Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has affected nearly every facet of modern life, and has left many wondering what implications, if any, the virus has on reproductive health. Increased levels of psychological stress, concern for viral contamination in embryology labs, and reports of decreased male fertility following COVID infection, have also been thought to contribute negatively to ART outcomes.We sought to determine whether the pandemic resulted in any differences in IVF/OOF outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who tested negative for COVID-19 and underwent GnRH-antagonist IVF and OOF cycles from January 2020 through December 2020 at NYU Fertility Center, a period marked by the COVID-19 pandemic, were separated by month of treatment and compared with patients from the corresponding month in the prior year. In patients with multiple cycles over this time period, only the first cycle was used. Patient age, AMH, #oocytes retrieved, #oocytes matured, #fertilized, #blastocysts, and #euploid embryos were compared using Student's T-test.
RESULT(S): 2,467 patients were compared. While the number of cycles were remarkably decreased over March and April of 2020 (59 and 25 respectively), the total number of cycles were very similar for the entire year (1,239 in 2019; 1,228 in 2020). There were no consistently significant differences in age, AMH, #oocytes retrieved, #oocytes matured, #blastocysts formed, or #euploid embryos formed, between the two years.
CONCLUSION(S): Despite initial concerns, and prior research suggesting otherwise, we did not detect any consistent quantitative or qualitative differences in retrieval outcomes amongst COVID negative patients receiving care during the pandemic. IMPACT STATEMENT: These results can reassure patients and their providers that IVF/OOF cycles can be continued safely during the pandemic without compromising outcomes

OBJECTIVE: POC is underutilized by Black women and persons of color1 . We sought to describe the opinions and attitudes toward POC among BOGs and their experiences in counseling patients of color. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to BOGs via separate listservs belonging to a BOG organization and a historically Black college/university in April 2021. The survey included 30 demographic and qualitative questions pertaining to personal family building goals, fertility preservation, and patient counseling experiences. Analyses included descriptive statistics and chi square test to compare answers across demographic, professional and subspecialty groups using SPSS (v25) with p<0.05 considered significant.
RESULT(S): Of the 136 potential participants, the response rate was 49% (n=67). The majority of respondents were female (93%) and heterosexual (93%). The mean age was 34.2 years. Attendings (ATT), fellows (FEL) and residents (RES) represented 47%, 17% and 36% of respondents, respectively. Fifty-four percent of ATTs were generalists. Subspecialties represented by ATTs and FELs included Maternal Fetal Medicine (24%), Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2%), Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (14%), and Urogynecology (8%). Sixty-six percent of subjects did not currently have children and 20% did not want children. Sixty-eight percent felt the need to postpone family building due to medical training, most commonly citing career plans (88%) and financial concerns (60%). Of the 41% who had tried to conceive in the past, 9% required fertility treatment. Nineteen percent had already undergone POC or planned to in the future. Most (70%) felt that all women planning to undergo residency +/- fellowship training should consider POC. Fifty-six percent reported receiving some form of education on POC and 22% felt ''very comfortable'' counseling patients on POC. Fifty-six percent had recommended POC to patients in the past. When asked to exclude cost, the most common reported personal barriers for POC were time (31%) and fear/stigma (22%) and the most common barriers for their patients of color were knowledge (41%) and fear/stigma (25%). Those <35 years were more likely to not have a child (p <0.01) and more likely to feel the need to postpone family building due to their medical training (p<0.01). RES and FELs were more likely to agree that all women planning medical training should consider POC (p<0.03). Generalist ATTs who had not undergone POC trended toward having more regret compared to subspecialists (p=0.05).
CONCLUSION(S): Medical careers can have an unfavorable impact on family building and our results highlight this effect in Black women and persons of color. Most BOGs think trainees may benefit from POC. Improved education and access to POC could support personalized reproductive planning. IMPACT STATEMENT: Considering the underutilization of POC among Black women1 and the increase in infertility among female physicians2 , a better understanding of the mitigating factors is important in order to develop culturally appropriate counseling and educational interventions for women of color

OBJECTIVE: There has been significant uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on human reproduction which resulted in a temporary suspension of ART treatments in early stages of the pandemic. The ACE2 receptor used by the virus to infect pulmonary cells is also found in reproductive organs and has fueled speculation as to whether the disease can be sexually transmitted and whether it can cause infertility. Non-viral issues (e.g., pandemic related psychological stress, alternate methods of communication and interaction, and new clinic procedures) may also worsen outcomes. We sought to determine whether clinical outcomes following the frozen embryo transfer (FET) of a euploid embryo were different during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 when compared to prior to the pandemic in 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who tested negative for COVID-19 and underwent FET of a single euploid embryo at NYU Fertility Center in NYC over January 2020 through September 2020 were separated by treatment month and compared with patients from the corresponding month in 2019. Patient's age at cycle start and age at freeze were compared using Student's T-Test. Potential cycle outcomes included intrauterine pregnancy (IUG), biochemical pregnancy (Biochem), and no pregnancy, and outcomes were compared between the two years using contingency Chi Square.
RESULT(S): 1,044 patients were compared over the corresponding months. 558 transfers from 2019 and 486 patients from 2020, with no patients in April of 2020. There were no differences noted in patient's age at cycle start, or age at cryopreservation, between any of the months across the two years. Analysis of outcomes following FET further revealed no statistically significant differences between any of the months over the two years, X² = 14.64, p > 0.05. Post hoc analyses comparing the combined months of March, April and May, or the combined 9-month periods, were also not statistically significant (X² = 0.042, p > 0.05; X² = 1.68, p > 0.05; respectively).
CONCLUSION(S): In patients who tested negative for COVID-19, there were no differences in treatment outcomes following FET's when comparing patients treated during the COVID pandemic with those who were treated prior to the pandemic. IMPACT STATEMENT: Providers and patients can be reassured that with proper testing and sanitizing techniques FET outcomes remained unaffected by the pandemic. (Table Presented)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To characterize the demographic differences between infertile/sub-fertile women who utilized infertility services vs. those that do not. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data obtained during the 2011-2013, 2013-2015, and 2015-2017 cycles of National Survey for Family Growth from interviews administered in home for randomly selected participants by a National Center of Health Statistics (NCHS) surveyor was used to analyze married, divorced, or women with long-term partners who reported difficulty having biological children (sub-fertile/infertile women). Demographic differences such as formal marital status, education, race, and religion were compared between women who presented for infertility care vs. those that did not. The primary outcome measure was presenting for infertility evaluation and subsequently utilizing infertility services. Healthcare utilization trends such as having a usual place of care and insurance status were also included as exposures of interest in the analysis. RESULTS:Of the 12,456 women included in the analysis 1770 (15.3%) had used infertility services and 1011 (8.3%) said it would be difficult for them to have a child but had not accessed infertility services. On univariate analysis, compared to women who used infertility services, untreated women had lower average household incomes (295.3 vs. 229.8% of the federal poverty line respectively). Untreated women also had lower levels of education and were more likely to be divorced or never have married. In terms of health status, unevaluated women were less likely to have a usual place for healthcare (87.3%) as compared to women presenting for fertility care (91.9%) (p = 0.004). When examining insurance status, 23.3% of unevaluated women were uninsured as compared to 8.3% of evaluated women. On multivariate analysis, infertile women without insurance were at 0.37 odds of utilizing infertility care compared to women with insurance. CONCLUSIONS:Demographic factors are associated with the utilization of infertility care. Insurance status is a significant predictor of whether or not infertile women will access treatment. Data from the three most recent NSFG surveys along with prior analyses demonstrate the need for expanded insurance coverage in order to address the socioeconomic disparities between infertile women who are accessing services vs. those that are not.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to investigate stress levels among women undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation by comparing their self-reported quality of life measures with women undergoing in vitro fertilization during the fertility treatment cycle. METHODS:Patients undergoing oocyte retrieval at a single institution were offered a voluntary, anonymous, and written questionnaire. The survey was adapted and validated from the Fertility Quality of Life tool to assess self-reported fertility treatment-related problems and was tested for construct validity and reliability. Based on exploratory factor analyses, three subscales were created as follows: fertility treatment-related stress, tolerability, and environment. Relationships between patient characteristics and fertility treatment-related measures were examined with Fisher's exact test, ANOVA, and multivariate regression with significance p < 0.05. RESULTS:A total of 461 patients (331 IVF, 130 egg freeze) were included in the analysis. Medically indicated egg freezing patients were excluded. Overall, both IVF and egg freeze patients reported stress during the current fertility cycle and there were no significant differences between IVF and egg freeze patients for any subscale scores. Three sets of generalized linear models were run and found age to be associated with fertility treatment-related stress and tolerability scores, with younger patients experiencing greater difficulties. Additionally, patients who underwent repeat cycles reported more fertility treatment-related stress. CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing egg freezing have similar responses to quality of life questions as patients undergoing IVF. Repeat cycles and younger age contribute to perceptions of stress. This information supports developing stress reduction strategies for all women undergoing egg freezing.

OBJECTIVE: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the normal methods of communication used by physicians and patients, as well as the standard protocols and procedures by which medical clinics operate. Pandemic related stresses may have also influenced patient's fertility goals and/or their ovarian response.We questioned whether these changes resulted in any unanticipated effects in the treatments and outcomes of ART patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent GnRH-antagonist IVF cycles from January 2020 through June 2020 at NYU Fertility Center, a period in New York City over which the COVID-19 pandemic escalated and life in the city drastically changed as a result of new social distancing measures, were separated by month of treatment and compared with patients from the corresponding month in the prior year (January 2019 through June 2019). Patient age, AMH, days gonadotropin, #oocytes retrieved, #oocytes matured, #fertilized, #blastocysts, and #euploid embryos were compared using Student's T-test.
RESULT(S): 1881 patients were compared over the parallel six-month periods. Clinic visits were markedly decreased over the months of March and April of 2020, when the pandemic was at its peak in NYC and treatments were suspended as per the ASRM pandemic guidelines. There were no differences in age, AMH, #oocytes retrieved, #mature oocytes, or #fertilized between the two years. In April of 2020 there were significantly more blastocysts per patient, as compared to April of 2019, however, in May and June of 2020 there were significantly fewer euploid embryos per patient, as compared to May and June of 2019 (see table).
CONCLUSION(S): In the months following the end of the COVID-19 treatment suspension, there were no apparent differences in patient characteristics or the quantitative responses to stimulation. However, there was a significant qualitative difference as expressed in the number of euploid embryos. It remains unclear if or how the pandemic is related to this difference