Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients ages > 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories. RESULTS:In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from < 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (P < .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases that develop in individuals of all ages and have variable prognoses. Improved survival resulting from therapy advances has led to the emergence of diverse late effects. Although several (US)-based organizations have developed survivorship guidelines, the distinct features of lymphoma subtypes and diverse therapies used raise concerns regarding their applicability to lymphoma survivors. We compared survivorship recommendations (outside primary disease monitoring) between US clinical guidelines. METHODS:. Comparisons were focused on second primary malignancy, cardiovascular complications, and vaccination. RESULTS:mainly differ in the timing and approaches for screening. Vaccination recommendations were primarily derived from other cancer populations. Identified research gaps were a lack of understanding of the risk of late effects across lymphoma subtypes, the role of social determinants of health in survivorship, and the lack of a survivorship care model that integrates lymphoma subtypes and treatment exposures. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study raises awareness about the complexity and challenges of managing survivors under the umbrella diagnosis of lymphoma. The inconsistency and incompleteness of existing guidelines may lead to suboptimal survivorship care. We propose expert-based research priorities to address gaps and unmet needs to help develop risk-based follow-up recommendations to optimize survivorship care for lymphoma survivors.

Progression of disease within 24 months of initial immunochemotherapy (POD24) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). There is no standard treatment after POD24. Assembling an academic-based cohort from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes Consortium for Real World Evidence, we evaluated patterns of care and outcomes for 220 patients with FL with POD24 and retained FL histology. Therapy after POD24 was heterogeneous, with no treatment category accounting for >25% of the total. Among patients initially treated with bendamustine-rituximab, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) was the predominant second-line choice (48%). Among patients initially treated with R-CHOP, aggressive salvage therapy was the predominant second-line choice (38%). Overall response rate to therapy after POD24 was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56-70); complete response rate was 39% (95% CI, 32-46). The median event-free survival for therapy after POD24 was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.3-12.1); 5-year overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% CI, 65-78). OS was inferior for patients aged >70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.27-4.20) and those with high-risk FL International Prognostic Index scores at diagnosis (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.60). No treatment category stood out with more favorable results. Cause of death was predominantly lymphoma related. Patients with follicular histology at their POD24 event had a low cumulative incidence of transformation (1.1% at 5 years). Our study is among the largest cohorts describing contemporary patterns of care for patients with POD24, providing a focused data set useful for interpreting and designing prospective clinical trials in this population.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, detailed delineation of toxicity data is limited and has not been examined by age. We sought to examine adverse event data in patients receiving R-CHOP from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 50303 trial to determine if there were differences in grade 3+ toxicities by age cohort or ECOG performance status (PS), and if outcome was impacted by age cohort or toxicity occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:CALGB 50303 was an intergroup phase III study for previously untreated patients with DLBCL that included R-CHOP as one of the trial arms. In the subset of 235 evaluable, seemingly fit patients receiving R-CHOP on this trial, data regarding the occurrence of grade 3+ hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities by treatment arm, as well as completion of protocol therapy, overall response rate (ORR), and survival outcome parameters were collected and analyzed for Alliance A151930. RESULTS:Data were available for further analysis from 235 of 243 patients evaluable for safety, i.e., those who received R-CHOP therapy on this trial, with 165 being <65 years of age, and 70 ≥ 65 years of age. There was an increased rate of grade 3+ non-hematologic (but not hematologic) toxicities in the older age cohorts, after controlling for disease stage and performance status (p < 0.001). One-year and three-year overall survival (OS) were inferior in patients ≥65 years of age, compared to those <65 years of age; there was no difference in one-year or in three-year progression-free survival (PFS) between the age cohorts. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Standard frontline therapy with R-CHOP can be effectively administered to an older age cohort. We found more grade 3+ non-hematologic, but not hematologic, toxicities in older patients. These data can be used in clinical trial and real-world settings to identify at-risk DLBCL subgroups for which pro-active measures can be utilized to ensure completion of therapy and optimization of clinical outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS/RESULTS:gov Identifier: NCT00118209 (CALGB 50303).

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:We report a case of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with an apparent lineage switch to an EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma. Although lineage switch is a well-documented phenomenon in some hematolymphoid diseases, such as acute leukemias or histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms, lineage switch from mature B-cell to T-cell lymphoma is exceedingly rare. CASE PRESENTATION/METHODS:A 55-year-old man with an established history of MCL presented to our institution. Peripheral blood flow cytometry was consistent with MCL. Biopsy of a lumbar vertebral fracture site demonstrated MCL, EBV-associated, with large cells reminiscent of high-grade transformation (BCL1-positive). Two months later, a lymph node biopsy demonstrated an EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma without phenotypic evidence of B-cell lymphoma (BCL1-negative). Cytogenetic testing revealed CCND1::IGH fusion in all three specimens. IGH/IGK clonality testing revealed conserved monoclonal peaks in all three samples; TCR clonality testing revealed monoclonal peaks in the T-cell lymphoma, only. NGS-based molecular genetic studies revealed shared mutations between the three samples, consistent with a clonal relationship suggesting evolution from MCL to T-cell lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS:This case demonstrates that lineage switch from mature B-cell to mature T-cell phenotype is possible in certain settings. Whether lineage switch in this case was potentiated by EBV infection is unclear. The loss of BCL1 expression in the T-cell lymphoma, despite conservation of the CCND1::IGH fusion, may be attributable to the downregulation of the IGH promoter as part of the shift from B-cell to T-cell phenotype. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:We report a case of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with an apparent lineage switch to an EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma. Although lineage switch is a well-documented phenomenon in some hematolymphoid diseases, such as acute leukemias or histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms, lineage switch from mature B-cell to T-cell lymphoma is exceedingly rare. CASE PRESENTATION/METHODS:A 55-year-old man with an established history of MCL presented to our institution. Peripheral blood flow cytometry was consistent with MCL. Biopsy of a lumbar vertebral fracture site demonstrated MCL, EBV-associated, with large cells reminiscent of high-grade transformation (BCL1-positive). Two months later, a lymph node biopsy demonstrated an EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma without phenotypic evidence of B-cell lymphoma (BCL1-negative). Cytogenetic testing revealed CCND1::IGH fusion in all three specimens. IGH/IGK clonality testing revealed conserved monoclonal peaks in all three samples; TCR clonality testing revealed monoclonal peaks in the T-cell lymphoma, only. NGS-based molecular genetic studies revealed shared mutations between the three samples, consistent with a clonal relationship suggesting evolution from MCL to T-cell lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS:This case demonstrates that lineage switch from mature B-cell to mature T-cell phenotype is possible in certain settings. Whether lineage switch in this case was potentiated by EBV infection is unclear. The loss of BCL1 expression in the T-cell lymphoma, despite conservation of the CCND1::IGH fusion, may be attributable to the downregulation of the IGH promoter as part of the shift from B-cell to T-cell phenotype.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:vs. placebo. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:administered weekly times four. 257 patients were assessed for participation: 24 were not eligible and 22 refused. Patients with stable disease or disease progression at week 13 counted as events; responding patients continued treatment with vitamin D or placebo until progression for up to three years. The primary endpoint was EFS, defined as the time from randomization to lack of response at week 13, initiation of a new treatment, disease progression or death. Secondary endpoints included week 13 response and OS. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03078855. FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:206 evaluable patients (135 on vitamin D and 71 on placebo) were enrolled between September 2017 and March 2022 with a median EFS follow-up of 19.6 months (IQR, 9.3-33.5). The median age was 62 years (IQR, 54-70); 118 (57%) female; 182 (89%) white. At week 13 the mean vitamin D level increased to 41.6 ng/mL (SD 10.1) in the vitamin D arm vs. remaining stable (31.3 ng/mL, SD 11.2) in the placebo arm. There was insufficient evidence of a difference in EFS between the two arms (P = 0.26): three-year EFS in the vitamin D arm was 47.7% (95% CI, 39.0-58.4) compared to 49.5% (95% CI, 37.6-65.0) in the placebo arm. There was no difference in week 13 response between the arms (both 84%). Adverse events associated with vitamin D supplementation were rare. The median OS follow-up was 35.1 months (IQR, 22.9-45.1), overall survival was 96.6% (95% CI, 93.1-98.6) and there was no significant difference between the vitamin D and placebo arms (P = 0.47). INTERPRETATION/UNASSIGNED:As tested in this study, there is no benefit to routine vitamin D supplementation in patients with indolent lymphoma treated with rituximab. These results have implications for ongoing and planned studies of vitamin D supplementation in other malignancies. FUNDING/UNASSIGNED:This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant R01CA214890.

BACKGROUND:Incorporating brentuximab vedotin into the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin's lymphoma improves outcomes in adult and pediatric patients. However, brentuximab vedotin increases the toxic effects of treatment in adults, more than half of pediatric patients who receive the drug undergo consolidative radiation, and relapse remains a challenge. Programmed death 1 blockade is effective in Hodgkin's lymphoma, including in preliminary studies involving previously untreated patients. METHODS:We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving patients at least 12 years of age with stage III or IV newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV+AVD) or nivolumab with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N+AVD). Prespecified patients could receive radiation therapy directed to residual metabolically active lesions. The primary end point was progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of progressive disease or death from any cause. RESULTS:Of 994 patients who underwent randomization, 970 were included in the intention-to-treat population for efficacy analyses. At the second planned interim analysis, with a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the threshold for efficacy was crossed, indicating that N+AVD significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with BV+AVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.87; two-sided P = 0.001). Owing to the short follow-up time, we repeated the analysis with longer follow-up; with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (range, 0 to 4.2 years), the 2-year progression-free survival was 92% (95% CI, 89 to 94) with N+AVD, as compared with 83% (95% CI, 79 to 86) with BV+AVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.65). Overall, 7 patients received radiation therapy. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent with nivolumab; brentuximab vedotin was associated with more treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS:N+AVD resulted in longer progression-free survival than BV+AVD in adolescents and adults with stage III or IV advanced-stage classic Hodgkin's lymphoma and had a better side-effect profile. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; S1826 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03907488.).

While initial therapy of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is not standardized, bendamustine-rituximab (BR) is commonly used in older patients. Rituximab (R) maintenance following induction is often utilized. Thus, the open-label, randomized phase II ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1411 trial was designed to test two questions: 1) Does addition of bortezomib to BR induction (BVR) and/or 2) addition of lenalidomide to rituximab (LR) maintenance improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naïve MCL? From 2012-2016, 373 previously untreated patients, 87% ≥ 60 years old, were enrolled in this trial. At a median follow up of 7.5 years, there is no difference in the median PFS of BR compared to BVR (5.5 yrs vs. 6.4 yrs, HR 0.90, 90% CI 0.70, 1.16). There were no unexpected additional toxicities with BVR treatment compared to BR, with no impact on total dose/duration of treatment received. Independent of the induction treatment, addition of lenalidomide to rituximab did not significantly improve PFS, with median PFS in R vs LR (5.9 yrs vs 7.2 yrs, HR 0.84 90% CI 0.62, 1.15). The majority of patients completed the planned 24 cycles of LR at the scheduled dose. In summary, adding bortezomib to BR induction does not prolong PFS in treatment-naïve MCL, and LR maintenance was not associated with longer PFS compared with rituximab alone following BR. Nonetheless, the > 5 year median PFS outcomes in this prospective cooperative group trial indicate the efficacy of BR followed by rituximab maintenance as highly effective initial therapy for older MCL patients. (NCT01415752).

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to determine whether Black patients with recurrent endometrial cancer were more likely than White patients to be ineligible for a recently published clinical trial due to specific eligibility criteria. METHODS:Patients with recurrent or progressive endometrial cancer diagnosed from January 2010 to December 2021 who received care at a single institution were identified. Demographic and clinicopathologic information was abstracted and determination of clinical trial eligibility was made based on 14 criteria from the KEYNOTE-775 trial. Characteristics of the eligible and ineligible cohorts were compared, and each ineligibility criterion was evaluated by race. RESULTS:One hundred seventy-five patients were identified, 89 who would have met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria for KEYNOTE-775, and 86 who would have been ineligible by one or more exclusion criteria. Patients in the ineligible cohort were more likely to have lower BMI (median 26.5 vs. 29.2, P <0.001), but were otherwise similar with regard to insurance status, histology, and stage at diagnosis. Black patients had 33% lower odds of being eligible (95% CI: 0.33-1.34) and were more likely to meet the exclusion criterion of having a previous intestinal anastomosis, but the result was not statistically significant. If this criterion were removed, the racial distribution of those ineligible for the trial would be more similar (46.4% Black vs. 42.2% White). CONCLUSIONS:Clinical trial eligibility criteria may contribute to the underrepresentation of racial groups in clinical trials, but other factors should be explored. Studies to quantify and lessen the impact of implicit bias are also needed.

Although it is evident that standard-dose whole-brain radiotherapy as consolidation is associated with significant neurotoxicity, the optimal consolidative strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. We performed a randomized phase 2 clinical trial via the US Alliance cancer cooperative group to compare myeloablative consolidation supported by autologous stem cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative consolidation after induction therapy for PCNSL. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to be initiated that eliminates whole-brain radiotherapy as a consolidative approach in newly diagnosed PCNSL. Patients aged 18 to 75 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to induction therapy (methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab, and cytarabine) followed by consolidation with either thiotepa plus carmustine and autologous stem cell rescue vs induction followed by nonmyeloablative, infusional etoposide plus cytarabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 113 patients were randomized, and 108 (54 in each arm) were evaluable. More patients in the nonmyeloablative arm experienced progressive disease or death during induction (28% vs 11%; P = .05). Thirty-six patients received autologous stem cell transplant, and 34 received nonmyeloablative consolidation. The estimated 2-year PFS was higher in the myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative arm (73% vs 51%; P = .02). However, a planned secondary analysis, landmarked at start of the consolidation, revealed that the estimated 2-year PFS in those who completed consolidation therapy was not significantly different between the arms (86% vs 71%; P = .21). Both consolidative strategies yielded encouraging efficacy and similar toxicity profiles. This trial was registered at www.clininicals.gov as #NCT01511562.