Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Corticosteroid injections are widely used for treating thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis, yet the accuracy of non-image-guided injections in expert hands is uncertain, with prior studies reporting intraarticular placement in about 60% of thumbs when performed by physicians with different levels of training. Despite their common use, there is a need to assess both the accuracy and the short-term clinical efficacy of these injections, particularly when performed without image guidance by fellowship-trained hand surgeons. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES:(1) What is the accuracy of thumb CMC injections performed without image guidance by fellowship-trained hand surgeons in an office setting? (2) What is the short-term efficacy of thumb CMC injections performed without image guidance? METHODS:We prospectively enrolled 33 patients with a mean ± SD age of 63 ± 12 years, 76% (25) of whom were female, with symptoms of basal joint arthritis that persisted despite conservative treatment, and we administered 1.5-mL corticosteroid injections without image guidance. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the outcomes, which included VAS, QuickDASH (Q-DASH), and Thumb Disability Examination (TDX) scores. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were defined as 0.9 points for the VAS, 18 points for Q-DASH, and 17 points for TDX. RESULTS:Of the 33 injections analyzed, 79% (26) were intraarticular. At 6 weeks, patients reported a mean improvement of 22 points in QuickDASH, 24 points in TDX, and 4 points in VAS scores. Importantly, 73% (24 of 33), 55% (18 of 33), and 82% (27 of 33) of the patients achieved the MCID in the patient-reported outcomes, respectively, suggesting that even without image guidance, corticosteroid injections can provide effective short-term relief for thumb CMC arthritis. CONCLUSION:We found that about 79% of injections were placed intraarticularly, which was comparable with the findings of previous studies using image guidance, and provided meaningful improvements in pain and function for 6 weeks. These findings suggest that for experienced fellowship-trained hand surgeons, non-image-guided injections remain a viable option. Future studies should explore long-term outcomes and the potential role of adjunctive treatments such as antiinflammatory medications and splinting to enhance patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level II, therapeutic study.

BACKGROUND:Corticosteroid injections are a first-line treatment of trigger finger and de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Little research has evaluated preinjection patient-reported outcomes as a predictive factor for treatment success following corticosteroid injection. We hypothesized that patients with less pretreatment impairment would demonstrate greater post-treatment improvement than patients whose function was more severely impaired. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) scores in patients undergoing corticosteroid injection for trigger finger or de Quervain's tenosynovitis from 2017 to 2023. Independent variables were patient baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and baseline PROMIS UE. The primary outcome was treatment success between 30 days and 12 weeks, defined as achieving the minimal clinically important difference for PROMIS UE without undergoing surgery. RESULTS:= .44). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Corticosteroid injection provides meaningful improvement for a subset of trigger finger and de Quervain's tenosynovitis patients. Corticosteroid injection remains a first-line treatment for trigger finger and de Quervain's tenosynovitis patients, especially for those with more severe functional impairment.

Imaging plays an important role in evaluating peripheral nerves. In the preoperative setting, imaging helps overcome pitfalls of electrodiagnostic testing and provides key anatomical information to guide surgical management. In the postoperative setting, imaging also offers key information for treating physicians, although it comes with several challenges due to postsurgical changes and alteration of normal anatomy. This article reviews our approach to peripheral nerve imaging, including how we use imaging in the pre- and postoperative setting for several common indications.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:. In this video article, we present the exploration of a complex BPI in which the creation of a gracilis free flap is executed for elbow flexion reconstruction. We provide a comprehensive guide from markings, flap elevation, microsurgical technique, and inset, with educational operative pearls at every step. DESCRIPTION/UNASSIGNED:The procedure involves harvesting the gracilis muscle as a free functioning muscle transfer. The gracilis, which will become a type-II muscle flap, is carefully dissected with its pedicle and nerve preserved. The muscle is then transferred to the upper extremity, where its proximal origin is anchored to the clavicle and its distal tendon is inserted into the biceps tendon with use of a Pulvertaft weave. Vascular anastomoses are performed utilizing branches of the thoracoacromial trunk and venous couplers under a microscope. The muscle is innervated with the spinal accessory nerve and tensioned to ensure optimal elbow flexion. ALTERNATIVES/UNASSIGNED:Surgical alternatives include nerve transfers (e.g., Oberlin transfer), tendon transfers, or other free muscle transfers (e.g., latissimus dorsi transfer). Nonsurgical alternatives include orthotic devices to compensate for elbow flexion loss, and physical therapy to maximize existing function. RATIONALE/UNASSIGNED:. Unlike orthotic devices, this technique provides active elbow flexion, critical for functional independence. The long tendon and reliable vascular pedicle make the gracilis ideal for this purpose. EXPECTED OUTCOMES/UNASSIGNED:. These findings suggest that free gracilis muscle transfer provides reliable functional improvements, enabling meaningful elbow flexion restoration and enhancing quality of life. IMPORTANT TIPS/UNASSIGNED:Utilize Doppler ultrasound to confirm the location of a skin perforator over the gracilis to aid in postoperative monitoring.Preoperative markings are key. Mark the orientation of the gracilis muscle belly and pedicle preoperatively for efficient harvesting.The gracilis inserts distal to the knee, so extending the knee can help distinguish it from the adductor longus.Preserve all fascia over the gracilis muscle to optimize muscle gliding.Ensure proper resting tension during gracilis insertion to prevent over- or under-tightening, optimize function, and avoid complications like hyperextension or limited flexion.Position the elbow at 90° of flexion and the forearm in supination when tensioning.Make accommodation for any vessel size mismatch between the gracilis pedicle and recipient vessels to minimize complications.Confirm intraoperative vessel patency with use of Doppler flow checks after completing the anastomoses.Confirm nerve viability intraoperatively with use of nerve stimulation, ensuring a strong muscle contraction response.Secure the nerve repair without tension and with the appropriate coaptation in order to maximize reinnervation success.Utilize drains to avoid fluid collections that can create pressure on the pedicle.Place the gracilis tendon insertion precisely with use of the Pulvertaft weave technique, ensuring secure fixation and proper alignment with the biceps tendon. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS/UNASSIGNED:BPI = brachial plexus injuryDASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and HandDVT = deep vein thrombosisEMG = electromyographyFFMT = free functioning muscle transferFGMT = free gracilis muscle transferICN = intercostal nerve transferM3/M4 = muscle strength grade 3 or 4MCA = medial circumflex arteryMCN = musculocutaneous nerveNCS = nerve conduction studyPPX = prophylaxisSAN = spinal accessory nerveSF-36 = Short Form-36.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Managing open distal radius fractures (DRFs) poses challenges. While preventing surgical site infection (SSI) involves prompt antibiotic administration and thorough irrigation and debridement, the impact of urgent intervention on reducing postoperative infection rates is debated. We hypothesize that timing of surgery does not significantly affect the incidence of SSI in open DRF treated within or after 24 hours from time of injury. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We retrospectively analyzed the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2021. We focused on outcome variables, including superficial SSI and deep SSI or osteomyelitis. To evaluate the relationship between time to operative intervention and SSI rates, we employed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariate regression models, adjusting for patient-specific factors and injury severity. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= .013) was significantly associated with increased rates of superficial SSI. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Extended time to surgery correlates with a modest rise in deep SSI incidence in open DRF. However, there was no heightened risk of superficial SSI in patients with delayed surgery. Polytrauma, alcohol use disorder, and diabetes were linked to elevated SSI rates in open DRF.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in patients with suspected brachial plexus injury (BPI) to the terminal nerves by comparing physical examination (PE) findings with US, electromyography (EMG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:All patients at a single institution who underwent US for peripheral nerve injury of the brachial plexus and terminal nerves resulting in sensory-motor deficits from October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2023 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed. Each PE, US, EMG, and MRI reports were given an overall rating: "normal" or "abnormal." Terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, axillary, radial, ulnar, medial) were individually assessed as "normal" or "abnormal." The interobserver agreement between reports was calculated using Cohen kappa. Specificity and sensitivity analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy and were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 120 patients were included. Most injuries were traumatic in nature (78.8%) and were low-energy (53.8%). When each imaging modality was compared with the PE findings, EMG had the highest interobserver agreement (Cohen kappa = 0.18), followed by US (Cohen kappa = 0.10), and last MRI (Cohen kappa = 0.07). The US had the highest sensitivity (0.92, CI = 0.85, 0.96) among the 3 imaging modalities (Table 2). On US, the ulnar nerve was most commonly abnormal (n = 84, 70.0%). DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Ultrasonography serves as a useful adjunct in the workup of patients with suspected peripheral BPI and is reliable in localizing the pathology of injured terminal nerves in the brachial plexus.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:This study investigates whether open distal radius fractures (ODRFs) treated after 24 hours from time of injury have an increased risk of infection or overall complication profile compared with those treated within 24 hours. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective review was performed of all patients treated for ODRF over a 6-year period at a single large academic institution. Postoperative complications included surgical site infections, need for revision irrigation and debridement, delayed soft tissue healing, loss of reduction, nonunion, and malunion. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:One-hundred twenty patients were treated for ODRF. Mean (SD) age at time of injury was 59.92 (17.68) years. Twenty patients (16.7%) had postoperative complications. Regarding mechanism of injury, 78 (65.0%) had a low-energy and 42 (35.0%) had a high-energy injury. Age and fracture grade were not significant factors. Mean (SD) open wound size was 1.18 (1.57) cm. Mean (SD) time from injury presentation to the emergency department (ED) and first dose of intravenous antibiotics was 3.07 (4.05) hours and mean (SD) time from presentation to the ED and operative treatment was 11.90 (6.59) hours, which did not show a significant association with postoperative complications. Twenty-four patients (20.0%) were treated greater than 24 hours after presentation to the ED, which was not significantly distinct from those treated within 24 hours. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients with ODRFs treated after 24 hours were not associated with a greater risk of postoperative complications. Factors including age, energy and mechanism of injury, and fracture grade did not alter outcome in any statistically significant manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level IV.

Open tibia fractures are the most common open long bone injury. Most of these injuries involve a high-energy mechanism. Many standards for management have been created to provide guidance and a baseline for quality. There are several factors that must be considered when determining the timing of coverage for an open fracture with soft tissue compromise. Understanding the available options for soft tissue coverage, including local/rotational flaps and free tissue transfer, will allow for a tailored approach based on the personality of the injury. The aim of this review was to characterize the critical window of treatment based on the current literature and to provide a review of the available soft tissue coverage options.

BACKGROUND:It remains poorly understood why only some hemodynamically unstable patients who receive aggressive treatment with vasopressor medications develop limb necrosis. OBJECTIVE:To determine the incidence of limb necrosis and the factors associated with it following high-dose vasopressor therapy. METHODS:A retrospective case-control medical records review was performed of patients aged 18 to 89 years who received vasopressor therapy between 2012 and 2021 in a single academic medical center. The study population was stratified by the development of limb necrosis following vasopressor use. Patients who experienced necrosis were compared with age- and sex-matched controls who did not experience necrosis. Demographic information, comorbidities, and medication details were recorded. RESULTS:The incidence of limb necrosis following vasopressor administration was 0.25%. Neither baseline demographics nor medical comorbidities differed significantly between groups. Necrosis was present in the same limb as the arterial catheter most often for femoral catheters. The vasopressor dose administered was significantly higher in the necrosis group than in the control group for ephedrine (P = .02) but not for the other agents. The duration of therapy was significantly longer in the necrosis group than in the control group for norepinephrine (P = .001), epinephrine (P = .04), and ephedrine (P = .01). The duration of vasopressin administration did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The findings of this study suggest that medication-specific factors, rather than patient and disease characteristics, should guide clinical management of necrosis in the setting of vasopressor administration.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Operating room (OR) efficiency has an impact on surgeon productivity and patient experience. Accuracy of case duration estimation is important to optimize OR efficiency. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with inaccurate case time estimates in outpatient hand surgery. A better understanding of these findings may help to improve OR efficiency and scheduling. METHODS:All outpatient hand surgical cases from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed. Poorly-estimated cases (i.e., poor scheduling accuracy) were defined as those cases where the actual operative time differed from the predicted time by >50% (either quicker by >50% or slower by >50% than the predicted time). The percentages of poorly-estimated cases were analyzed, categorized, and compared by surgeon, procedure type, and scheduled case length. RESULTS:A total of 6,620 cases were identified. Of 1,107 (16.7%) cases with poorly estimated case durations, 75.2% were underestimated. There was no difference in the likelihood of poor estimation related to start time. Well-estimated cases tended to have longer scheduled case duration, but shorter realized case duration and surgical time. Our systems analysis identified specific surgeons and procedures as predictable outliers. Cases scheduled for 15-30 minutes frequently were inaccurate, whereas cases scheduled for 30-45 and 106-120 minutes had accurate estimates. CONCLUSIONS:The accuracy of case time estimations in a standard outpatient hand surgery practice is highly variable. Nearly one-fifth of outpatient hand surgery case durations are poorly estimated, and inaccurate case time estimation can be predicted based on surgeon, procedure type, and case time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Maximizing OR efficiency should be a priority for surgeons and hospital systems. With multiple surgeries done per day, the efficiency of the OR has an impact on surgeon productivity and patient experience.