Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Psoricatic disease remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. We developed and validated a suite of novel, smartphone sensor-based assessments that can be self-administered to measure cutaneous and musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of psoriatic disease. METHODS:Participants with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or healthy controls were recruited between June 5, 2019, and November 10, 2021, at two academic medical centers. Concordance and accuracy of digital measures and image-based machine learning models were compared to their analogous clinical measures from trained rheumatologists and dermatologists. RESULTS:assessment categorized physician-assessed upper extremity involvement, considering joint tenderness or enthesitis (AUROC = 0.68 (0.47-0.85)). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The Psorcast digital assessments achieved significant clinical validity, although they require further validation in larger cohorts before use in evidence-based medicine or clinical trial settings. The smartphone software and analysis pipelines from the Psorcast suite are open source and freely available.

BACKGROUD/UNASSIGNED:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory arthritis that, when left untreated, can lead to erosions, deformities and decrease in quality of life. PsA is known to be associated with multiple comorbidities, including cardiovascular, metabolic and mental health syndromes, all of which can increase its overall morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To characterize a cohort of patients with PsA and understand the impact of depression on PsA outcome measures. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:527 consecutive patients with PsA were enrolled in an observational, longitudinal registry that followed them prospectively at standard of care visits. Demographics, medical history, medication use, and clinical exam were all recorded. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Depression was reported in 22.8% of the population, anxiety in 18%, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in 4%. Depression was more common in female participants (P < .001). At baseline, individuals with PsA and concomitant depression had similar tender and swollen joint counts and RAPID3 compared to those without depression, and had lower body surface area affected by psoriasis (P = .04). At year one, all patients had improvement in clinical outcomes. However, patients with depression had a significantly higher tender joint count compared to those without depression (P = .001), despite similar swollen joint count and body surface area. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In patients with depression, there is a discrepancy between improvement in physician assessed measures and patient reported outcomes. These observations underscore the importance of addressing depression and psychological distress as part of PsA treatment outcomes and points towards the need to address residual pain through co-adjuvant approaches.

The Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Clinics Multicenter Advancement Network (PPACMAN) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to optimize the clinical care of patients with psoriatic disease through multidisciplinary collaboration models. The PPACMAN 2021 Annual Meeting was held virtually on December 11, 2021. In all, 50 stakeholders participated in the meeting including dermatologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists, clinical researchers, patient advocacy representatives, and industry representatives. During the opening session of the meeting, presenters provided an update of several research projects dedicated to predicting and preventing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) such as the Psorcast, PAMPA, HIPPOCRATES, and the ELLIPSS studies. The second session centered around novel approaches to deliver multidisciplinary care in psoriatic disease. PPACMAN leadership introduced its wellness program and invited speakers to discuss new advances in cardiovascular disease, sleep disturbance, mental health problems, and dietary interventions in psoriatic disease. The final session of the meeting focused on how to improve patient engagement in their disease and care.

Whereas the cellular and molecular features of human inflammatory skin diseases are well characterized, their tissue context and systemic impact remain poorly understood. We thus profiled human psoriasis (PsO) as a prototypic immune-mediated condition with a high predilection for extracutaneous involvement. Spatial transcriptomics (ST) analyses of 25 healthy, active lesion, and clinically uninvolved skin biopsies and integration with public single-cell transcriptomics data revealed marked differences in immune microniches between healthy and inflamed skin. Tissue-scale cartography further identified core disease features across all active lesions, including the emergence of an inflamed suprabasal epidermal state and the presence of B lymphocytes in lesional skin. Both lesional and distal nonlesional samples were stratified by skin disease severity and not by the presence of systemic disease. This segregation was driven by macrophage-, fibroblast-, and lymphatic-enriched spatial regions with gene signatures associated with metabolic dysfunction. Together, these findings suggest that mild and severe forms of PsO have distinct molecular features and that severe PsO may profoundly alter the cellular and metabolic composition of distal unaffected skin sites. In addition, our study provides a valuable resource for the research community to study spatial gene organization of healthy and inflamed human skin.

OBJECTIVE:To develop initial American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines on the use of exercise, rehabilitation, diet, and additional interventions in conjunction with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as part of an integrative management approach for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS:An interprofessional guideline development group constructed clinically relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) questions. A literature review team then completed a systematic literature review and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate the certainty of evidence. An interprofessional Voting Panel (n = 20 participants) that included 3 individuals with RA achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS:The Voting Panel achieved consensus on 28 recommendations for the use of integrative interventions in conjunction with DMARDs for the management of RA. Consistent engagement in exercise received a strong recommendation. Of 27 conditional recommendations, 4 pertained to exercise, 13 to rehabilitation, 3 to diet, and 7 to additional integrative interventions. These recommendations are specific to RA management, recognizing that other medical indications and general health benefits may exist for many of these interventions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This guideline provides initial ACR recommendations on integrative interventions for the management of RA to accompany DMARD treatments. The broad range of interventions included in these recommendations illustrates the importance of an interprofessional, team-based approach to RA management. The conditional nature of most recommendations requires clinicians to engage persons with RA in shared decision-making when applying these recommendations.

OBJECTIVE:To develop initial American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines on the use of exercise, rehabilitation, diet, and additional interventions in conjunction with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as part of an integrative management approach for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS:An interprofessional guideline development group constructed clinically relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) questions. A literature review team then completed a systematic literature review and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate the certainty of evidence. An interprofessional Voting Panel (n = 20 participants) that included 3 individuals with RA achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS:The Voting Panel achieved consensus on 28 recommendations for the use of integrative interventions in conjunction with DMARDs for the management of RA. Consistent engagement in exercise received a strong recommendation. Of 27 conditional recommendations, 4 pertained to exercise, 13 to rehabilitation, 3 to diet, and 7 to additional integrative interventions. These recommendations are specific to RA management, recognizing that other medical indications and general health benefits may exist for many of these interventions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This guideline provides initial ACR recommendations on integrative interventions for the management of RA to accompany DMARD treatments. The broad range of interventions included in these recommendations illustrates the importance of an interprofessional, team-based approach to RA management. The conditional nature of most recommendations requires clinicians to engage persons with RA in shared decision-making when applying these recommendations.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the cutaneous microbiome spanning the entire psoriatic disease spectrum, and to evaluate distinguishing features of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS:Skin swabs were collected from upper and lower extremities of healthy individuals and patients with PsO and PsA. Psoriatic patients contributed both lesional (L) and contralateral non-lesional (NL) samples. Microbiota were analysed using 16S rRNA sequencing. RESULTS:was higher in NL PsA samples compared with NL PsO samples (p<0.05), potentially serving as a biomarker for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS:These findings show differences in diversity, bacterial composition and microbe-microbe interactions between healthy and psoriatic skin, both L and NL. We further identified bacterial biomarkers that differentiate disease phenotypes, which could potentially aid in predicting the transition from PsO to PsA.

Background/Purpose: The skin is recognized as a window into the immunopathogenic mechanisms driving the vast phenotypic spectrum of psoriatic disease.
Method(s): To better decipher the cellular landscape of both healthy and psoriatic skin, we employed spatial transcriptomics (ST), a ground-breaking technology that precisely maps gene expression from histologically-intact tissue sections (Fig. 1A).
Result(s): Findings gleaned from computationally integrating our 23 matched lesional and non-lesional psoriatic and 7 healthy control samples with publicly-available single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing datasets established the ability of ST to recapitulate the tissue architecture of both healthy and inflamed skin (Fig. 1B) and highlighted topographic shifts in the immune cell milieu, from a predominantly perifollicular distribution in steady-state skin to the papillary and upper reticular dermis in psoriatic lesional skin. We also incidentally discovered that ST's ability to ascertain gene expression patterns from intact tissue rendered it particularly conducive to studying the transcriptome of lipid-laden cells such as dermal adipose tissue and sebaceous glands (Fig. 1C), whose expression profiles are typically lost in the process of tissue handling and dissociation for bulk and single-cell RNA seq. Unbiased clustering of pooled healthy and psoriatic samples identified two epidermal clusters and one dermal cluster that were differentially expanded in psoriatic lesional skin (p values <=0.05) (Fig. 1D); pathway analysis of these clusters revealed enrichment of known psoriatic inflammatory pathways (Fig. 1E). Unsupervised classification of skin-limited psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis samples revealed stratification by cutaneous disease severity or Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and not by presence or absence of concomitant systemic/synovial disease (Fig. 1F). Remarkably, this PASI-dependent segregation was also evident in distal, non-lesional samples and was driven by the dermal macrophage and fibroblast cluster and the lymphatic endothelium (Fig. 2A). Inquiry into the mechanistic drivers of this observed stratification yielded enrichment of pathways associated with key T cell and innate immune cell activation, B cells, and metabolic dysfunction (Fig. 2B). Finally, tissue scale computational cartography of gene expression revealed differences in regional enrichment of specific cell types across phenotypic groups, most notably upward extension of fibroblasts to the upper dermis in both lesional and non-lesional samples from mild psoriasis and restriction to the lower dermis in the moderate-to-severe psoriasis samples (Fig. 2C), suggesting that disease severity stratification may be driven by emergent cellular ecosystems in the upper dermis. Fig. 1. (A) Schematic of spatial transcriptomics study workflow. Four mm skin punch biopsies were obtained from healthy volunteers (n=3) and lesional and non-lesional skin from patients with psoriatic disease (n=11). Ten micron-thick sections were then placed on capture areas on the ST microarray slide, each containing molecularly barcoded, spatially encoded spots with a diameter of 50 microns and a center-to-center distance of 100 microns. (B) Side-by-side comparison of a hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained section of representative healthy, lesional, and non-lesional skin samples and the corresponding ST plots showed concordance of unbiased gene expression-based clustering with histologic tissue architecture. (C) Pathway analysis of the adipose cluster in healthy skin (cluster 2) confirmed upregulation of lipid-associated processes. Inset: Spots corresponding to the adipose cluster highlighted in yellow. (D) Wilcoxon rank sum test (results displayed as box plots) yielded statistically significant expansion of three clusters in lesional skin compared to both non-lesional and healthy skin-inflamed suprabasal epidermis (cluster 4), epidermis 2 (cluster 7), and inflamed dermis (cluster 10). HC=healthy control, L=lesional psoriatic skin, NL=non-lesional psoriatic skin. (E) Pathways enriched in clusters 4, 7, and 10. (F) Principal component analysis (PCA) plots demonstrating segregation of samples by severity of cutaneous disease in both lesional and non-lesional samples along the first principal component (right) that was not seen in the samples categorized according to presence or absence of arthritis (left). PsA=psoriatic arthritis, PsO=skin-limited psoriasis. Fig. 2. (A) PCA of lesional and non-lesional samples colored by disease severity in spatial clusters 1 (left) and 12 (right) revealed more discrete clustering. (B) Pathways significantly enriched in clusters 1 (left) and 12 (right) showed enrichment of pathways associated with key T cell and innate immune cell activation, B cells, and metabolic dysfunction (highlighted in red). (C) SpaceFold one dimension projection of cell distribution from an independently-generated single-cell RNA seq data set on aggregated ST lesional and non-lesional samples from mild (PASI-low) and moderate-severe (PASI-high) samples. Y-axis represents tissue position, starting with the lower dermis marked as position 0 to suprabasal epidermis marked as position 1. Dashed line represents epidermal-dermal junction, discerned by cell types in the basal epidermal layer (melanocytes and Langerhans cells). Fibroblast signatures (red arrows) were largely relegated to the lower dermis in the PASI-high group, but extended to the upper dermis in the PASI-low group. This striking difference in fibroblast localization was also noted in non-lesional PASI-high vs. PASI-low groups. In addition to fibroblasts, lymphatic, endothelial, myeloid, and T cells signatures (black arrows) were also observed in the upper dermis of lesional PASI-low samples, but were much lower in the dermis of PASI-low non-lesional and all samples in the PASI-high group. Interfollicular epidermis (IFE), hair follicle and infundibulum (HF/IFN), n= number of individual biopsies.
Conclusion(s): Thus, we have been able to successfully leverage ST integrated with independently-generated single-cell RNA seq data to spatially define the emergent cellular ecosystems of healthy and matched psoriatic lesional and non-lesional skin and in so doing, demonstrated the value of ST in unearthing the genetic groundwork at both the site of inflammation and in distal, clinically-uninvolved skin

Background/Purpose: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at high risk for severe disease from COVID-19 and decreased vaccine efficacy, due to inherent immune perturbations and frequent immunosuppressant use. The impact of vaccine responses was "pressure" tested in New York City (NYC) from December 2021-February 2022, due to the highly infectious omicron BA.1 variant which resulted in a significant increase in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. This study was performed to assess clinical efficacy and seroreactivity in SLE patients with and without an additional vaccination dose after initial vaccine series, particularly during the omicron BA.1 surge in NYC.
Method(s): COVID-19 infections after vaccination were evaluated during patient encounters and chart review in subjects from the NYU Lupus Cohort who received an initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series with follow-up for at least 6 months or until breakthrough infection. Clinical follow-up was required after February 4, 2022 (when NYC COVID-19 cases returned to their preomicron BA.1 baseline), with last patient follow-up recorded April 24, 2022. Positive PCR or antigen-based testing was required, performed at the clinical site or self-reported. Fifty-seven patients receiving additional vaccine doses were evaluated longitudinally for recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain antibodies (#BT10500; R&D Systems). Low post-vaccine antibody response was defined as <=100 units/ml.
Result(s): Among the 163 subjects evaluated, 125 (76.7%) received an additional COVID-19 vaccination after the initial series. Demographics and medication usage were similar in patients who did and did not receive the additional vaccination dose, with 50% on at least one immunosuppressant and 16% on more than one at the time of the initial vaccine. Twentyeight (63.6%) of the 44 patients with a breakthrough infection had received an additional vaccination compared to 97 (81.5%) of the 119 without breakthrough infection (p=0.022) (Table 1). Of the 44 COVID-19 cases, only 2 occurred prior to the omicron wave, both in patients who did not receive the additional dose. There were no COVID-19 related deaths and two patients were hospitalized. Among the 57 patients with serologic evaluation, the median antibody level after initial vaccination series was 397 u/mL (IQR 57-753), and 1036 (IQR 517-1338.5) after the additional dose. After initial vaccination, 21 (37%) had low ELISA responses, but only 4 (7%) continued to have low responses after the additional dose. There was no association between the level of antibody after the additional dose and COVID-19 breakthrough.
Conclusion(s): SLE patients from a cohort of patients in NYC who received an additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose were significantly less likely to have a subsequent COVID-19 infection compared to those who only completed their initial vaccine series. SLE patients demonstrated an improvement in serologic response after an additional dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The mild disease in all vaccinated patients is reassuring given the risks inherent and frequent immunosuppressant use in this patient population