Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The diagnosis and treatment of tumors often depend on molecular-genetic data. However, rapid and iterative access to molecular data is not currently feasible during surgery, complicating intraoperative diagnosis and precluding measurement of tumor cell burdens at surgical margins to guide resections. METHODS:Here, we introduce Ultra-Rapid droplet digital PCR (UR-ddPCR), a technology that achieves the fastest measurement, to date, of mutation burdens in tissue samples, from tissue to result in 15 min. Our workflow substantially reduces the time from tissue biopsy to molecular diagnosis and provides a highly accurate means of quantifying residual tumor infiltration at surgical margins. FINDINGS/RESULTS: = 0.995). CONCLUSIONS:The technology and workflow developed here enable intraoperative molecular-genetic assays with unprecedented speed and sensitivity. We anticipate that our method will facilitate novel point-of-care diagnostics and molecularly guided surgeries that improve clinical outcomes. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and NYU Grossman School of Medicine institutional funds. Reagents and instruments were provided in kind by Bio-Rad.

The adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare demands a careful analysis of their potential to spread false medical knowledge. Because LLMs ingest massive volumes of data from the open Internet during training, they are potentially exposed to unverified medical knowledge that may include deliberately planted misinformation. Here, we perform a threat assessment that simulates a data-poisoning attack against The Pile, a popular dataset used for LLM development. We find that replacement of just 0.001% of training tokens with medical misinformation results in harmful models more likely to propagate medical errors. Furthermore, we discover that corrupted models match the performance of their corruption-free counterparts on open-source benchmarks routinely used to evaluate medical LLMs. Using biomedical knowledge graphs to screen medical LLM outputs, we propose a harm mitigation strategy that captures 91.9% of harmful content (F1 = 85.7%). Our algorithm provides a unique method to validate stochastically generated LLM outputs against hard-coded relationships in knowledge graphs. In view of current calls for improved data provenance and transparent LLM development, we hope to raise awareness of emergent risks from LLMs trained indiscriminately on web-scraped data, particularly in healthcare where misinformation can potentially compromise patient safety.

The current management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) includes observation, microsurgery, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or radiotherapy. Both microsurgery (MS) and irradiation have the potential for treatment failures. For microsurgical failures, options include observation, revision surgery, and SRS. SRS is most commonly used, as it carries a low risk of adverse events. Salvage MS following previous MS is reserved for specific cases and is often surgically challenging. For radiosurgical failures, both salvage MS and repeat SRS may be used. Salvage MS following SRS also tends to be challenging, although excellent facial nerve outcomes are achievable. Furthermore, repeat SRS is an emerging concept and should be considered in small tumors that are growing but are asymptomatic. This chapter is aimed at reviewing an approach to failure of primary interventions for vestibular schwannomas, with an emphasis on the time interval between modalities, tumor control rates, functional outcomes, and complications.

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery is one of the most common procedures performed to manage patients with vestibular schwannoma. With a history that spans over 40 years, there has been continued evolution in radiosurgery technique and understanding of outcomes. The goal has always been to achieve long-term inactivation of tumor growth, commonly with tumor volumetric regression, and preservation of neurologic function. Challenges remain particularly pertaining to hearing preservation and other related symptoms such as those related to balance and tinnitus. Current discussions span a variety of topics including the importance of cochlear dose, the timing of the radiosurgery intervention as opposed to initial observation, the interpretation of imaging changes after radiosurgery, and the value of hearing augmentation strategies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The management of World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 meningiomas is complicated by their diverse clinical behaviors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be an effective management option. Literature on SRS dose selection is limited but suggests that a higher dose is better for tumor control. We characterize the predictors of post-SRS outcomes that can help guide planning and management. METHODS:We reviewed a cohort of consecutive patients with pathologically-proven WHO grade 2 meningiomas who underwent SRS at a single institution between 2011 and 2023. RESULTS:Ninety-nine patients (median age 62 years) underwent SRS, 11 of whom received hypofractionated SRS in 5 fractions. Twenty-two patients had received previous irradiation. The median follow-up was 49 months. The median overall survival was 119 months (95% CI 92-NA) with estimated 5- and 10-year survival of 83% and 27%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 40 months (95% CI 32-62), with 3- and 5-year rates at 54% and 35%, respectively. The median locomarginal PFS was 63 months (95% CI 51.8-NA) with 3- and 5-year rates at 65% and 52%. Nine (9%) patients experienced adverse events, 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 and 7 grade 2, consisting of worsening neurologic deficit from edema. In the single-session cohort, Ki-67 significantly predicted both overall survival and intracranial PFS. Tumors with Ki-67 >10% had 2.17 times the risk of locomarginal progression compared with Ki-67 ≤10% (P = .018) adjusting for covariates. Sex, prescription dose, tumor volume, and location also predicted tumor control. In tumors with Ki-67 >10%, margin dose ≥14 Gy was associated with significantly better tumor control but not for tumors with Ki-67 ≤10%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The management of WHO grade 2 meningiomas requires a multimodality approach. This study demonstrates the value of a targeted SRS approach in patients with limited disease and further establishes predictive biomarkers that can guide planning through a personalized approach.

The detection and tracking of metastatic cancer over the lifetime of a patient remains a major challenge in clinical trials and real-world care. Advances in deep learning combined with massive datasets may enable the development of tools that can address this challenge. We present NYUMets-Brain, the world's largest, longitudinal, real-world dataset of cancer consisting of the imaging, clinical follow-up, and medical management of 1,429 patients. Using this dataset we developed Segmentation-Through-Time, a deep neural network which explicitly utilizes the longitudinal structure of the data and obtained state-of-the-art results at small (<10 mm³) metastases detection and segmentation. We also demonstrate that the monthly rate of change of brain metastases over time are strongly predictive of overall survival (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.18-1.38). We are releasing the dataset, codebase, and model weights for other cancer researchers to build upon these results and to serve as a public benchmark.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:DNA methylation profiling stratifies isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytomas into methylation low-grade and high-grade groups. We investigated the utility of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for predicting DNA methylation grade and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) homozygous deletion, a molecular biomarker for grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, according to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:Preoperative MRI scans of IDH-mutant astrocytomas subclassified by DNA methylation profiling (n=71) were independently evaluated by two radiologists for the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign. The diagnostic utility of T2-FLAIR mismatch in predicting methylation grade, CDKN2A/B status, copy number variation, and survival was analyzed. RESULTS:The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was present in 21 of 45 (46.7%) methylation low-grade and 1 of 26 (3.9%) methylation high-grade cases (p<0.001), resulting in 96.2% specificity, 95.5% positive predictive value, and 51.0% negative predictive value for predicting low methylation grade. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was also significantly associated with intact CDKN2A/B status (p=0.028) with 87.5% specificity, 86.4% positive predictive value, and 42.9% negative predictive value. Overall multivariable Cox analysis showed that retained CDKN2A/B status remained significant for PFS (p=0.01). Multivariable Cox analysis of the histologic grade 3 subset, which was nearly evenly divided by CDKN2A/B status, CNV, and methylation grade, showed trends toward significance for DNA methylation grade with OS (p=0.045) and CDKN2A/B status with PFS (p=0.052). CONCLUSIONS:The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is highly specific for low methylation grade and intact CDKN2A/B in IDH-mutant astrocytomas.

BACKGROUND:Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant astrocytoma grading, until recently, has been entirely based on morphology. The 5th edition of the Central Nervous System World Health Organization (WHO) introduces CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion as a biomarker of grade 4. We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of DNA methylation-derived molecular biomarkers for IDH mutant astrocytoma. METHODS:We analyzed 98 IDH mutant astrocytomas diagnosed at NYU Langone Health between 2014 and 2022. We reviewed DNA methylation subclass, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, and ploidy and correlated molecular biomarkers with histological grade, progression free (PFS), and overall (OS) survival. Findings were confirmed using 2 independent validation cohorts. RESULTS:There was no significant difference in OS or PFS when stratified by histologic WHO grade alone, copy number complexity, or extent of resection. OS was significantly different when patients were stratified either by CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion or by DNA methylation subclass (P value = .0286 and .0016, respectively). None of the molecular biomarkers were associated with significantly better PFS, although DNA methylation classification showed a trend (P value = .0534). CONCLUSIONS:The current WHO recognized grading criteria for IDH mutant astrocytomas show limited prognostic value. Stratification based on DNA methylation shows superior prognostic value for OS.

OBJECTIVE:To describe outcomes of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) who underwent repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) after primary SRS failure. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Multi-institutional historical cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Five tertiary care referral centers. PATIENTS/METHODS:Adults ≥18 years old with sporadic VS. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Primary and repeat treatment with SRS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Microsurgery-free survival after repeat SRS. RESULTS:Across institutions, 32 patients underwent repeat SRS after primary SRS. Most patients (74%) had tumors with cerebellopontine angle extension at primary SRS (median size, 13.5 mm [interquartile range, 7.5-18.8] mm). After primary SRS, patients underwent repeat SRS at a median of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3.2-5.7 yr). For treatment modality, 30 (94%) patients received gamma knife for primary treatment and 31 (97%) patients received gamma knife as their repeat treatment. Median tumor volume increased from 0.970 cm3 at primary SRS to 2.200 cm3 at repeat SRS. Facial nerve function worsened in two patients after primary SRS and in two patients after repeat SRS. There were no instances of intracranial complications after repeat SRS. Microsurgery-free survival rates (95% confidence interval; number still at risk) at 1, 3, and 5 years after repeat SRS were 97% (90-100%, 24), 84% (71-100%, 13), and 68% (48-96%, 6), respectively. There was one occurrence of malignancy diagnosed after repeat radiosurgery. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Overall, repeat SRS for sporadic VS has comparable risk profile, but lower rates of tumor control, compared with primary SRS.