Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) requires hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen to enter hepatocytes. Although HBV/HDV coinfection is the most severe form of viral hepatitis, disease progression and liver-related data are limited. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the characteristics of studies reporting HDV outcomes and the incidence of liver-related events among individuals with HDV. METHODS:We searched online databases from 1 January 2000 to 14 December 2022 and congress proceedings from 2021 to 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised interventional studies and observational studies reporting incidence of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplant (LT) and liver-related death in ≥ 20 adults with active HDV infection were included. Study/participant characteristics, cumulative incidence and incidence rates were extracted. RESULTS:Data were extracted from 32 unique studies in 47 publications. While most (n = 19; 59%) studies included < 100 individuals, five included ≥ 200. Most were retrospective cohort (n = 19; 59%), and the remainder were prospective cohort (n = 5), non-randomised interventional (n = 3), RCT (n = 3) or registry/database studies (n = 2). Outcomes reported by the largest numbers of studies were hepatic decompensation (n = 21) and HCC (n = 20); the least reported was cirrhosis (n = 9). Heterogeneity existed in participant populations, with variability in baseline markers of liver disease severity. Consequently, a wide range of cumulative incidence values was observed (cirrhosis, 0%-63%; hepatic decompensation, 0%-52%; HCC, 0%-19%; LT, 2%-43%; liver-related death, 0%-19%; composite endpoint, 3%-74%). CONCLUSIONS:The number of studies describing the incidence of liver-related outcomes among people with HDV remains limited. Quantifying incidence of liver-related events can improve our understanding of disease progression and inform potential treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023386845.

BACKGROUND:Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common but underdiagnosed and undertreated health condition and is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. HBV (rated a Grade 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer) drives the transformation of hepatocytes in multiple ways by inducing viral DNA integrations, genetic dysregulation, chromosomal translocations, chronic inflammation, and oncogenic pathways facilitated by some HBV proteins. Importantly, these mechanisms are active throughout all phases of HBV infection. Nevertheless, most clinical guidelines for antiviral therapy recommend treatment based on a complex combination of HBV DNA levels, transaminasemia, liver histology, and demographic factors, rather than prompt treatment for all people with infection. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:To determine if current frameworks for antiviral treatment address the impacts of chronic HBV infection particularly preventing cancer development. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We reviewed the recent data demonstrating pro-oncogenic factors acting throughout a chronic HBV infection can be inhibited by antiviral therapy. RESULTS:We extensively reviewed Hepatitis B virology data and correlating clinical outcome data. From thi, we suggest that new findings support simplifying and expanding treatment initiation to reduce the incidence ofnew infections, progressive liver disease, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. We also consider lessons learned from other blood-borne pathogens, including the benefits of antiviral treatment in preventing transmission, reducing stigma, and reframing treatment as cancer prevention. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Incorporating these practice changes into treatment is likely to reduce the overall burden of chronic HBV infections and HCC. Through this, we may better achieve the World Health Organization's goal of eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat and minimise its impact on people's lives.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has long been recognized as a complication in people with chronic liver disease, particularly those with cirrhosis. Two gene therapies for haemophilia A and B recently approved in Europe and the US utilize adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors designed to target hepatocytes. A number of other AAV gene therapies are undergoing clinical investigation for both liver and extrahepatic diseases, many of which likely transduce hepatocytes as well. Although AAV vectors predominantly persist in episomal forms, concerns about insertional mutagenesis have arisen due to findings in pre-clinical models and in a small subset of human HCC cases featuring wild-type AAV integrations in proximity to potential oncogenes. Despite the absence of any causative link between AAV vector therapy and HCC in approved extrahepatic gene therapies or haemophilia gene therapy trials, the package inserts for the recently approved haemophilia gene therapies advise HCC screening in subsets of individuals with additional risk factors. In this review, we discuss HCC risk factors, compare various screening modalities, discuss optimal screening intervals, and consider when to initiate and possibly discontinue screening. At this early point in the evolution of gene therapy, we lack sufficient data to make evidence-based recommendations on HCC screening. While AAV vectors may eventually be shown to be unassociated with risk of HCC, we presently favour a cautious approach that entails regular surveillance until such time as it is hopefully proven to be unnecessary.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients; however, there is a paucity of literature to suggest PSC alone as an independent risk factor for CRC. We aimed to determine if PSC is an independent risk factor for CRC in a large tertiary care medical center. Optimizing screening intervals is of great importance, given the burden and risks associated with a lifetime of colonoscopy screening. METHODS:This retrospective cohort study consists of patients diagnosed with PSC preceding IBD (PSC-IBD) and PSC-only before January 6, 2023 from a large, tertiary, academic medical center. Patients diagnosed with IBD concurrently or before PSC were excluded to reduce IBD's impact on CRC risk. Demographic data and colonoscopy findings were collected and assessed. RESULTS:Overall, 140 patients from all NYU Langone Health clinical settings were included. Patients with PSC-IBD were more likely to be diagnosed with CRC (23.3% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.01) and either low-grade or uncharacterized dysplasia (16.7% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.01) compared with those with PSC-only. Among PSC-only patients, the estimated CRC risk was significantly elevated compared with that expected of the standard NYU Langone population (SIR 9.2, 95% CI 1.1, 33.2). CONCLUSIONS:Our study revealed a significantly heightened CRC risk in PSC-IBD patients compared with those with PSC-only. Importantly, individuals with PSC-only also face a greater CRC risk compared with the general population. Individuals with PSC-alone may require extended screening and surveillance colonoscopy intervals compared with those with PSC-IBD, yet still require more frequent monitoring than screening guidelines recommend for the general population.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/UNASSIGNED:The investigational first-generation core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) demonstrated safety and antiviral activity over 24 weeks in two phase IIa studies in patients with chronic HBV infection. In this long-term extension study, patients received open-label VBR with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Patients in this study (NCT03780543) previously received VBR + NrtI or placebo + NrtI in parent studies 201 (NCT03576066) or 202 (NCT03577171). After receiving VBR + NrtI for ≥52 weeks, stopping criteria (based on the treatment history and hepatitis B e antigen status in the parent studies) were applied, and patients either discontinued both VBR + NrtI, discontinued VBR only, or continued both VBR + NrtI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/ml at 24 weeks off treatment. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Ninety-two patients entered the extension study and received VBR + NrtI. Long-term VBR + NrtI treatment led to continued suppression of HBV nucleic acids and, to a lesser extent, HBV antigens. Forty-three patients met criteria to discontinue VBR + NrtI, with no patients achieving the primary endpoint; the majority of virologic rebound occurred ≥4 weeks off treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). There were no deaths. Most AEs and laboratory abnormalities were related to elevations in alanine aminotransferase and occurred during the off-treatment or NrtI-restart phases. No drug-drug interactions between VBR + NrtI and no cases of treatment-emergent resistance among patients who adhered to treatment were observed. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Long-term VBR + NrtI was safe and resulted in continued reductions in HBV nucleic acids following completion of the 24-week parent studies. Following treatment discontinuation, virologic relapse was observed in all patients. This first-generation core inhibitor administered with NrtI for at least 52 weeks was not sufficient for HBV cure. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:NCT03780543. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) suppress viral replication, but viral rebound is almost always observed after treatment discontinuation, highlighting an unmet need for improved therapies with finite treatment duration producing greater therapeutic responses that can be sustained off treatment. First-generation core inhibitors, such as vebicorvir, have mechanisms of action orthogonal to standard-of-care therapies that deeply suppress HBV viral replication during treatment; however, to date, durable virologic responses have not been observed after treatment discontinuation. The results reported here will help researchers with the design and interpretation of future studies investigating core inhibitors as possible components of finite treatment regimens for patients with cHBV. It is possible that next-generation core inhibitors with enhanced potency may produce deeper and more durable antiviral activity than first-generation agents, including vebicorvir.