Faculty Bibliography

The transsphenoidal corridor for pituitary adenoma surgery was established as early as 1906 by Schloffer and was subsequently refined by Cushing throughout the early 20thcentury [1]. The use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resections, however, is a relatively contemporary addition to the surgical treatment of pituitary tumors. The morbidity of these cases has decreased over the years in light of advances in intraoperative navigation as well as improvements in endoscope dynamics and surgical instruments. Despite such improvements, a substantial number of patients require repeat surgeries or subsequent radiotherapy for residual and/or recurrent disease. This can be largely attributed to cavernous sinus invasion or suprasellar extension, which pose technical challenges to achieving gross total resections (GTRs). The rate of GTR for pituitary tumors cited in the literature varies from 59-88%.[2-3] The advantage of iMRI is that it provides the surgeon with immediate feedback regarding their progress and ability to safely achieve GTR which, in pituitary surgery, is critical for long term cure. Additionally, although there is concern for increased risk of postoperative endocrine dysfunction, Zhibin et al prove that this is not necessarily the case. In their series, 133 patients who underwent iMRI had higher rates of GTR and did not have a significant difference in postoperative hypopituitarism. [4] This study includes a combined retrospective and prospective comparative analysis of 238 patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary tumor from January 2013 until May 2019. All patients were operated on by one of four experienced neurosurgeons and one of three experienced otolaryngologists. There were 203 patients who did not undergo iMRI and 25 patients who did. A 3 tesla MRI magnet was used in all cases. All intraoperative images were read and interpreted by a senior neuroradiologist at our institution. Amongst the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference in patient age (p = 0.488), tumor size (microadenoma versus macroadenoma, p = 0.878), and primary versus recurrent tumor (p = 0.837). The use of iMRI did not yield a decrease in the length of stay (4.84 days in the no iMRI group and 5 in the iMRI group, p = 0.777). There were zero cases of a return to the OR for residual tumor in the intraoperative MRI group versus the non-MRI group. However, this did not reach statistical significance. This study did not yield a statistically significant difference in GTR (p = 0.75), near total resection (NTR, p = 0.167), or subtotal resection (p = 0.083). This is likely secondary to a low sample size and therefore power in the iMRI group. Finally, there was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring postoperative DDAVP (p = 0.099) or hydrocortisone (p = 0.873) after discharge. Preliminary results reveal a potential benefit of iMRI use to assess for residual disease which can be addressed immediately during the initial operation, thus decreasing the need for re-operations. Furthermore, the ability to correlate intraoperative findings with an intraoperative structure may lead to more precise identification and preservation of normal gland, which can possibly decrease the incidence of postoperative endocrine dysfunction

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To examine the frequency in which angled endoscopes are necessary to visualize the true maxillary ostium (TMO) following uncinectomy and prior to maxillary antrostomy. Additionally, to identify preoperative computed tomography (CT) measures that predict need for an angled endoscope to visualize the TMO. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective study. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary academic hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between December of 2017 and August of 2018 were retrospectively identified. Cases were reviewed if they were primary ESS cases for chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis and if they were at least 18 years of age. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Sixty-three maxillary antrostomies were reviewed (82.5% were from bilateral cases). Thirty-five cases (55.6%) required an angled endoscope in order to visualize the TMO. Of the preoperative CT measures examined, a smaller sphenoid keel-caudal septum-nasolacrimal duct (SK-CS-NL) angle was significantly associated with need for an angled endoscope intraoperatively to visualize the TMO (17.1° SD ± 3.2 vs 15.0° SD ± 2.9; P = .010). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Angled endoscopes are likely required in the majority of maxillary antrostomies to visualize the TMO. This is important to recognize in order to prevent iatrogenic recirculation. The SK-CS-NL angle may help to identify cases preoperatively which require an angled endoscope to identify the TMO during surgery.

OBJECTIVES:/UNASSIGNED:Data on health care disparities by socioeconomic status for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are lacking, and the available literature shows mixed results. The aim of this study was to evaluate several indicators of disease complexity in patients with CRS undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery between a private and a public hospital to determine if there are any disparities in the severity of disease presentation or in access to care. METHODS:/UNASSIGNED:Two hundred patients with CRS who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, disease-specific data, and pre- and postoperative management were collected. RESULTS:/UNASSIGNED:Public hospital patients (n = 100) were significantly more likely to be non-Caucasian (73.0% vs 25.0%, P < .0001) and to have Medicaid or no insurance (86.0% vs 4.0%, P < .0001). Patients from the public hospital were more likely to have CRS with nasal polyposis (85.0% vs 60.0%, P < .0001) and to have longer wait times for surgery (68 vs 45 days, P < .0001) and were more likely to be lost to follow-up (26.0% vs 16.0%, P = .031). Patients at the public hospital had CRS symptoms 21% longer ( P = .0206), and if a patient carried a diagnosis of asthma, he or she had on average more severe asthma ( P = .0021). CONCLUSIONS:/UNASSIGNED:This study suggests that patients of lower socioeconomic status had a longer duration of disease prior to surgery, more often had nasal polyposis, and had decreased access to care, as indicated by increased surgical wait times and being lost to follow-up. Acting as a foundation for further investigation, the ultimate intent of this study is to improve care for all patients.

Background: Surgical resection of pituitary adenomas is associated with a 10 to 30% rate of temporary diabetes insipidus with ~50% resolving within 1 week and 80% resolving at 3 months.[1] Adrenal insufficiency occurs in ~ 5 % of patients and can result in an Addisonian crisis if left undiagnosed postoperatively.[1] [2] Many studies have been performed looking at readmission rates after pituitary surgery. A review of over 1,200 cases demonstrated a readmission rate of 8.5% with the most common cause being hyponatremia (29.5%).[3] To reduce the rate of readmission for hyponatremia, some groups have demonstrated the effective use of outpatient fluid restriction criteria during the first week post-op.[4] These guidelines are intended for the management of standard postoperative hormonal fluctuations which do not necessitate endocrine consultation during hospitalization.
Objective(s): Retrospectively evaluate patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection of pituitary adenomas to identify areas for quality improvement through the development of more standardized postoperative guidelines.
Method(s): A retrospective review of 75 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of pituitary adenomas at a single academic center from 2013 to 2018. We evaluated the average length of stay, number of laboratory studies performed, need for hormone supplementation long term and short term, rate of gross-total resection, rate of cerebrospinal fluid leak, rate of infection, and 30-day readmission rate ([Table 1]). From this, we have developed a change in guidelines aimed at reducing length of stay, redundant laboratory studies, and reduced rate of readmission.
Conclusion(s): Although our current outcomes for resection of pituitary adenoma are on par with published data, we have identified areas of possible quality improvement which have since been implemented

Objectives  AlloDerm is an acellular dermal matrix often used for reconstruction throughout the body. AlloDerm has been shown to undergo revascularization when used to reconstruct soft tissue such as in abdominal wall reconstruction. In this study, the authors review the literature on revascularization of AlloDerm and demonstrate the histologic findings of AlloDerm after implantation during skull base reconstruction. Study Design  Literature review and case reports. Setting  Tertiary Care Institution Participants  Patients from a tertiary care institution Main Outcome Measures  Histologic slides are evaluated and compared with nonimplanted AlloDerm. Methods  The authors review a case of explanted AlloDerm that had been used for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic skull base surgery. Results  Upon reviewing the histologic slides of explanted AlloDerm to nonimplanted AlloDerm, we demonstrate revascularization of AlloDerm when used in skull base reconstruction. Representative slides will be included. Conclusions  AlloDerm undergoes revascularization when used for skull base reconstruction.

Background/UNASSIGNED:While effective for the repair of large skull base defects, the Hadad-Bassagasteguy nasoseptal flap increases operative time and can result in a several-week period of postoperative crusting during re-mucosalization of the denuded nasal septum. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma resection is generally not associated with large dural defects and high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks requiring extensive reconstruction. Here, we present the posterior nasoseptal flap as a novel technique for closure of skull defects following endoscopic resection of pituitary adenomas. This flap is raised in all surgeries during the transnasal exposure using septal mucoperiosteum that would otherwise be discarded during the posterior septectomy performed in binostril approaches. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We present a retrospective, consecutive case series of 43 patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary adenoma followed by posterior nasoseptal flap placement and closure. Main outcome measures were extent of resection and postoperative CSF leak. Results/UNASSIGNED:The mean extent of resection was 97.16 ± 1.03%. Radiographic measurement showed flap length to be adequate. While a defect in the diaphragma sellae and CSF leak were identified in 21 patients during surgery, postoperative CSF leak occurred in only one patient. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:The posterior nasoseptal flap provides adequate coverage of the surgical defect and is nearly always successful in preventing postoperative CSF leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas. The flap is raised from mucoperiosteum lining the posterior nasal septum, which is otherwise resected during posterior septectomy. Because the anterior septal cartilage is not denuded, raising such flaps avoids the postoperative morbidity associated with the larger Hadad-Bassagasteguy nasoseptal flap.

Objective Perioperative lumbar drain (LD) use in the setting of endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair is a well-established practice. However, recent data suggest that LDs may not provide significant benefit and may thus confer unnecessary risk. To examine this, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of LDs on postoperative CSF leak recurrence following endoscopic repair of CSF rhinorrhea. Data Sources A comprehensive search was performed with the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE (1947 to November 2015), EMBASE (1974 to November 2015), Cochrane Review, and PubMed (1990 to November 2015). Review Method A meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Results A total of 1314 nonduplicate studies were identified in our search. Twelve articles comprising 508 cases met inclusion criteria. Overall, use of LDs was not associated with significantly lower postoperative CSF leak recurrence rates following endoscopic repair of CSF rhinorrhea (odds ratio: 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-1.95) as compared with cases performed without LDs. Subgroup analysis of only CSF leaks associated with anterior skull base resections (6 studies, 153 cases) also demonstrated that lumbar drainage did not significantly affect rates of successful repair (odds ratio: 2.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-11.10). Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to support that adjunctive lumbar drainage significantly reduces postoperative CSF leak recurrence in patients undergoing endoscopic CSF leak repair. Subgroup analysis examining only those patients whose CSF leaks were associated with anterior skull base resections demonstrated similar results. More level 1 and 2 studies are needed to further investigate the efficacy of LDs, particularly in the setting of patients at high risk for CSF leak recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis(RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS). METHODS: Evidence-based reviews with recommendations(EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR)was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS)with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AECRS), and pediatric RS. CONCLUSION: As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too often the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lower level evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery has been established as the safest approach to pituitary tumors, yet its role in other common skull base lesions has not been established. To answer this question, we carried out a systematic review of reported series of open and endoscopic endonasal approaches to four major skull base tumors: olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM), tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSM), craniopharyngiomas (CRA), and clival chordomas (CHO). Data from 162 studies containing 5,701 patients were combined and compared for differences in perioperative mortality, gross total resection (GTR), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, neurological morbidity, post-operative visual function, post-operative anosmia, post-operative diabetes insipidus (DI), and post-operative obesity/hyperphagia. Weighted average rates for each outcome were calculated using relative study size. Our findings indicate similar rates of GTR and perioperative mortality between open and endoscopic approaches for all tumor types. CSF leak was increased after endoscopic surgery. Visual function symptoms were more likely to improve after endoscopic surgery for TSM, CRA, and CHO. Post-operative DI and obesity/hyperphagia were significantly increased after open resection in CRA. Recurrence rates per 1,000 patient-years of follow-up were higher in endoscopy for OGM, TSM, and CHO. Trends for open and endoscopic surgery suggested modest improvement in all outcomes over time. Our observations suggest that endonasal endoscopy is a safe alternative to craniotomy and may be preferred for certain tumor types. However, endoscopic surgery is associated with higher rates of CSF leak, and possibly increased recurrence rates. Prospective study with long-term follow-up is required to verify these preliminary observations.