Faculty Bibliography

Aortocaval fistula (ACF) is a lethal complication of aortic aneurysmal disease. Traditional treatment of ACF involves open surgical approaches to fistula ligation and repair of the great vessels, with a high mortality secondary to bleeding and cardiac compromise. We present the case of a 28-year-old man with a chronic ACF with concomitant aortic pseudoaneurysms secondary to penetrating trauma treated with a fenestrated endograft.

Aberrant left vertebral artery (LVA) origin off the aortic arch is an uncommon anatomic variant. Treatment of the thoracic aortic pathology that necessitates its coverage has not been described. We present a patient with an acute intramural hematoma with a dominant LVA originating from the aortic arch. A LVA-to-carotid artery transposition with shunt placement, carotid-to-subclavian bypass, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair were performed. The patient recovered uneventfully, without any evidence of stroke. This case study shows that aberrant left vertebral anatomy presents a unique and interesting challenge and that vertebral shunt techniques during revascularization can be performed without stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to determine if compression therapy after endovenous ablation (EVA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) improves efficacy and patient reported outcomes of pain, ecchymosis and quality of life. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial from 2009 to 2013 comparing the use of thigh-high 30-40mmHg compression therapy for 7 days vs no compression therapy following endovenous ablation of the GSV. Severity of venous disease was measured by CEAP scale and the venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Quality of life assessments were carried out with a CIVIQ-2 questionnaire at days 1, 7, 14, 30 and 90, and the visual analog pain scale daily for the first week. Bruising score was assessed at 1 week post procedure. Post ablation venous duplex was also performed. RESULTS: 70 patients and 85 limbs with EVA were randomized. EVA modalities included radiofrequency ablation (91%) and laser ablation (9%). CEAP class and VCSS scores were equivalent between the two groups. There was no significant difference in patient reported outcomes of post-procedural pain scores at day 1 (mean 3.0 vs. 3.12, p =0.948) and at day 7 (mean 2.11 vs 2.81,p =0.147), CIVIQ-2 scores at 1 week (mean 36.9 vs 35.1, p=0.594), at 90 days (mean 29.1 vs 22.5, p =0.367) and bruising score (mean 1.2 vs 1.4,p=0.561) in the compression vs. no compression groups respectively. Additionally, there was a 100% rate of GSV closure in both groups and no endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (eHIT) as assessed by post-ablation duplex. CONCLUSION: Compression therapy does not significantly affect both patient reported and clinical outcomes after GSV ablation in patients with non-ulcerated venous insufficiency. It may be an unnecessary adjunct following GSV ablation.

OBJECTIVE: This review explores the current literature on the natural history, diagnosis, and management of mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) in the modern era. METHODS: A review of the contemporary literature from 1997 to 2016 on MVT and its pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment was performed. RESULTS: MVT is an insidious and lethal disease associated with acute mesenteric ischemia. The prevalence of MVT has increased sharply during the past two decades commensurate with an increase in radiographic imaging for abdominal complaints. The optimal treatment of and approach to MVT is controversial, given the poorly understood natural history of this rare disease. Both endovascular and open surgical strategies in addition to systemic anticoagulation have been used as adjuncts to treat MVT with limited success. Despite advances in treatment, mortality associated with MVT is still high. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that failure to recanalize the portomesenteric venous system leads to an increased risk for development of sequelae of portal hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: MVT is a challenging disease to treat, given the difficulty in establishing a prompt initial diagnosis and the inability to reliably monitor patients for evidence of impending bowel infarction. Careful selection of patients for endovascular, open, or hybrid approaches is key to achieving improved outcomes. However, the paucity of prospective data and our evolving understanding of the natural history of MVT make consensus treatment strategies difficult to ascertain.