Faculty Bibliography

Objective: Data regarding the chance of more than one LB from oocyte cryopreservation (OC) is lacking. We reviewed outcomes from patients (pts) with >=1 LB from thawed autologous oocytes (AOs) to examine: 1) how many have inventory (AOs or resultant euploid/untested/no result embryos), and 2) embryo transfer (ET) outcomes after 1^st LB.
Material(s) and Method(s): We reviewed all pts who thawed AOs at our center in 2006-2021 and had >=1 resultant LB. Pts were excluded if OC was performed for a medical reason, as research, due to lack of sperm or a natural disaster, with embryo banking or for gestational carrier use.
Result(s): 191 pts had >=1 LB (median # OC cycles 1, median age at 1^st OC 37 years (y), median # cryopreserved AOs 18, median # AOs thawed before 1^st LB 15). After LB, 61% of pts (n=117) had inventory and 39% (n=74) did not; see table. Among pts with inventory, 12% (n=14) discarded or donated, 3% (n=4) transported out and 10% (n=12) consumed all inventory as of 1/2022. 22% of pts with inventory (n=26) had >=1 ET after LB. Among these pts, 21 thawed embryos (median # thawed 1, range 1-2), 4 thawed AOs (median # thawed 11, range 5-40) and 1 thawed both AOs + embryos (15 AOs + 4 embryos). Median time from the ET that led to 1^st LB and next ET was 26 months (range 15-57) and median age at next ET was 44y (range 37-53). This ET resulted in: implantation rate of 63% (19/30), spontaneous abortion rate of 16% (3/19) and ongoing pregnancy (OP) + LB rate of 58% (15/26); 1 pregnancy was terminated for monozygotic twins. Among pts who had a LB from this ET, 66% (10/15) had remaining inventory and 33% (5/15) did not. Among pts who did not have a LB from this ET, 45% (5/11) had remaining inventory and 54% (6/11) did not; 5 of these unsuccessful pts returned for another ET and 2 had a LB. In total, 16 pts had 2 ETs result in OP/LB and 1 pt had 3 ETs result in LB. 10 more pts had >=2 children from a single ET (9 twins, 1 triplet); thus, we report 27 pts with >=2 children from OC. Among pts with >=2 children, median # OC cycles was 1 (range 1-8), median age at 1^st OC was 37y (range 34-41), median # cryopreserved AOs was 20 (range 5-102) and median # thawed AOs was 19 (range 5-58).
Conclusion(s): Most pts (61%) had inventory after their 1^st LB from OC, and most pts (65%) who returned for ET after LB achieved another OP/LB. Further research must explore pts' thoughts regarding OC inventory after LB and its associated storage fees. Impact Statement: OC can help pts achieve their ideal family size, even if >1 child. [Formula presented] Support: None.
Copyright

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in patients with one ovary compared to two ovaries. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with one ovary who underwent ≥ 1 ART cycle between 2012 and 2020 at a large university-affiliated fertility center. Patients were 3-to-1 matched with two ovary controls during the same period. Primary outcome was metaphase II oocytes (MIIs) retrieved per cycle. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve markers, laboratory outcomes, and live birth rates (LBRs). RESULTS:A total of 104 one ovary patients (158 cycles; median age 35.5 years) were matched to 312 two ovary patients (474 cycles; median age 35.0 years). In one ovary patients, anti-Mullerian hormone was lower (median 1.1 vs. 2.2, p < 0.01) and day 2 follicle-stimulating hormone was higher (median 7.4 vs. 6.2, p < 0.01). One ovary patients yielded median 7.5 MIIs and 10 oocytes per cycle, fewer than two ovary patients (11.0 and 14.5, respectively; p < 0.01). However, one ovary patients had ≥ 50% the MII and oocyte yield of two ovary patients (Z > 5.8, p < 0.01). Fertilization and blastocyst formation rates, euploidy rate, and rate of ≥ 1 embryo for transfer were equivalent between groups (p > 0.40). Among the one and two ovary groups, LBRs per transfer (45.8% vs. 46.6%, p = 1.00) and per patient who underwent transfer (68.3% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.55) were equivalent. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:One ovary patients yielded fewer MIIs and oocytes than two ovary patients, but had ≥ 50% the yield of two ovary patients, suggesting a compensatory mechanism in oocyte yield in the solitary ovary. One and two ovary patients had equivalent LBRs.

OBJECTIVE:To review the outcomes of patients who underwent autologous oocyte thaw after planned oocyte cryopreservation. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Large urban university-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S)/METHODS:All patients who underwent ≥1 autologous oocyte thaw before December 31, 2020. INTERVENTION(S)/METHODS:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)/METHODS:The primary outcome was the final live birth rate (FLBR) per patient, and only patients who had a live birth (LB) or consumed all remaining inventory (cryopreserved oocytes and resultant euploid/untested/no result embryos) were included. The secondary outcomes were laboratory outcomes and LB rates per transfer. RESULT(S)/RESULTS:A total of 543 patients underwent 800 oocyte cryopreservations, 605 thaws, and 436 transfers. The median age at the first cryopreservation was 38.3 years. The median time between the first cryopreservation and thaw was 4.2 years. The median numbers of oocytes and metaphase II oocytes (M2s) thawed per patient were 14 and 12, respectively. Overall survival of all thawed oocytes was 79%. Of all patients, 61% underwent ≥1 transfer. Among euploid (n = 262) and nonbiopsied (n = 158) transfers, the LB rates per transfer were 55% and 31%, respectively. The FLBR per patient was 39%. Age at cryopreservation and the number of M2s thawed were predictive of LB; the FLBR per patient was >50% for patients aged <38 years at cryopreservation or who thawed ≥20 M2s. A total of 173 patients (32%) have remaining inventory. CONCLUSION(S)/CONCLUSIONS:Autologous oocyte thaw resulted in a 39% FLBR per patient, which is comparable with age-matched in vitro fertilization outcomes. Studies with larger cohorts are necessary.

OBJECTIVE: OC is widely used for fertility preservation. Many models predict the live birth (LB) rate of OC, but real-world data is lacking. We reviewed our LBs from OC to develop an OC counseling tool based on real outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients (pts) who thawed autologous oocytes (AOs) at our academic fertility center from 2004-2020. We included pts who: 1) had a LB or ongoing pregnancy (OP) >12 weeks at last contact, or 2) consumed all AOs and resultant embryos. Pts were excluded if they transferred AOs or resultant embryos to another center or if OC was performed for a medical reason, as research, due to no sperm or a natural disaster, combined with embryos or for use with a gestational carrier. We calculated OP + LB rate (LBR) based on number of AOs and metaphase II oocytes (M2s) thawed. Data were stratified by age (<38y vs. >=38y). For pts who underwent OC at <38y and >=38y, a weighted age was calculated (for each OC cycle, #AOs thawed was multiplied by age at OC; the sum of these numbers was then divided by total #AOs thawed). Statistics included Fisher's exact test (p<0.05 significant).
RESULT(S): We included 462 pts (median age at 1st OC 38.5y). Weighted ages were used for 21 pts (5%). Our pts underwent 650 OCs (90% our center, 9% elsewhere, 1% both), 512 thaws and 385 embryo transfers. OC involved vitrification for 72%, slow freezing for 4% and both for 24% of pts. A total of 7050 AOs and 6178 M2s were thawed. 38% of pts (n=176) have >=1 LB or OP from AO thaw. See table for outcomes. Pts who thawed 0-10 AOs had a lower LBR than pts who thawed 11-20, 21-30, or >30 AOs (p<=0.03). Pts who thawed 0-10 M2s had a lower LBR than pts who thawed 11-20 or 21- 30 M2s (p<=0.02). LBR was not significantly different between pts who thawed 11-20, 21-30, or >30 AOs or M2s.
CONCLUSION(S): Pts who thawed 0-10 AOs had a lower LBR (27%) than pts who thawed >10 AOs (LBR >= 43%), and pts who thawed 0-10 M2s had a lower LBR (30%) than pts who thawed > 10 M2s (LBR >= 42%), but LBR was not different with >10 thawed AOs. IMPACT STATEMENT: Our real-world OC outcomes are not consistent with LBRs in published models. These results provide more realistic expectations about OC outcomes and may help pts decide how many AOs to freeze

OBJECTIVE: The rise of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and temporary closures of fertility centers made the effect on POC cycles uncertain but garnered national attention1,2. We sought to assess the impact of the pandemic on POC cycles in a pandemic epicenter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all POC cycles at an academic fertility center in New York City from 1/1/2019- 12/31/2020. Primary outcomes were number of POC patients (pts) and cycles. Secondary outcomes were pt relationship status, payment method, AMH, and cycle parameters; with subgroup analyses by age groups. We also examined the relationship between monthly number of POC cycles and national SaRS-CoV-2 cases. Statistical analyses included z-score analysis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-squared, with p<0.05 significant.
RESULT(S): Despite a 5.5 week center closure in 2020, POC pts increased 14% and POC cycles increased 16% from 2019 to 2020 (Table), with a 32% increase seen between June-Dec, 2020 . There was a 28% increase in POC pts <37yo in 2020 (252 pts vs. 323 pts, p<0.04) and no change in pts >37yo in 2020 (p=0.9). Relationship status did not differ between years (16% partnered, 76% single, 8% unknown in 2019 vs. 16% partnered, 73% single, 11% unknown in 2020; p=0.6). Fewer patients in 2020 had insurance coverage (16% vs. 24%, p<0.001). AMH was higher in 2020 (2.3 vs. 2.1, p<0.03), but days of stimulation, oocytes retrieved, oocytes frozen, total gonadotropins, and maximum estradiol (E2) were not different (Table). While national SARS-CoV-2 cases peaked in April, July, and November 2020, monthly POC cycles at our center did not decrease with surges in SARS-CoV-2 after our center reopened in May (p=0.24). In 2020 there were 23 cycles cancelled, none due a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.
CONCLUSION(S): POC volume increased at our center in 2020, especially in young patients, despite center closures and SARS-CoV-2 surges. IMPACT STATEMENT: More young people pursued POC despite the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Further research is needed to understand POC pt motivations and experiences during a pandemic. (Table Presented)

OBJECTIVE: Oocyte cryo is widely used for fertility preservation, but the value of M1 cryo remains unclear. We evaluated the utility and efficiency of M1 compared to M2 cryo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (pts) who thawed autologous oocytes at our academic center from 2004-2020 were reviewed. Pts were excluded if cryo was performed for a medical indication, as research, due to no sperm or a natural disaster, in combination with embryos or for use with a gestational carrier. At our center, all M1s retrieved from 2004-2015 were cryopreserved; after 2015, M1s were only cryopreserved if <15 M2s were retrieved during the same cryo cycle. Outcomes included survival rate, useable embryo rate and embryo transfer (ET) results.Auseable embryo was defined as an embryo that was transferred, biopsied or cryopreserved for future use. Statistics included Fisher's exact test.
RESULT(S): 543 pts (median age at 1st cryo 38y, interquartile range 37-40y) underwent 800 cryo, 605 thaw and 416 ET cycles. Cryo was performed with vitrification for 72%, slow freezing for 4% and both technologies for 24% of pts. In total, 8511 oocytes (1019M1s + 7492 M2s)were thawed.All pts thawed >=1 M2, and 60% (n=327) thawed >=1 M1. See table for thaw outcomes of M1s vs. M2s. For 30 pts, >=1 M1 led to a useable embryo (n=32 useable embryos). Vitrification was used for 69% of these M1s (n=22) and slow freezing was used for 31% (n=10). Of the 32 useable embryos from M1s, 69% (n=22) underwent PGTand 4were euploid (17 aneuploid, 1 mosaic). Therewere 3 single ETs of euploid embryos from M1s, which led to 1 spontaneous abortion (SAB) and 2 biochemical pregnancies. Therewere 3 single ETs of untested embryos from M1s, which led to 1 negative result, 1 SAB and 1 singleton ongoing pregnancy. The ongoing pregnancy is from an ETof a day 5 morula and is now in the third trimester. There were 6 ETs in which untested embryos from M1s were transferred alongwith untested embryos fromM2s, resulting in 3 negative results, 1 SAB, 1 singleton live birth and 1 unknown outcome (ongoing singleton pregnancy at last contact).
CONCLUSION(S): Cryopreserved M1s can result in useable embryos and pregnancies, but are less likely to survive or form useable embryos than cryopreserved M2s. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an ongoing third trimester pregnancy from a cryopreserved M1. This information may be helpful for pt counselling and designing oocyte cryo protocols for embryology labs. IMPACT STATEMENT: Cryopreserved M1s may be a viable option for pts with a low M2 yield. (Table Presented)