Faculty Bibliography

The physiologic impact of pulsatile flow (PF) on end-organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is controversial. Using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to maintain PF during CPB for patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT) may impact end-organ perfusion, with implications for postoperative outcomes. A single-center retrospective study of 76 patients bridged to HT with IABP was conducted between January 2018 and December 2022. Beginning in May 2022, patients received IABP-generated PF during CPB at an internal rate of 80 beats/minute. Fifty-eight patients underwent HT with the IABP turned off (IABP-Off), whereas 18 patients underwent HT with IABP-generated PF (IABP-On). The unmatched IABP-On group experienced shorter organ ischemia times (180 vs. 203 minutes, p = 0.015) and CPB times (104 vs. 116 minutes, p = 0.022). The cohort was propensity matched according to age, organ ischemia time, and CPB time. Elevations in postoperative lactates in the immediate (2.8 vs. 1.5, p = 0.062) and 24 hour (4.7 vs. 2.4, p = 0.084) postoperative periods trended toward significance in the matched IABP-Off group. There was no difference in postoperative vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), postoperative creatinine, or length of stay. This limited preliminary data suggest that maintaining counterpulsation to generate PF during CPB may improve end-organ perfusion in this patient population as suggested by lower postoperative lactate levels.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Surgical management of mitral annular calcification remains challenging. Our institution pursued a strategy of total mitral annular calcification resection with pericardial patch reconstruction of the left ventricle when primary atrioventricular groove closure was not possible. We present the short-term outcomes derived after implementing this strategy. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A single-institution retrospective analysis included patients with significant mitral annular calcification undergoing totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery between October 2009 and August 2023. Mitral valve repair was performed in patients with sufficient posterior leaflet length. Patients requiring pericardial patch ventriculoplasty were compared with those in whom primary atrioventricular groove closure was possible (non-pericardial patch ventriculoplasty). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .52). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair is a safe and feasible technique for the management of mitral annular calcification with promising results at 3 years. Patients who required atrioventricular groove pericardial patch reconstruction had similar outcomes to those in whom primary closure was possible.

BACKGROUND:Latent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is an important cause of symptoms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) but can be challenging to provoke. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS/OBJECTIVE:To examine the value of postprandial resting and stress echocardiography and utilization of invasive or enhanced drug therapies (surgical myectomy, alcohol septal ablation, disopyramide, and mavacamten) in patients with postprandial LVOTO. Consecutive HCM patients without LVOTO underwent routine and postprandial echocardiography at rest, with provocation (Valsalva and standing) and after symptom-limited treadmill stress. RESULTS:Among 252 patients (mean age, 58 years, 39% women), postprandial LVOT gradients were higher compared with routine echocardiography at rest (median, 9.0 [0-38.0] vs 0 [0-14.0] mm Hg; P < .0001) and with provocation (18.5 [0-70.3] vs 1.5 [0-41.0] mm Hg; P < .0001). Postprandial exercise stress echocardiogram (PPXSE) gradients were higher in a subset of 44 patients who underwent both postprandial and fasting stress echocardiography (47.0 [5.3-81.0] vs 17.5 [0-46.0] mm Hg; P < .0001). In total, 49 (19.5%) patients achieved the ≥50 mm Hg threshold under routine conditions (rest/provocation); 90 (35.7%) additional patients achieved postprandial gradients ≥50 mm Hg (rest/provocation/exercise), 38 (15.1%) with PPXSE alone. A total of 71 patients were treated with 91 invasive or enhanced drug therapies, 32 (45.1%) of whom had gradients ≥50 mm Hg only after eating (rest/provocation) and 8 (11.3%) only with PPXSE, with symptom relief in the majority. CONCLUSIONS:Postprandial echocardiography was useful at unmasking LVOTO in more than one-third of patients who did not have high gradients otherwise. Eating before echocardiography is a powerful provocative tool in the evaluation of patients with HCM.

We describe a rare but interesting complication of totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair in a patient with severe mitral regurgitation. The mitral valve was repaired robotically by standard techniques, and the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated no residual mitral regurgitation. However, there was unexpected hypokinesia of the posterior and lateral walls of the left ventricle, with subsequent electrocardiography showing acute ST elevations of the lateral segment. Immediate cardiac catheterization revealed occlusion of the left circumflex artery. Aspiration thrombectomy was performed and a drug-eluting stent placed to restore the contour, thus preventing potential morbidity of the patient.

We compare outcomes of endo-aortic balloon occlusion (EABO) vs external aortic clamping (EAC) in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Adults undergoing mitral valve surgery (July 2017-December 2018) were identified within the STS database (N = 60,607). Total 7,978 patients underwent a minimally invasive approach (including robotically assisted). About 1,163 EABO patients were 1:1 propensity-matched to EAC patients using exact matching on age, sex, and type of mitral procedure, and propensity score average matching for 16 other risk indicators. Early outcomes were compared. Categorical variables were compared using logistic regression; hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were compared using negative binomial regression. In the matched cohort, mean age was 62 years; 35.9% were female, and 86% underwent mitral valve repair. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter for EABO vs EAC group (125.0 ± 53.0 vs 134.0 ± 67.0 minutes, P = 0.0009). There was one aortic dissection in the EAC group and none in the EABO group (P value > 0.31), and no statistically significant differences in cross-clamp time, major intraoperative bleeding, perioperative mortality, stroke, new onset of atrial fibrillation, postoperative acute kidney injury, success of repair. Median hospital LOS was shorter for EABO vs EAC procedures (4 vs 5 days, P < 0.0001). In this large, retrospective, STS database propensity-matched analysis ofpatients undergoing MIMVS, we observed similar safety outcomes for EABO and EAC, including no aortic dissections in the EABO group. The EABO group showed slightly shorter CPB times and hospital LOS.

BACKGROUND:Drug overdose (DO) deaths rose to unprecedented levels during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on the availability of cardiac allografts from DO donors and the implications of DO donor use on recipient survival. METHODS:Heart transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from January 2017 to November 2019 ("pre-COVID") and from March 2020 to June 2021 ("COVID pandemic") were analyzed with respect to DO donor status. Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression to identify predictors of survival. Characteristics of discarded cardiac allografts were also compared by DO donor status. RESULTS:During the COVID-19 pandemic, 27.2% of cardiac allografts were from DO donors vs 20.5% pre-COVID, a 32.7% increase (p < 0.001). During the pandemic, DO donors were younger (84.7% vs 76.3% <40 years, p < 0.001), had higher cigarette use (16.1% vs 10.8%, p < 0.001), higher cocaine use (47.4% vs 19.7%, p < 0.001), and higher incidence of hepatitis C antibodies (26.8% vs 6.1%, p < 0.001) and RNA positivity (16.2% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001). While DO donors were less likely to require inotropic support (30.8% vs 35.4%, p = 0.008), they were more likely to have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (95.3% vs 43.2%, p < 0.001). Recipient survival was equivalent using Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank, p = 0.33) and survival probability at 36 months was 85.6% (n at risk = 398) for DO donors vs 83.5% (n at risk = 1,633) for all other donors. Cox regression demonstrated that DO donor status did not predict mortality (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.23, p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS:During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a 32.7% increase in heart transplants utilizing DO donor hearts, and DO became the most common mechanism of death for donors. The use of DO donor hearts did not have an impact on short-term recipient survival.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The use of rapid-deployment valves (RDVs) has been shown to reduce the operative time for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Long-term core laboratory-adjudicated data are scarce, however. Here we report final 7-year data on RDV use. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:TRANSFORM was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, single-arm trial implanting a stented bovine pericardial valve with an incorporated balloon-expandable sealing frame. A prior published 1-year analysis included 839 patients from 29 centers. An additional 46 patients were enrolled and implanted, for a total of 885 patients. Annual clinical and core laboratory-adjudicated echocardiographic outcomes were collected through 8 years. Primary endpoints were structural valve deterioration (SVD), all-cause reintervention, all-cause valve explantation, and all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included hemodynamic performance assessed by echocardiography. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.0 ± 2.0 years. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:, respectively. Paravalvular leak at 7 years was none/trace in 88.6% and mild in 11.4%. In patients undergoing isolated AVR, the cumulative probability of pacemaker implantation was 13.9% at 30 days, 15.5% at 1 year, and 21.8% at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:AVR for aortic stenosis using an RDV is associated with low rates of late adverse events. This surgical pericardial tissue platform provides excellent and stable hemodynamic performance through 7 years.

BACKGROUND:The benefits of fast-track extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery are well established. Although extubation in the operating room (OR) is safe in carefully selected patients, widespread use of this strategy in cardiac surgery remains unproven. This study was designed to evaluate perioperative outcomes with OR vs ICU extubation in patients undergoing nonemergency, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS:The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data for all single-center patients who underwent nonemergency isolated CABG over a 6-year interval were analyzed. Perioperative morbidity and mortality with ICU vs OR extubation were compared. RESULTS:Between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022, 1397 patients underwent nonemergency, isolated CABG; 891 (63.8%) of these patients were extubated in the ICU, and 506 (36.2%) were extubated in the OR. Propensity matching resulted in 414 pairs. In the propensity-matched cohort, there were no differences between the 2 groups in incidence of reintubation, reoperation for bleeding, total operative time, stroke or transient ischemic attack, renal failure, or 30-day mortality. OR-extubated patients had shorter ICU hours (14 hours vs 20 hours; P < .0001), shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (3 days vs 5 days; P < .0001), a greater likelihood of being discharged directly to home (97.3% vs 89.9%; P < .0001), and a lower 30-day readmission rate (1.7% vs 4.1%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS:Routine extubation in the OR is a feasible and safe strategy for a broad spectrum of patients after nonemergency CABG, with no increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality. Wider adoption of routine OR extubation for nonemergency CABG is indicated.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Totally endoscopic intracardiac robotic surgery is generally limited to uncomplicated mitral valve surgery. With experience, our team has developed a more aggressive approach to robotic cardiac surgery that allows for repair of a broad spectrum of mitral valve pathologies. We report complex subvalvular procedural advancements associated with this approach secondary to enhanced team experience and capabilities. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:All robotic mitral procedures performed by a 2-surgeon team in a quaternary care medical center from July 2011 to May 2022 were reviewed. Natural language-processing techniques were used to analyze operative reports for subvalvular repair techniques. Complex subvalvular techniques included papillary muscle repositioning, division of secondary anterior leaflet chordae, septal myomectomy, division of aberrant left ventricular muscle band attachments, and left ventricular patch reconstruction. The surgical experience was divided into 2 periods: early robotic experience (pre-2018) versus late (2018 onwards). Baseline demographics, outcomes, and subvalvular techniques were analyzed and compared. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < .001)). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:An experienced 2-surgeon team can perform progressively more complex robotic subvalvular repair techniques. These subvalvular techniques are a surrogate for team proficiency and capabilities.