Faculty Bibliography

Stercoral colitis is an inflammatory reaction secondary to fecal impaction and almost always occurs in the setting of chronic constipation. Luminal distention caused by dense and dehydrated stool compresses the vascular supply of the distal colon, resulting in bowel ischemia and ulceration. Stercoral colitis primarily affects elderly patients, but it can be seen in any patient with decreased bowel motility, with risk factors including neurodegenerative disorders, chronic medical diseases, malignancy, immobility, and the use of narcotic or anticholinergic medications. Patients most often present with abdominal pain and tenderness. However, the presentation is often nonspecific and can include nongastrointestinal symptoms. Due to the common presence of comorbidities, a thorough history and physical examination findings may be difficult to obtain. Imaging, especially CT, plays a vital role in the diagnosis of stercoral colitis, demonstrating hallmark features such as fecal impaction and a large colorectal stool burden. Mural thickening (>3 mm) and other CT signs of inflammation aid in diagnosis, although findings including perirectal fat stranding can be nonspecific. Signs of perforation, including mural discontinuity, extraluminal air, and extraluminal stool collections, can also be identified. Other potential complications include obstruction, bleeding, fistulas, and urinary tract involvement secondary to mass effect. The overlap of findings between stercoral colitis and other colonic diseases, particularly diverticulitis and malignancy, can sometimes make diagnosis challenging. Identification of fecal impaction and associated inflammatory changes helps in distinguishing stercoral colitis from other pathologic conditions. Prompt diagnosis of stercoral colitis and its complications allows appropriate management, which can range from preventive measures to emergent surgical treatment. ^©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To better understand the occurrence of splenic disease as a potential manifestation of babesiosis by retrospectively estimating the frequency of acute splenic injury on abdominal and pelvic CT in a cohort of patients with active babesia infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:In a search of our single institution, suburban teaching community hospital database, 57 patients were found to have positive babesia infection between the years 2021-2023. 29 of these patients underwent abdominal and pelvic CT (22 with and 7 without intravenous contrast), and 3 underwent abdominal ultrasound without any CT. The imaging was reviewed for the presence or absence of splenic abnormalities, and for follow-up imaging. Parasitemia levels at the time of imaging were also reviewed; parasitemia levels < 4% are associated with mild to moderate disease, whereas parasitemia levels > 4% are associated with severe disease. RESULTS:21/32 (66%) patients who underwent any type of abdominal imaging (ultrasound, MRI, and CT) had splenomegaly. Of the 22 patients who had IV contrast-enhanced CT scans, 6 were found to have splenic infarction (27%). One of these 22 patients had multiple rounded non-peripheral hypoenhancing foci on both CT and MRI which did not meet criteria for infarction, in association with splenomegaly, and which resolved after treatment. 0/6 patients in the splenic infarction group had parasitemia levels greater than 4%, while 4 of the 16 patients (4/16) without infarction had parasitemia levels of greater than 4%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our study showed that splenic disease in patients with babesiosis mostly took the form of splenomegaly, and in a substantial minority of patients as splenic infarction. There were no cases of splenic rupture and perisplenic hematoma in our case series, likely reflecting a limitation of the relatively small study size. Concordant with prior studies, we found no identifiable association between parasitemia levels and the presence of splenic infarction.

Inferior vena cava (IVC) pathology is often underrecognized on non-dedicated imaging examinations, yet it carries significant diagnostic and clinical implications, particularly in acute emergency settings. This review highlights the complementary roles of ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of IVC abnormalities. The US provides real-time, bedside evaluation of IVC patency, caliber, and hemodynamics, whereas CT offers detailed anatomic and structural characterization critical for diagnosis and management. The review aims to systematically discuss congenital variants, thrombotic, traumatic, systemic conditions, and neoplastic involvement of the IVC, emphasizing their imaging features and clinical relevance.

Imaging plays a crucial role in the immediate evaluation of the trauma patient, particularly using multi-detector computed tomography (CT), and especially in moderately to severely injured trauma patients. There are specific areas of relative consensus, while other aspects of whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT) use remain controversial and are subject to opinion/debate based on the current literature. Even a few hours of a delayed diagnosis may result in a detrimental outcome for the patient. One must utilize all the tools available to enhance the interpretation of images. It is also important to recognize imaging pitfalls and artifacts to avoid unnecessary intervention.

There are many misconceptions related to the usage of intravenous contrast agents for medical imaging. These misconceptions can affect patient care, as they can lead to nonoptimal examination usage. Knowledge of the current contrast-related misconceptions can help radiologists provide higher quality care to their patients.

BACKGROUND:The recent publication of practice guidelines for management of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) in the United States and Europe was a major step forward in improving the accuracy and consistency of terminology, diagnostic criteria, and prognostication in this population. There remains a pressing need for a more precise brain injury classification system that combines clinical semiology with neuroimaging, electrophysiologic, and other biomarker data. To address this need, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke launched the Common Data Elements (CDEs) initiative to facilitate systematic collection of high-quality research data in studies involving patients with neurological disease. The Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign expanded this effort in 2018 to develop CDEs for DoC. Herein, we present CDE recommendations for behavioral phenotyping of patients with DoC. METHODS:The Behavioral Phenotyping Workgroup used a preestablished, five-step process to identify and select candidate CDEs that included review of existing National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke CDEs, nomination and systematic vetting of new CDEs, CDE classification, iterative review, and approval of panel recommendations and development of corresponding case review forms. RESULTS:We identified a slate of existing and newly proposed basic, supplemental, and exploratory CDEs that can be used for behavioral phenotyping of adult and pediatric patients with DoC. CONCLUSIONS:The proposed behavioral phenotyping CDEs will assist with international harmonization of DoC studies and allow for more precise characterization of study cohorts, favorably impacting observational studies and clinical trials aimed at improving outcome in this population.

A radiologist's career can be divided into the early, middle, and late phases. The midcareer phase is a particularly difficult period and has the highest rate of burnout among radiologists. Often throughout the early phase of a radiologist's career, during residency, fellowship, and while a junior faculty member, there is an abundance of support to help in personal and professional growth, but this support often wanes as radiologists gain seniority. Unfortunately, this often leaves midcareer radiologists feeling forgotten, or "invisible." This lack of support can lead to burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and premature departure from the workforce. The purpose of this review is to bring to light the challenges, such as higher rates of burnout and career stagnation, in addition to the lack of emphasis placed on midcareer mentorship, sponsorship, and career development programs, facing radiologists while climbing the "second mountain" of their career, as well as to provide potential individual and institutional interventions to combat these challenges. In addition, emphasis will be placed on the difficulties experienced by midcareer female radiologists, whose challenges are particularly problematic and to our knowledge have received little attention in the imaging literature to date.