Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer with early onset is increasing but comparisons with average onset cases have yielded mixed results (EOPC versus AOPC; age <50 versus ≥50). We compared clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and molecular traits of resected EOPC versus AOPC. METHODS:We retrospectively included patients with PDAC resected between 2010 and 2017 from The National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinicopathologic data were compared across EOPC versus AOPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox-regression were used to perform survival analysis. Molecular features were compared using data from the cBioPortal. RESULTS:24,078 patients with resected PDAC were included, of whom 1698 (7.1 %) had EOPC. Poor prognostic factors, including high grade, advanced T-stage, and lymphovascular invasion, were less prevalent in EOPC (All p < 0.05). Patients with EOPC more frequently received neoadjuvant (28 % vs. 22 %; p < 0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (68 % vs. 58 %; p < 0.001) and experienced improved OS (median OS 29.5 vs 25.9 months, p = 0.023; 5-year OS: 26.9 % vs 20.8 %). No differences in the presence of key driver mutations were observed between the two groups but some distinct oncogenic mutations were observed in EOPC. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:EOPC and AOPC are clinically similar but some cases of EOPC may harbor divergent molecular changes. These patients may have only marginally improved survival.

BACKGROUND:Although minimally invasive surgery is widely accepted across surgical disciplines, its role in pancreatic cancer continues to be debated. The objective of the São Paulo Consensus on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (MIPS) was to establish consensus statements on the use of MIPS for pancreatic cancer, integrating contemporary evidence and recent advances. METHODS:A scoping literature review informed statement development across five thematic groups: (1) Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer, (2) Pancreatoduodenectomy and Total Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer, (3) Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors, (4) Patient Evaluation and Surgical Technique, and (5) Implementation, Training, and Innovation. A three-round modified Delphi process was conducted with an international panel of 52 expert pancreas surgeons. Consensus was defined as ≥90 % agreement. RESULTS:From 2590 publications, 185 studies were selected for inclusion. Fifty-two hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons, with a median of 22 years of experience, achieved consensus through a three-round Delphi process. Ultimately, 22 of the initial 28 statements met the ≥90 % agreement threshold. The resulting recommendations provide evidence-based guidance on minimally invasive pancreas resection for cancer, including neuroendocrine tumors, patient evaluation, program implementation, and innovation. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The São Paulo Consensus provides contemporary, evidence-based recommendations to guide the safe and judicious adoption, implementation, and practice of minimally invasive techniques.

BACKGROUND:The 2024 Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) build on previous guidelines that consider worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) to recommend surveillance or resection. These new guidelines have not yet been validated. METHODS:Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for an IPMN at an academic medical center between 2012 and 2023 were included. IPMNs were categorized as low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or invasive carcinoma (IC). Preoperative imaging was used to determine HRS and WF in accordance with the 2024 Kyoto guidelines. We compared IPMNs with LGD to those with HGD or IC using univariate analyses and evaluated logistic regression models with c-statistics. RESULTS:Of 211 patients, 84 (40%) had LGD, 49 (23%) had HGD, and 78 (37%) had IC. Among HRS, obstructive jaundice (p = 0.004), pancreatic duct ≥ 10 mm (p < 0.001), and suspicious or positive cytology (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with HGD/IC. An increasing number of HRS were associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. Among WFs, an abrupt change in the caliber of pancreatic duct with distal pancreatic atrophy (p = 0.001) and cystic growth ≥ 2.5 mm/year (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. Increasing numbers of WFs were also associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. The 2024 Kyoto model showed improved discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.849) compared with the 2017 Fukuoka model (AUC=0.780, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The risk of HGD/IC in IPMNs increased in a stepwise fashion as the number of WFs increased. The 2024 guidelines represent an advancement over the 2017 guidelines, notably with the inclusion of suspicious cytology as an HRS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic cancer is typically managed like pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived pancreatic cancer. However, in IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer, the role of chemotherapy remains controversial, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting (NAT). OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer. METHODS:Patients with IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer treated with either upfront surgery (US) or NAT were identified from eight international centers (2000-2023). Clinicopathologic data were compared. Date of first treatment was used for Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests to compare overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). Multivariable Cox-regression was performed in patients that underwent NAT. RESULTS:In 1,019 patients, 76 (7%) underwent NAT. Patients who received NAT had higher baseline CA19-9 levels (P<0.001). Of these 76 patients, 27 (36%), 20 (26%), and 29 (38%) had resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced pancreatic cancer at diagnosis, respectively. Advanced resectability stage was significantly more common in the NAT patients as compared to those who underwent US (P<0.001). OS for US patients was 38.0 months (95%CI: 33.7.1-44.3), which was not statistically different than those that received NAT [27.5 mo (95%CI: 23.1-46.7), P=0.121]. This was also valid for patients with resectable disease [US: 38.1 mo vs. NAT: 35.6 mo, P=0.920)]. Complete or marked pathological treatment response (P=0.046) and serological CA19-9 normalization after NAT (P=0.017) were associated with improved survival. On Cox-regression for OS, N2 disease [HR: 4.15 (95%CI: 1.71-10.10)], elevated CA19-9 [HR: 2.02 (95%CI:1.06-3.85)] and R1 margin [HR: 2.36 (95%CI:1.20-4.61)] was independently associated with OS after NAT, while resectability status was not. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:After NAT and resection, advanced resectability stage was not associated with worse OS indicating the value of this approach for borderline resectable and locally advanced IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer. The benefit of NAT in resectable disease is unclear and may require an individualized approach. Biological treatment effect can be assessed with CA19-9 and confirmed by pathologic response.

OBJECTIVE:To establish a novel method for evaluating carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and assess its role in predicting overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Static CA19-9 values or percentage changes often fail to capture therapeutic responses in patients with BR-PC undergoing NAT. Improved evaluation methods are essential for guiding the treatment. METHODS:This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent BR-PC surgery. Two parameters were developed: slope coefficient (SC, change in CA19-9 divided by therapy duration) and mean δf (mδf, calculated as the sum of CA19-9 values over therapy intervals divided by the number of 15-day periods). The main objective was to correlate mδf with OS thresholds derived using a maximally selected log-rank statistic and validated in independent cohorts. RESULTS:Overall, 991 patients (median age 65 [59-71] years; 49% male) were included. The thresholds for mδf were defined as U.mL-1. month-1 (negative SC) and U.mL-1. month-1 (positive SC). Patients with mδf below these thresholds had significantly better prognoses, with hazard ratios (HR) for OS (95% CI) of 0.6 (0.4-0.8; P<0.01) and 0.4 (0.2-0.9; P=0.04) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Both thresholds were validated for mOS, with 29 vs 22 months (P=0.015) and 32 vs 16 months (P=0.0034) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Similarly, the mDFS was 13 vs 10 months (P=0.011) and 12 vs 7 months (P=0.0018), respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This CA19-9 evaluation approach accurately predicts survival outcomes, offering a valuable tool for optimizing treatment strategies. An mδf calculator is available at https://www.pancpals.com/tools.

OBJECTIVE:We aimed to better understand patients' treatment preferences and quantify the level of cancer risk at which treatment preferences change (risk threshold) to inform better counseling of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:The complexity of IPMN management provides an opportunity to align treatment with individual preference. METHODS:We surveyed a sample of healthy volunteers simulating a common scenario: undergoing an imaging study that incidentally identifies an IPMN. In the scenario, the estimated risk of cancer in the IPMN was 5%. Patients were asked their treatment preference (surgery or surveillance), to quantify the level of cancer risk in the IPMN at which their treatment preference would change (i.e. risk threshold), and their level of cancer anxiety as measured on a 5-point Likert scale. We examined associations between participant characteristics, treatment preferences, and risk threshold using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS:The median risk threshold among the 520 participants was 25% (IQR 2.3-50%). The risk threshold had a bimodal distribution: 40% of participants had a risk threshold between 0-10% and 47% had a risk threshold above 30%. When informed that the risk of cancer was 5%, 62% of participants (n=323) preferred surveillance, and the remaining 38% (n=197) preferred surgery. After adjusting for potential confounders, participants who expressed "worry" or "extreme worry" about the malignancy risk of IPMN had significantly lower risk thresholds than participants who were "not at all worried" (Coefficient -12, 95%CI -21 to -2, P=0.015 and Coefficient -18, 95%CI -29 to -8, P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Participants varied in treatment preference and risk threshold of incidentally identified IPMNs. Given the uncertainty in estimating the true malignant potential of IPMNs, a better understanding of a patient's risk threshold, as influenced by patient concern about malignancy, will help inform the shared decision-making process.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether transitional circulating tumor cells (trCTCs) predict systemic recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and assess their potential role in risk stratification for systemic treatment. BACKGROUND:The high metastatic potential of PDAC is believed to be associated with early dissemination after cancer cell reprogramming via an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. These cells are detectable in circulation as trCTCs and could serve as valuable biomarker capturing systemic disease involvement. METHODS:The prospective CLUSTER trial enrolled patients scheduled for PDAC resection (2016-2018). Pre- and postoperative CTCs were isolated with the Isolation-by-SizE-of-Tumor-Cells device and characterized by immunofluorescence. Cox regression with spline terms assessed associations between preoperative biomarkers and systemic recurrence, while multivariable subgroup analyses with interaction tests evaluated overall survival (OS) stratified by adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS:In preoperative samples, trCTCs were detected in 82 (67%) of 123 patients with a median number of two cells per ml (IQR 1-3). A linear association between preoperative trCTC counts and systemic recurrence (χ²=13.2, P=0.004) was observed, but no relevant correlation with CA19-9 levels was found (Pearson correlation=0.05, 95% CI:-0.13-0.23). Furthermore, trCTC-positivity after resection predicts recurrence and is associated with prolonged OS associated with adjuvant therapy (HR 0.21, 95%CI: 0.09-0.49) after adjustment for tumor stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS:Preoperatively, higher trCTC counts are associated with increased risk of systemic recurrence, while postoperative presence reflects minimal residual disease. Integrating trCTC assessment alongside currently used biomarkers into the clinical pathway for patients with PDAC could enhance risk stratification and support more personalized treatment decisions.

With a rising annual incidence, pancreatic cancer is now the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in American men and women [...].

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Histotripsy is a non-invasive ultrasound-based tumor ablation modality. This study aims to describe the preliminary safety and short-term imaging findings related to histotripsy of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:All patients who underwent histotripsy for liver metastases from February 2024 to January 2025 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, imaging, procedural, and adverse event data were collected via chart review. Immediate post-treatment ablation zones were measured on CT and compared to pretreatment tumor size and treatment cavity size on follow-up imaging. Untreated tumors were assessed using revised RECIST criteria to evaluate for off-target effects. RESULTS:Histotripsy was performed on 56 metastatic liver tumors (most common: 32% colorectal, 18% breast) in 26 patients (54% female, age 59.1 ± 15.6y). All patients were discharged within 36 h. Immediate post-procedural ablation zones (36.6 + 13.1 mm) were larger compared to pretreatment tumors (30.5 + 18.5 mm) (p = 0.0013). One-month ablation zones (31.5 + 16.7 mm) were smaller compared to immediate post-procedural ablation zones (p = 0.00064). Two patients experienced off-target effects in non-treated liver tumors following histotripsy while off cytotoxic therapy. One patient experienced a Grade 3 complication of bacteremia requiring prolonged inpatient admission. No deaths occurred within 30 days. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Histotripsy demonstrates a favorable safety profile for liver metastases. Observed off-target effects in untreated lesions suggest systemic immunomodulatory responses. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate patient-specific factors (e.g., tumor biology, concurrent therapies) that optimize systemic immune activation. Larger prospective studies with longitudinal immune profiling are needed to validate histotripsy's potential dual role as a locoregional therapy and immune primer in metastatic liver disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level 2b, retrospective cohort study.