Faculty Bibliography

Developing real-world evidence from electronic health records (EHR) is vital to advance kidney transplantation (KT). We assessed the feasibility of studying KT using the Epic Cosmos aggregated EHR dataset, which includes 274 million unique individuals cared for in 238 U.S. health systems, by comparing it with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). We identified 69,418 KT recipients transplanted between January 2014 and December 2022 in Cosmos (39.4% of all US KT transplants during this period). Demographics and clinical characteristics of recipients captured in Cosmos were consistent with the overall SRTR cohort. Survival estimates were generally comparable, although there were some differences in long-term survival. At 7 years post-transplant, patient survival was 80.4% in Cosmos and 77.8% in SRTR. Multivariable Cox regression showed consistent associations between clinical factors and mortality in both cohorts, with minor discrepancies in the associations between death and both age and race. In summary, Cosmos provides a reliable platform for KT research, allowing EHR-level clinical granularity not available with either the transplant registry or healthcare claims. Consequently, Cosmos will enable novel analyses to improve our understanding of KT management on a national scale.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Imlifidase is an IgG-cleaving endopeptidase conditionally approved in Europe for desensitization of highly sensitized patients before kidney transplantation. We present 5-y outcomes and donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels for clinical trial participants from a single site who received imlifidase for desensitization before incompatible transplantation (NCT02790437). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Imlifidase was administered up to 24 h before living or deceased donor kidney transplantation. DSAs were monitored before transplantation, at days 7 and 28, and at 5 y posttransplant. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:At 5 y, 7 of 8 participants were alive. One of these 7 had suboptimal graft function secondary to donor-derived disease but remained dialysis independent. Three participants had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which occurred in the first 30 d in all cases and was successfully treated. No new episodes of suspected or biopsy-proven AMR occurred after 30 d posttransplant. Seven participants had DSA rebound. DSAs commonly persisted 5 y posttransplant, although they were generally lower strength compared with pre-imlifidase. Dilution studies of sensitized serum enabled the identification of lower AMR risk phenotypes for persisting DSAs. Severe and/or opportunistic infections were not observed at greater than expected frequency. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Five-year outcomes of imlifidase-enabled incompatible transplants are overall favorable. DSA rebound is common, but antibody strength lessens in the long term, and longitudinally persisting DSAs did not lead to premature graft failure.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Some living organ donors will decide to donate again at a later date. Evidence has indicated that this practice may have increased in recent years. We evaluated the incidence and outcomes of this practice to inform counseling of potential repeat donors. METHODS:Using SRTR data from 1994 to 2023, we identified 220 repeat living donors and their 415 recipients. We constructed donor comparison groups using weighting by the odds. We described clinical and lab results at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-donation separately for kidney-second donors and liver-second donors. We compared all-cause graft failure for their recipients with those of comparison donors. RESULTS:The annual count of repeat living donors increased from 5 in 2018 to 25 in 2019 (p < 0.001). Of 220 donors, 159 were liver-second donors (72.3%) and 55 were kidney-second donors (25.0). The percentage of nondirected donations increased from 30.5% at first donation to 53.2% at second donation (p < 0.001). Liver-second donors had one death approximately 2.5 years post-donation. Seventeen were re-admitted and 20 experienced complications requiring an interventional procedure or re-operation. Among kidney-second donors, no deaths, re-admissions, or post-donation complications were reported. Post-donation outcomes in both groups were comparable when evaluated against organ-specific comparison donors. Recipients of repeat living donors experienced graft survival similar to recipients of comparison donors. CONCLUSIONS:Repeat living donation may be a safe practice for carefully selected living donors in the short term; however, long term safety is unknown. Outcomes for recipients are similar to recipients of comparison donors.

UNLABELLED:(N = 24 patients) among functioning grafts. DSA rebounded with levels progressively decreasing over time and no increase in DSA seen between 3 and 5 years. No AMR occurred between 3 and 5 years. Furthermore, no additional safety signals assessed as related to imlifidase were reported in this cohort. At 5 years, highly-HLA sensitized patients who underwent imlifidase desensitization prior to transplantation demonstrated excellent patient and graft survival, despite their high-risk immunological profile. Imlifidase offers a viable and effective treatment option for highly sensitized patients to achieve life-saving transplantation and continued optimism is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790437), EudraCT Number: 2016-002064-13.

The degree of immunological compatibility between donors and recipients greatly impacts allograft survival. In the United States kidney allocation system, HLA antigen-level matching has been shown to cause ethnic disparities and thus, has been de-emphasised. However, priority points are still awarded for antigen-level zero-ABDR matching, zero-DR matching and one-DR matching. Recently, the degree of HLA molecular (eplet) mismatch has emerged as a more accurate measure of immunological risk, and eplet mismatch load has gained attention as a possible biomarker to improve HLA compatibility. However, little is known about the frequency of eplets in population groups, which is a necessary step to ensure that candidates from any ethnical background can have similar chances at a well-matched organ. Eplet frequencies were estimated using HLA alleles in the Common, Intermediate and Well-Documented (CIWD) 3.0.0 catalogue for six population groups: African-American (AFA), Asian-Pacific Islander (API), European/European descent (EURO), Middle East/North Coast of Africa (MENA), Hispanic/Latino (HIS) and Native-American (NAM). We determined that 98.6% (484 out of 491) of HLA eplets are expressed by the common HLA alleles in all population groups. Of the seven eplets that were expressed by less common HLA alleles, six were Class I eplets and one was expressed by HLA-DQB1 alleles and most were expressed by HLA alleles that were more commonly observed in European/European descent populations. Our observations indicate that HLA eplets will not cause any significant disparity if applied to HLA molecular compatibility, regardless of the ethnic origin of both recipients and donors.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:ChatGPT has shown the ability to answer clinical questions in general medicine but may be constrained by the specialized nature of kidney transplantation. Thus, it is important to explore how ChatGPT can be used in kidney transplantation and how its knowledge compares to human respondents. METHODS:We prompted ChatGPT versions 3.5, 4, and 4 Visual (4 V) with 12 multiple-choice questions related to six kidney transplant cases from 2013 to 2015 American Society of Nephrology (ASN) fellowship program quizzes. We compared the performance of ChatGPT with US nephrology fellowship program directors, nephrology fellows, and the audience of the ASN's annual Kidney Week meeting. RESULTS:Overall, ChatGPT 4 V correctly answered 10 out of 12 questions, showing a performance level comparable to nephrology fellows (group majority correctly answered 9 of 12 questions) and training program directors (11 of 12). This surpassed ChatGPT 4 (7 of 12 correct) and 3.5 (5 of 12). All three ChatGPT versions failed to correctly answer questions where the consensus among human respondents was low. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Each iterative version of ChatGPT performed better than the prior version, with version 4 V achieving performance on par with nephrology fellows and training program directors. While it shows promise in understanding and answering kidney transplantation questions, ChatGPT should be seen as a complementary tool to human expertise rather than a replacement.

BACKGROUND:Since February 2020, exception points have been allocated equivalent to the median model for end-stage liver disease at transplant within 250 nautical miles of the transplant center (MMaT/250). We compared transplant rate and waitlist mortality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exception, non-HCC exception, and non-exception candidates to determine whether MMaT/250 advantages (or disadvantages) exception candidates. METHODS:Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 23 686 adult, first-time, active, deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) candidates between February 4, 2020, and February 3, 2022. We compared DDLT rates using Cox regression, and waitlist mortality/dropout using competing risks regression in non-exception versus HCC versus non-HCC candidates. RESULTS:Within 24 mo of study entry, 58.4% of non-exception candidates received DDLT, compared with 57.8% for HCC candidates and 70.5% for non-HCC candidates. After adjustment, HCC candidates had 27% lower DDLT rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.680.730.77) compared with non-exception candidates. However, waitlist mortality for HCC was comparable to non-exception candidates (adjusted subhazard ratio [asHR] = 0.931.031.15). Non-HCC candidates with pulmonary complications of cirrhosis or cholangiocarcinoma had substantially higher risk of waitlist mortality compared with non-exception candidates (asHR = 1.271.702.29 for pulmonary complications of cirrhosis, 1.352.043.07 for cholangiocarcinoma). The same was not true of non-HCC candidates with exceptions for other reasons (asHR = 0.540.881.44). CONCLUSIONS:Under MMaT/250, HCC, and non-exception candidates have comparable risks of dying before receiving liver transplant, despite lower transplant rates for HCC. However, non-HCC candidates with pulmonary complications of cirrhosis or cholangiocarcinoma have substantially higher risk of dying before receiving liver transplant; these candidates may merit increased allocation priority.