Faculty Bibliography

We present a 53-year-old woman with severe lichenoid dermatitis secondary to pembrolizumab therapy that was refractory to both topical and oral steroids. After almost three months without improvement, the rash was effectively combated with a single 15mg dose of methotrexate. We hope this case will help guide the management of the cutaneous adverse effects of anti-PD1 immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND:Dermatopathologists routinely use Ki67 immunostaining to assess atypical melanocytic lesions with a dermal component to determine whether an ambiguous tumor is melanoma. However, there is no universal standard of use for Ki67 in melanocytic neoplasms. We sought to observe the real-world use of Ki67 in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions and establish a best practice recommendation. METHODS:We searched dermatopathology reports from 2 academic practices for melanocytic lesions in which Ki67 staining was used for diagnosis. The proliferation rate was compared between cases diagnosed as benign (not requiring re-excision), moderate to severely dysplastic or atypical Spitz nevi (requiring re-excision), and malignant melanoma. The use of other melanocytic markers and consensus review was also recorded and compared between institutions. RESULTS:Pathology reports for 106 cases were reviewed. A high Ki67 proliferation rate (n = 18) favored a diagnosis of melanoma or nevi requiring re-excision (15/18, 83.3%) versus a benign nevus (3/18, 16.67%). A high Ki67 rate was 71.4%-90.9% sensitive and 40%-56% specific for the diagnosis of nevus requiring re-excision or melanoma. Institutional practices differed in regard to reporting of Ki67 staining, the use of multiple markers in the workup of atypical melanocytic lesions (HMB45, Melan-A, Ki67 being most common), and consensus review. CONCLUSIONS:A negative or low Ki67 proliferation rate correlates well with rendering of a benign diagnosis. However, a low proliferation rate does not preclude the diagnosis of melanoma. Ki67 staining is most commonly used as an ancillary test to support a diagnosis after other factors have been considered, such as histopathologic morphology and results of additional concurrently used stains.

BACKGROUND:Distinguishing acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and pustular psoriasis (PS) can be challenging. Staining for plasmacytoid dendritic cells, or PDCs (producer of IFN-α/β), and MxA (an IFN-α/β inducible protein) may help discriminate these entities. METHODS:Forty-three cases of AGEP and PS were compiled from two academic institutions. All cases were examined for CD123+ PDCs, eosinophils, acanthosis, papillomatosis, suprapapillary plate thinning, tortuous dilated capillaries, single necrotic keratinocytes, papillary dermal edema, vasculitis, eosinophil exocytosis, intraepidermal pustules, and subcorneal pustules. A subset of cases (n = 26) was stained for MxA. RESULTS:Perivascular and intraepidermal PDCs, dilated tortuous vessels, and MxA expression in the dermal inflammatory infiltrate were significantly (P < 0.05) in favor of a diagnosis of PS. The absence of PDCs and presence of eosinophils favored a diagnosis of AGEP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:We found compelling evidence for the use of CD123 to highlight PDCs in these cases. The presence of PDCs and expression of MxA in dermal inflammatory infiltrate, as well as absence of eosinophils and presence of tortuous dilated capillaries favored a diagnosis of PS. Expression of MxA in the dermal infiltrate corresponds with a Th1 pathway in PS and may indicate a Th1 component in the early initial phase of AGEP.