Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The burden of pediatric mental disorders in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is tremendous, but solutions for addressing the burden remain limited. Although digital solutions have potential to improve prevention services, such solutions have not been systematically tested in these countries. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:This study explores the use of a digital parenting intervention tool designed for pediatric behavioral health, known as the Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool, in a preventive service model for low resource communities. We study the feasibility of implementing this new digital health service model and preliminary estimate the potential impacts on parenting and child social emotional outcomes when the program is implemented in faith-based organizations in Uganda. The Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool is a preventive intervention designed to be implemented by trained community-health-workers to facilitate caregivers' access to the preventive mental health service in community for their young children. The tool is based on the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment prevention service model for promoting pediatric behavioral and mental health. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The evaluation study was designed using a pre-post assessment design. The content in Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool was co-designed with local expert and iteratively adapted based on parents and caregivers as well as community-health-workers and experts who were invited to provide their feedback and suggestions for improvements in content, functions, and delivery model through a series of focus groups and workshops. This pilot evaluation focuses on the pre-post changes of the intervention families (91 families) and 10 community-health-workers. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We found high acceptability, appropriateness, and usefulness of the program based on the intervention families' community-health-workers' report. Intervention parents felt safe in using the digital toolkit. Parents felt comfortable for the CHWs asked them personal questions. In estimating the impacts, we found some expected findings on parenting and child social emotional health. Specifically, we found intervention parents become more mindful in their parenting (d=1.61, p=.049), and felt more effective in discipline their child's misbehavior (d=1.29, p=.003) after they receive the intervention. For children, we found improvement on children's social emotional outcomes, measured by decreased parent-child conflict (d=-1.08, p=.002) and increased child emotional regulation skills (d=1.0, p=.049) after their parents receive the intervention. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool has potential to provide a cost-effective service solution to provide preventive mental health care in communities to promote child social-emotional and mental wellbeing in low-resource settings.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Our objective was to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a behavioral nudge on adoption of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a pilot cluster nonrandomized controlled trial in 2 Emergency Departments (EDs) at a large academic healthcare system in the New York metropolitan area. We tested 2 versions of a CDS tool for pulmonary embolism (PE) risk assessment developed on a web-based electronic health record-agnostic platform. One version included behavioral nudges incorporated into the user interface. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < .001). DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:We demonstrated feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a PE risk prediction CDS tool developed using insights from behavioral science. The tool is well-positioned to be tested in a large randomized clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05203185).

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Increasing numbers of unaffected individuals could benefit from genetic evaluation for inherited cancer susceptibility. Automated conversational agents (ie, chatbots) are being developed for cancer genetics contexts; however, randomized comparisons with standard of care (SOC) are needed. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine whether chatbot and SOC approaches are equivalent in completion of pretest cancer genetic services and genetic testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This equivalence trial (Broadening the Reach, Impact, and Delivery of Genetic Services [BRIDGE] randomized clinical trial) was conducted between August 15, 2020, and August 31, 2023, at 2 US health care systems (University of Utah Health and NYU Langone Health). Participants were aged 25 to 60 years, had had a primary care visit in the previous 3 years, were eligible for cancer genetic evaluation, were English or Spanish speaking, had no prior cancer diagnosis other than nonmelanoma skin cancer, had no prior cancer genetic counseling or testing, and had an electronic patient portal account. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:Participants were randomized 1:1 at the patient level to the study groups at each site. In the chatbot intervention group, patients were invited in a patient portal outreach message to complete a pretest genetics education chat. In the enhanced SOC control group, patients were invited to complete an SOC pretest appointment with a certified genetic counselor. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Primary outcomes were completion of pretest cancer genetic services (ie, pretest genetics education chat or pretest genetic counseling appointment) and completion of genetic testing. Equivalence hypothesis testing was used to compare the study groups. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:This study included 3073 patients (1554 in the chatbot group and 1519 in the enhanced SOC control group). Their mean (SD) age at outreach was 43.8 (9.9) years, and most (2233 of 3063 [72.9%]) were women. A total of 204 patients (7.3%) were Black, 317 (11.4%) were Latinx, and 2094 (75.0%) were White. The estimated percentage point difference for completion of pretest cancer genetic services between groups was 2.0 (95% CI, -1.1 to 5.0). The estimated percentage point difference for completion of genetic testing was -1.3 (95% CI, -3.7 to 1.1). Analyses suggested equivalence in the primary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:The findings of the BRIDGE equivalence trial support the use of chatbot approaches to offer cancer genetic services. Chatbot tools can be a key component of sustainable and scalable population health management strategies to enhance access to cancer genetic services. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03985852.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate demographic biases in diagnostic accuracy and health advice between generative artificial intelligence (AI) (ChatGPT GPT-4) and traditional symptom checkers like WebMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Combination symptom and demographic vignettes were developed for 27 most common symptom complaints. Standardized prompts, written from a patient perspective, with varying demographic permutations of age, sex, and race/ethnicity were entered into ChatGPT (GPT-4) between July and August 2023. In total, 3 runs of 540 ChatGPT prompts were compared to the corresponding WebMD Symptom Checker output using a mixed-methods approach. In addition to diagnostic correctness, the associated text generated by ChatGPT was analyzed for readability (using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level) and qualitative aspects like disclaimers and demographic tailoring. RESULTS:ChatGPT matched WebMD in 91% of diagnoses, with a 24% top diagnosis match rate. Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different across demographic groups, including age, race/ethnicity, and sex. ChatGPT's urgent care recommendations and demographic tailoring were presented significantly more to 75-year-olds versus 25-year-olds (P < .01) but were not statistically different among race/ethnicity and sex groups. The GPT text was suitable for college students, with no significant demographic variability. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The use of non-health-tailored generative AI, like ChatGPT, for simple symptom-checking functions provides comparable diagnostic accuracy to commercially available symptom checkers and does not demonstrate significant demographic bias in this setting. The text accompanying differential diagnoses, however, suggests demographic tailoring that could potentially introduce bias. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results highlight the need for continued rigorous evaluation of AI-driven medical platforms, focusing on demographic biases to ensure equitable care.

This study introduces a Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) assistant designed to address key challenges in Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) for hypertension. After a comprehensive needs assessment from clinicians and patients, we identified pivotal issues in RPM data management and patient engagement. The GenAI RPM assistant integrates a patient-facing chatbot, clinician-facing smart summaries, and automated draft portal messages to enhance communication and streamline data review. Validated through six rounds of testing and evaluations by ten participants, the initial prototype was positively received, highlighting the importance of personalized interactions. Our findings demonstrate GenAI's potential to improve RPM by optimizing data management and enhancing patient-provider communication.

BACKGROUND:Regular physical activity (PA) is a component of cardiovascular health and is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, only about half of US adults achieved the current PA recommendations. OBJECTIVE:The study purpose was to implement PA counseling using a clinical decision support tool in a preventive cardiology clinic and to assess changes in CVD risk factors in a sample of patients enrolled over 12 weeks of PA monitoring. METHODS:This intervention, piloted for 1 year, had 3 components embedded in the electronic health record: assessment of patients' PA, an electronic prompt for providers to counsel patients reporting low PA, and patient monitoring using a Fitbit. Cardiovascular disease risk factors included PA (self-report and Fitbit), body mass index, blood pressure, lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness assessed with the 6-minute walk test. Depression and quality of life were also assessed. Paired t tests assessed changes in CVD risk. RESULTS:The sample who enrolled in the remote patient monitoring (n = 59) were primarily female (51%), White adults (76%) with a mean age of 61.13 ± 11.6 years. Self-reported PA significantly improved over 12 weeks ( P = .005), but not Fitbit steps ( P = .07). There was a significant improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness (469 ± 108 vs 494 ± 132 m, P = .0034), and 23 participants (42%) improved at least 25 m, signifying a clinically meaningful improvement. Only 4 participants were lost to follow-up over 12 weeks of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS:Patients may need more frequent reminders to be active after an initial counseling session, perhaps getting automated messages based on their step counts syncing to their electronic health record.

We have entered a new age of health informatics—applied health informatics—where digital health innovation cannot be pursued without considering operational needs. In this new digital health era, creating an integrated applied health informatics system will be essential for health systems to achieve informatics healthcare goals. Integration of information technology (IT) and health informatics does not naturally occur without a deliberate and intentional shift towards unification. Recognizing this, NYU Langone Health’s (NYULH) Medical Center IT (MCIT) has taken proactive measures to vertically integrate academic informatics and operational IT through the establishment of the MCIT Department of Health Informatics (DHI). The creation of the NYULH DHI showcases the drivers, challenges, and ultimate successes of our enterprise effort to align academic health informatics with IT; providing a model for the creation of the applied health informatics programs required for academic health systems to thrive in the increasingly digitized healthcare landscape.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Virtual patient-physician communications have increased since 2020 and negatively impacted primary care physician (PCP) well-being. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) drafts of patient messages could potentially reduce health care professional (HCP) workload and improve communication quality, but only if the drafts are considered useful. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To assess PCPs' perceptions of GenAI drafts and to examine linguistic characteristics associated with equity and perceived empathy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This cross-sectional quality improvement study tested the hypothesis that PCPs' ratings of GenAI drafts (created using the electronic health record [EHR] standard prompts) would be equivalent to HCP-generated responses on 3 dimensions. The study was conducted at NYU Langone Health using private patient-HCP communications at 3 internal medicine practices piloting GenAI. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Randomly assigned patient messages coupled with either an HCP message or the draft GenAI response. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:PCPs rated responses' information content quality (eg, relevance), using a Likert scale, communication quality (eg, verbosity), using a Likert scale, and whether they would use the draft or start anew (usable vs unusable). Branching logic further probed for empathy, personalization, and professionalism of responses. Computational linguistics methods assessed content differences in HCP vs GenAI responses, focusing on equity and empathy. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 16 PCPs (8 [50.0%] female) reviewed 344 messages (175 GenAI drafted; 169 HCP drafted). Both GenAI and HCP responses were rated favorably. GenAI responses were rated higher for communication style than HCP responses (mean [SD], 3.70 [1.15] vs 3.38 [1.20]; P = .01, U = 12 568.5) but were similar to HCPs on information content (mean [SD], 3.53 [1.26] vs 3.41 [1.27]; P = .37; U = 13 981.0) and usable draft proportion (mean [SD], 0.69 [0.48] vs 0.65 [0.47], P = .49, t = -0.6842). Usable GenAI responses were considered more empathetic than usable HCP responses (32 of 86 [37.2%] vs 13 of 79 [16.5%]; difference, 125.5%), possibly attributable to more subjective (mean [SD], 0.54 [0.16] vs 0.31 [0.23]; P < .001; difference, 74.2%) and positive (mean [SD] polarity, 0.21 [0.14] vs 0.13 [0.25]; P = .02; difference, 61.5%) language; they were also numerically longer (mean [SD] word count, 90.5 [32.0] vs 65.4 [62.6]; difference, 38.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .07) and more linguistically complex (mean [SD] score, 125.2 [47.8] vs 95.4 [58.8]; P = .002; difference, 31.2%). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In this cross-sectional study of PCP perceptions of an EHR-integrated GenAI chatbot, GenAI was found to communicate information better and with more empathy than HCPs, highlighting its potential to enhance patient-HCP communication. However, GenAI drafts were less readable than HCPs', a significant concern for patients with low health or English literacy.