Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:In people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperphosphatemia is a risk factor for mortality. Though unproven, dietary phosphorus control is considered essential in CKD. Although dietary and serum phosphorus are correlated, phosphorus from plant foods rich in phytate is less bioavailable than from animal and processed foods. Yogurt, valued for its low phosphorus and high protein, may be detrimental in CKD due to animal protein content. Plant-based yogurts (PBYs) might offer similar benefits without the downsides of animal protein, but little is known about their phosphorus content. DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:Protein contents and phosphorus additives were gathered from nutrition labels of several PBYs, including almond, cashew, oat, coconut, and soy substrates. Phosphorus content was measured via emission spectrometry by Eurofins (Madison, WI), and the phosphorus-to-protein ratio (PPR) was calculated for each PBY. RESULTS:Phosphorus content was highest in Silk Soy Strawberry, Silk Almond Strawberry, and Siggi's Coconut Mixed Berries, while it was lowest in So Delicious Coconut Strawberry, Oatly Oat Strawberry, Forager Cashew Strawberry, and Kite Hill Almond Strawberry. Ingredient labels revealed that Silk Soy Strawberry, Silk Almond Strawberry, and Oatly Oat Strawberry contained phosphorus additives, and Siggi's Coconut Mixed Berries contained pea protein additives. Though from the same substrate class, So Delicious Coconut Strawberry and Siggi's Coconut Mixed Berries showed significant differences in phosphorus and protein contents. All seven PBYs had higher PPR ratios than dairy yogurts like Stonyfield Organic Oikos Strawberry, Chobani Nonfat Strawberry, and Yoplait Greek Strawberry. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Low-PPR foods are important for CKD patients. Siggi's Coconut Mixed Berries had the lowest PPR, making it potentially the most desirable for CKD patients. However, there is high variability in PPR among PBYs with the same substrate; therefore, Delicious Coconut Strawberry had the highest PPR, highlighting the importance of product selection for patients with CKD.

Telemedicine, virtual conferences, and reducing waste in the operating room are ways in which urologists can reduce their environmental impact in daily practice. Patient counseling should also consider advice that simultaneously promotes overall, urological, and planetary health, such as plant-based diets and active transport.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Readability of patient education materials is of utmost importance to ensure understandability and dissemination of health care information in uro-oncology. We aimed to investigate the readability of the official patient education materials of the European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urology Association (AUA). METHODS:Patient education materials for prostate, bladder, kidney, testicular, penile, and urethral cancers were retrieved from the respective organizations. Readability was assessed via the WebFX online tool for Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES) and for reading grade levels by Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Score (GFS), Smog Index (SI), Coleman Liau Index (CLI), and Automated Readability Index (ARI). Layperson readability was defined as a FRES of ≥70 and with the other readability indexes <7 according to European Union recommendations. This study assessed only objective readability and no other metrics such as understandability. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Most patient education materials failed to meet the recommended threshold for laypersons. The mean readability for EAU patient education material was as follows: FRES 50.9 (standard error [SE]: 3.0), and FKGL, GFS, SI, CLI, and ARI all with scores ≥7. The mean readability for AUA patient material was as follows: FRES 64.0 (SE: 1.4), with all of FKGL, GFS, SI, and ARI scoring ≥7 readability. Only 13 out of 70 (18.6%) patient education materials' paragraphs met the readability requirements. The mean readability for bladder cancer patient education materials was the lowest, with a FRES of 36.7 (SE: 4.1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Patient education materials from leading urological associations reveal readability levels beyond the recommended thresholds for laypersons and may not be understood easily by patients. There is a future need for more patient-friendly reading materials. PATIENT SUMMARY/RESULTS:This study checked whether health information about different cancers was easy to read. Most of it was too hard for patients to understand.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Although prostate MRI and tissue-based gene expression (genomic) tests improve staging and estimates of prostate cancer prognosis, their association with the intensity of treatment patients receive is not well understood. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in 2013 through 2017 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The primary study outcome was the receipt of treatment intensification in the first 12 months after diagnosis (defined as the addition of androgen deprivation therapy among patients receiving radiation or pelvic lymphadenectomy among those undergoing radical prostatectomy). We assessed associations between the receipt of prostate MRI and genomic testing and treatment intensification, adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors and further stratifying the analyses by risk status. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= .05). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Prostate MRI was associated with intensified treatment across risk strata, while genomic testing was associated with lower intensity of treatment among high-risk disease. Additional study is needed to determine whether use of imaging and risk stratification tools leads to improved long-term patient outcomes.

Plant-based diets have grown in popularity owing to multiple health and environmental benefits. Some evidence suggests that plant-based diets are associated with benefits for urological health. In genitourinary oncology, most research has focused on prostate cancer. Clinical trial results suggest a favourable influence of healthy lifestyle modifications including plant-based diets before and after prostate cancer treatment. Epidemiological evidence shows that a diet higher in plant-based and lower in animal-based food is associated with a lower risk of aggressive prostate cancer and better quality-of-life scores than a diet with less plant-based and more animal-based food. Studies on bladder and kidney cancer are scarce, but limited data suggest that vegetarian or plant-forward dietary patterns (increased consumption of fruits and vegetables and minimizing meat) are associated with a lower risk of development of these cancers than dietary patterns with fewer fruits and vegetables and more meat. With respect to benign urological conditions, epidemiological studies suggest that plant-based dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia and urinary tract infections than non-plant-based dietary patterns. Compared with diets high in animal-based foods and low in plant-based foods, a substantial body of epidemiological evidence also suggests that increased consumption of healthy plant-based food is associated with a lower risk of erectile dysfunction. Plant-based dietary patterns that are high in fruits and vegetables with normal calcium intake, while limiting animal protein and salt, are associated with a lower risk of kidney stone development than dietary patterns that do not follow these parameters. Overall, increasing consumption of plant-based foods and reducing intake of animal-based foods has favourable associations with multiple urological conditions.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The objective of this study is to determine whether a sleep and health improvement programme (SHIP) to promote healthy sleep, eating and physical activity would be feasible, acceptable and have a positive impact on lifestyle behaviours for prostate cancer survivors and caregivers. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We recruited 50 participants for a single group 3-month pre-post pilot study. The SHIP intervention included (1) website about sleep, nutrition and physical activity (≥1 view/week), (2) two email newsletters with goal-setting exercises and resources and (3) midpoint health coach call. The primary outcome was changes in validated sleep scales; secondary outcomes included changes in diet, physical activity and concentration from baseline to 3 months. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.07). There were no statistically significant improvements in sleep quality or physical activity, but there were improvements in healthy eating (e.g., increase in cruciferous vegetables and reduction in dairy) and in fatigue-related problems and concentration. Exit interview feedback was positive. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:A web-based sleep and healthy lifestyle programme for patients with prostate cancer and their caregivers is feasible and acceptable. A randomized controlled trial is planned to test whether a refined SHIP improves sleep and lifestyle in patients with prostate cancer and caregivers.