Faculty Bibliography

Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although pre-emptive therapy (PET) are routinely used in treatment of CMV after SCT, their prophylactic use is limited by clinically unacceptable myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity. Letermovir, available since 2019 in Italy, is the first antiviral agent approved by FDA and EMA which is indicated for the prophylaxis of CMV infection in CMV seropositive (R+) patients undergoing SCT. Presently, cost and drug interactions are the main disadvantages of Letermovir use. We performed a single-center observational retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of primary Letermovir prophylaxis for CMV infection among high-risk patients (R+) receiving HSCT from serological negative donor (D-). Methods We evaluated a cohort of R+/D- patients transplanted from January 2017 to December 2020 (86/235 transplanted patients): among those eligible for Letermovir prophylaxis (N=70), 29 patients (transplanted after 2019) received Letermovir until day +100, whereas 41 patients (the historical control group transplanted before 2019) received CMV PET only in case of increased viral load (CMV reactivation). Patients unable to take oral therapy at day +7 from HSCT or assuming drugs for concomitant clinical conditions bringing about major pharmacokinetic interaction were excluded (N=16). We compared day +100 and day +200 cumulative incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi), defined according to drug registration trial: Letermovir discontinuation before day +100, CMV reactivation (CMV-DNAemia leading to PET), CMV tissue invasive disease, disease relapse and death from any causes. Survival functions between groups were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Moreover, the overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and cumulative incidence of II-IV grade acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was compared in the two cohorts. Finally, we analyzed the number of accesses in day hospital from initial discharge to day +180, as an indirect cost-effectiveness evaluation of letermovir prophylaxis. Results No severe adverse events related to the therapy were observed in the letermovir group. Letermovir prophylaxis started at a median of 11 days (range, 5-27) after HSCT. The median duration of Letermovir administration was 89 days (range, 40-113). The only early stop was due to patient death, not related to CMV or drug toxicity. CS-CMVi at day +100 occurred in 13.8% vs 61.0% in letermovir and historical group, respectively (p <0.001). Of note, none of the events in letermovir group was related to CMV reactivation whereas 24/25 in the historical group were. A trend toward lower CS-CMVi in the letermovir group was observed also at day +180 (44,8% vs 65,9%, p =0.080), with 6 late reactivations in patients who received prophylaxis. Moreover, at follow-up one patient in the experimental group and 3 in the control group developed CMV disease. Of note, in vivo T-cell depletion was used in 86% of patients in letermovir and 83% in historical group, and most of the CMV reactivations occurred after development of aGVHD: in 83% and 54% of patients, respectively. No differences in OS and DFS were observed between the two cohorts. Finally, a trend toward lower number of day hospital admissions was shown in patients who received letermovir prophylaxis (median 2 admissions, IQR 0-8, vs median 4.5, IQR 0-16), suggesting higher quality of life and costs reduction. Conclusions Our real-life experience demonstrated the efficacy of Letermovir in reducing the incidence of CMV reactivation. Longer follow-up is needed to clarify advantages in terms of disease-free and overall survival. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of prophylaxis beyond day 100 in high risk patients, such as those who receive a T-depleted transplant or who develop aGVHD. The role of Letermovir prophylaxis on immuno-reconstitution and its cost-effectiveness remains to be evaluated. Disclosures: Marco: Jazz: Consultancy; Insight,: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clinigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau.
Copyright

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CAR-T) have dramatically changed the treatment landscape of B-cell malignancies, providing a potential cure for relapsed/refractory patients. Long-term responses in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non Hodgkin lymphomas have encouraged further development in myeloma. In particular, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR-T have established very promising results in heavily pre-treated patients. Moreover, CAR-T targeting other antigens (i.e., SLAMF7 and CD44v6) are currently under investigation. However, none of these current autologous therapies have been approved, and despite high overall response rates across studies, main issues such as long-term outcome, toxicities, treatment resistance, and management of complications limit as yet their widespread use. Here, we critically review the most important pre-clinical and clinical findings, recent advances in CAR-T against myeloma, as well as discoveries in the biology of a still incurable disease, that, all together, will further improve safety and efficacy in relapsed/refractory patients, urgently in need of novel treatment options.

Even with high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) which was initially introduced for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prevention in the setting of HLA-haploidentical transplantation, both acute and chronic GvHDs remain a major clinical challenge. Despite improvements in the understanding of the pathogenesis of both acute and chronic GvHDs, reliable biomarkers that predict their onset have yet to be identified. We recently studied the potential correlation between extracellular vesicles (EVs) and the onset of acute (a)GvHD in transplant recipients from related and unrelated donors. In the present study, we further investigated the role of the expression profile of membrane proteins and their microRNA (miRNA) cargo (miRNA100, miRNA155, and miRNA194) in predicting the onset of aGvHD in haploidentical transplant recipients with PT-Cy. Thirty-two consecutive patients were included. We evaluated the expression profile of EVs, by flow cytometry, and their miRNA cargo, by real-time PCR, at baseline, prior, and at different time points following transplant. Using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, a significant association between expression profiles of antigens such as CD146, CD31, CD140a, CD120a, CD26, CD144, and CD30 on EVs, and their miRNA cargo with the onset of aGvHD was observed. Moreover, we also investigated a potential correlation between EV expression profile and cargo with plasma biomarkers (e.g., ST2, sTNFR1, and REG3a) that had been associated with aGVHD previously. This analysis showed that the combination of CD146, sTNFR1, and miR100 or miR194 strongly correlated with the onset of aGvHD (AUROC >0.975). A large prospective multicenter study is currently in progress to validate our findings.

Introduction. Prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) remains a major challenge. The combination of methotrexate (MTX) and a calcineurin inhibitor has been the standard regimen for prophylaxis in patients receiving matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants for the past few decades. However, over 50% of patients undergoing AHCT still develop acute or chronic GvHD or even both, causing high rates of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, calcineurin inhibitors also have untoward toxic side effects. High dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), initially introduced for GvHD prevention in the setting of haploidentical transplantation, has now been studied in MSD and MUD transplants. We adopted a novel approach to prevent GvHD using a short course of PTCy and bortezomib. We hypothesized that such combination is safe and effective and omits the need for calcineurin or m-TOR inhibitors. Study Design. We report the outcomes of a prospective cohort of patients who received PTCy and bortezomib for GvHD prevention following MSD or MUD transplants. Twenty-eight patients were treated in a phase I-II trial and their clinical outcomes were previously reported (al-Homsi AS et al, BBMT 2019). Most of the remaining patients were treated on an extension trial. GvHD prevention consisted of PTCy 50 mg/kg IV on day +3 and +4, and bortezomib 1.3mg/m ² IV 6 hours after transplant and again 72 hours after. Patients receiving MUD transplants also received rabbit ATG (thymoglobulin) 5mg/kg total IV fractionated on day -4 to -2. All patients received peripheral blood grafts and standard supportive care as per Institutional policy. G-CSF was administered routinely until neutrophil engraftment. Results. Fifty-eight patients are included in this analysis. Median age was 60 (range 22-78) years. Fifty-three percent of patients were male. Underlying malignancies consisted of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies in 79.3% and 20.6%, respectively. Acute myeloid leukemia (50%) and myelodysplastic syndromes (24.1%) were the most common diseases. At transplant, disease risk index was low, intermediate, high and very high in 19.0%, 48.3%, 31.0% and 1.7% of patients, respectively. Median Pretransplant Assessment of Mortality Score (PAM) was 16.7 (5.4-29.4). Grafts were from MSD in 24.1% or MUD in 75.9% of patients. Recipient (R)/Donor (D) CMV status at transplant was as follows: R+/D+: 43%; R+/D-: 21%; R-/D+: 14% and R-/D-: 22%. Conditioning regimens consisted of reduced intensity fludarabine and busulfan in all but 2 patients who were conditioned with myeloablative fludarabine and busulfan. Overall, the regimen was remarkably well tolerated. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 16 (13-28) and 26 (15-57) days respectively. No patient experienced primary graft failure. CMV and EBV reactivation rates were 46.6% and 24%. Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD were 35% (95% CI: 22%-47%) and 15% (95% CI: 7%-25%) at day +120, respectively. Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 14% at 1 year. Overall, 34% of patients required immunosuppression with systemic steroids after day +4 either for grade III-IV acute or chronic GvHD. Disease relapse rate was 26%. One-year cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality was 14% (95% CI: 6%-25%). Median overall survival was 30.7 (95% CI: 15.7-not yet reached) months. One-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI: 57%-82%). One-year composite GvHD (acute and chronic) free and relapse free survival (GRFS) was 41.6% (95% CI: 28.9%-54%). Conclusion. PTCy and bortezomib combination for GvHD prophylaxis following MSD and MUD transplants is well tolerated and effective. It offers an alternative regimen to calcineurin and m-TOR inhibitor-containing regimens and may be preferred in certain settings including patients with limited resources, poor medication compliance, and with impaired renal function. A comparison of this cohort to a matched control group of patients receiving methotrexate and cyclosporine for GvHD prevention is ongoing. Disclosures: Abdul-Hay: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Al-Homsi: Celyad: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sanyko: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib are used for GvHD prevention
Copyright

Despite  improvements in outcome, 15-25% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients have treatment resistant high-risk (HR) disease with a poor survival. The lack of a genetic basis for HR has focused attention on the role played by epigenetic changes. Aberrant expression and somatic mutations affecting genes involved in the regulation of tri-methylation of the lysine (K) 27 on histone 3 H3 (H3K27me3) are common in cancer. H3K27me3 is catalyzed by EZH2, the catalytic subunit of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). The deregulation of H3K27me3 has been shown to be involved in oncogenic transformation and tumor progression in a variety of hematological malignancies including MM. Recently we have shown that aberrant overexpression of the PRC2 subunit PHD Finger Protein 19 (PHF19) is the most significant overall contributor to HR status further focusing attention on the role played by epigenetic change in MM. By modulating both the PRC2/EZH2 catalytic activity and recruitment, PHF19 regulates the expression of key genes involved in cell growth and differentiation. Here we review the expression, regulation and function of PHF19 both in normal and the pathological contexts of solid cancers and MM. We present evidence that strongly implicates PHF19 in the regulation of genes important in cell cycle and the genetic stability of MM cells making it highly relevant to HR MM behavior. A detailed understanding of the normal and pathological functions of PHF19 will allow us to design therapeutic strategies able to target aggressive subsets of MM.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies in which other therapies have failed. AREAS COVERED/UNASSIGNED:The review provides an overview for recognizing and managing the most acute toxicities related to CAR-T cells. EXPERT OPINION/UNASSIGNED:The development of immune-mediated toxicities is a common challenge of CAR-T therapy. The mechanism that determines this toxicity is still unclear, although an unfavorable tumor microenvironment and a pro-inflammatory state put patients at risk. The monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of post-CAR-T toxicities must be determined and based on international guidelines and internal clinical practice. It is urgent to identify biomarkers that can identify patients at greater risk of developing complications. The adoption of consistent grading criteria is necessary to improve toxicity management strategies continually. The first-line therapy consists of supportive care and treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids. An early start of cytokine blockade therapies could mitigate toxicity. The plan will include cytokine release prophylaxis, a risk-adapted treatment, prevention of on-target/off-tumor effect, and a switch on/off CAR-T approach.