Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of pathologic complete response (pCR) (i.e., T0N0M0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A single-center, prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database was queried for patients with primary cII and cIII rectal cancer staged by CT and ERUS/MRI undergoing long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by proctectomy with curative intent between 1997 and 2007. Patients were stratified into pCR and no-pCR groups and compared with respect to demographics, tumor and treatment characteristics, and oncologic outcomes. Outcomes evaluated were 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, disease-specific mortality, local recurrence, and distant recurrence. RESULTS:The query returned 238 patients (73% male), with a median age of 57 years and median follow-up of 54 months. Of these, 58 patients achieved pCR. Patients with pCR vs no-pCR were statistically comparable with respect to demographics, chemoradiation regimens, tumor distance from anal verge, clinical stage, surgical procedures performed, and follow-up time. No patient with pCR had local recurrence. Overall survival and distant recurrence were also significantly improved for patients achieving pCR. CONCLUSIONS:Achievement of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with greatly improved cancer outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. Future studies should evaluate the relationship between increases in pCR rates and improvements in cancer outcomes in this population.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a longer interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery on perioperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes. METHODS:A colorectal cancer database was queried for clinical stage II and III rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by proctectomy between 1997 and 2007. The neoadjuvant regimen consisted of long course external beam radiation and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary cancer, extracolonic malignancy, urgent surgery, or non-validated treatment dates were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the interval between chemoradiation and surgery (<8 and ≥ 8 weeks). Perioperative complications and oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS:One hundred seventy-seven patients were included. Groups were comparable with respect to demographics, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Perioperative complications were not affected by the interval between chemoradiation and surgery. Patients undergoing surgery ≥ 8 weeks after chemoradiation experienced a significant improvement in pathologic complete response rate (30.8% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.03) and had decreased 3-year local recurrence rate (1.2% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.04). A Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the compounding effect of a complete pathologic response on oncologic outcome. A longer interval correlated with less local recurrence, although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:An interval between chemoradiation and surgery ≥ 8 weeks is safe and is associated with a higher rate of pathologic complete response and decreased local recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: The field of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is expanding. We compare short-term and early oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus open resection in carefully matched rectal cancer patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were reviewed. Laparoscopic resections were matched 1:1 to open resections by age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and type of surgery. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ninety-one rectal cancer patients with laparoscopic resection were included, 59% were male, and median age was 62 years. Conversion rate was 18.7%. Laparoscopic and open surgery had similar 30-day morbidity and mortality except wound infection, which was lower for the laparoscopic group (p = 0.02). Laparoscopic surgery had similar 30-day readmissions but shorter total length of hospital stay (5 versus 7 days, p < 0.01), time to first flatus (3 versus 4.5 days, p = 0.001), and time to first bowel movement (4 versus 5 days, p = 0.05) when compared with open surgery. The 3-year disease-free survival, local recurrence, and distant recurrence rates were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed for rectal cancer, with better postoperative recovery and acceptable early oncological outcomes. Results from large ongoing randomized trials with longer follow-up time are pending to better define oncologic outcomes.

Until the development of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the early 1980s, proctocolectomy with end ileostomy was the only definitive surgery for ulcerative colitis and colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis was the procedure of choice for affected patients who were reluctant to have a permanent ileostomy. Currently, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the most common procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis requiring surgical treatment. However, there is still a role for ileorectal anastomosis and proctocolectomy with end ileostomy for a selected group of patients. In this review, the authors summarize the current indications for ileorectal anastomosis and proctocolectomy with end ileostomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to define the learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC). METHOD/METHODS:A retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data was performed. Consecutive segmental and total HALC performed by a single surgeon with no prior HALC experience was included. Operative time and quality-related outcomes, including conversions, operative and postoperative complications, length of stay, reoperations and readmissions were compared for consecutive cohorts of 25 HALC. A subgroup analysis of right, left, total and proctocolectomy performed in each cohort of 25 HALC was also performed. RESULTS:From December 2005 to February 2009, 200 HALC were performed. When evaluated in cohorts of 25 consecutive cases, operative times (155-206 min), operative complications (4-12%), postoperative complications (8-36%), length of stay (4-5 days), reoperations (0-8%) and readmissions (0-16%) were similar. In the subgroup analysis, there were no changes in the quality-related measures for any colectomy type or the operative time for right and proctocolectomy as experience was gained. Operative time decreased for left (183-127 min) and total HALC (259-218 min) after experience with 50 cases (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:HALC operative times decreased with surgeon experience. For quality-related outcomes, there was no learning curve for HALC.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether downstaging impacts prognosis in patients with cII versus cIII rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified from our colorectal cancer database 295 patients with primary cII and cIII rectal cancer staged by CT and ERUS/MRI who received 5-FU-based chemoradiation followed by R0 surgery after a median interval of 7 weeks during 1997-2007. The median radiotherapy dose was 5040 cGy. We excluded 58 patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) and compared among the remaining 162 patients pathologic downstaging (cII to ypI, cIII to ypII or ypI) versus no pathologic downstaging (c stage < or = yp stage). Outcomes evaluated were 5-year overall survival, 3-year cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, overall recurrence, local recurrence, and distant recurrence. RESULTS: The median age was 58 years and median follow-up was 48 months. Patients with downstaging versus no downstaging were statistically comparable with respect to demographics, chemoradiation regimen, interval time between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery, tumor distance from anal verge, surgical procedures performed, and follow-up time. With the exception of local recurrence rates, downstaging resulted in significantly improved cancer outcomes for cIII but not cII. CONCLUSIONS: Downstaging without pCR is a significant prognostic factor for patients with stage cIII rectal cancer. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation should be taken into account when defining the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with cIII rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Conceivably, the benefits of earlier recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique used in laparoscopic colectomy (LC) may be amplified for patients with comorbid disease. The dearth of evidence supporting the safety of laparoscopy for these patients led to a comparison of outcomes between LC and open colectomy (OC) for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4. METHODS: Data for all ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent elective LC were reviewed from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic database. The patients who underwent LC were matched with OC patients by age, gender, diagnosis, year, and type of surgery. Estimated blood loss, operation time, time to return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and 30-day complication and mortality rates were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In this study, 231 LCs were matched with 231 OCs. The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 234 (51%) of the patients were male. There were 44 (19%) conversions from LC to OC. More patients in the OC group had undergone previous major laparotomy (5 vs. 15%; p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss, return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, and total direct costs were decreased in the LC group. Wound infection was significantly greater with OC (p = 0.02). When patients with previous major laparotomy were excluded, the two groups had similar overall morbidity. The other benefits of LC, however, persisted. CONCLUSION: The findings show that LC is a safe option for patients with a high ASA classification. The LC approach is associated with faster postoperative recovery, lower morbidity rates, and lower hospital costs than the OC approach.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated factors that may be associated with the development of septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate preoperative and operative factors that might be associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: Patients developing abdominal and pelvic septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy were identified from a prospective database. Patients with subclinical leaks and ileostomy closure leak were not included in the septic complication group. A multivariable logistic regression model for sepsis was constructed using a forward stepwise selection with entry criterion of P < 0.05. RESULTS: From 1983 to 2007, 3233 patients (56% male) were included in the database. Eight-four percent (2597) of patients underwent proximal diversion. Two hundred patients (6.2%) developed septic complications within 3 months of restorative proctocolectomy or within 3 months of ileostomy closure. On multivariate analysis, body mass index > 30 (P = 0.02, OR = 1.77), final pathologic diagnosis of ulcerative/indeterminate colitis (P = 0.02, OR = 2) or Crohn's disease (P = 0.02, OR = 3.6), intraoperative (P = 0.02, OR = 1.6), and postoperative transfusions (P = 0.01, OR = 1.9) were all independently associated with septic complications. We also demonstrated an independent association among individual surgeons (P = 0.04) with decreased septic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Body mass index greater than 30, final pathologic diagnosis of ulcerative/indeterminate colitis or Crohn's disease, intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, and surgeon were all independent factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to determine the fate of the rectum, functional results and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in ulcerative colitis. METHODS:Patients with ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis who underwent IRA from 1971 to 2006 were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-two patients with an IRA were matched by age, sex and follow-up duration with 66 patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and compared for functional outcomes and quality of life. RESULTS:Eighty-six patients with an IRA were included. Median follow-up was 9 (range 1-36) years. Rectal dysplasia and cancer rates were 17 and 8 per cent respectively. The rectum was resected in 46 patients (53 per cent) because of refractory proctitis in 24, rectal dysplasia in 15 and rectal cancer in seven. The cumulative probability of having a functioning IRA at 10 and 20 years was 74 and 46 per cent respectively. Patients with an IRA had fewer bowel movements (P = 0.020) and less night-time seepage (P = 0.020) but increased urgency (P < 0.001) compared with patients with an IPAA, whereas quality of life was similar. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In selected patients with ulcerative colitis IRA gives an acceptable quality of life and functional outcome that are comparable to those in patients with an IPAA. Owing to the risk of cancer, surveillance of the rectum is mandatory.