Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to characterize the natural history of incidentally identified asymptomatic mesenteric artery stenosis and to identify clinical and radiographic predictors that differentiate patients with asymptomatic mesenteric artery occlusive disease (MAOD) and patients with symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) diagnosed at index study. METHODS:This single-institution retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with >70% stenosis of the celiac or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) on axial imaging or duplex ultrasound in an institutional radiology database. Patients were grouped into asymptomatic MAOD and symptomatic CMI cohorts according to their clinical presentation at index study. The primary endpoint was progression of disease from asymptomatic stenosis to CMI. Demographic, clinical, and imaging features at index study were also compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts. RESULTS:79 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 43 in the asymptomatic group and 36 in the symptomatic group. Patients in the asymptomatic group were followed for mean 32.7 ± 30.2 months; 60.5% (n=26) were referred to and followed by a vascular surgeon for 21.5 ± 27.8 months. No asymptomatic patients developed symptoms during the follow-up period. All patients in the symptomatic group were evaluated by a vascular surgeon and underwent procedural intervention for CMI within six months of diagnosis. Patients with CMI were more likely to have a history of smoking (p=0.02) and less likely to be anticoagulated (p<0.01) than patients with asymptomatic MAOD. Symptomatic patients trended towards a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (p=0.06) and a lower prevalence of arrhythmia (p=0.08). On imaging, the symptomatic cohort was more likely to have severe SMA stenosis (p<0.001), multivessel mesenteric disease (p=0.001), calcified aortic plaque (p=0.01), and severe stenosis in one or both internal iliac arteries (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, a lack of anticoagulation use (p<0.01) and severe SMA stenosis (p<0.001) were independently associated with higher odds of symptomatic mesenteric stenosis. While statistically insignificant, calcified aortic plaque (p=0.08) and smoking history (p=0.06) trended toward higher odds of symptomatic index presentation. CONCLUSIONS:The rate of progression from asymptomatic MAOD to CMI appears exceedingly low in the first two to three years after diagnosis, suggesting that prophylactic revascularization is mostly unnecessary. Surveillance of asymptomatic MAOD may be personalized based on clinical and radiographic features of disease. SMA stenosis severity, anticoagulation use, and possibly smoking history and the presence of aortic plaque calcification may be promising markers to stratify the risk of ischemic progression.

BACKGROUND:Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) have outcomes worse than uncomplicated ST elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, no large-scale study has compared the outcomes of large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) with anticoagulation alone (AC). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes among patients receiving LBMT vs AC alone. METHODS:This was a two-center retrospective study that included patients with intermediate-risk PE from October 2016 - October 2023 from the institution's Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) database. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest or hemodynamic decompensation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates; Kaplan Meir curves and IPTW multivariable Cox regression were used to assess the relationship between treatment groups and outcomes. RESULTS:Of the 273 patients included in the analysis, 192 (70 %) patients received AC alone and 81 (30 %) patients received LBMT and AC. A total of 30 (10.9 %) patients experienced the primary composite outcome over a median follow-up of 30 days. The primary composite outcome was significantly lower in the group that received LBMT compared to those on AC alone (1.2 % vs 15.1 %, log-rank p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 0.02; 95 % CI: 0.002-0.17, p < 0.001) driven by a lower rate of 30-day all-cause mortality (0 % vs 7.3 %, log-rank p = 0.01), resuscitated cardiac arrest (0 % vs 6.8 %, log-rank p = 0.016) and new or worsening hemodynamic instability (4 % vs 11.1 %, log-rank p = 0.007). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this largest cohort to date comparing LBMT versus AC alone in acute intermediate-risk PE, LBMT had a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome including a lower rate of all-cause mortality when compared to AC alone. Ongoing randomized trials will test these associations.

OBJECTIVE:Venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) is the accepted initial imaging study to rule out lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In accordance with the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) vascular laboratory policies, many institutions require technicians to additionally assess the asymptomatic contralateral common femoral vein. There is conflicting literature on whether this policy is needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the utility of examining the asymptomatic contralateral common femoral vein in patients undergoing a unilateral lower extremity VDUS to rule out DVT by (1) defining the prevalence of DVT in the contralateral asymptomatic limb and (2) identifying risk factors that predispose patients to develop a DVT in the asymptomatic limb. METHODS:and Student's t-tests, respectively. For all tests, a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:371 patients (170 inpatient vs. 201 outpatient) with unilateral DVT symptoms who underwent VDUS during the study period were identified. Right leg symptoms were present in 186 (50%) patients and left leg symptoms were present in 185 (50%) patients. The overall incidence of acute DVT in the symptomatic limb was 17% (17.4% outpatient vs. 16.5% inpatient, p=NS). Outpatients were more likely to have superficial venous thrombosis (7.0% vs. 0.6%, p=0.002) and chronic venous changes (25.4% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001) in the symptomatic limb. 59% of DVTs in the symptomatic limb were documented in the calf veins, 25% in the proximal veins, and 16% in both the proximal and calf veins. There were no incidences of bilateral DVT in our cohort. Moreover, none of the patients had a DVT isolated to the contralateral common femoral vein. CONCLUSIONS:Scanning the asymptomatic contralateral common femoral vein may not be necessary for patients undergoing unilateral VDUS for symptomatic DVT, regardless of thrombotic risk factors. A single-extremity study will suffice in most cases, and if implemented, it will improve vascular laboratory efficiency and decrease costs without a decline in DVT detection.

OBJECTIVE:This study compared outcomes in patients with and without preoperative stress testing undergoing carotid revascularization including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS), and transcarotid revascularization (TCAR). METHODS:Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VQI VISION) database who underwent elective carotid revascularization 2016-2020 were included. Patients were analyzed by group based upon whether they underwent cardiac stress testing within two years preceding revascularization without subsequent coronary intervention. Subset analysis was performed comparing outcomes between those with negative and positive results (evidence of ischemia or MI). Outcomes of interest were postoperative MI/neurologic events, 90-day re-admission rates, as well as long-term mortality. RESULTS:We analyzed 18,364 patients (78.8% CEA, 9.3% TF-CAS, 11.9% TCAR). Of these, 35.8% underwent preoperative stress testing (37.4% of CEA patients, 27.5% of TF-CAS patients, and 31.9% of TCAR patients). While comorbidities were significantly higher amongst patients undergoing CEA with preoperative stress test compared to those without stress testing, the overall prevalence of co-morbidities was higher amongst patients undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR irrespective of preoperative stress test status. Compared to patients with a negative stress test, patients with positive stress test undergoing any form of carotid revascularization had a significant increase in 90-day re-admission rates (CEA 19.6% vs 15.8%, p=0.003; CAS 33.3% vs. 18.6%, p<0.001; TCAR 25% vs. 17.5%, p=0.04). No group demonstrated a difference in the incidence of in-hospital postoperative neurologic events or CHF, but those undergoing CEA (but not CAS or TCAR) experienced a significant increase in-hospital post-operative MI (1.7% vs 0.6%, p<0.001). In 3-year follow-up, those with a positive compared to negative stress test were more likely to undergo CABG/PCI in the CEA (adjusted HR 1.87 [1.42-2.27], p<0.0001) and CAS groups (adjusted HR 3.89 [1.77-8.57], p<0.01), but not the TCAR cohort. Notably those undergoing CEA with a positive compared to negative stress test, but not CAS or TCAR, exhibited a 28% increase in mortality (adjusted HR 1.28 [1.03-1.58], p=0.03) at 3 years. Conversely, those patients with a negative stress test compared to no stress test undergoing CEA experienced a 14% reduction in mortality at 3 years (adjusted HR 0.86 [0.76-0.98], p=0.02); this mortality difference was not observed in similar stress test cohort undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR. CONCLUSIONS:Our study highlights that a positive stress test in appropriately selected, asymptomatic patients undergoing elective carotid revascularization can predict select perioperative and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, given the high follow-up mortality associated with those undergoing CEA for elective carotid revascularization, our findings call into question whether these patients should be preferentially offered optimal medical management and/or stenting.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:While the use of endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease (PAD) has expanded in recent years, there remains relatively few studies focused on the endovascular treatment of isolated popliteal artery occlusive disease. The popliteal artery presents a particular challenge for endovascular intervention due to the constant flexion at the knee. We sought to assess the outcomes for endovascular management of isolated popliteal artery occlusive disease based on type of intervention performed. METHODS:The Vascular Qualitative Initiative (VQI) database was queried for patients with isolated popliteal artery occlusive disease who underwent endovascular intervention from January 2011 to December 2019. Patients were excluded from analysis if they did not have Medicare FFS entitlement, had a history of prior intervention in the ipsilateral limb, or had vessels treated in addition to the popliteal artery. Patients were stratified into groups based on their initial presenting symptom (claudication vs. chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI)) and were analyzed by endovascular procedure performed (plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) vs. adjunctive stent/atherectomy). The POBA group underwent only plain balloon angioplasty whereas the adjunctive stent/atherectomy group underwent any type of balloon angioplasty and adjunctive stenting or atherectomy or both. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival, a composite outcome of freedom from major amputation and/or death. RESULTS:A total of 1,740 patients met criteria for analysis who underwent endovascular intervention for isolated popliteal artery occlusive disease. Among patients with claudication, the amputation-free survival rate was significantly higher at 1 year and 3 years for patients treated with adjunctive stent/atherectomy compared to POBA (1 year: 94.2% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.03; 3 years: 83.0% vs. 76.6%, p = 0.04). This difference appeared to be driven by mortality, as mortality was significantly better for adjunctive stent/atherectomy compared to POBA (1 year: 4.6% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.01; 3 years: 15.4% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.02), whereas major amputation rates were not significantly different. However, multivariable analysis showed that use of adjunctive stent/atherectomy was not independently associated with improved amputation-free survival (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48-1.16, p = 0.19). In the CLTI group, amputation-free survival rates were not significantly different for patients treated with adjunctive stent/atherectomy compared to POBA (1 year: 65% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.78; 3 years: 47.1% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.30). Re-intervention rates were not statistically different when stratified by use of adjunctive therapies in either the claudication or CLTI groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that across all patients with isolated popliteal artery occlusive disease, amputation-free survival rates were comparable regardless of endovascular treatment modality. As expected, amputation-free survival for patients presenting with claudication was favorable compared to those with CLTI, and was driven primarily by mortality. Re-intervention rates were similar across all patients regardless of treatment modality. This study underscores the clinical challenge of treating isolated popliteal artery occlusive disease and stresses the need for further study of adjunctive modalities in treating complex lesions.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a preferred surgery to prevent aneurysm sac enlargement and minimize the risk of life-threatening rupture in patients with AAA. Serious complications of type II endoleaks following EVAR can cause sac expansion and increase rupture risk. This study focused on evaluating clinical and blood characteristics in patients with type II endoleaks to refine our understanding of systemic fluctuations associated with unsuccessful EVAR. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective study included 146 patients with AAA who underwent primary elective endovascular procedures (EVAR/fEVAR) between 2013 and 2021. Clinical characteristics, complete blood count (CBC) and imaging data were analyzed from patients who did and did not develop type II endoleaks. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Mean platelet volume (MPV) was significantly increased in patients who developed type II endoleaks after EVAR. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that MPV has a satisfactory discriminatory performance in distinguishing post-EVAR patients who developed type II endoleaks, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.64. A risk stratification panel incorporating MPV, type II diabetes history, and administration of dual antiplatelet therapies yielded an AUC of 0.70 and predicted an endoleak-free survival rate with a hazard ratio of 2.94. A nomogram revealed that MPV had the highest scoring weight among all significant variables. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients with type II endoleaks following EVAR have elevated MPV indicative of different phenotypes of circulating platelets. MPV presents an attractive predictive criteria for assessing the occurrence of type II endoleaks in patients with AAA.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The aim of this study was to examine the impact of early versus delayed catheter-based therapies (CBTs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2 academic centers involving patients with intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were divided into early (<12 hours) and delayed CBT (≥12 hours) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hemodynamic instability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:=0.046). When patients were stratified by timing of CBT (early/late) and the composite PE shock score (high ≥3; low <3), all 16 patients who experienced the primary composite outcome had a high composite PE shock score, with 14/16 (87.5%) having a high composite PE shock score and delayed intervention. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Early CBT was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The composite PE shock score may help identify patients who will benefit from early CBT. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

BACKGROUND:The recently published PEERLESS trial compared catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it included a low proportion of patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (4.4%), leaving uncertainty about how CDT would perform relative to CBT in a real-world cohort with higher bleeding risk. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to address this gap by comparing real-world outcomes of CDT and CBT in patients with acute PE. METHODS:This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent CDT and CBT at two tertiary care centers from January 2020 to January 2024. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline variables. RESULTS:A total of 162 (mean age 58 years, 45.7% women, 17.3% high-risk, 28% contraindication to lytics, 28% CDT, 72% CBT) patients were included, with 12.4% patients experiencing the primary outcome. There was no difference in the rates of the primary outcome between CBT versus CDT (11.2% vs. 15.2%, IPTW HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.27-2.38, p = 0.69). CBT was associated with a lower risk of hemodynamic decompensation (5% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.036), major bleeding (7.8% vs. 17.4%, IPTW HR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.95, p = 0.042) and ICH (0 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.024) compared to CDT. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among a real-world cohort of patients with acute PE with higher bleeding risk than PEERLESS undergoing catheter-based therapies, CBT was associated with a lower rate of hemodynamic deterioration, major bleeding, and ICH with similar rate of primary composite outcome when compared with CDT. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

OBJECTIVE:While ambulatory capacity is a readily assessable clinical indicator of functional status, its association with outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the association between pre-operative ambulatory status and outcomes following elective EVAR. METHODS:A retrospective review of the multi-institutional Vascular Quality Initiative database was conducted for all patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR from 2009 - 2022. Patients were categorised into independent ambulation and impaired ambulation groups. A propensity score matched analysis was performed to produce two well matched cohorts in a 1:1 ratio without replacement. The primary outcome was 30 day death. Secondary outcomes included one year survival and in hospital major complications. RESULTS:Among 11 474 patients, 10 539 (91.8%) were independently ambulatory pre-operatively. Propensity score matching resulted in 885 matched pairs. The impaired ambulation group, although older (mean 77.6 vs. 76.3 years; p = .001), showed comparable baseline characteristics. Post-operatively, the impaired ambulation group had higher cumulative in hospital complications and death as well as 30 day death. Even after adjustment for age, impaired pre-operative ambulation was associated with increased in hospital and 30 day death (hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26 - 3.95; p = .006). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increasing cumulative risk of 30 day death in the setting of impaired pre-operative ambulatory status with age > 75 years requiring post-operative red blood cell transfusion > 2 units (HR 5.75, 95% CI 2.09 - 15.88; p < .001). Beyond 30 days, impaired pre-operative ambulation was not associated with increased one year death (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.81 - 1.48; p = .570). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR in this matched analysis, impaired pre-operative ambulatory capacity was associated with an increased risk of in hospital and 30 day death, further compounded by advanced age and post-operative transfusion. As such, a threshold higher than the traditional size criteria should be considered in shared decision making when determining options for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm in this high risk cohort.