Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has limited role for large arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) is used to optimize outcomes, but studies reporting results are limited. METHODS:This multicenter retrospective cohort of 378 patients from 21 centers reports results of VS-SRS for the entire AVM nidus. We report favorable outcome, obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic adverse radiation effect rates. RESULTS:The median age was 31 years (IQR: 19-44) at the first volume stage, with patients treated in 2-4 stages. The median total nidus volume was 21 cm3 (IQR: 13.9-30.1 cm3), and a median prescription dose of 17 Gy (IQR: 16-18 Gy) was used. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up were 48 and 55 months, respectively. Seventy-seven patients (20.4%) had a favorable outcome, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 3.9% and 18%, respectively. 127 patients (33.6%) achieved obliteration, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 6.8% and 26%, respectively. Obliteration rates of AVMs <15 cm3 were 81% and 31%, respectively. The latency period hemorrhage incidence rate was 3.02 cases per 100 patient-years; 52 patients (13.8%) had a bleed. Seventy-two patients (19%) had symptomatic adverse radiation effect; in 38 patients (10.1%), these were permanent. Total nidus volume, prescription dose at first stage, diffuse nidus, and prior hemorrhage were all independent affecting outcome rates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:VS-SRS can be used to treat large AVMs as a standalone treatment. Obliteration rates and favorable outcomes are lower than that with smaller AVMs, and repeat treatment is often required. Optimizing treatment plans, by increasing prescription doses, reducing treatment volume at each stage, and increasing the number of stages, may lead to better outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Bladder cancer rarely metastasizes to the brain. This study was performed to evaluate stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the management of bladder cancer brain metastases. METHODS:Cases of bladder cancer brain metastases treated with SRS were collected by members of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) and outcome data was analyzed for patients with at least one clinical or imaging follow-up. RESULTS:103 patients received SRS for 301 brain metastases. Median age at SRS was 68 and 73.8% of patients were male. Median KPS was 80%. Median time from primary to brain metastases diagnosis was 18 months. At the time of SRS, 50% of patients had other systemic metastases. The median number of metastases treated was 1, and median cumulative SRS volume was 1.16 cc. Most patients had single fraction SRS using a median margin dose of 18 Gy. At the time of analysis, 9.7% of patients were alive. Median survival after SRS was 7 months. Local control was achieved for 89.3% of metastases, 42% of patients developed new remote brain metastases, and 4.9% had leptomeningeal dissemination. Subsequent management included repeat SRS in 21.7%, surgical resection in 8.8% and WBRT in 7.6% of patients. At last follow-up, 32.1% of patients had improvement of their symptoms, whereas 38.5% remained stable. Adverse radiation effects occurred in 4.3% of treated metastases. On multivariate analyses, KPS ≥ 80% and non-urothelial histology predicted improved survival, while absence of corticosteroid intake predicted longer tumor control. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Bladder cancer brain metastases can be safely managed with SRS.

BACKGROUND:Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between feeding arteries and draining veins, associated with significant risks of haemorrhage, seizures and other neurological deficits. Preoperative embolization is commonly used as an adjunct to microsurgical resection, with the aim of reducing intraoperative complications and improving outcomes. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach remain controversial. METHODS:This study is a subanalysis of the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs consortium. We retrospectively analysed 486 patients with brain AVMs treated with microsurgical resection between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent microsurgery alone (n=245) and those who received preoperative embolization, followed by microsurgery (n=241). Propensity score matching was employed, resulting in 288 matched patients (144 in each group). The primary outcomes were rates of complete AVM obliteration and functional outcomes (measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)). Secondary outcomes included complication rates, mortality, hospital length of stay and postsurgical rupture. RESULTS:After matching, the complete obliteration rate was 97% with no significant difference between the microsurgery-only group and the preoperative embolization group (p=0.12). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0-2 at the last follow-up was similar in both groups (83% vs 84%; p=0.67). The median hospital stay was significantly longer for the embolisation group (9 days vs 7 days; p=0.017). Complication rates (24% vs 22%; p=0.57) and mortality rates (4.9% vs 2.1%; p=0.20) were comparable between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in postsurgical rupture, recurrence or retreatment rates. CONCLUSIONS:In this large multicentre study, preoperative embolization did not significantly improve AVM obliteration rates, functional outcomes or reduce complications compared with microsurgery alone.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Gynecological cancers represent 10% to 15% of cancers in women, but brain metastases (BM) are uncommon, with limited evidence regarding their management. This study investigates the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for BM from primary gynecological cancers. METHODS:Institutions of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation participated in this study. Inclusion criteria required histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, cervical, or endometrial cancer, SRS between 2000 and 2020, and at least 1 imaging or clinical follow-up. RESULTS:A total of 276 patients having SRS for 977 BM were included. Median age at SRS was 62 years (IQR, 55-70). Primary cancer origin was ovarian in 128 (46%), cervical in 43 (16%), and endometrial in 105 patients (38%). Median Karnofsky Performance Scale was 80%, and systemic disease was active in 124 (45%) of patients. A median of 1 metastasis was treated (IQR, 1-3) per patient. Median individual metastasis volume was 0.27 cc (IQR, 0.05-1.59 cc). The majority (91%) received single-fraction SRS, using a median margin dose of 18 Gy (IQR, 16-20 Gy). Actuarial overall survival was 77%, 65%, and 44% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Predictors of worsened survival included older age, cervical and endometrial primary, previous whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), active systemic disease, worsened Karnofsky Performance Scale, absence of subsequent surgery, and increasing number of BM. Actuarial local control was 94% at 6 months, 89% at 12 months, and 78% at 24 months. Previous SRS or WBRT, tumor bed treatment, and cervical histology increased the risk of local failure. New remote BM and leptomeningeal dissemination occurred in 44% and 11% of patients, respectively. Adverse radiation effects (ARE) occurred in 13% of cases but were symptomatic in only 3%. Previous WBRT or SRS and increased tumor diameter increased the risk of ARE. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SRS is an effective management for BM from gynecological cancers with low risks of symptomatic ARE.

BACKGROUND:There is a paucity of data on treatment outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases from sarcoma primaries. METHODS:The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation member-sites were queried for patients with brain metastases from sarcoma primaries treated with SRS. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were calculated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analyses examined prognostic factors associated with LC and OS via log-rank t-tests and multivariate analyses (MVA) via Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:A total of 146 patients with 309 brain metastases were identified. Two-hundred and thirty lesions were treated with single-fraction SRS with a median dose of 20 Gy (15-24 Gy). Ninety-five patients had extracranial metastases, including 75 oligometastatic patients. One- and 2-year OS and LC rates were 47.7% and 37.3%, and 78.3% and 62.2%, respectively. On univariate analyses, superior 1-year OS was noted among leiomyosarcomas (69.7% vs. 42.6%; p = .02) with poorer outcomes among pleomorphic histologies (10.5% vs. 50.7%; p = .002). Pleomorphic histologies were associated with poorer OS on MVA (hazard ratio [HR], 3.13; p = .006). On MVA, LC was inferior among patients of age ≥45 years (HR, 3.78; p < .001) and superior among leiomyosarcomas (HR, 0.31; p = .03). OS was prognosticated based on adverse factors (ie, nonleiomyosarcoma histology and progressive extracranial metastases). Two-year OS for patients with and without adverse features were 78.6% and 31.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:LC outcomes were driven by histology and age with superior LC among leiomyosarcomas and patients of age <45 years. OS was driven by nonleiomyosarcoma histology and the presence of progressive extracranial disease.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma care. Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with ICI has shown promise to improve clinical outcomes in prior studies in patients who have metastatic melanoma with brain metastases. However, others have suggested that concurrent ICI with stereotactic radiosurgery can increase the risk of complications. METHODS:We present a retrospective, single-institution analysis of 98 patients with a median follow up of 17.1 months managed with immune checkpoint inhibition and stereotactic radiosurgery concurrently and non-concurrently. A total of 55 patients were included in the concurrent group and 43 patients in the non-concurrent treatment group. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relation between concurrent or non-concurrent treatment and overall survival or local progression-free survival. The Wald test was used to assess significance. Significant differences between patients in both groups experiencing adverse events including adverse radiation effects, perilesional edema, and neurological deficits were tested for using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS:Patients receiving concurrent versus non-concurrent ICI showed a significant increase in overall survival (median 37.1 months, 95% CI: 18.9 months - NA versus median 11.4 months, 95% CI: 6.4-33.2 months, p = 0.0056) but not local progression-free survival. There were no significant differences between groups with regards to adverse radiation effects (2% versus 3%), perilesional edema (20% versus 9%), neurological deficits (3% versus 20%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that the timing of ICI does not increase risk of neurological complications when delivered within 4 weeks of SRS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Classical biomedical data science models are trained on a single modality and aimed at one specific task. However, the exponential increase in the size and capabilities of the foundation models inside and outside medicine shows a shift toward task-agnostic models using large-scale, often internet-based, data. Recent research into smaller foundation models trained on specific literature, such as programming textbooks, demonstrated that they can display capabilities similar to or superior to large generalist models, suggesting a potential middle ground between small task-specific and large foundation models. This study attempts to introduce a domain-specific multimodal model, Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS)-Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP), developed for neurosurgical applications, leveraging data exclusively from Neurosurgery Publications. METHODS:We constructed a multimodal data set of articles from Neurosurgery Publications through PDF data collection and figure-caption extraction using an artificial intelligence pipeline for quality control. Our final data set included 24 021 figure-caption pairs. We then developed a fine-tuning protocol for the OpenAI CLIP model. The model was evaluated on tasks including neurosurgical information retrieval, computed tomography imaging classification, and zero-shot ImageNet classification. RESULTS:CNS-CLIP demonstrated superior performance in neurosurgical information retrieval with a Top-1 accuracy of 24.56%, compared with 8.61% for the baseline. The average area under receiver operating characteristic across 6 neuroradiology tasks achieved by CNS-CLIP was 0.95, slightly superior to OpenAI's Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining at 0.94 and significantly outperforming a vanilla vision transformer at 0.62. In generalist classification, CNS-CLIP reached a Top-1 accuracy of 47.55%, a decrease from the baseline of 52.37%, demonstrating a catastrophic forgetting phenomenon. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study presents a pioneering effort in building a domain-specific multimodal model using data from a medical society publication. The results indicate that domain-specific models, while less globally versatile, can offer advantages in specialized contexts. This emphasizes the importance of using tailored data and domain-focused development in training foundation models in neurosurgery and general medicine.

BACKGROUND:Pituitary metastases (PM) account for 0.4% of all intracranial metastases and typically present with visual and endocrinological deficits. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown excellent tumor control and safety profile in the management of intracranial metastases. However, its role and safety in managing metastases to the pituitary gland are not well-characterized. This study aims to evaluate SRS outcomes and safety profile in the management of PM in a multicenter international cohort. METHODS:The authors retrospectively analyzed data from 63 patients with PM treated with SRS across 12 institutions, assessing clinical and radiological outcomes, including survival rates, tumor control, visual and endocrinological outcomes, and post-treatment complications. RESULTS:Among 63 patients included in the study (median tumor volume: 1.5 cc), SRS demonstrated a local tumor control rate of 93.1% at 12 months. The median survival was 25.4 months and overall survival rates of 77.6%, 65.9%, and 55.1% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a margin dose for PM > 10 Gy emerged as an independent predictor across progression-free survival (HR: 0.20, p < 0.01), distant metastasis-free survival (HR: 0.30, p = 0.01), and overall survival. (HR: 0.15, p < 0.01). Following SRS, most patients showed stable or improved visual function (n = 17/18). A small percentage of patients experienced complications: developed new visual deficits (n = 1/63), experienced new anterior pituitary hormone deficiency (n = 5/63), and developed arginine vasopressin (AVP)-deficiency post-treatment (n = 2/63). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SRS is an important modality in the management of PM, offering excellent local tumor control and survival outcomes with minimal morbidity. These findings support the incorporation of SRS into the multidisciplinary management for treating patients with PM.