Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:chalae02
Morcellation in gynecologic oncology
Chalas, Eva
PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Morcellation of uteri with unsuspected malignancies has been the focus of reports for decades. More intensive evaluation of clinical outcomes and evaluation of impact of changes in practice has occurred since the release of FDA statement advising against the use of power morcellators. The review summarizes some of the most relevant publications on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists concur that symptomatic women should undergo appropriate evaluation, morcellation should not be performed whenever malignancy is suspected or diagnosed, and acknowledge the limitations of diagnostic testing currently available to detect leiomyosarcoma. Accurate incidence of occult leiomyosarcoma in women undergoing hysterectomy for symptomatic myomas is not known because of poor quality of data. Increased complication rates, including death, with abdominal procedures and increased societal costs have been reported. The FDA safety communication has resulted in decreased laparoscopic hysterectomy rates. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:Clinical judgement and practice in accordance to clinical guidelines, based on best current scientific evidence, is recommended. Women should be aware of the limitation of current data regarding the incidence of occult leiomyosarcoma or other malignancies whenever consenting to any form of therapy for symptomatic myomas, including surgical, medical and expectant management. If surgical treatment is selected, morcellation should not be performed if a malignancy diagnosis is known or suspected. A minimally invasive surgical approach is associated with a decreased complication rate and an increased quality of life years. Research efforts should focus on improving diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of therapeutic interventions.
PMID: 29251679
ISSN: 1473-656x
CID: 3460232
Regarding "Incidence of Occult Uterine Malignancy Following Vaginal Hysterectomy with Morcellation" [Letter]
Parker, William H; Berek, Jonathan S; Pritts, Elizabeth A; Olive, David; Chalas, Eva; Clarke-Pearson, Dan
PMID: 28826956
ISSN: 1553-4669
CID: 3460222
ENGAGE: Evaluation of a streamlined oncologist-led BRCA mutation (BRCAm) testing and counselling model for patients with ovarian cancer. [Meeting Abstract]
Colombo, Nicoletta; Scambia, Giovanni; Chalas, Eva; Huang, Gloria S.; Pignata, Sandro; Fiorica, James; Van Le, Linda; Ghamande, Sharad A.; Santiago, Gonzalez Santiago; Bover, Isabel; Suarez, Begona Grana; Green, Andrew Emmons; Huot-Marchand, Philippe; Bourhis, Yann; Karve, Sudeep; Blakeley, Christopher
ISI:000411931704037
ISSN: 0732-183x
CID: 3460652
Assessment of BRCA testing uptake in ovarian cancer patients during the implementation of an oncologist-led genetic counseling model at an urban and suburban teaching hospital [Meeting Abstract]
Jorgensen, Jennifer; Chiu, Kimberley; Gotimer, Kristin; Chalas, Eva; Kuo, Dennis Yi-Shin; Huang, Gloria S.
ISI:000411895703058
ISSN: 0732-183x
CID: 3460642
Factors Associated With Dissatisfaction Among Obstetricians and Gynecologists in the United States [Meeting Abstract]
Cha, Sandolsam; Smith, Heather A.; Atallah, Fouad; Chalas, Eva; McCalla, Sandra; Goffman, Dena
ISI:000402705800270
ISSN: 0029-7844
CID: 4142642
Outcomes and Postoperative Complications After Hysterectomies Performed for Benign Compared With Malignant Indications
Wallace, Sumer K; Fazzari, Melissa J; Chen, Hui; Cliby, William A; Chalas, Eva
OBJECTIVE:To compare complications and outcomes after hysterectomy for benign compared with malignant indications in the United States. METHODS:Women who underwent hysterectomy in the United States for either benign or malignant indications from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were excluded if the procedure was not performed for primary gynecologic indications. Appropriate procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. Univariate and multivariable models for complication risk were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS:We identified 59,525 eligible patients, with 49,331 (82.9%) hysterectomies performed for benign and 10,194 (17.1%) for malignant indications. All complications, including wound complications (2.5% benign compared with 5.5% malignant, P<.001), venous thromboembolism (0.33% compared with 1.7%, P<.001), urinary tract infection (2.7% compared with 3.2%, P=.009), sepsis (0.53% compared with 1.9%, P<.001), blood transfusion (2.6% compared with 11.5%, P<.001), death (0.02% compared with 0.10%, P<.001), unplanned readmission (1.8% compared with 4.5%, P<.001), and returns to the operating room (0.91% compared with 1.4%, P<.001), were significantly more common for malignant hysterectomies. The overall rate of complications for benign cases was 7.9% compared with a rate of 19.4% for malignant hysterectomy. The median operating time for laparoscopy in benign cases was significantly longer than for open or vaginal hysterectomy procedures (127 minutes compared with 105 or 94 minutes, respectively; P<.001). The median operating time in malignant cases was significantly longer than for benign cases (P<.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hysterectomies performed for gynecologic malignancies are associated with a more than twofold higher complication rate compared with those performed for benign conditions. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with a decreased complication rate compared with open surgery. These data can be used for patient counseling and surgical planning, determining physician and hospital costs of care, and considered when assigning value-based reimbursement.
PMID: 27500339
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 3460192
Are Graduating Ob/Gyn Residents Confident as Independent Gynecologic Surgeons? [Meeting Abstract]
Chen, Hui; Jimenez, Edward A.; Chalas, Eva; Villella, Jeannine A.
ISI:000398934900064
ISSN: 0029-7844
CID: 3465822
Impact of Universal Screening Recommendation on Genetic Testing in Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers [Meeting Abstract]
Gotimer, Kristin F.; Jimenez, Edward A.; Villella, Jeannine A.; Chan, Kent C.; Levine, Kelly; Chalas, Eva
ISI:000398934900469
ISSN: 0029-7844
CID: 3461022
In Reply [Comment]
Parker, William H; Kaunitz, Andrew M; Pritts, Elizabeth A; Olive, David L; Chalas, Eva; Clarke-Pearson, Daniel L; Berek, Jonathan S
PMID: 27101114
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 3460182
An Open Letter to the Food and Drug Administration Regarding the Use of Morcellation Procedures in Women Having Surgery for Presumed Uterine Myomas [Editorial]
Parker, William; Berek, Jonathan S; Pritts, Elizabeth; Olive, David; Kaunitz, Andrew M; Chalas, Eva; Clarke-Pearson, Daniel; Goff, Barbara; Bristow, Robert; Taylor, Hugh S; Farias-Eisner, Robin; Fader, Amanda Nickles; Maxwell, G Larry; Goodwin, Scott C; Love, Susan; Gibbons, William E; Foshag, Leland J; Leppert, Phyllis C; Norsigian, Judy; Nager, Charles W; Johnson, Timothy; Guzick, David S; As-Sanie, Sawsan; Paulson, Richard J; Farquhar, Cindy; Bradley, Linda; Scheib, Stacey A; Bilchik, Anton J; Rice, Laurel W; Dionne, Carla; Jacoby, Alison; Ascher-Walsh, Charles; Kilpatrick, Sarah J; Adamson, G David; Siedhoff, Matthew; Israel, Robert; Paraiso, Marie Fidela; Frumovitz, Michael M; Lurain, John R; Al-Hendy, Ayman; Benrubi, Guy I; Raman, Steven S; Kho, Rosanne M; Anderson, Ted L; Reynolds, R Kevin; DeLancey, John
PMID: 26773577
ISSN: 1553-4669
CID: 2049252