromosome variations were compared with those in the general population. RESULTS.—/UNASSIGNED:Among 458 cases during 5.5 years, 5 germ cell neoplasms in 4 patients emerged. Our institution's annual incidence rate (159 per 100 000) is 26.5 times higher than the National Cancer Institute's previous report (6.0 per 100 000). Although they were morphologically no different from germ cell neoplasms in the general population, fluorescence in situ hybridization tests showed no i(12p) in 4 of 5 neoplasms (80%) in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS.—/UNASSIGNED:The cause behind this rise in incidence remains uncertain but may be due to long term pretreatment with hormones or blockers. The lower isochromosome 12p frequency suggests an alternative mechanism driving tumor development, which requires more detailed molecular studies.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:High quality data regarding long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS) are lacking, and transgender and non-binary (TGNB) community voices have not historically been included in research development. These factors limit the utility of current research for guiding patients, clinicians, payers, and other GGAS stakeholders in decision-making. The Transgender and Non-Binary Surgery (TRANS) Registry has been developed to meet the needs of GGAS stakeholders and address limitations of traditional GGAS research. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Development of the TRANS Registry occurred over several developmental phases beginning in May 2019 to present. Stakeholder engagement was performed throughout these phases, including: determination of key clinical outcomes and PROs, creation and implementation of data collection tools within the electronic health record (EHR), and development of centralized registry infrastructure. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The TRANS Registry is a prospective observational registry of individuals seeking vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty. The EHR-enabled infrastructure allows patients and clinicians to contribute longitudinal outcomes data to the TRANS Registry. We describe our community engaged approach to designing the TRANS Registry, including lessons learned, challenges, and future directions. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The TRANS Registry is the first multicenter initiative to prospectively track the health of individuals seeking vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty using EHR-enabled methods, engaging TGNB community members and clinicians as partners in the process. This process may be used as a model for registry development in other emerging fields where high-quality longitudinal outcomes data are needed.

BACKGROUND:Often secondary to obesity, adult-acquired buried penis (AABP) is an increasingly common condition. AABP is often detrimental to urinary and sexual function, psychological well-being, and quality of life. Surgical treatment involves resection of excess soft tissue, with adjunct procedures, including a panniculectomy. However, few studies have been conducted investigating the risks of panniculectomy in the context of AABP surgical repair. METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Descriptive statistics regarding patient demographics, complications, and surgical technique were conducted. After this, an analysis of AABP patients within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was conducted. RESULTS:Four studies including 57 patients reported panniculectomy as part of buried penis repair (PBPR). Surgical approaches included a modified trapezoid and traditional transverse incision. All authors utilized postoperative drains. Dehiscence and wound infection were the most frequent complications. Univariate NSQIP analysis revealed that PBPR patients had higher body mass index, more comorbidities, and greater wound complication rates. Multivariate analysis revealed that PBPR did not significantly increase 30-day complications compared to isolated BPR ( P > 0.05), while body mass index remained a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS:Surgical repair of AABP can greatly improve patient quality of life. The available literature and NSQIP-based analysis reveal that concurrent panniculectomy in AABP repair has a comparable complication profile. Future studies are necessary to better characterize the long-term outcomes of this PBPR.

The 2 most common techniques for gender-affirming mastectomy are the double-incision free nipple graft and periareolar techniques. However, some patients are not well suited for either technique. When the nipples are high and on the pectoralis muscle, but there is marked breast tissue and skin redundancy, a double-incision free nipple graft would land the incision above the pectoral shadow, but a periareolar approach would not adequately remove the excess skin. In these patients, a nipple-preserving inferior-ellipse incision allows for appropriate chest contouring, leaving the nipple position unchanged and placing the incision in the pectoralis muscle shadow. A retrospective review identified all consecutive patients undergoing nipple-preserving inferior-ellipse mastectomy by the senior author (R.B.-L.). Indications were patients with moderate glandular tissue, skin excess, and a high nipple-areola complex (NAC) above the inferior border of the pectoralis major. Sixteen patients underwent inferior-ellipse mastectomy and were included. Mean follow-up was 203 days. Two patients (14%) required revision of the NAC. There was no partial or complete NAC loss. One patient (7%) developed postoperative seroma, which resolved with aspiration. For patients with moderate glandular tissue, excess skin in the inferior pole, and NAC position above the inferior border of the pectoralis major, the nipple-preserving inferior-ellipse mastectomy technique achieves excellent chest contour.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Several factors influence recurrence after urethral stricture repair. The impact of socioeconomic factors on stricture recurrence after urethroplasty is poorly understood. This study aims to assess the impact that social deprivation, an area-level measure of disadvantage, has on urethral stricture recurrence after urethroplasty. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing urethral reconstruction by surgeons participating in a collaborative research group. Home zip code was used to calculate Social Deprivation Indices (SDI; 0-100), which quantifies the level of disadvantage across several sociodemographic domains collected in the American Community Survey. Patients without zip code data were excluded from the analysis. The Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to study the association between SDI and the hazard of functional recurrence, adjusting for stricture characteristics as well as age and body mass index. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= .027). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Patient social deprivation identifies those at higher risk for functional recurrence after anterior urethral stricture repair, offering an opportunity for preoperative counseling and postoperative surveillance. Addressing these social determinants of health can potentially improve outcomes in reconstructive surgery.