Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Interstitial fibrosis in lupus nephritis (LN) is often infiltrated by immune cells but typically regarded as non-specific 'scar reaction'. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between inflammatory fibrosis and kidney disease progression in LN. METHODS:Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) were scored in 124 LN kidney biopsies. Inflammation in areas of IFTA (i-IFTA) was graded 0-3 according to the Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology. Significant glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss was defined as a decline of >15 mL/min at 3 years from biopsy. Immune cell phenotype was defined by serial immunohistochemistry (13-plex). RESULTS:IFTA was observed in 88/124 (71%) biopsies, and i-IFTA was identified in 76/88 (86%) cases. The distribution of i-IFTA grades was heterogeneous across all IFTA grades. In patients with moderate-to-severe IFTA (>25%), the degree of i-IFTA was associated with a higher risk of significant GFR loss: 0/1 (0%), 0/3 (%), 3/4 (75%) and 7/9 (78%) for i-IFTA grades 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.015). Multiplexed histology revealed that i-IFTA was mostly composed of CD163+ macrophages and CD4 T cells, followed by CD8 T cells and granulocytes. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:I-IFTA is frequently observed in LN and is dominated by macrophages and T cells. For patients with baseline IFTA >25%, the degree of i-IFTA emerged as a predictor of GFR loss. These data support the routine scoring of i-IFTA in LN due to its prognostic implications and nominate i-IFTA as a potential therapeutic target.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with an increased risk of vascular dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. We validate our previously developed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Platelet-Gene Expression Signature (SLAP-GES) score and investigate its relationship with platelet activity and vascular health. SLAP-GES was associated with the SLE Disease Activity Index (Padj < 0.001) and consistent over time (r = 0.76; P = 9 × 10^-5). Moreover, SLAP-GES was associated increased platelet aggregation in response to submaximal epinephrine (P = 0.084), leukocyte platelet aggregates (P = 0.014), and neutrophil platelet aggregates (P = 0.043). SLAP-GES was also associated with impaired glycocalyx (P = 0.011) and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (P = 0.045). Altogether, SLAP-GES is associated with SLE disease activity, platelet activity, and impaired vascular health.

Monocytes and macrophages in patients with lupus nephritis exhibit altered behavior compared with healthy kidneys. How to optimally use mouse models to develop treatments targeting these cells is poorly understood. This study compared intrarenal myeloid cells in four mouse models and 155 lupus nephritis patients using single-cell profiling, spatial transcriptomics, and functional studies. Across mouse models, monocyte and macrophage subsets consistently expanded or contracted in disease. A subset of murine classical monocytes expanded in disease; these cells expressed Cd9, Spp1, Ctsd, Cd63, Apoe, and Trem2, genes associated with tissue injury in other organs that play roles in inflammation, lipid metabolism, and tissue repair. Resident macrophages expressed similar genes in clinical disease. In humans, we identified analogous disease-associated monocytes and macrophages that were associated with kidney histological subtypes and disease progression, sharing gene expression and localizing to similar kidney microenvironments as in mice. This cross-species analysis supports the use of mouse functional studies for understanding human lupus nephritis.

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, and fewer than half of patients achieve complete renal response with standard immunosuppressants. Identifying non-invasive, blood-based immune alterations associated with renal injury could aid therapeutic decisions. Here, we used mass cytometry immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 145 patients with biopsy-proven LN and 40 healthy controls to evaluate the heterogeneity of immune activation and identify correlates of renal parameters. Unbiased analysis identified three immunologically distinct groups of patients that were associated with different patterns of histopathology, renal cell infiltrates, urine proteomic profiles, and treatment response at one year. Patients with enriched circulating granzyme B+ T cells showed more active disease and increased numbers of activated CD8 T cells in the kidney, yet they had the highest likelihood of treatment response. A second group characterized by a high type I interferon signature had a lower likelihood of response to therapy, while a third group appeared immunologically inactive but with chronic renal injuries. The major immunologic axes of variation could be distilled down to five simple cytometric parameters that recapitulate several clinical associations, highlighting the potential for blood immunoprofiling to translate to clinically useful non-invasive metrics to assess immune-mediated disease in LN.

OBJECTIVE:The objective is to provide evidence-based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. METHODS:The Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. RESULTS:We present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus-based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3-5 years for those achieving complete renal response. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:-test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed. KEY POINTS/UNASSIGNED:There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.

The accepted version of this article was posted prematurely on March 24, 2025. The final version of record will be made fully available at a later date.

OBJECTIVE:Traditional initial treatment regimens for lupus nephritis (LN) used oral glucocorticoids (GC) in starting doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent with or without a preceding intravenous methylprednisolone pulse. More recent management guidelines recommend lower starting oral GC doses following intravenous pulse therapy. As there have been no large studies directly comparing patients receiving low versus high initial oral GC doses, this pooled analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety. METHODS:Published data were analysed from RCTs that assessed variable GC doses in the standard of care (SOC) treatment arms. Patients receiving starting prednisone doses up to 0.5 mg/kg/day (low dose) were compared with 1.0 mg/kg/day (high dose). Complete renal response requiring urine protein-creatinine ratio <0.5 mg/mg (CRR 0.5), CRR or partial renal response (PRR), serious adverse events (SAE) and SAE due to infections at 12 months of treatment were compared between groups. RESULTS:417 patients from SOC arms of five studies were exposed to low-dose initial GC after intravenous pulse, while 521 patients from four studies were treated with high-dose oral GC. In patients with low-dose oral GC, 25.2% achieved CRR 0.5 at 12 months compared with 27.2% in high-dose groups, p=0.54. CRR or PRR was attained in 48.7% low-dose vs 43.6% high-dose patients, p=0.14. SAEs and infection SAEs were less common in the low-dose GC group (19.4% vs 31.6%, p<0.001 and 9.8% vs 16.5%, p=0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Based on pooled RCT data, there was no significant difference in 12-month renal responses between patients receiving low-dose prednisone following intravenous GC compared with those receiving initial high doses. SAEs were less frequent in patients receiving low-dose initial GC. These findings support the use of lower oral GC doses in LN treatment.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are an emerging class of medications with demonstrated promise in improving cardiometabolic outcomes. Whether these drugs may be useful in mitigating the cardiac risk associated with SLE remains unknown, and a recent case of drug induced lupus secondary to GLP1-RA use calls the safety of GLP1-RAs in SLE patients into question. Accordingly, this retrospective analysis was initiated to evaluate outcomes of GLP1-RAs in SLE. METHODS:All patients in the NYU Lupus Cohort who had used a GLP1-RA were eligible for inclusion. Patient characteristics were assessed at baseline (most recent rheumatology visit prior to starting GLP1-RA), 1-4 months, and 6-10 months after GLP1-RA initiation. RESULTS:Of the 1211 patients in the cohort, only 24 had received a GLP1-RA. Six were excluded due to insufficient documentation regarding duration of medication use. Of the remaining 18 (median age 50), 17 (94%) were female and 9 (50%) were white. There was one mild-to-moderate flare at 6-10 months, but no patients accumulated new SLE criteria during the follow up period. Compared with baseline, median BMI was reduced by 3% at 1-4 months (p= 0.002) and 13% at 6-10 months (p= 0.001). Nine (50%) patients were initially denied insurance coverage for a GLP1-RA. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While limited by a small sample size, this descriptive study showed that GLP1-RAs did not trigger flares above expected background rates and were associated with significantly decreased BMI. Future studies exploring the potential benefits of GLP1-RAs in patients with SLE are warranted.