Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between feeding arteries and draining veins, associated with significant risks of haemorrhage, seizures and other neurological deficits. Preoperative embolization is commonly used as an adjunct to microsurgical resection, with the aim of reducing intraoperative complications and improving outcomes. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach remain controversial. METHODS:This study is a subanalysis of the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs consortium. We retrospectively analysed 486 patients with brain AVMs treated with microsurgical resection between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent microsurgery alone (n=245) and those who received preoperative embolization, followed by microsurgery (n=241). Propensity score matching was employed, resulting in 288 matched patients (144 in each group). The primary outcomes were rates of complete AVM obliteration and functional outcomes (measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)). Secondary outcomes included complication rates, mortality, hospital length of stay and postsurgical rupture. RESULTS:After matching, the complete obliteration rate was 97% with no significant difference between the microsurgery-only group and the preoperative embolization group (p=0.12). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0-2 at the last follow-up was similar in both groups (83% vs 84%; p=0.67). The median hospital stay was significantly longer for the embolisation group (9 days vs 7 days; p=0.017). Complication rates (24% vs 22%; p=0.57) and mortality rates (4.9% vs 2.1%; p=0.20) were comparable between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in postsurgical rupture, recurrence or retreatment rates. CONCLUSIONS:In this large multicentre study, preoperative embolization did not significantly improve AVM obliteration rates, functional outcomes or reduce complications compared with microsurgery alone.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Gynecological cancers represent 10% to 15% of cancers in women, but brain metastases (BM) are uncommon, with limited evidence regarding their management. This study investigates the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for BM from primary gynecological cancers. METHODS:Institutions of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation participated in this study. Inclusion criteria required histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, cervical, or endometrial cancer, SRS between 2000 and 2020, and at least 1 imaging or clinical follow-up. RESULTS:A total of 276 patients having SRS for 977 BM were included. Median age at SRS was 62 years (IQR, 55-70). Primary cancer origin was ovarian in 128 (46%), cervical in 43 (16%), and endometrial in 105 patients (38%). Median Karnofsky Performance Scale was 80%, and systemic disease was active in 124 (45%) of patients. A median of 1 metastasis was treated (IQR, 1-3) per patient. Median individual metastasis volume was 0.27 cc (IQR, 0.05-1.59 cc). The majority (91%) received single-fraction SRS, using a median margin dose of 18 Gy (IQR, 16-20 Gy). Actuarial overall survival was 77%, 65%, and 44% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Predictors of worsened survival included older age, cervical and endometrial primary, previous whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), active systemic disease, worsened Karnofsky Performance Scale, absence of subsequent surgery, and increasing number of BM. Actuarial local control was 94% at 6 months, 89% at 12 months, and 78% at 24 months. Previous SRS or WBRT, tumor bed treatment, and cervical histology increased the risk of local failure. New remote BM and leptomeningeal dissemination occurred in 44% and 11% of patients, respectively. Adverse radiation effects (ARE) occurred in 13% of cases but were symptomatic in only 3%. Previous WBRT or SRS and increased tumor diameter increased the risk of ARE. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SRS is an effective management for BM from gynecological cancers with low risks of symptomatic ARE.

BACKGROUND:There is a paucity of data on treatment outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases from sarcoma primaries. METHODS:The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation member-sites were queried for patients with brain metastases from sarcoma primaries treated with SRS. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were calculated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analyses examined prognostic factors associated with LC and OS via log-rank t-tests and multivariate analyses (MVA) via Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:A total of 146 patients with 309 brain metastases were identified. Two-hundred and thirty lesions were treated with single-fraction SRS with a median dose of 20 Gy (15-24 Gy). Ninety-five patients had extracranial metastases, including 75 oligometastatic patients. One- and 2-year OS and LC rates were 47.7% and 37.3%, and 78.3% and 62.2%, respectively. On univariate analyses, superior 1-year OS was noted among leiomyosarcomas (69.7% vs. 42.6%; p = .02) with poorer outcomes among pleomorphic histologies (10.5% vs. 50.7%; p = .002). Pleomorphic histologies were associated with poorer OS on MVA (hazard ratio [HR], 3.13; p = .006). On MVA, LC was inferior among patients of age ≥45 years (HR, 3.78; p < .001) and superior among leiomyosarcomas (HR, 0.31; p = .03). OS was prognosticated based on adverse factors (ie, nonleiomyosarcoma histology and progressive extracranial metastases). Two-year OS for patients with and without adverse features were 78.6% and 31.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:LC outcomes were driven by histology and age with superior LC among leiomyosarcomas and patients of age <45 years. OS was driven by nonleiomyosarcoma histology and the presence of progressive extracranial disease.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma care. Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with ICI has shown promise to improve clinical outcomes in prior studies in patients who have metastatic melanoma with brain metastases. However, others have suggested that concurrent ICI with stereotactic radiosurgery can increase the risk of complications. METHODS:We present a retrospective, single-institution analysis of 98 patients with a median follow up of 17.1 months managed with immune checkpoint inhibition and stereotactic radiosurgery concurrently and non-concurrently. A total of 55 patients were included in the concurrent group and 43 patients in the non-concurrent treatment group. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relation between concurrent or non-concurrent treatment and overall survival or local progression-free survival. The Wald test was used to assess significance. Significant differences between patients in both groups experiencing adverse events including adverse radiation effects, perilesional edema, and neurological deficits were tested for using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS:Patients receiving concurrent versus non-concurrent ICI showed a significant increase in overall survival (median 37.1 months, 95% CI: 18.9 months - NA versus median 11.4 months, 95% CI: 6.4-33.2 months, p = 0.0056) but not local progression-free survival. There were no significant differences between groups with regards to adverse radiation effects (2% versus 3%), perilesional edema (20% versus 9%), neurological deficits (3% versus 20%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that the timing of ICI does not increase risk of neurological complications when delivered within 4 weeks of SRS.

BACKGROUND:Given the low haemorrhagic risk of intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), the benefits of routine intervention remain controversial. This study compares patient outcomes treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus conservative management. METHOD/METHODS:Multicentre retrospective analysis of the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research and the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation data. Inclusion criteria were (1) intracranial low-grade dAVF diagnosed by catheter-based angiography, (2) no prior dAVF-related haemorrhage and (3) management with upfront SRS (intervention group) or conservative management (observation group). The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement. Secondary outcomes included dAVF obliteration, up-conversion, haemorrhage, improvement and favourable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at follow-up. RESULTS:304 patients with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13.5) and a follow-up of 46.7 months (SD 45.5) were included. 135 (44.4%) were managed conservatively and 169 (55.6%) had upfront SRS. Compared with the observation group, symptomatic and mRS Score improvement (≥1-point decrease in baseline score) was more likely in the intervention group (95.1% vs 58.5%; OR=13.75 (5.61-33.69) and 37.0% vs 24.0%; OR=1.85 (1.09-3.15), respectively). These findings remained significant after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Remaining outcomes were similar between groups. The all-cause mortality rate was 5.4% (n=16), unrelated to the dAVF or treatment. Five (3.0%) SRS-related complications were reported and resolved during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS:SRS was associated with increased symptomatic and mRS Score improvement for low-grade dAVFs compared with conservative management. SRS had a low complication risk and did not appear to alter dAVF obliteration or haemorrhage. Future prospective trials on SRS as a first-line intervention for symptomatic low-grade dAVFs should be considered.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Classical biomedical data science models are trained on a single modality and aimed at one specific task. However, the exponential increase in the size and capabilities of the foundation models inside and outside medicine shows a shift toward task-agnostic models using large-scale, often internet-based, data. Recent research into smaller foundation models trained on specific literature, such as programming textbooks, demonstrated that they can display capabilities similar to or superior to large generalist models, suggesting a potential middle ground between small task-specific and large foundation models. This study attempts to introduce a domain-specific multimodal model, Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS)-Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP), developed for neurosurgical applications, leveraging data exclusively from Neurosurgery Publications. METHODS:We constructed a multimodal data set of articles from Neurosurgery Publications through PDF data collection and figure-caption extraction using an artificial intelligence pipeline for quality control. Our final data set included 24 021 figure-caption pairs. We then developed a fine-tuning protocol for the OpenAI CLIP model. The model was evaluated on tasks including neurosurgical information retrieval, computed tomography imaging classification, and zero-shot ImageNet classification. RESULTS:CNS-CLIP demonstrated superior performance in neurosurgical information retrieval with a Top-1 accuracy of 24.56%, compared with 8.61% for the baseline. The average area under receiver operating characteristic across 6 neuroradiology tasks achieved by CNS-CLIP was 0.95, slightly superior to OpenAI's Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining at 0.94 and significantly outperforming a vanilla vision transformer at 0.62. In generalist classification, CNS-CLIP reached a Top-1 accuracy of 47.55%, a decrease from the baseline of 52.37%, demonstrating a catastrophic forgetting phenomenon. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study presents a pioneering effort in building a domain-specific multimodal model using data from a medical society publication. The results indicate that domain-specific models, while less globally versatile, can offer advantages in specialized contexts. This emphasizes the importance of using tailored data and domain-focused development in training foundation models in neurosurgery and general medicine.

BACKGROUND:Pituitary metastases (PM) account for 0.4% of all intracranial metastases and typically present with visual and endocrinological deficits. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown excellent tumor control and safety profile in the management of intracranial metastases. However, its role and safety in managing metastases to the pituitary gland are not well-characterized. This study aims to evaluate SRS outcomes and safety profile in the management of PM in a multicenter international cohort. METHODS:The authors retrospectively analyzed data from 63 patients with PM treated with SRS across 12 institutions, assessing clinical and radiological outcomes, including survival rates, tumor control, visual and endocrinological outcomes, and post-treatment complications. RESULTS:Among 63 patients included in the study (median tumor volume: 1.5 cc), SRS demonstrated a local tumor control rate of 93.1% at 12 months. The median survival was 25.4 months and overall survival rates of 77.6%, 65.9%, and 55.1% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a margin dose for PM > 10 Gy emerged as an independent predictor across progression-free survival (HR: 0.20, p < 0.01), distant metastasis-free survival (HR: 0.30, p = 0.01), and overall survival. (HR: 0.15, p < 0.01). Following SRS, most patients showed stable or improved visual function (n = 17/18). A small percentage of patients experienced complications: developed new visual deficits (n = 1/63), experienced new anterior pituitary hormone deficiency (n = 5/63), and developed arginine vasopressin (AVP)-deficiency post-treatment (n = 2/63). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SRS is an important modality in the management of PM, offering excellent local tumor control and survival outcomes with minimal morbidity. These findings support the incorporation of SRS into the multidisciplinary management for treating patients with PM.

The management of brain metastases is challenging and should ideally be coordinated through a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been the cornerstone of management for most patients with oligometastatic central nervous system involvement (one to four brain metastases), and several technological and therapeutic advances over the past decade have broadened the indications for SRS to include polymetastatic central nervous system involvement (>4 brain metastases), preoperative application and fractionated SRS, as well as combinatorial approaches with targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. For example, improved imaging and frameless head-immobilization technologies have facilitated fractionated SRS for large brain metastases or postsurgical cavities, or lesions in proximity to organs at risk. However, these opportunities come with new challenges and questions, including the implications of tumour histology as well as the role and sequencing of concurrent systemic treatments. In this Review, we discuss these advances and associated challenges in the context of ongoing clinical trials, with insights from a global group of experts, including recommendations for current clinical practice and future investigations. The updates provided herein are meaningful for all practitioners in clinical oncology.

BACKGROUND:Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular lesions that pose a risk for hemorrhagic stroke. The number of draining veins has recently emerged as a significant predictor of rupture risk. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in adult AVM patients with single versus multiple draining veins. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective analysis of 735 AVM patients from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) database. Patients were categorized into single draining vein (n = 430) and multiple draining veins (n = 305) groups. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics, including age, rupture status, Spetzler-Martin grade, and other relevant factors. RESULTS:After adjustment, no significant differences were observed in complete AVM obliteration at last follow-up between the multiple and single draining veins groups (OR: 1.1; 95 % CI: 0.72-1.93, p = 0.49) after any treatment type. Good functional outcomes at last follow-up (mRS 0-2) were similar between the two groups (OR: 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.48-2.09, p = 0.98), as were retreatment rates (OR: 1.68; 95 % CI: 0.74-3.83, p = 0.21). Ruptured AVMs were more common in the single draining vein group (52.0 % vs. 35.4 %, p < 0.001). Patients in the multiple draining vein group had lower odds of hemorrhagic complications compared to the single vein group (OR: 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.14-1.02, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Single draining vein AVMs were more likely to present with rupture, but no significant differences in obliteration rates, functional outcomes, or retreatment rates were found between the groups after adjustment. These findings suggest that while venous drainage patterns may influence initial presentation, they do not appear to affect overall treatment success or patient prognosis after any treatment type. Further studies are needed to confirm.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with neoadjuvant embolization is a treatment strategy for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), especially for those with large nidal volume or concomitant aneurysms. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of pre-SRS embolization in AVMs with an associated intracranial aneurysm (IA). METHODS:The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM database from 1987 to 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. SRS-treated AVMs with IAs were included. Patients were categorized into those treated with upfront embolization (E + SRS) vs stand-alone SRS (SRS). Primary end point was a favorable outcome (AVM obliteration + no permanent radiation-induced changes or post-SRS hemorrhage). Secondary outcomes included AVM obliteration, mortality, follow-up modified Rankin Scale, post-SRS hemorrhage, and radiation-induced changes. RESULTS:Forty four AVM patients with associated IAs were included, of which 23 (52.3%) underwent pre-SRS embolization and 21 (47.7%) SRS only. Significant differences between the E + SRS vs SRS groups were found for AVM maximum diameter (1.5 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 cm3, P = .019) and SRS treatment volume (9.3 ± 8.3 vs 4.3 ± 3.3 cm3, P = .025). A favorable outcome was achieved in 45.4% of patients in the E + SRS group and 38.1% in the SRS group (P = .625). Obliteration rates were comparable (56.5% for E + SRS vs 47.6% for SRS, P = .555), whereas a higher mortality rate was found in the SRS group (19.1% vs 0%, P = .048). After adjusting for AVM maximum diameter, SRS treatment volume, and maximum radiation dose, the likelihood of achieving favorable outcome and AVM obliteration did not differ between groups (P = .475 and P = .820, respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The likelihood of a favorable outcome and AVM obliteration after SRS with neoadjuvant embolization in AVMs with concomitant IA seems to be comparable with stand-alone SRS, even after adjusting for AVM volume and SRS maximum dose. However, the increased mortality among the stand-alone SRS group and relatively low risk of embolization-related complications suggest that these patients may benefit from a combined treatment approach.