Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Tibial plateau fractures are some of the most commonly treated injuries around the knee and loss of range of motion has a significant effect on post-operative outcomes, very few studies have demonstrated the impact of flexion contractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect that development of a knee flexion contracture has on outcomes following operative repair of tibial plateau fractures. METHODS:Patients operatively treated for tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker II, IV, V, and VI) between 2005-2024 at a multi-center academic urban hospital system were included in this retrospective comparative study. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts: 1. Full extension (FE), 2. 5-10 degrees of flexion contracture (Mild, ME) and 3. Greater than 10 degrees of flexion (Severe, SE) contracture at 6 months post-operatively. Patients with contracture were matched to patients who regained full extension based on age and Schatzker classification. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate outcomes including patient reported pain levels, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, complication rates and reoperation rates. RESULTS:The cohort consisted of 3 groups of 30 patients (14 Schatzker II, 5 Schatzker IV, 3 Schatzker V, and 8 Schatzker VI). The average knee flexion contracture for the mild cohort was 5 degrees and the average knee flexion contracture for the severe cohort was 12.7 degrees. Patients who experienced flexion contracture had poorer SMFA scores at 6 months, and those in the severe cohort had the poorest SMFA scores (112.6) when compared to those with full extension at 6 months (77.7) (p<0.001). Flexion contractures were associated with higher rates of fracture related infection (FRI) (p =0.002). Patients with flexion contracture also had a higher rate of subsequent re-operation, with 36.7% of the ME undergoing re-operation and 40% of SE undergoing re-operation. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who developed a flexion contracture following repair of a tibial plateau fracture experienced worse outcomes, higher rates of complications, increased pain, and poorer function at long term follow up compared to those who achieved full knee extension.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of an acute traumatic meniscus tear that required repair in association with a tibial plateau fracture repair on outcomes. METHODS:Over a 17-year period, 843 patients presented with a tibial plateau fracture and were followed prospectively. 721 patients with Schatzker I-VI fractures were treated operatively via a standardized algorithm. 161 tibial plateau fractures (22.3 %) had an associated meniscus tear that underwent acute repair at the time of bony fixation. These patients were compared to operatively repaired tibial plateau fracture patients with no meniscus injury (NMR). Demographics were collected and outcomes including: radiographic healing, knee range of motion (ROM), and complication rates, were recorded. In addition, re-operation rates were compared and any reoperation for meniscus repair failure identified. All patients had a minimum of 1 year follow up. RESULTS:A total of 524 patients with a mean of 21.4 (range: 12-120) months follow up met inclusion criteria. Patients in the meniscus repair (MR) cohort had poorer knee extension (1.01 degrees, range: 0-30 degrees) compared to the NMR cohort (0.07 degrees, range: 0-10 degrees) (p < 0.001), in addition to poorer knee flexion (123 degrees, range: 0-145 degrees, p = 0.024). Additionally, MR patients reported higher pain scores (mean: 3 and range: 0-8, p = 0.005) at latest follow up. Finally, MR patients had higher rates of infection (8.1 % vs. 3.3 %, p = 0.025) and lateral collapse of the joint (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who had a meniscus repair at the time of tibial plateau fracture repair were found to have poorer knee ROM, more patient reported pain at minimum 12 (mean 24) months post-operation. Additionally, these patients developed more post-operative complications than those patients who did not undergo a meniscus repair.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is to compare the quality and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for a proximal humerus fracture in a "timely manner" which was defined to be within 5 days of injury compared to those with "delayed intervention" (>5 Days) to determine the effect this had. METHODS:This IRB-approved study evaluated patients who sustained a proximal humerus fracture treated with plate and screw fixation (ORIF) between January 2004 and October 2022 and had time from injury to surgery documented. Patients were grouped based on the time to surgery (TTS) - Less than 5 Days (L5) vs. More than 5 Days (M5). TTS was also evaluated as a continuous variable. Univariable and multivariable analysis compared patient demographics, injury/surgical characteristics, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes to determine effect of TTS. Clinical outcomes included shoulder range of motion (ROM) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at least 1 year following the date of injury. Standard statistical tests were used (p<0.05 considered significant). RESULTS:, p=0.03, β= -0.27, 95% CI = -41.71- -2.89) surgery was associated with less passive forward elevation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Timing of surgery did not impact outcomes of patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures. Surgical intervention after 14 days was associated with diminished passive forward elevation only.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate revision and removal rates of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for elbow trauma using modern press-fit modular implants. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Urban academic medical center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients who underwent RHA (2012-2024) for isolated comminuted radial head fractures, combined head-neck fractures, terrible triad injuries, or Monteggia variants (OTA 2R1) were study eligible. Inclusion criteria consisted of treatment with press-fit modular implants and ≥1 year of clinical follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:Demographics, injury patterns, elbow range of motion, and postoperative complications-including fracture-related infection, nerve injury, periprosthetic fracture, implant resection, and non-resection procedures-were assessed. Implant survivorship was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS:250 patients were included (mean age 52.2 ± 17.8 years, range 18.1-88.3 years; mean length of follow up 43.8 ± 35.2 months, range 12.0-128.0 months, BMI 28.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2, 56.8% female). Common indications for RHA included Monteggia fractures (38.0%), isolated radial head fractures (23.6%), and terrible triad injuries (19.2%).Post-index surgery iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 7.2%, most commonly involving the ulnar nerve. Fracture related infection occurred in 2.8% post index surgery, and one nonoperative periprosthetic fracture (0.4%) was observed.The resection rate was 7.2% (18/250), with 33.3% (6/18) of implant resection surgeries occurring within one year (mean length of follow up 43.8 ± 35.2 months, range 12.0-128.0 months). Common resection indications included postoperative stiffness (n=5), infection (n=4), and neuropathy (n=3). One-year implant survival was 97.6%, with mean survivorship of 8.5 ± 1.0 years (95% CI, 7.1-9.8).In total, 24 patients (9.6%) underwent additional non-resection procedures including nerve decompressions, elbow contracture releases with excision of heterotopic ossification, and manipulations under anesthesia.At final follow-up (mean 43.8 ± 35.2 months), mean range of motion was 125.4° flexion, -14.9° extension, 73.5° pronation, and 79.3° supination. No significant difference in length of follow-up was observed between patients with post-operative nerve injury (52.4 ± 38.2 months) and those without (42.5 ± 34.8 months, p = 0.16). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With a 7.2% resection rate and one-year implant survival of 97.6%, contemporary press-fit modular RHA demonstrated durable elbow trauma outcomes.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of autogenous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) compared with other graft types in achieving successful fracture nonunion repair. METHODS:An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on a consecutive series of patients surgically treated for fracture nonunions at an academic medical center between September 10, 2004, and August 20, 2023. Patients were analyzed based on which bone graft type-ICBG versus alternative graft types-used during their nonunion repair. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical history were compared. Outcomes included radiographic healing, time to union, postoperative complications, and revision rate. Cohorts were compared using an independent sample Student t-test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons assessed differences across treatment strategy groups. RESULTS:Five hundred fifty-six patients were treated surgically for a fracture nonunion using standard internal fixation and a "bone graft" for biologic stimulation. 57.4% of these patients were treated with autogenous ICBG; 42.6% received alternative grafts (iliac crest aspirate, allograft, bone morphogenetic, reamer-irrigation aspirator, and/or demineralized bone matrix, without autogenous cancellous iliac crest). Compared with the alternative cohort, the ICBG cohort showed greater healing success after a single nonunion surgery (95.6% ICBG versus 86.9% alternative, P < 0.001) and faster healing times (4.8 ± 2.4 months versus 7.1 ± 4.9 months, P < 0.001). Complications at the ICBG harvest site included wound infections/hematomas and iliac wing fracture. No notable differences were found in positive cultures at the time of surgery, postoperative fracture-related infection, implant failure, or neurovascular injury. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Using autogenous ICBG in the surgical repair of fracture nonunions was associated with higher healing rates compared with alternative graft types, supporting its continued role in enhancing bone healing outcomes, even in the face of infected nonunion.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to reliably define the concept of "extreme tibial nailing" and (2) assess the feasibility of tibial intramedullary nailing when the fracture extends into the nail's locking bolt zone. METHODS:Design: A retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:A single academic center comprised of a specialty orthopedic hospital and a Level I Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: 543 patients who sustained 555 tibia fractures between February 2014 and January 2024 were reviewed by two board-certified orthopedic surgeons. Cases were classified as "extreme nailing" based on the tibial fracture within the most proximal or distal 25% of the bone such that the fracture extended into the locking bolt section of the intramedullary nail used to treat the fracture. Patients with supplemental periarticular plating of the tibia were excluded. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Data collected included patient demographics, hospital metrics, and outcomes. RESULTS:Twenty-five tibial fractures treated met radiographic criterion. The "extreme IMN" cohort was 45.8 years, 72% female with a mean BMI of 26.6. Over half of fractures resulted from high-energy injuries, and 40% were open. Patients were hospitalized for 92.8 h on average, and the 90-day readmission rate was 8.0%. The average time to weight-bearing allowance was 5.2 weeks post-op. Eight (32.0%) patients experienced complications: 12% developed fracture-related infection (FRI), 4% experienced hardware complications, and 20.0% developed nonunion requiring surgery. The rate of all-cause reoperation was 32.0%, and 28% of patients experienced knee or ankle pain at 6 months or later. The rate of malalignment was 8.0%, and the average time to radiographic healing was 5.7 months. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Tibial nailing is an effective treatment for "extreme" tibial fractures that extend as far as the articular surface and interlocking cluster on either end. The majority of patients who underwent extreme tibial nailing recovered with acceptable alignment, minimal healing complications, and achieved radiographic union within 6 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Evaluate healing outcomes of patients who sustained a comminuted clavicle fracture and underwent operative fixation using a bridge plate technique or interfragmentary screw/neutralization plate. METHODS:Two hundred and seventy-one comminuted clavicle fractures that underwent operative fixation with minimum 6 months follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on fixation methods. Data collected include patient demographics and injury information. Fracture healing, total complications, fracture related infection, removal of hardware, nonunion, and revision fracture surgery were reviewed. Clinical healing was defined as non-tenderness about the fracture site, and radiographic healing was defined as bridging callus and/ or lack of fracture line on X-ray. Chi square analysis, T test, and linear regression were used for analysis. RESULTS:There were 126 comminuted fractures fixed with a bridge plate and 145 comminuted fractures fixed with a plate and at least one interfragmentary screw both with a mean follow-up of 8.2 months. The bridge plated group was more female, the result of high-energy mechanisms, and had more anteroinferior plates (p < 0.05 for all). There were no differences in time to radiographic healing as well as incidence of nonunion between cohorts. Patients fixed with the bridge plate technique underwent a higher incidence of revision surgery, higher incidence of hardware removal, and had a longer time until clinically healed. On multivariate regression analysis, fixation method was not associated with any of these outcomes (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Bridge plating and lag screw/neutralization plate fixation were both associated with similar rates of healing. Complication profiles were similar.

METHODS:This study assessed the safety of the lateral femoral cutaneous and over the hip (LOH) block, a regional anesthetic, in anticoagulated hip fracture patients while maintaining efficacy. A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with hip fractures (AO/OTA 31A/B) who presented to a single academic medical center and level 1 trauma center actively using oral anticoagulants. Patients were grouped based on anesthesia type: LOH block (LOH) versus general anesthesia (GA) and LOH versus spinal anesthesia (SA). LOH patients were matched based on anticoagulant type, OTA/AO classification, and risk (STTGMA) score with a 3:1 ratio to GA and a 1:1 ratio to SA. Outcome comparisons included: time to surgery, operative and anesthesia time, and bleeding complications, demographics (age, sex, race, BMI, CCI, and STTGMA), postoperative complications, 90-day readmission rates, mortality within 1 year, and discharge location. RESULTS:A total of 135 patients: 27 LOH, 27 SA, and 81 GA, were analyzed. Compared to GA, LOH block patients had a shorter time to surgery (1.31 ± 0.082 vs. 0.89 ± 0.69, p = 0.014), lower rates of 90-day readmission (3.7% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.047), and a greater discharge to home with health services rate (33.3% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.024). The GA population trended-toward more major complications (p = 0.077) and mortality within 1 year (p = 0.077). Compared to SA, LOH patients were slightly underweight (25.1 ± 4.19 vs. 22.7 ± 4.16, p = 0.035) and got to surgery faster (0.89 ± 0.69 vs 1.54 ± 1.48, p = 0.039). Across all groups, there were no differences in the need for blood transfusion or other quality markers. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The LOH block was safe and effective for use in anticoagulated hip fracture patients. This technique provided an intraoperative safety profile similar to other anesthetic choices, allowed for less delay to surgery compared to spinal anesthesia and improved discharge parameters compared to GA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III/METHODS:Prognostic Level III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect that associated glenohumeral dislocations have on outcomes following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:This IRB-approved study reports on 301 patients, who underwent operative treatment for proximal humerus fractures at an academic medical center from January 2006 to January 2023. Fractures were classified according to the Neer system. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on whether a glenohumeral dislocation was present at the time of initial injury. Outcomes measured included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, shoulder range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), readmission rates, complications, hardware removal, and need for revision surgery. Independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analysis were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of these factors on complication rate. RESULTS:230 patients sustained an isolated fracture (PHF) and 71 sustained a fracture-dislocation (FD). Significant differences were observed between the FD and PHF groups in all measured outcomes. The FD group had a poorer DASH score (24.38 ± 19.09 vs 10.54 ± 13.67; P < 0.001) and reduced range of shoulder motion in forward elevation (114° ± 40° vs 162° ± 19°; P < 0.001), external rotation (40° ± 19° vs 66° ± 19°; P < 0.001), and internal rotation (57° ± 26° vs 82° ± 21°; P < 0.001). Readmission rates were higher in the FD group (0.28 ± 0.85 vs 0.05 ± 0.28; P < 0.001). The FD cohort also had a higher rate of complications (25.35% vs 6.52%; P < 0.001), need for removal of hardware (14.08% vs 3.04%; P = 0.002), and overall revision surgery (11.27% vs 1.30%; P < 0.001). The FD cohort demonstrated a greater incidence of AVN (12.68% vs 4.35%; P = 0.012). No significant difference was observed regarding rates of fracture healing and recurrent dislocation. Multivariate analysis in the form of binary logistic regression indicated that fracture-dislocation significantly increased the complication risk (OR = 3.310, 95% CI = 1.42-7.70; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Proximal humerus fracture-dislocations are associated with worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates compared to those without dislocations. These findings highlight the potential need for specialized treatment strategies to mitigate the impact of dislocation on recovery.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Several types of fifth metatarsal (MT) fractures exist and are treated with various methods of immobilization, weight bearing restrictions, and occasionally operative procedures. This study evaluated the differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes among pseudo-Jones fractures (Zones 1 and 2), true Jones fractures (Zone 3), and fifth metatarsal shaft and neck fractures. METHODS:A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients presenting to a single academic medical center with a fifth metatarsal fracture between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. Radiographs obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed, and fracture patterns were categorized as either Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, shaft, neck, or head fractures. RESULTS:In total, 1314 patients with isolated fifth metatarsal fractures were treated (mean age = 49.6 ± 18.0 years). In total, 1217 fractures (92.5%) were initially treated nonoperatively, and 97 fractures (7.5%) were treated operatively. The overall time to clinical and radiographic healing for all fifth metatarsal fractures treated nonoperatively was 9.9 ± 8.7 weeks and 17.9 ± 15.6 weeks, respectively (P = .245, P = .088). Immediate weightbearing led to a faster time to clinical healing by (P = .035). There was no statistically significant difference in time to clinical or radiographic union among the different fracture types (P = .496, P = .400). Likewise, there was no evidence of any difference in time to clinical or radiographic union for patients treated operatively versus nonoperatively (P > .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:.